Page 1 of 9 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 89

Thread: Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,207
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    7 Posts

    Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

    A thought-provoking article... :frown: http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/wfpim.html


    Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

    By Simon Sheppard

    In this short article I wish to detail the phenomenon, which many nationalists and others will surely have noticed, of the female tendency to favour immigrant males. During my investigations into human behaviour, documented in my recently published book <CITE>The Tyranny of Ambiguity</CITE>, I surveyed this phenomenon, sitting at the side of a Dutch shopping mall with a clipboard. Its essentially female origin was confirmed and moreover, the trait appeared to be common to females of all ages and social classes. No doubt many individuals have advanced their own theories as to the origins of this behaviour but the reality is that the sources of it are complex: no single explanation suffices.

    Although the policy of the mass media is Malign Encouragement, encouraging an opponent to pursue an adverse policy (Table 1), this phenomenon cannot be the product of media influence alone. One technique is to promote artificial media role models (AMRM's; successful businesswomen, swaggering female police officers and the like) but to a large extent the media encourages detrimental traits and behaviours which already exist. I shall therefore list a number of elements which have been isolated, with the actual origins in each case being a mixture of one or more of these components.


    Malign Encouragement

    The following discussion derives from a new system of human behaviour analysis proposed by this author called Procedural Analysis (see Table 2). It is not claimed that all females prefer immigrant males, but that it is the female policy. Here we deal not with individuals but with male and female policies, according to whether the policy or procedure serves the furtherance of male or female genes. For example, the optimal male policy for the furtherance of his genes is to impregnate as many reproductive females as possible. The optimal female policy is to secure a single, long-term mate of exceptional fitness who will stay with her and provide for her while she rears children.

    A gesture, particularly of sexual one serving to attract a mate[/SIZE][/FONT]</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>The Accident Signal, which is a prompt for male aid, from a relationship and progeny may result</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>MARKER (M)</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>An unambiguous indication of involvement</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>Talking to someone; buying someone a drink; a female mending or ironing her mate's clothes. Primoridial marking is leaving scent</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>TOKEN (F)</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>When one thing means another</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>An invitation for a cup of coffee; traditionally, it is an invitation to share in the ritual of its preparation, and to talk</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>HANDLE (M)</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>A request which generates a fixed and predetermined response</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left>Calling someone's name. A state in which handles are issued (e.g. being married) is called a handle state.


    The male/female game is the game of opposites: the male instinct is to compete (maximizing fitness) while the female instinct is to conspire (raising the cost of sex, enforcing monogamy). Applying this simple yet powerful and most important of all, accurate model, the male instinct is to be racist (because it is males who fight to protect territory and to retain the racial integrity of the tribe), so therefore the female instinct is to be "anti-racist." Similarly the female instinct on seeing a mixed race couple is to smile approvingly while the true, deep male instinct is homicidal.

    In an environment where male influence is strong, females will conform to male expectations; but in a society where masculine influence is diminishing, race-mixing by females will become increasingly prevalent. This is plainly evident in areas where there is a high proportion of coloured immigrants. Those females who would not enter into this behaviour (and the majority would, given the opportunity and an environment that is amenable to it) are actually exhibiting a masculine characteristic. Ten Reasons Why Females Prefer Alien Males

    It is noteworthy that none of the following components are transient; they are not mere whims of fashion. The following list of origins was arrived upon:
    1. Malleability. Immigrant males are generally more responsive to signals and easier for females to manipulate. (Darwin: "It is generally admitted that with woman the powers of intuition, of rapid perception, and perhaps of imitation, are more strongly marked than in man; but some, at least, of these faculties are characteristic of the lower races, and therefore of a past and lower state of civilisation." <CITE>Descent of Man</CITE>, 2nd ed., p. 858.) Further, some immigrant males have been observed to deliberately play on their docility (e.g. Negroes making "baby eyes"), which the female finds appealing and to which she responds.
    2. Affection Beneath. The underlying mechanism by which caretaking instincts are inspired is Affection Beneath; it is obviously inappropriate to seek to protect something or someone that is more powerful than you. Females seek to monopolize Affection Beneath. The immigrant's reduced status (accounting in part for his malleability), which many whites deny but which is plainly apparent to him, is allied to Affection Beneath. All the obstacles which females place in the path of their own males, and they are many, can appear to magically disappear in the case of an immigrant male because of AB.
    3. First and Second Level Mental (also called Psychic) Assaults (see Table 3). The Second Level Mental Assault (SLMA) involves males of alien race, the First Level Mental Assault (FLMA) does not. The coloured male provides the female with the ability to Mental Assault at the most potent level, the SLMA. This is such a powerful weapon that the female cannot resist progressively exploiting it. Clearly there is a role for the FLMA in providing an impetus for sublimation, by which males redirect their sexual energy to the production of high art, science and the like, but the SLMA appears to have no redeeming features whatever. It might be suggested that by introducing foreign genes the female is furthering an evolutionary dynamic, and re-masculinizing the race, but this argument is invalidated by the Double Reinforcement of Female Characteristics (DRoFC): the notion that non-Occidental males naturally possess female characteristics. Even some Occidental males can express female characteristics (e.g. homosexual males, monogamous males).

      The SLMA is capable of arousing intense distaste in males, however subconsciously that sense has been submerged, and this is another method by which sex can be limited and its value raised. The female policy is to raise the costs of sex, the male instinct is to lower it. By the SLMA the male is confounded and rendered yet more susceptible to manipulation. It is one of many procedures which the female executes personally but with considerable benefit to females generally (the conspiracy policy). She derives satisfaction from following her instincts in this way and by further depriving her own males of sex she is collectively increasing female power and the control and influence they can exact. Females' explorations with immigrants, which may initially be for novelty, become a self-perpetuating cycle. After the period of novelty has passed, only immigrant males allow females the level of control and increased latitude to which they become accustomed. Put another way, the revulsion this and their other behaviour (deriving from their increased power, Item 1) arouses in their menfolk becomes such that only immigrants will put up with them.
    4. Release from neurosis. The female finds the immigrant's less neurotic nature attractive because it satisfies her longing for a release from neurosis. (Neurosis is defined in this system as the condition which arises when one stimulus evokes two or more responses, and is obviously associated with the production of high art, science and the like.) It is comparable to one of the reasons for the female affinity for animals, the clarity and unambiguity of their signals.
    5. Maintenance of heterogeneity; IoR. Another likely factor is that a female taking an immigrant male is a short cut to IoR (the Indulgence of Romance, a mechanism evolved by females to raise the costs of sex and promote long-term bonding; for IoR to be invoked some intangible 'specialness' must be achieved). In ancient times females would have had much less control over their choice of partner, many having been promised to a male since childhood under an arrangement (even a tacit one) with her family. In these circumstances it was incumbent on the female to introduce different genes to prevent excessive inbreeding, say within the confines of a village or small town.

      A male from a remote area would seem foreign and attractive to her and would also, having navigated a considerable distance on foot, or possessing a horse, be likely to be exceptional, an alpha-male. Such a union would be evolutionarily advantageous for her, and considerable effort might be required to extricate herself from her existing commitments. She may also be in competition with other females of her settlement having the same objective. The male in these circumstances, although perceived as foreign, might only have travelled a few dozen miles and would be of the same basic stock as she. Now, however, females apply these instincts to males who come not from scores of miles away but thousands, and are of completely alien stock. One report, which is unverified, is of Celtic women dancing naked on a hilltop while their menfolk battled a challenging tribe below. Whatever the outcome, the women could be confident of being ravished by the victors. For the female, two males fighting for her might be the ultimate in IoR.
    6. Guilt. It has been stated that atonement is necessary for former colonial sins. This is a pretext, a decades-old guilt-trip and an application of Proposition 8 of PA, that the female will use any argument, however ridiculous, if it suits her purpose. If there is female guilt requiring absolution its origins are likely to be rather more obvious. At best this argument is an application of another female characteristic, the Inability to Egress (e.g. avoiding resolution, a hatred of ultimata; it facilitates the acquisition of the best possible mate). It is also an attempt to judge these supposed former sins, which took place amid a background of barbarity, by modern standards.
    7. It is an expression of Vicarious Generosity. Giving away, often enthusiastically, something which is not one's to give. Everything the female is for, biologically, is given away. By corrupting her blood-line, hundreds of thousands of years of genetic lineage is destroyed.
    8. It constitutes a Challenge. This is a blatant form of the Challenge Signal. Challenges demand a response, and can be a subconscious appeal for subjugation. Proposition 2 of PA states that the status of the female is proportional to the status of the male she can attract.
    9. It weakens and distributes a marker. The marker is the involvement of belonging to the same folk. Females prefer signals and tokens, because they are ambiguous and therefore manipulative, while males favour markers and handles because they are unambiguous and often involve the wealth that he creates.
    10. It weakens a prospective handle. The handle is the expectation of pairing with a member of the same folk.


      Table 3. Formal definition of the Mental (or Psychic) Assault
    11. The Mental Assault is a political manoeuvre. The female manipulates the male into a position where she could have sex but refrains from doing so.
    12. She maintains and perpetuates the male in a state of arousal or false expectation.
    13. She scores points to bolster and satisfy her ego.
    14. She evokes images of granting sexual favours to another (the more perverse her selection, for these purposes, the better) but grants them to the male or males in her audience either rarely or never.
    15. She quits from a male suddenly or prematurely, because she prefers to Assault rather than engage in a proper relationship.
    16. She grants and withdraws sexual favours to a male with whom she is involved in a relationship without logic or reason.
    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


    There may be an unresolved issue as to why women appear more willing to be submissive to an immigrant than would be the case in a relationship with a white man. This may be accountable by reference to Item 6, combined with a psychologist's observation that females express guilt concerning their behaviour towards other females, children and animals but never in respect of their actions towards males (also bearing in mind DRoFC).


    Male Instincts Regarding Mixed Race Couples

    Examining (as always) the situation in evolutionary terms, for the male on the individual level, a female he supported who bore a visibly different child would likely be ejected from the cave or dwelling, if not from the entire tribe, and thereafter she would be left to fend for herself. (Protecting herself from such an eventuality is a likely origin of Vicarious Generosity.) The male might even have been supporting older members of her family and he would feel entirely justified in giving short shrift to a wife who gave her favours to another.

    On the collective level, millions of males have suffered brutal deaths in battles fought to preserve differences; all those who had been left to perish at the scene of some bloody battle, after receiving a sword in the stomach or a grievous wound with a blunter weapon. After such costs have been incurred by his forebears the sight of one of the females of his tribe making herself available to a male of a strange and different one is an affront. For a white male and an alien female there is a slightly different situation. Firstly, there is Affection Beneath to consider, and this is the reason why this circumstance is less abhorrent to the instincts than the opposite case. Nonetheless such a union is a feminine expression of DSoD ("Dee-sod"; see Table 4) and its prevalence, which is much less common than white females with alien males, evidence of feminization in any event.


    The Dishonest Female Submersion of Large Differences

    It is important to appreciate that females are not naïve in sexual matters and particularly in the matter of sexual selection. Sexual selection is absolutely essential to her being. Many behaviours which are learnt (i.e. acquired) in the male are inherent in the female; this explains the many and varied sexual aberrations in males, such as fetishes. The female is regularly reminded, by menstruation, of her reproductive function.

    While the male excels at manipulating things, the female imitates him. To the female, relationships are sex and it is her natural domain, so males will often imitate the female. (This and a male need to express Affection Beneath largely accounts for white male/immigrant female couples such as men with mail-order wives.) Although the immigrant is a successful invader, he is evidently not so by his masculine prowess and females who choose a mate of alien race know precisely the extent of their betrayal. This accounts for the often extreme reaction they give when criticism is implied. A female taking such a partner is the sexual-political equivalent of the nuclear bomb (cf. the etymology of bikini).<SUP>2</SUP> Females and the Laws of Nature

    When male animals fight, they usually fight for territory. They may fight virtually, and only posture and threaten, but it is still a struggle for dominance. The loser retreats, surrendering his claim on the territory. The point is that in nature, females come with the territory. A male that dominates a territory also dominates, controls and mates with the females within it. In human society, the fact that females have language and intelligence only enables them to employ specious arguments to justify their actions, as in the case of the alien takeover of our territory.

    Being humans, we are capable of acting against our instincts, but following our natural drives is our "default mode." To defy them requires effort, which we will prefer to avoid. Happiness generally results from following our instincts, almost by definition, and the pursuit of happiness must certainly be the leading human activity.

    It gives me no satisfaction to say this, but there is not much wrong with females that controlled, restrained physical force would not correct. The female has evolved numerous mechanisms to compensate for her physical weakness relative to the male. If the male is denied the ability to respond with force (or at least, the tangible threat of force) he is at a disadvantage and simply cannot counter females' natural manipulative skill or, more apposite to this discussion, retaliate for the supreme insult he is delivered. Thus we have the situation where a white female can flaunt her relationship with a Negro or other immigrant male in a public or semi-public place (such as a pub or bar) with the male prohibited by law from responding. The institutionalised favouring of immigrants, and legal protection of females from a natural masculine response to their excesses, is indicative of the Super Feminine State or, as it may otherwise be known, 'Big Sister.'

    If their behaviour is unlimited, females are capable of firstly, making their own males into an underclass, for example by their wholesale preference for alien males, as can readily be observed in areas with high immigrant populations. Secondly, they are capable of taking their race to the brink of, if not beyond, extinction. These are critical flaws for which accommodation cannot be countenanced. Woman is the human reproductive animal, and all her instincts are concerned with raising the costs of sex, securing a mate and child-rearing. Giving her power to apply these instincts to wider society is not appropriate. The sexual behaviours of women, and Vicarious Generosity, point to a feminine source of the original problem of mass coloured immigration.


    1. Note on definitions: In this system a policy is defined as a set of procedures; a procedure will be capable of being expressed mathematically. Use of the term strategy is problematic because in mathematical game theory a strategy is defined as a complete specification of what an individual will do in any situation, which for humans is generally unattainable. The Protagonist in game theory is the player who starts the game. 2. The bikini was so named because its effect on males was compared to the effect of the nuclear bombs being tested at the time at Bikini Atoll.

    First published in the November 2002 edition of <CITE>Spearhead</CITE> magazine under the title ‘Why many white women prefer non-white males.’ This title is slightly incorrect however, since the phenomenon has been reported to occur elsewhere, for example in Japan.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 @ 04:34 AM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Gender
    Posts
    2,606
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    I skimmed through it. It sounds interesting, and I'll be sure to read all of it later.

  3. #3
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,207
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
    I skimmed through it. It sounds interesting, and I'll be sure to read all of it later.
    Consider this vital teaching, my promising young apprentice. :

  4. #4
    Senior Member Istaevones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Saturday, May 21st, 2011 @ 07:59 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    55
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    There are a lot of good observations here, many of which require a kind of brutal honesty on our parts. This is why the argument for the main thesis might sound quite plausible and even convincing. On the other hand, there are tons of leaps of logic and suspect assumptions which much of his evidence rests upon. The whole article strikes as implicit hostility of white males towards their female counterparts and serves as an elaborate justification for it. It's misdirected anger originating in a frustrating and confusing situation.

    This is a seductive little screed for white racist males but it is not wisdom. This is not empowering knowledge but just more self-destructive paranoia and passive-aggression. It unequivocally encourages distrust between the sexes and thus serves to undermine our confidence in ourselves as individuals and as a people. Be wary: our greatest enemy is ourselves.

  5. #5
    Account Inactive perkele14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, September 28th, 2008 @ 03:16 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Location
    Suomi, Finland
    Gender
    Posts
    527
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Istaevones
    This is a seductive little screed for white racist males but it is not wisdom. This is not empowering knowledge but just more self-destructive paranoia and passive-aggression.
    I´m sure the most of us are anyhow safe from getting brainwashed by the article in particular

    Quote Originally Posted by Istaevones
    It unequivocally encourages distrust between the sexes and thus serves to undermine our confidence in ourselves as individuals and as a people.
    I don´t trust miscegenationists to begin with anyways...

    Quote Originally Posted by Istaevones
    Be wary: our greatest enemy is ourselves.
    Indeed.
    And if we´re supposed to fix something we need to know what´s broken.

  6. #6
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 08:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,152
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    "... the male instinct is to be racist (because it is males who fight to protect territory and to retain the racial integrity of the tribe), so therefore the female instinct is to be "anti-racist." Similarly the female instinct on seeing a mixed race couple is to smile approvingly while the true, deep male instinct is homicidal.
    In an environment where male influence is strong, females will conform to male expectations; but in a society where masculine influence is diminishing, race-mixing by females will become increasingly prevalent."

    From my experiences I would say that this is the tendency in our current environment. It's not absolute, as in my own family my mother's female lineage is the most racist. None of them attained my level of racism of course. Not many do! I have even been called extreme by other racists!

    I have witnessed the most anti-racist and pro-miscegenist behavior from white females. From white females who only date blacks, who openly and smugly condemn white males as inferior, enjoying in the belittlement of white men while exhalting black men, and even a few here or there that only date Asian men believe it or not. While there are plenty of white men that race mix too, I have not seen this same mentality of scorn for white women, at least not at the same level and certainly not as young. Usually it takes men in their 30s or 40s to dislike women after going through bad divorces and such. I've seen plenty of white females in their teens and twenties who already hate white males. It is quite popular these days to hate white men, we are the number one target, while white women are lumped in with "minorities" and those who are oppressed. This is all calculated and you can thank Jews for this pathologization.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 24th, 2009 @ 04:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    american
    Subrace
    nordish
    Location
    near njörd eriksson
    Gender
    Occupation
    full-time parent/exemplar
    Politics
    reality > reason > rights
    Religion
    no beliefs - knowledge
    Posts
    864
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    they follow your lead.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordhammer
    ...white females who only date blacks,
    who openly and smugly condemn white males as inferior...
    which attributes could the females be comparing?
    he has a darker tan?
    he exceeds me at basketball?

    how many rich black phd's can there be?

    if you manifest your genetic potential,
    only neurotic women will miscegenate.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordhammer
    I've seen plenty of white females in their teens and twenties
    who already hate white males.
    i know it is not true in every case,
    but, in my experience,
    when white girls hate white guys
    - it is because of the abuse they have received.

    it is not terribly foresightful
    to drive our companions
    in to the arms of our enemies.

    raise your sons better!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Istaevones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Saturday, May 21st, 2011 @ 07:59 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    55
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by perkele14
    Indeed.
    And if we´re supposed to fix something we need to know what´s broken.
    namely women. eyes:

    The bottom line is that this article proposes that:
    a) white women are to blame for the racial tragedy
    b) that this is a good reason to subjugate them

    This is undisguised misogyny. If you can't see that then you are broken.

    There is a strong undercurrent of misogyny in racist nationalism that its proponents aren't owning up to. What's worse is that those with the intellectual honesty to at least privately acknowledge this do not recognize it as a problem.

    There is something very ugly about this ideology and unfortunately almost everyone can see that except for us.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 @ 04:34 AM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Gender
    Posts
    2,606
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Istaevones
    The bottom line is that this article proposes that:
    a) white women are to blame for the racial tragedy
    b) that this is a good reason to subjugate them

    This is undisguised misogyny. If you can't see that then you are broken.
    It is somewhat misogynistic; in my short experience, women do act in those manners though. I have not heard them so methodically quantified in such a way though; perhaps "political correctness".

    I once knew a girl who talked to Negroes simply to spite me. There is also, then, the fact that women are more likely to miscegenate than men. I didn't see the article as being unnecessarily chauvinistic, atleast in the manner that a realist is typically both "racist" and "misogynist" when confronted by the facts.

  10. #10
    New Member Katyusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, February 7th, 2006 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Istaevones
    The whole article strikes as implicit hostility of white males towards their female counterparts and serves as an elaborate justification for it. It's misdirected anger originating in a frustrating and confusing situation.
    Yes, thankyou, I agree with everything you said . As for Sheppard, uh, well. I was told he was "obsessed with gay sex and cannibals" (not sure what that's all about), and there was a story about him being arrested for pestering prostitues. Apparently "someone" (i.e. Sheppard) in a raincoat with a clipboard was asking them for sex... hey, maybe he was doing the 'research' for articles like this one?

    ...and he couldn't even get it from a prostitue, no wonder he hates women so much, and spends so much time writing stuff like this (he's written a lot of other articles on similar lines). including one where he reaches the 'scientific' conclusion that women must be controlled for the good of society. actually I'm sure some of you will agree with that one? lol. But even if some few things might be true, I just can't take anything this guy writes seriously. (and I never will agree with his style )

Page 1 of 9 123456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why Do Females Seem More Blond Than Males?
    By fareast in forum Nordid
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: Saturday, December 15th, 2018, 02:35 AM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: Friday, August 6th, 2010, 07:35 AM
  3. Why are thin males/females most popular?
    By Gagnraad in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006, 03:46 AM
  4. Why females prefer immigrant men
    By Euclides in forum Men, Women, & Relationships
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Friday, October 24th, 2003, 11:17 AM
  5. 10 Reasons Why Females Prefer Alien Males
    By Euclides in forum Men, Women, & Relationships
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Saturday, October 11th, 2003, 10:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •