View Poll Results: Partition, Repatriation or Apartheid?

Voters
90. You may not vote on this poll
  • Partition

    12 13.33%
  • Repatriation

    75 83.33%
  • Apartheid

    3 3.33%
Page 1 of 37 12345611 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 368

Thread: Partition, Repatriation, Apartheid

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Æmeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Britain, Ulster, Germany, America
    Subrace
    Dalofaelid+Baltid/Borreby
    Y-DNA
    R-Z19
    mtDNA
    U5a2c
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Gender
    Age
    57
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Anti-Obama
    Religion
    Conservative Protestantism
    Posts
    6,271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    573
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    522
    Thanked in
    229 Posts

    Partition, Repatriation, Apartheid

    Which do you prefer for racial preservation?

    1. Partition; Give the non-Europeans, non-Whites, non-Germanics, their own territory within our nations. This doesn't mean just the US, but also Europe, as regards the Muslim & African populations. In the case of Aboriginals (US, Canada, Australia & New Zealand) it would mean giving them more land in addition to the reserves they already possess.

    2. Repatriation; Force the alien populations to return to their land of origin or make arrangements to resettle them in nations where they are racially & culturally assimilable, e.g. resettling US Negroes in Africa or sending mixraced persons to the Carfribbean etc...

    3. Apartheid; Let them stay, but enforce a series of laws mandating seperate accommodations in public, seperate residential areas based on race & ethnicity, separate schools, laws against miscegenation, with no right to participate in the political process.


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, June 7th, 2010 @ 01:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Gender
    Posts
    322
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Repatriation is the only way to go, there's no reason to share a country in any way. Not quite sure what would be best to do with the generally mixed European Americans though.

  3. #3
    Naturbursche
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Boche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 @ 11:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,574
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Repatriation of course. It would eliminate the Multi-Cultural Problems and gives everyone on the world the Patriotic Feeling everyone needs. Many of those Problems exist because the Immigrants don't have any Patriotic Feelings anymore, and if they have they tend to be radical towards the Lands People they live in.




    Gruß,
    Boche
    "We Germans fear God, but nothing else in the world; and already that godliness is it, which let us love and foster peace."
    - Otto von Bismarck, 1888

  4. #4
    Account Disabled on Request
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 28th, 2009 @ 04:48 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Subrace
    Bruenn
    Location
    europe
    Gender
    Posts
    4,145
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Æmeric View Post
    This doesn't mean just the US, but also Europe, as regards the Muslim & African populations.
    I oppose that. Europe is the home of our peoples.

    As for giving some territory in America or Australia to the folk who lived there before Europeans arrived - why on earth not?

    Unless we seek extermination of American Indians and Australian Aborigines or to live among them and thus eventually mix. Those peoples deserve a homeland too. And not some lame white-mandated reservation or "play area", proper sovereign states so that they take responsibility for themselves and set their own entry requirements.

    Partition and repatriation are both valid. So is apartheid, for differing races will always need places to meet, discuss, trade in peace.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sakoku

  5. #5
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Blood_Axis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    Monday, March 18th, 2019 @ 11:58 AM
    Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ancestry
    75% Hellenic. 25% Anglosaxon
    Subrace
    Noric
    Country
    Other Other
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Religion
    Still searching
    Posts
    5,158
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    31
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    57
    Thanked in
    19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OEN
    As for giving some territory in America or Australia to the folk who lived there before Europeans arrived - why on earth not?
    Exactly.

    Do you seriously think repatriation is possible?

    The world has been so mixed up nowadays that it is impossible to just "send 'em home".

    It's not like a group of gypsies have camped in your back yard, and you can kick them out and send them back to their homeland.

    The equilibrium has been so messed up that it is impossible to go back the way the world was in the 18th century.

    Also, it is kind of ironical for colonials talking about repatriation. You're the ones who were "trespassing" in the first place. Sending the African-Americans back to Africa is just as impossible as sending the Americans of european descent back to their respective home countries eyes:

    You opened the Pandora's box by colonizing those countries. You set the stage for globalization. So what gives you now the right to repatriate other colonials when you are not indigenous yourselves?

  6. #6
    Senior Member Hermelin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 13th, 2011 @ 08:56 PM
    Ethnicity
    nordisk
    Subrace
    Hallstatt+Dalonordid
    Location
    Fólkvangr, Sessrúmnir
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Posts
    117
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I also voted for repatriation. It's probably the least likely course of action among the three options, but IMO it would also be the most effective and permanent solution.

    Quote Originally Posted by OneEnglishNorman View Post
    I oppose that. Europe is the home of our peoples.
    I'm firmly with OEN on this. Europe belongs to the Europeans.

  7. #7
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Æmeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Britain, Ulster, Germany, America
    Subrace
    Dalofaelid+Baltid/Borreby
    Y-DNA
    R-Z19
    mtDNA
    U5a2c
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Gender
    Age
    57
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Anti-Obama
    Religion
    Conservative Protestantism
    Posts
    6,271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    573
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    522
    Thanked in
    229 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OneEnglishNorman View Post
    As for giving some territory in America or Australia to the folk who lived there before Europeans arrived - why on earth not?

    Unless we seek extermination of American Indians and Australian Aborigines or to live among them and thus eventually mix. Those peoples deserve a homeland too. And not some lame white-mandated reservation or "play area", proper sovereign states so that they take responsibility for themselves and set their own entry requirements.
    Read more carefully;
    In the case of Aboriginals (US, Canada, Australia & New Zealand) it would mean giving them more land in addition to the reserves they already possess.

    Meaning they already have land set aside for them. They have territories existing for them & many are already living there.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blood Axis View Post
    Exactly.

    Do you seriously think repatriation is possible?
    Yes. With the exception of the native US Negroes, the other minority groups - Asians & "Hispanics" - have been here 40-years or less. They still have ties to their ancestral countries, We're talking about persons who are immigrants or the children of immigrants.

    The world has been so mixed up nowadays that it is impossible to just "send 'em home".
    But yet we can continue to keep mixing populations through immigration eyes:. Migration can work both ways. There is no reason Mexicans in the US or Turks in Germany cannot return to the native countries. Some people seem to look at immigration as some sort of natural phenomena that only works one way.

    It's not like a group of gypsies have camped in your back yard, and you can kick them out and send them back to their homeland.
    In a way, that 's exactly what it is. If a group of people immigrate illegal enmass, why shouldn't the natives kick them out. At gunpoint if necessary. It's an invasion, even if they are not using guns & tanks. The results are the same.

    The equilibrium has been so messed up that it is impossible to go back the way the world was in the 18th century.
    It would take decades to sort the mess out, but so what. You have to actually start somewhere & sometime.

    Also, it is kind of ironical for colonials talking about repatriation. You're the ones who were "trespassing" in the first place. Sending the African-Americans back to Africa is just as impossible as sending the Americans of european descent back to their respective home countries eyes:
    Same old anti-American bias. Colonials conquered North America & Australia fair & square. It's wrong to take land by conquest from Amerindians or Australian Aboriginals, but its was ok if it involved other Europeans such as the Slavs & Celts :033102st: And the problem is not the Aboriginals- its Asians & Middle Easterners in Australia & Canada, & primarily Hispanics in the US - persons who's ancestors were not living in what is the US in 1492 or even 1968, when the Immigration Reform Act went into afffect. And sending Negores back to Africa is not impossible. Paying them to emigrate to Africa would be worth the cost for the racial peace it would bring this country. A resettlement program sprend out over 30-years at a cost of 100 billion a year, is not impossible.

    You opened the Pandora's box by colonizing those countries. You set the stage for globalization. So what gives you now the right to repatriate other colonials when you are not indigenous yourselves?
    Because my ancestors created this country. Not the Chinese or the Arabs or the Aztecs. That's why. And after 10+ genrations I consider myself indigenous. I have more of a right to be here then someone who arrived from China or Mexico over the last 30-years. With the exception of US Negroes & the Native US Indians (who are under 3 million), most of our non-White population has been in the US about the same amount of time as Europe's Muslim, Asian & African minorities have been in Europe.

  8. #8
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, October 2nd, 2010 @ 12:38 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Gender
    Posts
    962
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    I've already given my view on partition in the "Blacks in America" thread here: http://forums.skadi.net/showpost.php...4&postcount=17
    Apartheid and segregation, unfortunately, have been a failure. It will not be possible to strip the freedoms from a people without violent repercussions to eventually suffer. It is an investment into an impermanent solution. I do not want to have to pay for their extra facilities and the law enforcement it would take to keep them in their place because I would then be paying for people who don't belong here to stay here. The right for them to remain in this nation but at a distance isn't enough. I shouldn't have to cater or surrender to them in any way, be that giving them their own territories by slicing up my country or allotting them their own restaurants and water fountains. Repatriation is the only option that can be met with any lasting success. Making it possible will be a long-term commitment, but it is the only one worth dedicating my time, money and effort into.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Loyalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, August 4th, 2018 @ 03:49 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    British Isles
    Subrace
    Keltic-Nordid/Atlantid
    Country
    Dominion of Canada Dominion of Canada
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Traditionalist
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    1,165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    Repatriation; I cannot justify carving up my own nation to accommodate groups of racial aliens, nor is it sensible to enforce a two-tiered system of apartheid or segregation, as this will only ensure perpetual civil conflicts and unrest.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Loddfafner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 27th, 2018 @ 12:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    European Blood, American Soil
    Ancestry
    English, Swedish, Scottish, Irish, German, Welsh
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Pennsylvania Pennsylvania
    Location
    New Sweden
    Gender
    Politics
    Beyond left and right
    Religion
    Odin/Thor/Freyr
    Posts
    946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Repatriation may be necessary for Europe especially if the immigrants seriously try to turn Europe into the sort of place they were alledgedly seeking asylum from. Genuine refugees - refugees from their own cultures such as the Somali woman in the Netherlands who renounced Islam, might be able to stay.

    As for America, all those options are wildly unrealistic. What is reasonable and feasible is for a smaller unit such as a town or even a neighborhood to regain the right to be able to legally control its ethnic composition.

    Separation should not be an obligation as that would generate more problems than it would solve, but it should be a viable option.

Page 1 of 37 12345611 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why Apartheid?
    By Loki in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 19th, 2018, 05:51 AM
  2. Racial Partition for Racial Preservation in the US
    By Gefjon in forum The United States
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: Friday, October 22nd, 2010, 11:41 PM
  3. How Should a Process of Repatriation Work?
    By Hrogar in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, October 18th, 2010, 11:16 PM
  4. The Repatriation of German Production
    By Liberator Germaniae in forum Economics, Business, & Finance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, March 5th, 2007, 02:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •