Things That Should Be Illegal

[Sigurd]

There are, however, medical reasons that demand circumcision, like Phimosis. Therefore I don´t think it should be completely outlawed.

True. I myself have a relative who needed to have it done at age 6 because the foreskin was, well, too tight. It was a big fuss because that family line are so Fundi xian that they were debating whether they should allow it... eyes:

Medical reasons should be an exception for most things.
Exception to the exception: Mixing with an Albino Negro is still race-mixing.

[Zyklop]

If you are implying Motown is something which could bring our race to it's knees, I disagree.

I am a Nationalist, but i don't want to suppress freedoms.
Do that, and it will only lead to a new age ressurgence of Liberalism.

Ok, but why do you support the banning of HipHop, but not that of Motown then?

[Thruthheim]

O, but why do you support the banning of HipHop, but not that of Motown then?

Motown doesn't use words such as "bitches", "Hoe's" and "Bling".. it also doesn't encourage violence, drug use and womanising.

Motown i see is acceptable, appreciative, everything Hip Hop isn't.

Groups such as the Drifters, Banning that would be reckless censorship.
It poses no threat, propoganda wise, or culture wise, i doubt it will re-emerge as the predominant popular music form, in a Nationalist society.

Whereas, Hip Hop is representative of all the ills that a re displayed by our youth, attitude, ebonic speech, bastardizing of the language, loss of identity.. etc.

Don't get me wrong, i don't overtly like Motown, but i see it's banishment as Puritanic.

[Sigurd]

O, but why do you support the banning of HipHop, but not that of Motown then?

I know that this wasn't directed at me, but I'll throw in my own mustard.

Doesn't Hip-Hop often have anti-European/anti-White political messages in, in any case. :

Well, I can't see a point of banning Jazz or Blues, just because it originated with Black people. Heck, we shouldn't play the modern drumset; and the guitar we can't use because it was based upon Arabian stringed instruments.

My personal opinion is, if it's part of the propaganda, then ban it. And Hiphop promotes race-mixing, anti- "White" violence, etc.

[fog]

I am fairly libertarian. I would never outlaw free speech, which includes enemy propaganda.

I disagree with the assertion that non-nordish cultural influence is by definition undesirable. If the cultural element is inferior, no honorable person will adopt it, and I do not worry much about the others.

As for abortion/circumcision, I think that the parent fully owns the child, and should be able to do whatever he/she wants with it.

The parent has great control over what form the child will take. I could see nations banning teaching one's children racism, as they never chose to become hateful on their own. The child has no choice as to what he will become. The parent has control of the socialization and the genetics.

I see no reason to ban miscegenation. I am glad to let the less honorable members of our race abandon it.

So long as our basic freedoms are maintained, our race should not fear, for our only threat is that we do not care enough to preserve ourselves. It does not take many, and if there is only a few they will be among the most honorable, and they alone will be sufficient for perpetuating the race.

[Lissu]

As for abortion/circumcision, I think that the parent fully owns the child, and should be able to do whatever he/she wants with it.

:icon_surp

...Would that include physical abuse and incest also? eyes:

Your statement is also somewhat in conflict with your statements about abortion.

A child is an individual, not part of his/her parents and thus cannot be owned. A good parent protect his/her children and gives as good tools to survive in life than possible. A parent can also teach his/her values to the child, but it is up to the child to decide would they follow the paths of his/her parents or not.

[fog]

My statement would not be considered shocking in some past cultures. In early Rome, a father could kill his son even after it had reached adulthood. (and some like to pretend that the early Romans were Nordid. )

Your statement is also somewhat in conflict with your statements about abortion.

No need for a debate, but to clarify, I agree with you that abortion should be legal.

...Would that include physical abuse and incest also? [IMG]images/smilies/general/rolleyes.gif[/IMG]

I am not sure how you define physical abuse, but I think a father should be able to punish his children physically. (I am not saying that it is desirable.)

When I read about an African man raping his child, I usually do not fell sorry for the child, as I know that the child comes from the same stock and will likely behave in the same manner as an adult.

Perhaps I am too darwinistic, in my assumption that those with unflawed genes will behave reasonably and that those with bad genes will give birth to children with bad genes. I admit that this is not always true.

but it is up to the child to decide would they follow the paths of his/her parents or not.

I work with the assumption that the mind is a chemical machine, which assumes a physical form inherited from the parents, and that this mind responds to external stimuli in a manner governed by the laws of physics. The child choses neither the architectue of the mind nor the stimuli to which the mind responds to.

The parents limitation is their ignorance of the exact workings of the greatly complex mind and the exact effects stimuli will have on it, but they are responsible for all of the factors which go into forming the child.

[Æmeric]

I'm do'nt approve of elective abortions but I did not vote to ban it because in the United States more then half of all abortions are performed on black & hispanic women. Without legal abortion there would be anywhere from 25-40 million additional non-whites in this country.

[Hell Cell]

Just ban abortion on babies with good race or give the woman involved a finacial insentive to keep him/her. I think alot more stigma should be put on abortion you know like they do with smoking at the moment.

They should have posters up funded by the governmet in public places (white areas and places of frequent) with slogans like "are you sure you want to do this" and adverts with the same message so maybe not ban it but strongly discourage it. And purposfully aim it at white women in the under current.

[newenstad]

I ticked Abortion, Immegration from certain countries, the race-mixing options and zionism...but at least I believe in Kants categorical imperative...eyes: