Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

  1. #11
    Senior Member Kaiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, February 27th, 2012 @ 09:41 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Scottland primarily
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Contested-Zone, Arizona
    Gender
    Occupation
    Networking
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Atheist/Pagan/Odinist
    Posts
    461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: AW: Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    Quote Originally Posted by Phlegethon View Post
    Let's not forget that quality always wins over quantity in the end.
    Not true. We need both. We must think in terms of quality and quantity if we expect a sure victory.

    We must secure the existence of Our Volk and a future for Germanic Children.

  2. #12
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 @ 07:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Mediterranean
    Ancestry
    Spain
    Subrace
    Mediterranid
    Country
    Other Other
    Location
    Valencia
    Gender
    Family
    Single
    Occupation
    Pharmacy
    Politics
    Traditional-Conservative
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Posts
    117
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    I think that there isn´t a solution, sincerely, fighting against the trend is very difficult.

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    Saturday, June 14th, 2008 @ 02:40 PM
    Subrace
    Baltid+Brunn+Atlantid
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Family
    Single
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Disoriented
    Religion
    Atheist
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    seems to me that the population is too high as it is...the goal should not be to increase birth rates in developed countries, but to limit immigration and decrease them in the developing ones...

    our current lifestyle is not sustainable, in part because there are too many consumers with sky-high demands, an increase in birth rates in countries like the US, for example, will do more harm than good without a complete paradigm shift, which, let's be realistic, isn't happening....

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 30th, 2017 @ 05:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German and English
    Subrace
    Nordid
    mtDNA
    H
    Country
    Prussia Prussia
    State
    Teutonic Order Teutonic Order
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aquarius
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Ethnocentrism
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,823
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    AW: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    There is only one thing to do, and its also quite an obvious solution. Now get to it!

    Yes, it may ''suck'' having a family at times these days, but think of the future of our race and the future of the world. No one can leave descendents for us. We should at the very least, replace ourselves...

    In the not-so-distant future when society hits its inevitable collapse, the world population will drastically reduce itself, being unable to sustain these kind of numbers without mass production and factories etc. We need to make sure the best types still survive until then, and also far beyond that and into the mists of time.

  5. #15
    Senior Member Kaiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, February 27th, 2012 @ 09:41 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Scottland primarily
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Contested-Zone, Arizona
    Gender
    Occupation
    Networking
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Atheist/Pagan/Odinist
    Posts
    461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    I know it is depressing for us. This sorry state of racial affairs we find ourselves in is sad. Our outlook looks dim, indeed. But the last thing we need is to give up hope. Or to sabotage others efforts to come up with solutions to our demise. Hence, I hope he repents of this statement. Recant at once!

    So the only real questions now is how does this generation achieve the same goals in the face of overwhelming opposition?

    Do we:

    A. First create the social and political conditions ripe for the flourishing of Germanic families, babies, etcetera?

    B. Have scores of babies regardless in the hope of at least having our genetic stock available for brainwashing and slaughter with the chance that a collapse comes before our remnants are too small in number to ever thrive again?


    What propose you for having more babies? Giving up is never an option with Kaiser!

    We must secure the existence of Our Volk and a future for Germanic Children.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Sunday, November 12th, 2017 @ 06:54 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Silesia Silesia
    Gender
    Posts
    853
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horagalles View Post
    ... Have more sex?
    The more sex people "have", the less children they "have".
    But then that isn't really the reason. I must say I'm very impressed with the analysis Raven has given there. But what is the synthesis (what must be done to turn the trend around)? That is a far more difficult question.
    According to Oswald Spengler, this trend is irreversible. You can do nothing.

    Something was tried to do in Germany during the NS era. But that was quite artificial and somewhat forced. In the end it boils down to paying for breeding. Voluntarily, as a sort of "struggle for life", people won't have more children anymore in our Western Civilisation.
    Adolf Hitler complained in a table talk that it was so terrible to read in the newspaper again and again that "the only son fell in battle". And this was some sixty years ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phlegethon View Post
    Let's not forget that quality always wins over quantity in the end. A few folks will always outsmart the rest of the world population.
    As Germany outsmarted them? Two times?
    Actually it is going to become much easier with the Americanization (i.e. mental retardation and reinfantilization) in most parts of the world.
    Didn't someone say the smartest get the fewest kids?

    Those smart asses will go where the money is luring them. There they will work, enjoy their lives, and die. And there's nothing you can do about.

  7. #17
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    -
    Gender
    Posts
    2,858
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Re: AW: Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    Didn't someone say the smartest get the fewest kids?

    Those smart asses will go where the money is luring them. There they will work, enjoy their lives, and die. And there's nothing you can do about.
    Yes, that's what he means I'm sure.... that as the world "dumbs down" due to widespread Americanisation, the birth rates will most likely eventually increase. Yet at the same time these same Americanised populations will become even weaker and more easily defeated by their enemies.

  8. #18
    Senior Member Jantelover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 @ 09:56 PM
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Gender
    Occupation
    Philosopher
    Posts
    95
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why Women Have Fewer Babies

    Eggsactly as I've pointed out before
    (http://forums.skadi.net/one_third_al...ght=jantelover)

    having kids is simply BORING – especially to people of higher intelligence, complexity, sophistication, and maturity. Sure once you have a "strategic purpose" in having them, then it can be fun again, but yer typical 32 year old new mommy had no such designs.

    Smart people -- that does not necessarily mean "IQ" but means people who need to be challenged mentally (though they're often found together) -- will simply find children uninteresting as such.

    Ever hear of wise old professors, doctors or "the elders" in general WANTING kids? Yes as CHIEFTAINS playing "Risk"... but not as individual people -- hence the grandparents' "pleasure" with YOUR kids. In fact for proof that even mothers ultimately find them uninteresting, just check out how she acts AFTER the kids are “gone”… “Yay! Now it’s MY turn to have FUN!”… (Yeah, fun spelled will a v-e-n-g-e-a-n-c-e undoubtedly.)

    Please, next time, spare the rest of us the collective misery of those 20 years in between! Too bad for them there IS no ‘next time.’ To realize what misery women live in under this j/yoke simply ask them how important it is that men be able to “make them laugh.” Talk about SAD! QED.

    After all, why kids? She calculates how pretty she is with CPA like meticulousness, but does even ONE mother really ask herself "Why kids for me?" and force herself to anwer it before setting out to ‘have them’ and nab the guy who will underwrite it? Don’t bother answering: Most DON’T ask, even if YOU do (or THINK you do).

    The matter is driven by SELF ESTEEM… People don’t want BABIES, they want PRIDE. They want the ability to feel WORTHY of pleasure, of LIVING (or in the case of Muslim suicide bombers , of dying). The more Western they are, the more they need to feel WORTHY in THIS life -- which by the way is why "we" just don't get it about the aforementioned MSBs. Any Lutheran worth their road salt knows that. Read Nietzsche on THIS! (As one of the above posters’ signature (incongruously) suggests: As long as you feel WORTHY, you don’t care HOW or WHAT -- and what piece of granite EVER felt MORE 'worthy' -- or cared less for what YOU thought -- than a spankin new momma?)

    People don’t need babies, they need DIGNITY. For a guy, knowing he’s nailed a hot girl confers such dignity. But getting blown by another guy fails to do so, no matter how much they 'close their eyes’ – thus proving, much to women’s bafflement: It’s not the pleasure stupid, it’s about the DIGNITY – which is also why he has his “limits” even regarding women ("a menu monsieur?").

    For a girl, well of course, she doesn’t want to be seen as ONLY good for sex (fortunately for most of em, and as a result of male gifts for disingenuousness, she won’t have to think so either – INGENUE meet DISingenue!).

    For YOUNG women – this attitude practically DEFINES “youth” – the baby- making years -- sex changes everything because women really believe and therefore feel that their sexual desirability – and the type of male they can attract -- is their primary source of identity and self esteem, and were they merely to “give sex away” or even just “enjoy it,” it would undermine their own sense of self worth. Let’s leave strippers, geniuses, misfits (hmm), and the abused out of it (anyone left?).

    Sex for (culturally “normal” Western women) is something of high value that they must get high value in RETURN for because that is what “tells them” who they are and what self esteem they “should” feel. Hence once they have had sex, they’ve “handed over their power” and now need something back to restore their self esteem, whereas before they had sex, that “imbalance” did not exist. For men by contrast, sex seems to change nothing, but because they depend ON women for sex, it THEREFORE changes everything for them too

    People want to feel worthwhile. The vast majority are taught the currency for this “value” and they ACCEPT IT unaskingly and even unwittingly. In general it’s called CULTURE. It IS what we value, and kids, especially for women, ARE that value. For guys, it’s obviously -- especially at the age most have them -- a ticket to a rather DIFFERENT “value”.

    It’s astonishing how unreflective and unaware women are of their “reasons” for what they’re doing (after which BTW they wonder why they get ‘no respect’ cept for their booty (they secretly hope!)). Later, past menopause – when the ova are ova as I’ve put it, women suddenly discover religion, politics and the hot young stud who tests the pool water – for his instrument, finally, rather than his instrumental value in getting back at hubby.

    They become interested in the “Reich”… a couple of decades too late for their consort's taste, and for the rest of the world. THEIR “war” is done -- and WON?.

    Now she is full of harmony and milky empathy for her fellow "warriors" rather than either the wrath or grudging respectful dependence she had before. Her LIFE may be only half over, but her IMPACT is 99% complete in most cases.

    As Freud so astutely observed: it appears that men and women are one generational phase out of step with each other. This much is for the “West,” for the REST it’s even MORE a robotic exercise in unconscious cultural self perpetuation.

    A "solution"? It is the West’s distinction with pretzel logic to twist "natural" values upside down and inside out on a schedule unheard of and unimagined. “Got insecurity?” Working book title: “The Self Esteem Machine” copyright Jantelover 2007 all rights reserved.

    Well, as has been “our” heritage, it is through the mischief of Prometheus that we got here, and it will have to be through more of it that we (think) we get out. Some combination of liver, ballz and brains no doubt. Just ask Copernicus and Galileo.

    Once upon a time women were mere property to be disposed of accordingly. Once upon a time the sun revolved around the earth. And once upon a time yo momma revolved around YOU. Now mother(earth) no longer revolves around the son either. Like it or not, those days are ova. Ova a long time ago...
    Last edited by Jantelover; Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 at 03:03 AM.
    In a woman's love is injustice and blindness towards all that she does not love... Woman is not yet capable of friendship: women are still cats and birds. Or, at best, cows. Woman is not yet capable of friendship. But tell me, you men, which of you is yet capable of friendship? --- Nietzsche, TSZ

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Deranged Feminist Calls on Women to “Kill All Male Babies”
    By Nachtengel in forum Men, Women, & Relationships
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Thursday, December 13th, 2018, 05:24 AM
  2. Replies: 34
    Last Post: Friday, June 9th, 2017, 12:27 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: Tuesday, March 7th, 2017, 11:38 AM
  4. Why European Women Are Saying No to Having (More) Babies
    By Englisc in forum Parenthood & Family
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Monday, May 23rd, 2016, 04:39 PM
  5. Austrians Want Fewer Immigrants in Europe
    By Pellonpekko in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Wednesday, November 16th, 2005, 05:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •