View Poll Results: Should all I.E. people be labeled Aryan?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Appropriate

    1 5.00%
  • Inappropriate

    19 95.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Should all I.E. people be labeled Aryan?

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Thursday, December 10th, 2009 @ 07:34 AM
    Age
    46
    Posts
    596
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Should all I.E. people be labeled Aryan?

    This topic was touched on in this thread. I'm interested in seeing what people think of using the word Aryan to describe modern Europeans or whites.

    Is it appropriate to call the Indo-European race Aryan? Or should this be a name reserved for the eastern branch (Iranians and Indians) only.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    NatRev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 20th, 2011 @ 08:02 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Anglo Saxon
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    Midlands
    Gender
    Age
    50
    Family
    Having a longtime compani
    Politics
    red-brown-green
    Religion
    Pantheist
    Posts
    634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Mmmm, is it a 'racial' thing or a 'racist' thing.

    I define myself as Aryan but not because I hate Jews or blacks etc... (which I don't BTW)

    I call myself Aryan as it is what I am.

    I call my cats cats as that's what they are. eyes:
    "Only through a re-integration of Humanity into the whole of Nature can our People be made stronger."

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, August 1st, 2008 @ 02:11 AM
    Posts
    149
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Good questions.

    Since the 'Aryan' is Sanskrit in origin and was to describe the 'noble', but that doesnt describe the Northern European in his own tongue (Germanic/Celtic).

    I think that 'Aryan' was horribly killed due to the propaganda against it during and after WW2. Are we really 'Aryan', the Folks from Europe and Vinland? Or does it describe just the acient 'Aryans' that were from Eurasia/Central Asia? I dont know and cant answer this one, but like I said above makes a good point: 'but that doesnt describe the Northern European in his own tongue (Germanic/Celtic).'

    I would imagine that it would take a life time of study and sifting thru all the propaganda against the word Aryan to come up with a close answer. But we will see what others say, they might hit the nail on the head.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    barry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, October 19th, 2008 @ 01:05 PM
    Location
    northern england
    Gender
    Occupation
    health care worker
    Posts
    74
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    On the use of Aryan.

    The Aryans were the ancient Iranians: the Northern europeans never called themselves Aryan, {i know that Aryan also appears in the Vedic literature of India}


    The Saga of the Aryans is a literary work pertaining to the ancient Zoroastrian religion of Iran.
    The Aryans mentioned in the story, set in a time frame of twenty thousand or so years ago, were the original Aryans or Indo-European people of the days of yore. They were noble and tolerant people who considered all races equal and maintained that the righteous men and women of every country reached God - as was proclaimed by the ancient Avestan scriptures such as the Fravardin Yasht.

    This can also be seen in the Proclamation of Khushru (Cyrus), one of the great Aryan Kings of Iran, more than 2500 years ago. The Proclamation is today enshrined in the United Nations because it promised equal rights to all his diverse subjects, in the world's first multi-cultural empire which abolished slavery thousands of years before the modern nations of the world even existed. This Zoroastrian King and his descendants, who proudly called themselves Aryans, freed the Jews from their unhappy bondage in Babylon and re-built their Temple in Jerusalem, and for that Cyrus is even praised in the Hebrew Old Testament as the "Anointed of the Lord". This is history. This indeed was the action of a true Aryan - protection of the weak, and benevolence towards different peoples and religions.

    In the ancient Indian Mahabharata, a large epic Saga written by the Rishi Veda Vyasa, and in the earlier Ramayana written by Sage Valmiki, the right behaviour and moral conduct of the Aryan is explained in great detail. It is here that we gain a real understanding of what the word "Arya" really meant - nobility in its purest form. From these two epics held in high reverance by the millions of Indians, we can understand the high moral code and chivalrous noble behaviour of the Aryan - how he never raised a hand against the unarmed, how he never hit below the belt, how he protected women and children, how he never fought at night, how he never pursued a fleeing foe, how he respected his parents and cared for them, how he respected ALL righteous people, how he protected the weak - the one who came to him for protection, the "Sharanagat" ie. the one who askes for protection, how he respected and worshipped the elements of God such as the earth, the sky, the wind and the ocean, how he lived his life according to "Dharma" - the high code of morality or righteousness, akin to the Iranian "Ashoi". Indeed in India, the word "Aryan" is still synonymous with nobility and tolerance - as indeed it should be.

    As to my own Mazdayasni Zarathushtri religion, the word "Aryan" appears many times in our holy scriptures. Two occurrences which spring to mind are: in the Atash Niyaesh (prayer), the Holy Fire is extolled as:

    ATHRO AHURAE MAZDAO PUTHRA

    O Fire Son of Ahura Mazda,

    AIRYANAM KHARENO MAZDA DHATANAM !

    In you shines the Glory of the Aryans, created by Mazda !


    In the Fravardin Yasht, we remember and revere our holy ancestors. We take the name of Gaya Marethan (Gayomard) first, the first man on earth:



    "We revere the Fravashi (immortal soul) of righteous Gaya Marethan

    Yo pairyo Ahurai Mazdai manascha gushta sasnaoscha -

    Who first heard (gushta) Ahura Mazda's intentions (manascha)

    and commands (sasnaoscha),

    Yahmat hacha frathveresat nafo Aryanam Dakhyunam,

    Who lead, who fixed the lineage (nafo) of the Aryan Countries,

    Chithrem Aryanam Dakhyunam -

    He was the Seed, the Origin of the Aryan Countries!"


    Such occurrences abound. Needless to say, the ancient Iranians were proud that they were Aryans. They named their country "Iran" after the word (the ancient name of India too is AryaVarta or land of the Aryans. So too for Ireland). The Iranian kings inscribed on stone, "I am an Aryan, son of an Aryan." It was one of these Aryan kings, Cyrus the great, who worshipped at the temples of his diverse subjects and taught the world the true meaning of the words *multi-culturalism* and *tolerance*. The West recognizes that Cyrus's empire was the first true multi-cultural empire in recorded history - that too at a time when the Greeks used to look down with evident hatred on other races as "barbarians".

    Lastly but not least, the word "Arya" is linked to the word "Ereta" or righteousness in Avestan, "Rita" in Vedic Sanskrit. This meant the great law of righteousness, and an Aryan was one who followed the law. "Ritu" in Sanskrit meant the cycle of seasons which was an integral part of that moral, physical and spiritual law of God. A "Rishi" was one who explained the law, in Avestan the word "Ratu" was a spiritual teacher of the law of righteousness. The very word "Right" in English could be derived from "Ereta" or "Rita". As such, being an Aryan in both Iran and India, meant following the path of Righteousness as well as being a proud member of the Aryan people.

    I don,t know what Northern Europeans should call themselves:



    Northern Europeans?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Ewergrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 07:45 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Northwestern European Ancestry
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Gemini
    Posts
    3,556
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    26
    Thanked in
    25 Posts
    I believe it is inappropriate.

    Regardless of the true history of the term, it's meaning has been twisted and contorted and does nought but shine a bad light on those who choose to use it to describe themselves. People who use it to describe Northern European ancestry pigeonhole themselves instead of empowering themselves like they believe they are doing.

    The word is tainted, and I'm sure that our enemies would love for us to continue to use it, for it would only help them in their cause.

  6. #6
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 09:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    90
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,698
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    31
    Thanked in
    31 Posts

    Using the word "Aryan"

    I agree with Ewergrin that the word is inappropriate for use today as applied to Northern Europeans. The present-day Northern Europeans are NOT Aryans. Their languages are descended from the Indo-Iranian language spoken by the true Aryans of Iran and India but they are probably not either racially or ethnically connected with the Aryans otherwise.

    Words rise and fall in response to their use. "Knave" now means a low scurvy fellow, not to be trusted. All it originally meant was a servant boy . On the other hand, "lord" now has high status, but originally meant "he who guards the loaf" (hlafweard). "Aryan" has been so besmirched by Nazi misuse that it will probably never regain its original noble meaning.

    Regardless of its noble origin, Aryan is best left unused. So, what do I call MYself ? Nordic, because I am half Norwegian. :redbeard . This term is too narrow in its application, however, to be used generically by Northern Europeans. I have to agree with Barry that they'll just have to settle for calling themselves (proudly) " NORTHERN EUROPEANS" .

  7. #7
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, August 1st, 2008 @ 02:11 AM
    Posts
    149
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Egil Skallagrimsson
    The present-day Northern Europeans are NOT Aryans. Their languages are descended from the Indo-Iranian language spoken by the true Aryans of Iran and India but they are probably not either racially or ethnically connected with the Aryans otherwise..
    I some what agree with this because I see that the Indians and Iranians are freely calling themselves "Aryan", take a look at this example: http://www.thearyanschool.net/ & http://www.aryansociety.org/ These people look nothing like the Northern European what so ever! I know that there is a debate on the Aryan invasion of the Indian & Iranian lands, but the big quesetion to me is: are we related to the ancient Aryans too?

    Quote Originally Posted by Egil Skallagrimsson
    Regardless of its noble origin, Aryan is best left unused. So, what do I call MYself ? Nordic, because I am half Norwegian. :redbeard . This term is too narrow in its application, however, to be used generically by Northern Europeans. I have to agree with Barry that they'll just have to settle for calling themselves (proudly) " NORTHERN EUROPEANS" .
    Yes, I agree with Egil along with what Ewergrin said...
    Quote Originally Posted by Ewergrin
    The word is tainted, and I'm sure that our enemies would love for us to continue to use it, for it would only help them in their cause. .
    ...this is why: http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/aryanbro.htm
    http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/american/aryan-nations/
    http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intel...le.jsp?sid=230
    http://www.jdl.org/action/action/idaho_98_p1.shtml
    http://www.jdo.org/
    http://www.kahane.org/ And the list goes on.

    If you read into these sites you will find that they are very anti-Aryan , but also anti-anything-to-do-with-Northern-European(ism).

  8. #8
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Blood_Axis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 07:56 AM
    Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ancestry
    75% Hellenic. 25% Anglosaxon
    Subrace
    Noric
    Country
    Other Other
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Religion
    Still searching
    Posts
    5,150
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    31
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    79
    Thanked in
    41 Posts
    Totally inappropriate in any scientific context. It holds more historical/reference value than anything else.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Willow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, February 21st, 2011 @ 06:09 PM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    North-Atlantid/Galatizied Cromagnid
    Ancestry
    Scottish/Irish
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Scotland Scotland
    Gender
    Politics
    NS
    Religion
    Nature
    Posts
    265
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post

    I like the term Aryan, although, of course, to use it nowadays, for example on a job application, when it asks you to describe your ethnicity:O , well, i doubt very much that you'd get the job...It's always tempting. I mean, they have virtually every other ethnic description on their forms, and i think that 'white british' doesn't quite hit it!
    It's a shame that it now carries, for the masses, implications of being an evil, hitler worshipping, white supremacist who condones throwing jews into gas chambers :runaway
    Actually, how come Iranians call themselves Aryan...?! they certainly don't look like your stereotypical Aryans, in fact, they just look like arabs to me. Maybe that just proves the above is true after all :eek

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    NatRev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 20th, 2011 @ 08:02 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    Anglo Saxon
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    Midlands
    Gender
    Age
    50
    Family
    Having a longtime compani
    Politics
    red-brown-green
    Religion
    Pantheist
    Posts
    634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Yes but... I'm sure you all know where the word Éireann comes from?

    But agreed, like gay or fantastic, the meaning of the term has changed so much, it's not really that appropriate to use it at times.

    Is Europid more appropriate?
    "Only through a re-integration of Humanity into the whole of Nature can our People be made stronger."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: Saturday, January 20th, 2007, 04:36 AM
  2. The Origins of Aryan People
    By Ederico in forum Germanic & Indo-Germanic Origins
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 13th, 2006, 06:42 AM
  3. Are Iranian people Aryan?
    By Seph in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: Tuesday, December 12th, 2006, 02:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •