Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Evolutionary Neurotheology and the Varieties of Religious Experience

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, July 16th, 2012 @ 01:14 AM
    Ethnicity
    CeltoGermanic
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    State
    Alabama Alabama
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    Married, happily
    Occupation
    Tree Wizard
    Religion
    Wotanist
    Posts
    431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Evolutionary Neurotheology and the Varieties of Religious Experience

    Evolutionary Neurotheology
    and the Varieties of Religious Experience
    (Extended Version)*

    Bruce MacLennan
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville
    MacLennan@cs.utk.edu

    Abstract
    My goal is to outline an evolutionary neuropsychological foundation for spiritual and religious experiences. Central to this account are concepts from archetypal psychology, which, on the one hand, explain the structure of common religious experiences, but, on the other, are grounded in ethology and evolutionary biology. From this it follows that certain religious phenomena are objective, in that they are empirical, stable, and public. As a consequence, certain theological claims can be objectively confirmed or refuted. However, it would be a mistake to assume that this approach reduces religious experiences to the “merely psychological” or considers them inessential epiphenomena in a materialist universe. On the contrary, I will show that it demonstrates the compatibility and even inevitability of transcendental religious experience—and its crucial importance—to biological beings such as ourselves. (Along the way I will advance some concrete hypotheses about the possible role of specific brain systems in religious experience.)

    I. Overview
    How can we achieve a unified understanding of the universe, which comprehends the physical, psychical, and spiritual dimensions of reality? In this chapter I will argue that the archetypes, as described in the psychological theories of Jung and his followers, provide the crucial link between the material and spiritual worlds: on the one hand, they are grounded in evolutionary neuropsychology; on the other, they are the objective constituents of the spiritual world. This might seem to reduce the spiritual realm to the “merely psychological,” or even to neural epiphenomena, but I will argue that this is a misinterpretation of the theory, and that the gods (or God) are objectively real and crucially important for meaningful human life.
    An additional part of my goal is to show that science does not imply atheism, for certain theological propositions are consistent with, and indeed implied by, contemporary science. I also hope to show that the religious believer should not feel threatened by evolutionary theory, for it in fact implies the reality of a spiritual realm.
    In brief, I will proceed as follows. In the next section I will review the main ideas of archetypal psychology, but emphasizing their evolutionary basis (drawing upon Stevens, 1982, 1993). Section III explores the religious implications of the archetypes in the context of their material embodiment. In the final section I will review possible neuropsychological bases of religious experience.
    -Lyfing
    Attached Images Attached Images

Similar Threads

  1. What's the Scariest Experience You've Ever Had?
    By Northern Paladin in forum The Hearth
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: Sunday, April 14th, 2019, 04:19 PM
  2. Any Experience with Couchsurfing?
    By Siebenbürgerin in forum The Hearth
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Sunday, June 19th, 2016, 10:16 PM
  3. Who Has Military Experience?
    By hardcorps in forum Self-Defense & the Art of War
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: Tuesday, June 17th, 2008, 09:03 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, July 2nd, 2005, 10:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •