Some of the people used as examples on their website don't really seem to fit the description of their race except for location.
This Swedish woman was classified as a Hallstatt Nordic, yet she does not seem to have a long, narrow face.
Marilyn Monroe does not seem to fit the description of female Borrebys that I have heard before, yet she is of Danish descent.
I guess what I'm getting at is this: Is geographical location more of a deciding factor in racial classification than some physical traits?
(I could imagine how someone could be genetically similar, but different-looking, than the people who have historically lived near them. Similarly, people who live further away from each other and look like each would not necessarily be genetically close.) Is this about right?
Bookmarks