Race Mixing and Mental Health

[Mac Seafraidh]

I do not want to sound unintelligent with this post, but I was reading about dogs the other day and humans just popped up in my head with this theory. You know how mixing other breeds of dogs can create illnesses , etc. I was thinking that mixing nationalities could be a problem creating hereditary illnesses like depression etc. Racially mixed people will have everything of the worse though, but I am a mutt and I notice if you look back in time there is far less noticible problems with people in the past because they were only one nationality. Yes there were ancients to create those cultures too and their health mentally was better. I realize that Mozart,Beethoven,Nietzsche, and Ludwig II,etc. had mental illnesses, but they had their own plutonic visions in the future. This post is stupid and I will get the bashing treatment for it I bet, but maybe others might have similarities in thought.

Der Sieg ist Unser,

Bobby

[morfrain_encilgar]

I do not want to sound unintelligent with this post, but I was reading about dogs the other day and humans just popped up in my head with this theory. You know how mixing other breeds of dogs can create illnesses , etc. I was thinking that mixing nationalities could be a problem creating hereditary illnesses like depression etc. Racially mixed people will have everything of the worse though, but I am a mutt and I notice if you look back in time there is far less noticible problems with people in the past because they were only one nationality. Yes there were ancients to create those cultures too and their health mentally was better. I realize that Mozart,Beethoven,Nietzsche, and Ludwig II,etc. had mental illnesses, but they had their own plutonic visions in the future. This post is stupid and I will get the bashing treatment for it I bet, but maybe others might have similarities in thought.

Der Sieg ist Unser,

Bobby

I heard that children from mixed racial origins are more likely to suffer from depression.

[Frans_Jozef]

I heard that children from mixed racial origins are more likely to suffer from depression.

psychology should decypher behavioural patterns and not going in declaring certain affects as maladies, putting people in a mental constraint that they are ill and not useful to work and live as an individual, family member, employee or labourer, giving some technocrats and medical wizards leeway to tamper with all kind of disturbingly ambivalent theories, machineries from hell and cocktails of drugs the human mind...Michel Foucault and even Julius Evola
that the madman was revered once as a special herald of a mind-boggling, stupendous experience in life bordering to having a glimpse of another world, another level of existence, and as such accepted within the traditional society...of course, the pappenheimers of "psychological sciences" are often Jews or their Anglo-Saxon acolytes(see weininger on jews and englishmen), the former the practical jokers of the confection or off the peg clothes and ready made suits...they want the golims to substitute the real creative man who in his suffering burns up his ego to transcend in a more luminous olympic state...

[Parzifal_]

I heard that children from mixed racial origins are more likely to suffer from depression.

Hard to say exactly why that may be the case (if it is true to begin with). It may be purely social stressors of being different, standing out, being neither here nor there etc. There is however no classical medical evidence for the supposition that race mixing is injurious, if anything some feel that it is healthy and adds genetic diversity. I typically don't feel that way.

I feel that if two people are of approximately the same general race ( a Nord and a Dinaric; a Vietnamese and a Malaysian for instance) and of approxiamately the same IQ they will be fine. Its when very diverse types unite that the trajectories of psychic, evolutionary and spiritual energies they retain move into violent collision and THAT is why the racially mixed are often "unresolved". There is too much to bridge within the individual and long lines of separate development become stalled within their persons.

It may be for this reason that the white man's incursion into alien lands led to so much of local devastation. It was because he seeded more often than not, the peoples he encountered and created new unbalanced populations. This may have been a strategy. These populations were abandoned by the progenitor Caucasoids whilst keeping their own female stock untouched. Its only now when white women are "taken" by the millions that the racial integrity of the European type is under threat. This obvious threat is only minuscule compared to a more sinister process - the degeneration of the mental potential of the European type. There is a reason why people look at Euro-Americans and think they are not as "bright" as their fatherland counterparts. The reasons for that represent another thread altogether.

[Boche]

.

[Erbe]

So i am mental affected with mental illness? Don't think so! I myself I am mixed between Nordic and Dinaric, and the dinaric part is predominant morphologically. I can't be considered as a Noric, because of my darker skin. The mental and psychological part is i think wheter pure of dinaric type or nordic type.
Ok, let's put it this way. My father must be a Noric, but he also looks predominant Dinaric. My mother is Nordic. So i am 75% Nordic and 25% Dinaric. But this isn't right. I am more dinaric than a average Noric. I don't know what happened before i was born, but i am proud that it happened this way.

[Boche]

.

[Erbe]

I understand fully now what you meant. This means that a child from a mediterannid/pontid or whatever europid subrace Mexican and a amerind woman could possibly have mental diseases. Or children of negrid and amerind parents, which are called Zambo.
But it also depends on the racial mixture. Asiatic people are nearer to the Europids than Africans. This can mean mulatts could have more often mental problems than persons of other main racial mixtures.
What bothers me is why negrids are so different from us, beeing but a younger race and evolved 20.000 BC. Their ancestors must have been people of a race that comes near to the europids. So this is someway unexplainable??

[Siegfried]

What bothers me is why negrids are so different from us, beeing but a younger race and evolved 20.000 BC. Their ancestors must have been people of a race that comes near to the europids. So this is someway unexplainable??

This is going off topic, but Negroids are hardly a young race. There is genetic evidence that the peoples who left Africa have experienced more mutation and selection that those who stayed behind, so their types would on average be younger than sub-Saharan types, not older.

[SuuT]

This is going off topic, but Negroids are hardly a young race. There is genetic evidence that the peoples who left Africa have experienced more mutation and selection that those who stayed behind, so their types would on average be younger than sub-Saharan types, not older.

Indeed. [...] I will add to the above.

The Genetic distance of sub-saharan Afrikans is enormous: If one were to imagine the totality of genetic distance as the length of a ruler, sub-saharan Afrikans' genetic distance would occupy the entire length; whereas Europeans (in general) would occupy roughly one inch.