Illegal Immigration Versus Legal Immigration

[Dagna]

What do you think is more of a threat to our Germanic communities?

[Blood_Axis]

Not only to your germanic countries, but any country:

Illegal is dangerous because it is uncontrollable. It helps crime rates sky rocket and also f**s up the market since illegals are willing to do any job for peanuts, hence putting those who work legally out of a job.

Legal is dangerous because then they can 'legitimately' and with the blessing of the system, suck your country dry. Also send their kids to school, take your place in the hospital and due to their 'special status', enjoy the privileges that, as a native, you don't.

[Flash Voyager]

Immigration is a problem that denotes an even greater problem such as a traitorous government.

[Soldier of Wodann]

I don't care what the government dubs legal or not, immigrants are a detriment either way, though the one's too inept to even become legitimate are clearly the lower end of this plague.

[SwordOfTheVistula]

Well, if we are going ask 'what immigration is a threat to Germanics', the answer would obviously be 'non-Germanic immigration', regardless of the legality or illegality and whether the ruling government actually enforces the laws or not.

[Beornulf]

Hostile alien takeovers.

As the post above me states, the biggest threat to Germanic nations is non-Germanic immigration. Along with the migration of Germanics from their countries.

[Zimobog]

I chose "other" because I see the immigration threat as peripheral to the problem of voluntary sterility and the abandonment of family duty by my generation.

I can't speak to the situation in other countries.

In the case of North Americans, if we had sustainable population growth rate we could physically inhabit our own territories and more sons of Americans might take arms to defend what is "theirs" . Defense of unihabited territory (like Arizona and New Mexico) seems illogical to me, unless there is some strategic value to a desert frontier with Mexico I am missing. :

[Æmeric]

In the case of North Americans, if we had sustainable population growth rate we could physically inhabit our own territories and more sons of Americans might take arms to defend what is "theirs" . Defense of unihabited territory (like Arizona and New Mexico) seems illogical to me, unless there is some strategic value to a desert frontier with Mexico I am missing. :

Arizona & New Mexico are not uninhabited territory. And many of the illegals who enter the US via Arizona & New Mexico procede to other inland areas of the US. The border from San Diego to Brownsville is on the frontline of the illegal invasion. Not securing all of it leaves the entire country vunerable.

[Zimobog]

Just my opinion, but I see all minority majority states, cities, and towns in the world not only as staging areas but as defacto minority territory not belonging to me or mine. I say we cannot claim what we cannot hold and nor can they.

Maybe "unihabited" was a poor choice of words. I think folks still living in the South-West and Texas are "behind the lines". It is America, but not White America.

[Bärin]

Both are threats but illegal immigration is more dangerous. First, illegal immigrants will be very sneaky because they don't want to get caught. Second, they will do dirty jobs because they need money and they have little alternatives. Often they will be involved in criminal activity. Last, they attract the sympathy of some people because they don't want them deported after the established themselves there. eyes: