Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 9/11 demolition theory challenged

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    SineNomine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    Sunday, November 9th, 2008 @ 05:25 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Subrace
    Mediterranid
    Country
    England England
    Location
    Nord du pays
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Family
    Single
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Libertarian
    Religion
    MYOB
    Posts
    2,131
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Grin 9/11 demolition theory challenged

    An analysis of the World Trade Center collapse has challenged a conspiracy theory surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
    The study by a Cambridge University engineer demonstrates that once the collapse of the twin towers began, it was destined to be rapid and total.

    One of many conspiracy theories proposes that the buildings came down in a manner consistent with a "controlled demolition".

    The new data shows this is not needed to explain the way the towers fell.

    Over 2,800 people were killed in the devastating attacks on New York.

    After reviewing television footage of the Trade Center's destruction, engineers had proposed the idea of "progressive collapse" to explain the way the twin towers disintegrated on 11 September 2001.

    This mode of structural failure describes the way the building fell straight down rather than toppling, with each successive floor crushing the one beneath (an effect called "pancaking").

    Resistance to collapse

    Dr Keith Seffen set out to test mathematically whether this chain reaction really could explain what happened in Lower Manhattan six years ago. The findings are to be published in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

    Previous studies have tended to focus on the initial stages of collapse, showing that there was an initial, localised failure around the aircraft impact zones, and that this probably led to the progressive collapse of both structures.

    In other words, the damaged parts of the tower were bound to fall down, but it was not clear why the undamaged building should have offered little resistance to these falling parts.

    "The initiation part has been quantified by many people; but no one had put numbers on the progressive collapse," Dr Seffen told the BBC News website.

    Dr Seffen was able to calculate the "residual capacity" of the undamaged building: that is, simply speaking, the ability of the undamaged structure to resist or comply with collapse.

    His calculations suggest the residual capacity of the north and south towers was limited, and that once the collapse was set in motion, it would take only nine seconds for the building to go down.

    This is just a little longer than a free-falling coin, dropped from the top of either tower, would take to reach the ground.

    'Fair assumption'

    The University of Cambridge engineer said his results therefore suggested progressive collapse was "a fair assumption in terms of how the building fell".

    "One thing that confounded engineers was how falling parts of the structure ploughed through undamaged building beneath and brought the towers down so quickly," said Dr Seffen.

    He added that his calculations showed this was a "very ordinary thing to happen" and that no other intervention, such as explosive charges laid inside the building, was needed to explain the behaviour of the buildings.

    The controlled detonation idea, espoused on several internet websites, asserts that the manner of collapse is consistent with synchronised rows of explosives going off inside the World Trade Center.

    This would have generated a demolition wave that explained the speed, uniformity and similarity between the collapses of both towers.

    Conspiracy theorists assert that these explosive "squibs" can actually be seen going off in photos and video footage of the collapse. These appear as ejections of gas and debris from the sides of the building, well below the descending rubble.

    Other observers say this could be explained by debris falling down lift shafts and impacting on lower floors during the collapse.
    Source.

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 13th, 2010 @ 01:33 AM
    Ethnicity
    Extraterrestrial
    Ancestry
    Germany/Saxons
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Lower Saxony Lower Saxony
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,464
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    It does not challenge the theory at all because if it is a conspiracy they will also have the power to cover it up by seemingly indepedent studies and experiments

  3. #3
    Active Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Æmeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Britain, Ulster, Germany, America
    Subrace
    Dalofaelid+Baltid/Borreby
    Y-DNA
    R-Z19
    mtDNA
    U5a2c
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Gender
    Age
    59
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Anti-Obama
    Religion
    Conservative Protestantism
    Posts
    6,350
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    641
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    879
    Thanked in
    469 Posts
    I find it hard to believe there were explosives throughout the building, wired for a controlled collapsed. The jetliners crashing into the building could have cause the explosives to go off prematurely (at impact), besides which trying to wire an occupied building with explosives, along with the necessary wiring without anyone noticing seems so unlikely. The World Trade Center towers had a unique design which placed the burden of supporting the buildings on the outerwalls, rather then on reinforced concrete columns, which is the norm in skyscrapers. This helped contribute to the collapse the Twin towers.

Similar Threads

  1. r/K Theory: What Are r and K?
    By Ahnenerbe in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Thursday, August 11th, 2016, 07:51 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011, 02:43 PM
  3. The Theory of Rent needs a Theory of History
    By morfrain_encilgar in forum Economics, Business, & Finance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, October 17th, 2005, 04:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •