This was concerning many of us finding it a little more difficult then previously in distinguishing the Anglo-Saxon type and the Keltic Nordic type. There had been many valid questions raised recently on some other posts. A population like Britain and the Netherlands have both the Keltic and the Anglo-Saxon plus other Germanic types so finding specimens that we can clearly portray as one or the other with little distraction is more difficult. We were even questioning whether Hugh Grant was indeed possibly an Anglo-Saxon or at least partly. A region where both types are plentiful makes it more difficult to nail down an exact phenotype description. This is why Ireland, where the percentage of Keltic types is no less mind you, is easier to distinguish against the backdrop of the compellingly different and unrelated Bruenn. Its more like night and day.
Bookmarks