Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The Technology Productivity Paradox

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 20th, 2009 @ 12:11 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Subrace
    Uralic/Alpine/Pontid mixed
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post The Technology Productivity Paradox

    http://www.gerrymcgovern.com/nt/2001...oductivity.htm

    The technology productivity paradox

    By Gerry McGovern


    The basic promise of technology is more efficiency and thus greater productivity. However, the links between more technology and more productivity have historically been weak. As the Nineties progressed, we were told that that had all changed. Technology has reached critical mass within organizations, the reasoning went, and now we were finally seeing a surge in technology-fueled productivity. A recent McKinsey report begs to differ with this logic.

    The report entitled, U.S. Productivity Growth 1995-2000, states that, “Contrary to popular belief, our research shows that IT was only one of many factors causing the post-1995 productivity growth jump.” According to Bill Lewis, director of the McKinsey Global Institute, “There was a big jump in capital spending on IT and a big jump in productivity in the [American] economy as a whole at the end of the ‘90s. But the actual correlation between the two is very weak.”

    The question thus must be: if technology is not driving productivity, then what good is it? For a long time we have been sold a technology-driven world of efficiency and leisure. Back in the Fifties, we were promised a 3-day week. But the facts show that we are working longer hours than ever. We were promised the ‘paperless office.’ But we have never produced more paper and it’s rising every year.

    Thomas Landauer, in his 1995 book ‘The trouble with computers,’ pointed out that computers had not contributed nearly as much to labor productivity as had been hoped, and that the efficiency of computer applications had been poor.

    During the period 1973 and 1993, American productivity growth was half that of the period 1950 to 1973. While the oil crisis of the Seventies seriously impacted on productivity, the period 1973-93 saw a huge investment in technology. Morgan Stanley’s Stephen Roach wrote a paper in 1997 entitled ‘The boom for whom: revisiting America’s technology paradox.’ Roach pointed out that between 1990 and 1996 alone, $1.1 trillion was invested in IT hardware.

    However, he noted that much spending was in fact a process of running to stand still. “Sixty percent of annual corporate IT budgets,” he wrote, “go toward replacement of outdated equipment and increasingly frequent product replacement.”

    I think the essence of the problem can be found in a basic flaw that lies deep in the heart of the technology industry. The dream of many a technologist is to automate and replace people, rather than help people to become more efficient. We see this sort of thinking all the time in the content management industry, for example.

    It astounds me the view that many technologists have of content. It’s all about a quick fix, it’s all about automation, it’s all about shoveling content around the place. Much of the Web illustrates what happens when technology is let loose on a problem - it makes the problem far, far worse. Technology has allowed us all to become publishers. It has facilitated the creation of 550 billion documents on the Web.

    But quality publishing has never, ever been about quantity. And the key ingredient in a successful publication has never, ever been its technology. The New York Times depends first and foremost on its writers and editors, not on its printing machines and black ink. As long as technology puts automation before people we will continue to sink money down a black hole of poor productivity.


    Gerry McGovern

  2. #2
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 06:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: The technology productivity paradox

    The debate concerning worker productivity in the USA has been going on for some time. Somehow, economists in the USA claim workers here work harder than in other countries leading to statements claiming that US workers are the most productive in the world. Anyone who has ever witnessed a factory in production in the USA automatically questions this statement.

    It now appears that American worker productivity has two basic causes. First, American workers might get a one-week vacation if they work at the company for a year or more. They rarely get the chance. Unlike the month off Europeans get, American rarely get a two week vacation. Sick time has also been cut back. Less time off work equals higher productivity.

    Secondly, we are in a recession here. Our jobs are being exported (outsourced) to places like Mexico, India and China where factory owners can pay only a fraction of the labor costs they would have to pay in the USA. The result of this is that every worker in the USA is scared to death of losing his job. The employer is in the driver's seat. Wages are declining. Workers are having to work harder and longer for less just to keep their jobs. Longer work for less money equals increased worker productivity.

    Just hope the country you live in never tells its citzens how "productive" their workers are.

Similar Threads

  1. The Paradox of Our Time
    By Hersir in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Friday, December 10th, 2010, 10:10 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, March 29th, 2010, 12:18 AM
  3. Australia's 'Productivity Commission' Claims Babies a Drag on Economy
    By SwordOfTheVistula in forum Economics, Business, & Finance
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Thursday, August 7th, 2008, 01:39 PM
  4. The Liar's Paradox
    By Moody in forum Logic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, May 18th, 2006, 05:07 AM
  5. The Paradox of Intelligence
    By SouthernBoy in forum Psychology, Behavior, & Neuroscience
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Saturday, March 12th, 2005, 07:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •