Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Epicurus: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

  1. #1
    Senior Member Moody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Tuesday, July 10th, 2012 @ 09:18 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Albion
    Subrace
    Paleo-Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Investigator of Souls
    Politics
    Pan-Germanic Nationalist
    Religion
    Runosophy
    Posts
    1,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Epicurus: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    Montaigne adopted an Epicurean position when he said;
    "Rejoice in your present life; all else is beyond you".

    The Life-Philosophy of Epicurus was a noble one, as Epicureans endeavoured to live 'like gods among men'.

    "Epicureanism was designed for the use of educated upper and middle classes of the Athenian mainland. This was a philosophy of detachment and impeccable taste, and unlike Stoicism, it was never meant to appeal, or to apply, to the masses, or, to the Universal State".
    [M. O'Sullivan, 'The Four Seasons of Greek Philosophy', page 198]

    This conflict between noble pagan philosophy and plebeian cults continues into the time of Christ;

    "In short, Christianity accomodated itself to already existing and established anti-paganism, to the cults that had been combatted by Epicurus - more precisely, to the religions of the lower masses, the women, the slaves, the non-noble classes ..."
    [Nietzsche WP 196]

    This is an important distinction;

    "Christianity only takes up the fight that had already begun against the CLASSICAL ideal and the NOBLE religion".
    [ib.,]

    That noble religion is classical paganism of the kind found in Epicurus.
    The link;
    www.epicurus.net

    Live like gods, not like slaves!
    Why are there beings at all, & why not rather nothing?
    [Leibniz/Heidegger]

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 20th, 2009 @ 12:11 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Subrace
    Uralic/Alpine/Pontid mixed
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    Quote Originally Posted by Moody Lawless
    "Epicureanism was designed for the use of educated upper and middle classes of the Athenian mainland. This was a philosophy of detachment and impeccable taste, and unlike Stoicism, it was never meant to appeal, or to apply, to the masses, or, to the Universal State".
    [M. O'Sullivan, 'The Four Seasons of Greek Philosophy', page 198]
    Hmmmn.....that may explain why it ultimately failed. Elitism gets us nowhere since its the masses on which every society is built upon. Without the masses, the elites aren't worth a dime!


    http://www.infoukes.com/shevchenkomu...try/dont_envy/

    Don't Envy

    Don't envy, friend, a wealthy man:
    A rich man's life is spent
    Without a friend or faithful love --
    Those things he has to rent.
    Don't envy, friend, a man of rank,
    His power's based on force.
    Don't envy, too, a famous man:
    The man of note well knows
    The crowd's acclaim is not for him,
    But for that thorny fame
    He wrought with labour and with tears
    So they'd be entertained.
    But then, when young folk gather 'round,
    So fine they are and fair
    You'd think it's heaven, -- ah, but look:
    See evil stirring there ...

    Don't envy anyone my friend,
    For if you look you'll find
    That there's no heaven on the earth,
    No more than in the sky.

    Mirhorod, October 4th, 1845.

    Translated by John Weir
    Toronto


    http://www.worldburnsclub.com/poems/...st_poverty.htm

    Is There For Honest Poverty

    Is there for honest poverty
    That hangs his head, and all that?
    The coward slave, we pass him by -
    We dare be poor for all that!
    For all that, and all that,
    Our toils obscure, and all that,
    The rank is but the guinea's stamp,
    The man's the gold for all that.

    What though on homely fare we dine,
    Wear course grey woolen, and all that?
    Give fools their silks, and knaves their wine -
    A man is a man for all that.
    For all that, and all that,
    Their tinsel show, and all that,
    The honest man, though ever so poor,
    Is king of men for all that.

    You see yonder fellow called 'a lord,'
    Who struts, and stares, and all that?
    Though hundreds worship at his word,
    He is but a dolt for all that.
    For all that, and all that,
    His ribboned, star, and all that,
    The man of independent mind,
    He looks and laughs at all that.

    A prince can make a belted knight,
    A marquis, duke, and all that!
    But an honest man is above his might -
    Good faith, he must not fault that
    For all that, and all that,
    Their dignities, and all that,
    The pith of sense and pride of worth
    Are higher rank than all that.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Moody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Tuesday, July 10th, 2012 @ 09:18 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Albion
    Subrace
    Paleo-Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Investigator of Souls
    Politics
    Pan-Germanic Nationalist
    Religion
    Runosophy
    Posts
    1,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Post Re: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    The Elite philosophy has not 'failed'.
    In the eternal cycles of time, there are periods when the mass holds sway, and the elite few are pushed to the margins. But the elite never die, even if they have to return to the centre of the earth and await their moment of return - but return they must!

    Just as the tide ebbs, so it must flood.
    To that end, this philosophy preserves the thoughts of the Rare and of the Few.

    The Hyperboreans; this is Aryanosophy.

    Without an elite, there would be nothing but a formless mass - a herd.

    Indeed, the lower elements do not even produce higher beings; they produce only breeders, feeders and toilers.
    Sluts and slaves.

    That is the mass of humanity.

    This mass would be ultimately worthless were it not for the rare few, products of a higher race.

    These are the shepherds.
    This is the creative race.

    From this elite derives all higher culture, all higher political ideals, all philosophy and science.

    Only by the existence of this Master Race is the herd justified, as they have always traditonally served the higher beings.

    The Aryan must have a philosophical spirituality, such as that of Epicurus.
    He cannot go down among the swine and sup with them as the Christian does.

    Indeed, they are the veritable 'gods' that the dimly comprehending herd speak of.
    Why are there beings at all, & why not rather nothing?
    [Leibniz/Heidegger]

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 20th, 2009 @ 12:11 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Subrace
    Uralic/Alpine/Pontid mixed
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    Theres a difference between being anti-elitist and being anti-hierarchal. Anti-elitist means you're against the social-darwinist notion that the elites are better than the masses. Being anti-hierarchal is being against the notion of hierarchies themselves. I believe in hierarchies, but like a true Slavophile I believe that the elites are answerable to the people and must be in connection with them and their needs.

    "The Russian genius, in contrast to the Western European, when it has reached a summit throws itself down and wants to mingle with the earth and people. There is no desire to be a privledged race. The idea of the superman is alien to it. It is enough to compare Tolstoy with Nietzsche."
    --Nikolai Berdyaev "The Russian Idea" pg.137


    The Black Hundreds were anti-elitist but they fully accepted the Monarchist hierarchy, but believed the elites must be in touch with the people. Indeed their agenda was very much shared by the Czar himself.

    "Like Stolypin, Nicholas realized that a dangerous gap had opened between the mass of the population and the institutions of the empire. But his ideas about bridging it were entirely different from Stolypin's. His upbringing at court and in the Guards, under the guidance of the Orthodox Church, led him to believe that the direct link between monarch and people could restored by reviving the customs of pre-Petrine times. He called his long-awaited heir Alexei, after the greatest tsar of the 17th century, and he endeavored throughout his reign to use ceremony, and particularly religious ceremony, to recreate a sense of unity with his people. Wheras Alexander II had wanted to be a monarch in touch with the zemlia, with local elites, Nicholas aimed at direct contact with the narod, the people themselves."
    --Geoffrey Hosking "Russia and the Russians: a History" admits on page 379


    Indeed, nationalism by its very nature is populist. An aristocratic nationalism is an oxymoron! I agree with Herder that the soul of nation is found among the common people. A notion that was shared by Russia's greatest nationalist thinkers and leaders.
    Last edited by Moody; Sunday, April 4th, 2004 at 02:57 PM. Reason: removed uncivil element

  5. #5
    Senior Member Moody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Tuesday, July 10th, 2012 @ 09:18 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Albion
    Subrace
    Paleo-Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Investigator of Souls
    Politics
    Pan-Germanic Nationalist
    Religion
    Runosophy
    Posts
    1,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Post Re: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    Quote Originally Posted by Taras Bulba
    "Theres a difference between being anti-elitist and being anti-hierarchal".
    Moody; Every hierarchy has an elite.

    "Anti-elitist means you're against the social-darwinist notion that the elites are better than the masses".
    Moody; The elites are certainly higher up the hierarchy than the masses; where would you place your elites - at the bottom?

    "Being anti-hierarchal is being against the notion of hierarchies themselves".

    Moody: Obviously; but then by the same token, being anti-elitist means being against the notion of elites themselves.
    How can you have hierarchy without elitism?

    "I believe in hierarchies, but like a true Slavophile I believe that the elites are answerable to the people and must be in connection with them and their needs".
    Moody; That turns the notion of hierachy on its head.
    The elite ruling caste must rule, and the masses must obey; otherwise the tail wags the dog.
    Monarchy is a perfect example of such elitism; the King is answerable to God and no one else [Divine right of kings etc.,]

    "Indeed, nationalism by its very nature is populist".
    Moody; There is not just one type of nationalism; populist nationalism is ... populist. Monarchic nationalism isn't.

    "An aristocratic nationalism is an oxymoron!"
    Moody; No, it is quite possible for a nationalism to include a monarchy and an aristocracy.

    "I agree with Herder that the soul of nation is found among the common people. A notion that was shared by Russia's greatest nationalist thinkers and leaders".
    Moody; You may find its "soul" there - who would disagree; but you would not find its genius there. There you have to look at the 'dominant 5%' - I believe I made a thread on just this notion called 'Necessary Domination';
    Why are there beings at all, & why not rather nothing?
    [Leibniz/Heidegger]

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Friday, March 25th, 2016 @ 07:28 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Celt Australian
    Subrace
    Keltic Nordic
    Country
    Australia Australia
    State
    Victoria Victoria
    Location
    Terra Australis
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Guerilla Philosopher
    Politics
    Aristotelian Nationalist
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Posts
    1,811
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: The Epicurean War Against the Galilean

    Moody, what you've been saying about the stoics being a mass-philosophy doesn't fit. Marcus Aurelius was emporer and he was a stoic. Stoicism was the basis for the entirety of the Roman armies. Not to mention Stoicism conflicted significantly with the 'mosh pit Colloseum masses' in its emphasis on self-discipline and personal excellence.
    All men dream, but not equally. Those who dream at night, in the dusky recesses of their minds, wake in the day to find that it was vanity. But the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams, with open eyes, to make it possible.

  7. #7
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    Friday, July 8th, 2011 @ 09:46 AM
    Location
    Hades
    Gender
    Posts
    678
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack
    Moody, what you've been saying about the stoics being a mass-philosophy doesn't fit. Marcus Aurelius was emporer and he was a stoic. Stoicism was the basis for the entirety of the Roman armies. Not to mention Stoicism conflicted significantly with the 'mosh pit Colloseum masses' in its emphasis on self-discipline and personal excellence.
    Stoicism was a Universalist, Cosmopolitan philosophy. As the Roman Empire moved more in this direction, it is no surprise that leading Romans took up this philosophy of Zeno the Semite. Of course, some Emperors even became ... 'Christians' ... But by then the game was completely up.

    The link describes how Epicureanism, NOT Stoicism, was favoured by the military, while Stoicism was preferred by the politicians [section 6, 'Influence'];

    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/stoicism/

    http://www.epicurus.net

  8. #8
    Account Inactive Dirigible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Online
    Saturday, September 25th, 2010 @ 12:49 AM
    Ethnicity
    Irish
    Ancestry
    Ireland
    Gender
    Age
    27
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Unionism/monarchism/nationalism
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    11
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    It seems to me that it's a mistake to see Epicurus' philosophy as being solely for the wealthy. His path to happiness revolves around rejecting the use of material means in achieving happiness, and instead learning to appreciate the simplest of things in life. It is, in fact, anti-Epicurean to indulge in fine foods and the like. Epicurus said that he was perfectly happy with nothing more than a barley cake and a cup of water. It's a philosophy that a man can practice no matter his material means.

Similar Threads

  1. Iraq War Deaths Exceed Vietnam War Numbers
    By Roderic in forum The United States
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Thursday, July 7th, 2011, 03:22 AM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010, 10:07 PM
  3. The South African War: The First Total War of the 20th Century
    By Bittereinder in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, September 6th, 2010, 06:30 PM
  4. Principle Doctrine of Epicurean Philosophy
    By Frans_Jozef in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006, 04:06 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, October 29th, 2004, 08:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •