View Poll Results: Should polygamy be made legal?

Voters
273. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes.

    101 37.00%
  • No.

    130 47.62%
  • Other opinion.

    21 7.69%
  • No opinion/I just want to see the votes.

    21 7.69%
Page 1 of 72 1234561151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 715

Thread: Polygamy

  1. #1
    Senior Member Wulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 1st, 2009 @ 07:29 AM
    Ethnicity
    Irish, German, French
    Ancestry
    Connacht
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    Westchester
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    Taken
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Wotanist
    Posts
    67
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Polygamy

    I have had some feedback from a few of our folk who have expressed distress over recent articles on the subject of Polygamy. Particularly as one might expect from our few loyal women. But also from established monogamous families who understandably prefer the security of this tradition.

    So please bear with me as I attempt to clear up any misconceptions inadvertently created. And also, again please, recognize that these following concepts are not my egotistical invention. These are the teachings of our indigenous religion based on observance of nature. Be assured that the special romance between one man and one woman, as well as the time tested structure of monogamous marriage are not threatened by the beliefs, practices or history of our Norse, Germanic, European forebears.

    Our wise forefathers, and mothers did indeed structure their social and religious teachings on nature's laws. And nature's laws do indeed declare that superior males should have many mates and many offspring, while inferior males do not deserve the pleasure of either mates or offspring.

    However, our forebears also realized that the needs of a structured society required that certain instincts, as well as the most primitive natural law had to be tempered with reason and common sense.

    For example, if all men fought to the death over women with very few surviving the carnage, then the number remaining could not defend the tribe or race. So laws and rules of conduct were necessary.

    Over eons of time the monogamous family structure proved to be the most beneficial, providing security for women and children, and the basis of an orderly society.

    However, this does defy natural law which declares that the best must breed the most. So what was the answer devised by our ancestors?

    The solution, as always based on observance of natural phenomenon was to divide men into three classifications, termed Thralls, Karls and Jarls.

    Thralls have always been the slugs of society. Today some examples are government employees, word twisting preachers, welfare bums and politicians, just to name a few. In a natural world they have no right to the pleasures of a woman, or to reproduce. They should rightfully be enslaved, deported or executed.

    The second classification was the Karls. In times past they were farmers, metalworkers and what we would now call a "Citizens militia." They are the salt of the earth and the backbone of a civilization. Today they are ranchers, farmers, inventors and craftsmen. They should, and must pass on their genetic inheritance with a wife and children. And monogamy is the time tested best marriage structure for the Karls who make up the largest mass of an Aryan society.

    Although, let me hasten to add, that in a Wotanist society, government does not force structures on the folk. In ancient times if a woman's sister's husband was killed, she might well ask her husband to take her sister as a second wife. We might accurately say that what was "good," was "right."

    The third classification was the Jarls. Jarls are few and far between. Jarls are superior men who prove their right to rule by demonstrations of tribal (now racial) loyalty, by service to the folk, by courage, perseverance and determination. The survival of the folk depends on the wisdom, courage, altruism and genetic makeup of Jarls. And because they are so rare, their genes must be passed on in abundance. Thus Polygamy is nature's desire for true Jarls.

    Instinctively women know this to be true. Thus we see so called "Groupies" following to the bed of Rock Stars and Sports Stars or other celebrities, even though they know they are but one of many in a virtual harem. And even though the celebrities of this age are scum.

    The true Jarl who sacrifices and fights for the life and welfare of the folk deserves a multiplicity of the most beauteous maidens of the folk. Not only so that his genes and their beauty unite in grand offspring, but also because sexual pleasure is the proper reward for a defender of the folk. Again, all our folk instinctively know this as they forgive the sexual peccadilloes of Presidents like Kennedy or Clinton. And again, even though our politicians are falsely perceived as Jarls.

    Robert Mathews and George Lincoln Rockwell were Jarls who never received their just rewards in this cycle. Undoubtedly, if our ancestors' teachings on reincarnation and Valhalla are true, their reward is with the Valkyrie. I like to hope that someday some Valkyrie will be mine, although it appears that age and prison deny that possibility in this cycle.

    Hopefully the above will clear up any misconceptions or misapprehensions about Polygamy. The rewards of multiple beautiful maidens must be EARNED by EXCEPTIONAL service to the folk, BEFORE the pleasures are claimed.

    The rewards are necessary in order to inspire our young men to heroic deeds in this desperate age. But this does not endanger the common family structure of our folk over all.

    One last point, however. If this is the time of Ragnarok, then the coming chaos will be such that civilization and its structures will be irrelevant. At that time remember, "What is good is right." Morality will consist of reproduction and survival and little else.

    14/88
    David Lane


  2. #2
    None
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, April 3rd, 2006 @ 09:17 PM
    Subrace
    Other
    Gender
    Posts
    1,347
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    I'm sure David thinks of himself as a Jarl. I think he fits in more with the Thralls.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 20th, 2009 @ 12:11 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Subrace
    Uralic/Alpine/Pontid mixed
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Mad Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Nothing but Christian-bashing pagan wannabe nonsense. Pathetic really!

  4. #4
    American Couch Potato
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    AngryPotato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Subrace
    Norðvestrid/NW. Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Amidst the brown horde
    Gender
    Occupation
    Ball Breaker
    Politics
    Hunting the Enemy
    Religion
    Children of Tyr
    Posts
    589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    He left out the job description for Jarls. I guess in his case it could include criminal or counterfeiter. I give respect to Mr. Lane for his dedication to the European people, but I believe he is mentally unbalanced. In Mr. Lanes world it is fine for those Jarls to go around raping our females. I would rather see an end to my people than see our men raping our women. I doubt the resulting children benefit from such couplings. In Deceived, Damned, and Defiant rape is suggested.

  5. #5
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Polygamy should only be practiced in a eugenic manner. Also only by those who can actually afford to take care of more than one woman and many children financially. This disqualifies about 95% of men already.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, June 6th, 2005 @ 02:03 AM
    Subrace
    Corded Pontid/Cro-Magnid
    Country
    Other Other
    Location
    Ankh-Morpork
    Gender
    Age
    40
    Occupation
    Evil water sprite
    Politics
    laissez-faire
    Religion
    Impious free thinker
    Posts
    1,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordhammer
    Polygamy should only be practiced in a eugenic manner. Also only by those who can actually afford to take care of more than one woman and many children financially. This disqualifies about 95% of men already.
    And needless to say, if all parties are consenting.
    Personally, I would rip the head out of the man who would think of having another woman before me, it is downright unrespectful.

  7. #7
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Unfortunately for David and other racialist men, women don't care whether a man is racialist or not. This really has no bearing on women finding a man attractive. Anymore than a guy being nice means women will love him.

  8. #8
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    Friday, July 9th, 2004 @ 01:16 AM
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Politics
    fanatical
    Religion
    generally religious
    Posts
    9
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Are the "Jarls" supposed to be related to the Viking kings who kept multiple wives, supporting them with loot? The practice may have been imported from some Oriental port.

    I've been thinking about this. It seems like frowning on polygamy is one thing that may set European culture apart from all others.

    Judaism (the Old Testament) has polygamy. Christianity snorts at the mention of polygamy, but deep down there seems to be some weakness in Christianity's opposition to plural marriage. We have the historical Mormon polygamy. Today, the "Christian polygamy" movement has several web sites, and a small group of followers. In the New Testament, Paul says polygamy should not be allowed because it results in immorality. If that is true, then if the immorality can be avoided, polygamy should be acceptable to Christians. So both Judiasm and Christianity accept polygamy.

    Polygamy is the most unnatural of all the marital forms. You never see polygamy in nature. You might see one male mating with several females, but you never see one male living together with several females, their offspring, and no competitor males.

    Polygamy subordinates women. It is irrational. To celebrate European exceptionalism, one should include a celebration of monogamy.

    Modern-day pagans seem obsessed with sex rites, AKA "The Great Rite." One was on display in the TV movie, "The Mists of Avalon." This was a screen presentation of a book that reworked the King Arthur myth. In the TV movie, Arthur and his half-sister Morgaine have sex not because of Morgaine's wicked sorcery (the traditional Arthurian storyline), but because they were tricked by the pagan religious leader. The pagans were seen as ratifying the incest and generally approving of it.

    "The Mists of Avalon" helped spread the myth that pagans are pro-incest. That fits with the larger myth that the historic European pagans were pro-polygamy and generally sexually promiscuous. While polygamy did occur among some European pagan cultures, for the most part evidence shows that it was not practiced. The most obvious example is that of the ancient Greeks.

    I don't see how polygamy or other deviant sexual practices are authentically "European."

  9. #9
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 06:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,097
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    It's strange. Every time I ask a girl to be my second wife, she just laughs.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 13th, 2018 @ 09:14 AM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Gender
    Posts
    2,673
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Re: Polygamy by David Lane

    Has anyone read Lane's 'KD Rebel'? It can be found on www.whiterevolution.com I'm getting the strong impression that the guy is sexually frustrated. Aside from that, his understanding of paganism is limited at best.

Page 1 of 72 1234561151 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Tuesday, September 20th, 2011, 04:57 AM
  2. Polygamy Left Its Mark on the Human Genome
    By Nachtengel in forum Population Genetics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008, 03:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •