View Poll Results: Holding families responsible

Voters
40. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    7 17.50%
  • No

    33 82.50%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Holding Families Responsible for Shaping Individuals?

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Blutwölfin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Last Online
    2 Days Ago @ 11:03 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Skåne and North Frisia
    Country
    Iceland Iceland
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Posts
    4,117
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    18
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    125
    Thanked in
    77 Posts

    Question Holding Families Responsible for Shaping Individuals?

    We all know that a community and especially families are responsible for shaping individuals. If that someone commits a crime (a serious crime; robbery or murder say) should we punish the community that failed to keep tabs on that individual?

    Yes? If so, how?
    No? Why?

    Please take the poll and elaborate on your vote!
    Lík börn leika best.

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 09:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    89
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    19 Posts

    Holding families resoonsible.

    Almost no one becomes a felon overnight with no previous record of misdemeanours. The parents whose children can do no wrong, who hire expensive lawyers to assure that they will be unpunished for their earlier and lesser infractions at, at least, morally responsible for their children's careers in crime. "As the twig is bent, the tree's inclined."

    In the US, and except in religious schools, teachers are forbidden to teach their students moral and ethical values. This education they MUST receive from their parents. Repeatedly enabling them to evade the consequences of their actions assures that they will never develop any sense of moral or legal responsibility.

    Controlling the behaviour of the young and teaching them proper conduct is far less, if at all, the responsibility of the community and mainly, if not exclusively, the responsibility of their PARENTS.

    If the parents feel no responsibility for their children's actions, perhaps they can be induced to view the matter otherwise if. when a minor commits a serious crime, not only does he/she not evade the appropriate legal penalties, but also, the parents are charged with dereliction of parental duty and delinquency and, if convicted, required to pay very substantial fines or face imprisonment, themselves.

  3. #3
    On The Road
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Tabitha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Scottish
    Subrace
    North Atlantid & Borreby
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Posts
    633
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Re: Holding families responsible

    NO: We live in a society, nay, a world governed by free will and although our environment may influence our behaviour, we alone stand responsible for our actions. Frankly, I refuse to be held responsible for the actions of "wee rotten Johnnie" from round the corner, much as, at times, I may wish to lamp him with a cricket bat. It is one of these concepts that idealistically seems a great idea, where everyone polices each other's behaviour, however I find the idea repugnant in its claustrophobia.
    Last edited by Tabitha; Friday, December 15th, 2006 at 09:00 PM. Reason: sp

  4. #4

  5. #5
    The lion's gate
    Chlodovech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    3 Minutes Ago @ 08:58 PM
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Ancestry
    Frankish
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Politics
    Völkisch traditionalist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    3,477
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,746
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,960
    Thanked in
    1,334 Posts

    Re: Holding families responsible

    Yes, but only in a moral sense. There's nothing wrong with some good old shame - and regret & penitence - of people caring for their reputation as a family, more or less like an Army platoon being hard on its weakest link in order to create a common bond and individual soldiers of extraordinary quality.
    "Beauty is a form of genius, higher, indeed, than genius, as it needs no explanation." - Oscar Wilde

  6. #6
    Progressive Collectivist
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Agrippa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, January 31st, 2011 @ 09:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Subrace
    Atlantid
    Location
    Asgard
    Gender
    Politics
    Progressive Collectivist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    6,968
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13
    Thanked in
    13 Posts

    AW: Holding families responsible

    I voted "No" for various reasons, but it depends. If family members played a clear and important role for a concrete crime or child's attitude in an irresponsible way, then yes, but in "normal cases" in which the parents didnt supported criminal and destructive behaviour, it would be absurd, because as we all know, children can develop in a very different way whether parents like that or not. They being oftentimes punished enough by having such a child, to hold them responsible beyond reasonable limits of conscious decisions and influences in the context of the child's criminal behaviour is absurd and unfair.

    If a parent told his child to steal or harming other individuals is a good thing, probably even motivating it to do so, then there is a clear responsibility. But if the parent just raised the child in a suboptimal way, I see no clear responsibility and if the child acted against parent's rules they should be rather involved if its about the punishment and what to do with the child, to hear their opinion about different ways of resocialising, but not being punished themselves.

    So far we dont know for sure which results certain influences will show in a child, which means that there is not always one right way ro raise an individual child with an individual personality. Thats a very important point for the issue in my opinion. If it would be known that certain actions lead to specific negative results for the child as individual and the community, but the parents still do it, against better knowledge and education, consciously and without taking their responsibility serious, then they have to be punished first, even before the child in some thinkable cases.
    Magna Europa est patria nostra
    STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM!

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, February 5th, 2007 @ 11:19 PM
    Subrace
    mediterranid/berid/alpine
    Country
    Other Other
    Gender
    Family
    Single
    Posts
    33
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Holding families responsible

    If the families are not directly responsible, then no. Maybe it would be necessary to take measures, but not holding them responsible for something one of their members did, unless they have direct guilt or participation.

    Of all tv shows out there, I heard on CSI (!) a very true thing: nowadays everybody blames their own behaviour on the way they were raised, on the behaviour of the people around them, on TV, on society... but never on themselves. Everbody finds an excuse: now we are not just allowed to behave bad, but also to not feel bad about it. It is true that the community where we live influences us, but it is also true that we are rational beings, capable of learning (and un-learning if that word exists), taking decisions and so on...

  9. #9
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 1st, 2007 @ 06:48 AM
    Subrace
    Anglo-Saxon / North-Atlantid
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Family
    Currently dating
    Occupation
    outlaw / berzerker
    Politics
    the strong survive
    Religion
    Anti-Christian - Ásatrú - PAGAN
    Posts
    155
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Holding families responsible

    Are you kidding me? NO!

    Thats similar to russian mafia ideals, they dont just kill you, they kill your friends and family.

    Pure bullshit.

  10. #10
    hearthtender
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    ladybright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, July 31st, 2010 @ 07:14 PM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    Swedish/Irish
    Ancestry
    Swedish Irish ?English?
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Michigan Michigan
    Gender
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    Mother
    Politics
    Classical liberal
    Religion
    Heathen
    Posts
    1,611
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    I voted no because after you are an adult your family should not be held legally responible for your actions.

    I agree that the truely henous crimes have lesser crimes in before them. If people watch hoe a child treats animals and smaller children they will learn alot.The worst criminals almost all come from an abusive childhood. There are studies if people want me to look them up. This does not excuse the criminal.

    I feel that it is appropriate to hold the extended family and community responible when a child commits a serious crim but I do not have any impamentable suggestions. A closeknit community where people care about what others think reduces public crime but not nessisarily child abuse and domestic violence. But being strangers to each other only makes it worse.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: Sunday, August 19th, 2012, 09:27 PM
  2. Labour Shortage Puts the Breaks on Leighton Holding Projects
    By Roderic in forum Australia & New Zealand
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, August 31st, 2011, 02:10 AM
  3. Apple Holding More Cash Than USA
    By Hersir in forum The United States
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Friday, August 5th, 2011, 05:08 AM
  4. Luxurious Holding Centre for Aliens Costs Millions of Pounds
    By Hilderinc in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 8th, 2011, 07:32 PM
  5. The Shaping of Western Europe
    By Johannes de León in forum Middle Ages
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, July 9th, 2004, 11:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •