Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Was Carleton Coon a Populationist?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Rassenpapst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, February 18th, 2008 @ 04:49 AM
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Was Carleton Coon a Populationist?

    Coon criticised the Czekanowski school harshly but why does Wiercinski lump him together with Boas and Montagu (aka Israel Ehrenburg)?

    Strangely, Coon does not even deny this association in his reply to Wiercinski.

    "A new approach to the study of race evolved as anthropology
    assimilated the concepts of classic Mendelism.
    The populationist concept of race has attracted
    many adherents among modern anthropologists and
    geneticists: Boas (1938), Coon (1939, 1955), Kluckhohn
    (1949), Garn (1955), Birdsell (1950), Dunn and Dobzhansky
    (1946), and others. Their views have been well
    set forth by Ashley Montagu (1950)."

    IMHO, Coon was a solid supporter of the typological model. Were there some populationist elements in his racial system?

  2. #2

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Dr. Solar Wolff For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, October 13th, 2009 @ 09:06 PM
    Ethnicity
    Cisapline Gaul
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Occupation
    Working university student
    Politics
    Folkish
    Posts
    56
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Solar Wolff View Post
    After World War Two, the word "population" was substituted for the word "race" in Anthropology. There are some different shades of meaning but the object was Boasian and to get rid of race and typological Anthropology. Coon had no choice nor did anyone else at that time. Typological Anthropology was associated with racism and the Nazis. All study of race stopped. Since the study of race is allelic substitutions, all study of contemporary "populations" had to be restructured. This mind-numbing concept continued until about 1974 when Sarich, Allen, Vincent, and others in Genetics came up with the genetic clock technology. This technology was then reversed and led to what we now call genetic markers. Genetic markers opened up the study of race and allelic substitutions once more on a more P/C basis.
    Very well. But the study of race is incomplete without finding out which alleles positively code for phenotypes. How is the connection positively established?

Similar Threads

  1. Carleton Coon on Ancient Egyptians
    By Ahnenerbe in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Tuesday, June 14th, 2016, 03:56 PM
  2. Carleton Coon on the Scythians
    By Ahnenerbe in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, June 14th, 2016, 03:13 PM
  3. The Origin of Races (by Carleton S. Coon)
    By cosmocreator in forum Physical Anthropology
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: Friday, March 18th, 2011, 02:35 AM
  4. The Germanic Peoples (by Carleton Coon)
    By Siegfried in forum Germanic & Indo-Germanic Origins
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Friday, May 20th, 2005, 11:21 PM
  5. The Sumerians, according to Carleton S. Coon
    By cosmocreator in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Thursday, July 8th, 2004, 07:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •