Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: France's New Stonehenge: Secrets of A Neolithic Time Machine

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, December 8th, 2008 @ 08:05 AM
    Ethnicity
    German & English
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Utah Utah
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Gender
    Family
    Married, happily
    Occupation
    Biologist
    Politics
    Independent
    Posts
    291
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    France's New Stonehenge: Secrets of A Neolithic Time Machine

    By John Lichfield
    Published: 31 July 2006

    A spectacular discovery of Stone Age menhirs in Brittany could unlock the code to one of the most puzzling chapters of human development, and transform our knowledge of mankind's early history

    Some months ago builders were clearing a piece of wasteland in southern Brittany when they struck an enormous hunk of granite. The developer was no historian but he knew instantly what the obstacle must be: the remains of a buried "menhir" or neolithic standing stone.


    He ordered a bulldozer to shove the stone underground again before any passing busybody spotted it. He did not want the work on his six seaside bungalows to be halted for a prolonged archaeological dig.


    Brittany, he probably reasoned, is crammed with old stones. At Carnac - the largest neolithic site in the world, just down the road - there is a linear forest of 3,000 menhirs in the space of four kilometres. Was that not enough ancient monuments to satisfy the historians, the tourists and the Ministry of Culture in Paris? Too late. A passing busy-body had noticed the unearthed menhir. Work on the bungalows was halted. An archaeological dig was ordered.


    As a result, our knowledge of early human history may be transformed - or at least deeply enriched. Preliminary exploration of the site has just been completed. One of France's foremost experts on neolithic times calls the results a "miracle". Other experts speak of a "time machine".


    The Ministry of Culture is in the process of designating the whole area - 10 times larger than the 3,000 square metre preliminary dig - as a place of overwhelming historical importance. In other words, the six new bungalows at Kerdruelland, near Belz, in Morbihan, will never be built.


    To neolithic experts, the name Kerdruelland may yet come to have something of the same significance as Stonehenge or Carnac or Newgrange in Co. Meath. The site may provide - like a kind of modern-day Rosetta Stone- some of the clues to unlock the code of one of the most important but puzzling chapters in human development.


    The middle and late-neolithic (or Stone Age) and early Bronze Age in western Europe - roughly from 4000 BC to 1500 BC - was a period of rapid and revolutionary advance. European man made pottery and tamed animals for the first time. He turned from hunting to agriculture. He emerged from caves and built houses. He progressed from cave-painting to the building of elaborate stone and earth tombs and - many years before the Egyptian pyramids - to the construction of carefully plotted and painstakingly laboured alignments and circles of standing stones.


    There are 3,000 of them in Britain, Ireland and Brittany alone. They are also scattered from Denmark to Portugal and southern Italy. Much has been discovered about the period in the past 50 years. Much remains utterly mysterious.


    Archaeologists working on the Kerdruelland site over the past nine months have discovered not one but 60 "lost" menhirs. They believe that they were erected - and then destroyed - during the "middle period" of the standing stones era in western Europe, in around 2500 BC. (This was about the same time that the main ring at Stonehenge was constructed, possibly by invaders from Brittany).


    Because the Kerdruelland menhirs have been preserved in mud and silt for 4,500 years, they should offer important new information on how such alignments were created and why. At the well-known sites, such as Carnac and Stonehenge, some of the stones have been moved or propped up or stolen or added over the centuries. Here the stones, up to 2m long, lie just as they did after they were felled four-and-half millennia ago.

    At neolithic sites elsewhere, the soil of the period has been eroded by the ravages of time and man. At Kerdruelland, the neolithic sub-soil - the soil on which the stones were erected - has been preserved intact. This offers a cornucopia of possible new archaeological finds. Already, a brief dig has yielded a rich harvest of flint tools and shards of pottery.


    Just as importantly, the preservation of the neolithic sub-soil will help the experts to discover traces of the original earthworks and study the methods of assembling and positioning the menhirs.


    The fact that the stones were erected, and then deliberately toppled, at roughly the same time, is also an important discovery. It offers new evidence that the neolithic was a period of social and religious upheavals, revolutions and wars. In other words, the neolithic may have been "megalithic" - obsessed with whacking great stones - but it was not socially or culturally monolithic. Ancient man was as fractious and destructive as modern man.


    Professor Jean-Paul Demoule is president of the French agency which undertakes urgent archaeological digs on threatened sites - L'Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives (Inrap) - which undertook the preliminary dig at Kerdruelland. He is also one of France's, and the world's, leading experts on the neolithic era: "This site is, historically and archaeologically speaking, a miracle," he told The Independent. "It is a great paradox. Precisely because it was destroyed, it has been preserved: like the wreck of an ancient ship beneath the ocean."

    "The great neolithic sites like Stonehenge, such as Carnac, have come down to us, still standing, through the millennia and we can look at them as we imagine that they always were. But we cannot be sure that they were exactly that way and - most importantly - the soil in which they were planted has gone. If you dig at Stonehenge or Carnac today, you are mostly digging into the soil of previous ages, before the stones were placed there. Here, we are digging into the neolithic soil itself, the soil on which the erectors, and destroyers, of the stones once stood and lived."


    Stephan Hinguant, 43, the chief archaeologist on the site, said: "This is as a truly astonishing find, a time machine. We have only explored a small part of it, and very rapidly, but we have found enough to know that there is a treasury of information here which will take several years to uncover fully.


    READ ENTIRE ARTICLE

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Dropkick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, August 24th, 2012 @ 11:48 AM
    Ethnicity
    Irish
    Country
    Other Other
    Location
    Waterford
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Posts
    402
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Re: France's new Stonehenge: Secrets of a neolithic time machine

    Thank god for the "busy bodies"!

    You'd have to wonder though whats been lost because of builders greed.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Sciz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, February 24th, 2007 @ 12:57 AM
    Subrace
    Keltic Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Innsmouth, MA
    Gender
    Family
    Having a longtime companion
    Occupation
    Cartoonist, Graphic Designer
    Politics
    Homebrewing
    Religion
    Skeptic
    Posts
    134
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Re: France's new Stonehenge: Secrets of a neolithic time machine

    Wow, I never thought I'd see H.P. Blavatsky's name emerge in a thread like this. Kudos to you Dr.

    Very nice find, considering that it is something of a time capsule.

    As for a Megalithic sub-forum, I agree it would be to our benefit. However, I would suggest a primarily Neolithic forum with a Megalithic sub-forum. Breaking them down into a Paleo/Meso/Neolithic structure just seems more organised to me.
    Last edited by Sciz; Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006 at 05:45 PM.
    "As for seriously-written books on dark, occult, and supernatural themes—in all truth they don’t amount to much. That is why it’s more fun to invent mythical works like the Necronomicon and Book of Eibon."
    H.P. Lovecraft

  5. #5
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    Friday, April 15th, 2016 @ 01:57 PM
    Subrace
    Gwalarnid
    Location
    Brest / An Oriant
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Family
    Single, looking
    Politics
    Nationalist / Independentist
    Religion
    Techno Vikingism
    Posts
    103
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: France's new Stonehenge: Secrets of a neolithic time machine

    Thanks a lot for this article but Brittany is not French.
    Concerning Carnac, I live near, I can tell you that the Menhirs are in a worst shape than in Stonehenge.
    Last edited by Youenn; Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006 at 05:58 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Friday, October 3rd, 2008 @ 09:26 AM
    Subrace
    mixed Alp/Medit/Nord or Balt
    Country
    New Zealand New Zealand
    Location
    "Antipodes"
    Gender
    Family
    lonely
    Occupation
    self-scholar/research
    Politics
    theocrat/Corpor/Organic/Folkish
    Religion
    antidual/theocrat/panthei/monist
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: France's new Stonehenge: Secrets of a neolithic time machine

    "deliberately toppled"????, "upheveals, revolutions, wars"?, "Ancient man was as fractious and destructive as modern man"?
    since the stonhenge was also damaged (from sth west if I remember correctly) I'd suggest a natural catastrophe rather than human destruction.

    I have read both GS Hawkins and I Velikovsky and they both have convincing cases. Who do you think is more right (if you have read them)?

    Don't forget mystery hill in America!

Similar Threads

  1. The Time Machine: The Fantastic Predictions of H. G. Wells
    By MCP3 in forum Film, TV, & Performing Arts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Thursday, January 26th, 2012, 01:14 AM
  2. Scientists Set Out to Unlock Secrets of Stonehenge
    By Brunswijk in forum Archaeology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, March 31st, 2008, 11:14 PM
  3. The Forgotten 11th Chapter of H.G. Wells' The Time Machine
    By Frans_Jozef in forum Literature & Book Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, December 5th, 2006, 05:03 PM
  4. The Time Machine (1960)
    By Loki in forum Film, TV, & Performing Arts
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Sunday, February 27th, 2005, 09:56 PM
  5. The Dutch Find There's a Time for Tolerance -- and a Time to Get Tough
    By Mac Seafraidh in forum Netherlands & Flanders
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Sunday, January 30th, 2005, 03:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •