Question about Nordics

[executiona9]

According to Carleton S. Coon and a few other anthropologists:

- A darkhaired Keltic Iron Age type (keltic-nordic) is considered nordic

- A blondhaired broad headed person is not considered nordic because of his broad head


Dont you think this is weird? Personally I disagree with this weird way of thinking

[Fred]

According to Carleton S. Coon and a few other anthropologists:

- A darkhaired Keltic Iron Age type (keltic-nordic) is considered nordic

- A blondhaired broad headed person is not considered nordic because of his broad head


Dont you think this is weird? Personally I disagree with this weird way of thinking

In a sense we can consider bone features at least as important as, if not more important than pigmentation to judge whether someone is nordic or not. Hair color may darken depending on testosterone production whatever one's race is.

[Agrippa]

Nordid in the narrower sence is:

Absolutely and relativeley long head and face, narrow nose, light skin, usually light eyes and often light hair too in short.

Pigmentation alone is nothing or is an Albino Negroe (at least if there would be a stabilized branch of them) a Nordid?

[Zimmer Mann]

Keltics are often blonde or sandy brown haired, and usually have light eyes and fair skin. You could say they are a variable type that is usually inclined to be darker haired, though, than the Hallstatt type. They are not entirely contained within a brunette sphere or else we would call them Meds. They are Nordics because they are a related type who diverged from their original stock. Both have retained similar skull dimensions and bone structures which sets them apart from other races in Europe. East-Baltids are commonly blonde but they differ morphologically from the Nordics in most dimensions of the body. A Keltic type that is less tinted with Atlanto-Mediterranean is common in the Netherlands. Roger Moore would be a good example of an English type.

[White Preservationist]

According to nordish.com ( which is junk science ) Belgium has more Nords than Norway!

[Glenlivet]

I suppose you mean Mcculloch, albeit he helped the people who created nordish.com. Your statement is wrong, Belgium and Norway got different Nordid types and according to McCulloch Norway got more.

According to nordish.com ( which is junk science ) Belgium has more Nords than Norway!

[White Preservationist]

According to nordish.com Belgium is not predominantly Alpine but 60 % keltic nordic and Norway is only 30 % nordic.

[Glenlivet]

From McCulloch:

Norway = 45% Trønder (most common in the west), 30% Hallstatt Nordic (most common in the southeast area around Oslo).

That is 45 + 30 = 75 %.

I do not care where he got his numbers from or if they are correct. The argument is whether he stated that Norway is only 30 % Nordid. He talk about Nordish though. Whatever though, Trönder is merely another Scando-Nordid type.

According to nordish.com Belgium is not predominantly Alpine but 60 % keltic nordic and Norway is only 30 % nordic.

[executiona9]

Nordish is a term made up by McCullogh for his own political reasons.

[White Preservationist]

Nordish.com says there are only two nordic types keltic and "hallstatt".