View Poll Results: Do the Germanic gods really exist?

Voters
101. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    55 54.46%
  • No

    28 27.72%
  • I am not sure...

    18 17.82%
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910
Results 91 to 93 of 93

Thread: Do You Believe in the Literal Existence of the Gods?

  1. #91
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 08:25 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    491
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    160
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    246
    Thanked in
    135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean_Jobst View Post
    ....
    In theory, monotheists believe in one god who is omniscient and omnipresent, all-knowing and all-wise. But in practice, they delegate some of this one god's powers to lesser beings. For example, in the form or angels, prophets, sages, etc.. Why would such a superior being who is already capable of all things, need to delegate some of these superior powers to intermediaries?
    Because it's in his nature also to delegate authority to beings that work in his creation. God is a respecter of the sovereignty, he delegates.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  3. #92
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 05:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,129
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    128
    Thanked in
    106 Posts
    Might as well ask why we were created. I'm not exactly Unitarian or Trinitarian. I don't believe that mere mortals are capable of defining God in any specific number of dimensions and manifestations. Oneness and polytheistic views of Divinity are merely shades of the spectrum.

  4. #93
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 6th, 2019 @ 05:14 PM
    Ethnicity
    Aryo-Germanic
    Ancestry
    1/2 German, 3/8 English, 1/8 Welsh
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    V10b
    Country
    England England
    State
    Northumberland Northumberland
    Location
    Dane Law
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Parent,Co-habiting
    Occupation
    Retired
    Politics
    Exposing idiocy
    Religion
    Wodenist
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    413
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    372
    Thanked in
    254 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I wonder then if these gods of the Northmen, if they exist, are even concerned at all with the folk's welfare. My guess is they are not in the slightest. Either that, or they are powerless.
    You are thinking like a man and not as a God. If you wish to understand the Gods then you need to jettison what is clearly a Christian mindset. It is obvious to me that you have one.

    Are the Gods Merely Archetypes?



    The question of the nature of the Gods is something which has given me much food for thought over recent months. Following a recent conversation with somebody I wish to set forth my thoughts regarding this issue so that people who read this and my other blogs may understand the position which I take on this issue.

    I believe that our Gods may be understood on a number of different levels. I accept the theory that they may be viewed as archetypes in a Jungian sense. Many modern heathens and I stress the word modern, are influenced greatly by Jung's work on archetypes, especially his essay Wotan (1936). Whilst I believe that Jung's contribution to the subject is useful and has a great deal of merit I do not accept that this is all that the Gods are. Let me quote the most relevant part of Wotan here:
    "Archetypes are like river-beds which dry up when the water deserts them, but which it can find again at any time. An archetype is like an old water-course along which the water of life has flowed for centuries, digging a deep channel for itself. The longer it has flowed in this channel the more likely it is that sooner or later the water will return to its old bed."
    Of course the Germanic peoples were heathen for much longer than they were held under the grip of Christianity which by comparison is just (an unfortunate) blip in time. The people are thus able still to find their ancient deities with not too much trouble for in a sense they are part of our very nature and the fabric of our being. Jung believed that given the right circumstances they could manifest themselves within the collective life of a people. In his assessment of the phenomenon of the rise of National Socialism in Germany I believe that his analysis in this regard is correct. However it is sheer folly on our part to believe that this all that the Gods are. Jung was a scientist and the founder of Analytical Psychology but he was not a follower of the Ancient Ones. We should thus not feel ourselves to be constrained by his interpretation as it is the interpretation of a scientist but I feel that many heathens have been. In fact Jung took a rather scathing view of people who believed that the Gods had an existence independent of the people who honoured and believed in them:
    "A mind that is still childish thinks of the gods as metaphysical entities existing in their own right, or else regards them as playful or superstitious inventions." (Wotan)

    This is a typical materialist and almost atheist perspective. Jung, the scientist would seem to know better the nature of our Gods than our ancestors. Jung, like everyone was a product of his time and sought to explain the 'irrational' in rational terms and this simply does not work. Thus whilst I value Jung's contribution it is a grave mistake for us to regard his interpretation as the only valid one. Our ancestors certainly did see the Gods as existing "in their own right" and gave due reverence to them (See Tacitus's Germania). If all the Gods are are archetypes then why give them reverence or even honour? Are we not deceiving ourselves? For if they are only archetypes then all we do is give honour to a part of ourselves. I fail to see why our ancestors would think this way. The Gods as archetypes is a 20th and 21st century rationalisation of the divine and for some strange reason it is only the heathen deities that are rationalised in this way, not the Abrahamic one!


    Edred Thorsson discusses the nature of the Gods in chapter 11 of his very interesting A Book of Troth :
    "What are the gods and goddesses? To this question there can be many answers. Much depends on the level of understanding any one true man or woman has at one time. REAL gods, like REAL people, are not one-dimensional easily defined, pigeonholed entities. Some understand the gods as pure mental or psychological constructs, some as true living beings, and others as forces of nature. The troth does not put limits on types of understandings that true folk come to on this."
    In my opinion Edred's presentation of the Gods is far more honest than that of Jung's. There is no reason at all why the Gods cannot be viewed in more than one way. They are complex and as Edred has said "are not one-dimensional easily defined, pigeonholed entities". I certainly do not think that anyone who has spent mere weeks or months meditating on this can come to a valid opinion. To know the Gods takes a lifetime and I have spent half of my life on this sacred quest and I am still searching for answers.


    Stephen A. McNallen in his Asatru. A Native European Spirituality states:
    "They exist on the very margins of our comprehension...yet, as we shall see, they are intimately involved in all that we are. Secondly, they are powers. They are potent, energy-filled, with capacity for action on a scale we can hardly imagine.
    "For hundreds of generations, our ancestors believed the Gods and Goddesses to be as real as their own family, as real as the mountains hovering on the horizon, or the clouds blowing through the sky."
    Modern man in his conceit believes that he is the pinnacle of all that is, that there can be no higher power. If you are a heathen and only believe the Gods to be manifestations of psychic impulses within the Collective Unconscious then how do you differ from a pure atheist? Is your understanding of the Gods thus superior to that of our ancestors who were not influenced by Christianity or materialist science? If we believe that there are forces and powers, sentient beings that exist in different dimensions or on a higher vibrational frequency then why is it so difficult to accept the concept that we are the product of a divine agency, not 'evolution', a purely materialistic and faulty concept, for modern man as he is today is not the product of 'evolution' but involution!


    http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.com/2018/08/are-gods-merely-archetypes.html


Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910

Similar Threads

  1. Do You Believe in a Literal Adam and Eve?
    By Dagna in forum Christianity
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Wednesday, November 28th, 2018, 10:52 PM
  2. How to Lead a Wholesome Existence?
    By NewWorldMed in forum Questions About Germanics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, February 12th, 2017, 04:31 AM
  3. Can The Existence of God be Proven?
    By Northern Paladin in forum Metaphysics
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: Tuesday, August 26th, 2008, 12:52 AM
  4. Gods and Half-Gods Fathered by Odin, Listed in the Skáldskaparmál
    By Blutwölfin in forum Cosmology & Mythology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, February 12th, 2006, 03:07 PM
  5. Can You Prove the Existence of Gods?
    By Alkman in forum Metaphysics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Wednesday, September 22nd, 2004, 02:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •