Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Homosexuality: It's In Your Genes

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, December 8th, 2006 @ 03:25 AM
    European Union European Union
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post Re: Homosexuality: It's In Your Genes

    Almost all Northern Europeans are used to live with fewer people. There are no Metropolises in the north. Germanic tribes lived in small village communities. They were semi-nomadic farmers and herders.

    Quote Originally Posted by cosmocreator
    Different races and even subraces can tolerate crowding better than others. I think Mongoloids and Mediterraneans are more tolerant than Upper Paleolithics which seem to like wide open spaces.

  2. #12
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Zyklop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    Other Other
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Lightbulb Gay Genes

    Mom's Genetics Could Produce Gay Sons
    The arrangement of a mother's genes could affect the sexual orientation of her son, according to a new study. The finding, detailed in the February issue of the journal Human Genetics, adds fuel to the decade-long debate about whether so-called "gay genes" might exist.

    The researchers examined a phenomenon called "X chromosome inactivation" in 97 mothers of gay sons and 103 mothers whose sons were not gay.

    X and Y

    Chromosomes are large thread-like molecules that contain an organism's genetic instructions. Humans have 23 chromosome pairs. The X chromosome is one of two sex chromosomes in mammals; the other is the Y chromosome. Females have two X chromosomes and no Y's, while males have one X and one Y.

    Even though women have two X chromosomes, only one is functional because the other is inactivated through a process called "methylation." "It gets wrapped up in a ball and is not used with the exception of a few genes," explained study leader Sven Bocklandt of the University of California, Los Angeles.
    If one of the females' X chromosomes is not turned off, then there is too much genetic material, which can lead to a harmful overabundance of proteins. Down syndrome, for example, results from the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21.

    Big difference

    Normally, X chromosome inactivation occurs at random: half of the cells in a woman's body will have one X chromosome inactivated, while the other half inactivates the other chromosome.

    However, when the researchers in the current study examined cells from the 42 mothers who had at least two gay sons, they found that about a quarter of the women in this group showed something different.

    "Every single cell that we looked at in these women inactivated the same X chromosome," Bocklandt told LiveScience. "That's highly unusual."

    In contrast, only 4 percent of mothers with no gay sons and 13 percent of those with just one gay son showed this type of extreme skewing. Bocklandt thinks this suggest that a mother's X chromosomes partly influences whether her son is gay or not.

    "We think that there are one or more genes on the X chromosome that have an effect on the sexual orientation of the sons of these mothers, as well as an effect on the cells we were looking at," Bocklandt said.

    Other chromosomes implicated

    Bocklandt was also involved in an earlier study that looked at the entire human genome of men who had two or more gay brothers. The researchers found identical stretches of DNA on three chromosomes—7, 8 and 10—that were shared by about 60 percent of the gay brothers in the study.

    That study also found mothers to have an unusually large role in their son's sexual orientation: the region on chromosome 10 correlated with homosexuality only if it was inherited from the mother.

    The results from these two studies suggest that there are multiple genetic factors involved in determining a person's sexual orientation and that it might vary depending on the person.

    "We think that there are going to be some gay men who are X chromosome gay men and some who are chromosome 7 gay men or chromosome 10 gay men or some combination," Bocklandt said in a telephone interview.

    Most researchers now think that there is no single gay gene that controls whether a person is homosexual or not. Rather, it's the influence of multiple genes, combined with environmental influences, which ultimately determine whether a person is gay.

    A touchy subject

    Research into the genetics of sexual orientation is controversial. Religious leaders who believe that sexual orientation is a choice argue that such research is an attempt to legitimize homosexuality; others worry that a detailed knowledge of the genetics underlying homosexuality will open the door to genetic engineering that prevents it. But Bocklandt doesn't think these concerns should prevent scientists from asking the basic question of whether homosexuality has an underlying genetic component to it or not.

    "I have no doubt that at some point we'll be able to manipulate all sorts of aspects of our personality and physical appearance," Bocklandt said. "I think if there's ever a time when we can make these changes for sexual orientation, then we will also be able to do it for intelligence or musical skills or certain physical characteristics—but whether or not these things are allowed to happen is something that society as a whole has to decide. It's not a scientific question."
    Tolerance is a proof of distrust in one's own ideals. Friedrich Nietzsche

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. The Vikings and Homosexuality
    By svartabrandr in forum Viking Age
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Monday, June 27th, 2016, 07:43 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, February 26th, 2012, 04:18 PM
  3. Genes Drive Behaviour, But Culture Can Select Genes: Study
    By Nachtengel in forum Medical & Behavioral Genetics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Saturday, October 31st, 2009, 07:48 AM
  4. How Did Recessive Genes (Light Skin & Eyes, Blonde Hair, etc) Replace Dominant Genes?
    By Tryggvi in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Sunday, August 22nd, 2004, 03:44 AM
  5. How did Homozygous Recessive Genes replace the Homozygous Dominant Genes?
    By Noddy in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Monday, December 23rd, 2002, 11:11 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts