To understand my thesis, a bit of subtle reasoning is needed. I feel this is a good topic for me to address since I am new here. I was invited here a few months ago via a PM at Stormfront. I know the image of this forum is one of elitism. Therefore, I am sure that this applies to many of you: How many of you feel or have felt discomfort over the actual or perceived number of dregs involved in our cause? The controlled media loves to portray us as unsophisticated, and to folks with a college degree and/or who do not fit these stereotypes, it can be a bit uncomfortable when a family member or friend who does not approve says "you're too smart/good/educated for 'racism.'"
Imagine the following scenario. A little boy and his mother are walking through a store. They pass a person with a deformity or handicap. The boy loudly points out the abnormality. The mother sternly reprimands him to not only never say that again, but also gets the message across that he should pretend that the handicap or deformity is not there. Of course, no one should have his nose rubbed in a handicap or deformity. But for the sake of truth, the boy should be able to freely acknowledge the deformity or handicap in his own mind, rather than pretend it is not there in a politically correct, Orwellian sense.
As we all know, children are less sophisticated than adults. It is because of this that they point out that which is very obvious in ways which are not "socially accpetable." Think about it, a lack of sophistication does not cause someone to say things that are false and thus cause great scorn to be directed at that person. Yes, ignorance goes hand-in-hand with a lack of sophistication, but how many people would want to beat someone senseless for ignorantly stating that the world is flat? No, a lack of sophistication causes people to state that which is very obviously true in social contexts and thus cause extreme anger to be directed at that person.
Think about that. A sterotypical unsophisticated "backwoods hick" that the jews portray as the epitome of a white nationalist says that blacks are less intelligent and are more violent on average comapred to whites. I suspect that almost everyone except the most eccentric academics knows or has suspected at one time or another that this is true. If said in certain situations, this unsophisticated individual would be the target of enormous anger. Why? Because he stated that which is very obviously true in a "socially unacceptable" way, namely, by saying it in public to lemmings.
I like to look at the less sophisticated people in our ranks and think of them as analagous to children who "impolitely" point out that which is so obviously true (which others have conditioned themselves not to see or to ignore). With this in mind, I do not feel as akward, and I mention this analogy to fence-sitters in order to divert stigma away from our cause.
Bookmarks