Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Israel's demographic timebomb

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post Israel's demographic timebomb

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/com...122746,00.html

    Israel's demographic timebomb

    Jews risk becoming a minority in their own land. They should face up to this unpalatable truth

    Jonathan Spyer
    Wednesday January 14, 2004
    The Guardian

    Israeli right-of-centre politics is today turned in on itself. The reason for this derives from the prominence in recent weeks given to proposals for unilateral disengagement by Israel from the Gaza Strip and the greater part of the West Bank, in the event of the continuation of the current deadlock between the sides.
    The Likud party's raison d'être, since its formation in 1973, has been the rejection of any territorial compromise in the West Bank, an area it considered crucial strategically, and which is saturated with sites and symbols of Jewish historical, cultural and religious importance.

    In order to grasp what is happening in Likud, it is important to understand that the party has always rested on two not necessarily compatible foundations. The first is a disenchanted political realism, an acceptance that Zionism would need to re-establish itself in Israel in the face of violent Arab opposition to its claim, and a consequent viewing of the world and the conflict in stark, zero-sum terms. The second is a romantic nationalism, and a sentimental, historical attachment to the land.

    The combination of these factors makes for a heady cocktail. While Israel in 2004 is no longer a country of rigid ideologies, a version of these concepts may be said to form the bedrock view of a majority of Israeli Jewish voters. However, for important figures in Likud, the combination can no longer be sustained.

    They consider that the maintenance of the strong Jewish state structure with its western and liberal democratic system - the creation of which was always for rightwing Zionism a primary goal - may now be endangered by the insistence on maintaining national heritage in the desired dimensions.

    This consideration derives not from any external Arab military threat, nor from international condemnation of Israeli policies, which tends to provoke only contempt. The factor that is leading figures such as trade and industry minister Ehud Olmert towards support for unilateral withdrawal is that of demography.

    As he himself expresses it: "It's only a matter of time before the Palestinians demand 'one man, one vote' - and then, what will we do?" This scenario would emerge if, in the absence of a coherent border, the Palestinian Arabs were to achieve a decisive majority of the population between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean. This would enable them to frame their struggle as one for the rights of a majority population, rather than for one side in a bitter ethno-national dispute - and it could spell disaster for the Jews of Israel.

    A number of counter-positions to Olmert's have sprung up on the right. At the extremes, there are the advocates of a policy of expulsion of the Palestinian population, but these find little support outside the lunatic fringe.

    Within Likud, senior figures are pioneering the opposition to unilateralism. Most articulate among them is former defence minister Moshe Arens, who argues that since Israel's final borders have not yet been set, demographics is a non-issue. The majority of the Palestinian Arab people within the area under Israeli control are not, and will not become, Israeli citizens. The key issue in this dispute, of course, is the position of Ariel Sharon. The prime minister has rejected Olmert's demographic concerns, in tones similar to those used by Arens. Nevertheless, Sharon has also outlined his own plan for "disengagement" from the Palestinians, along lines similar to those advocated by Olmert, and the indications are growing that he is serious about it.

    Recently Olmert, considered the Israeli politician closest to Sharon, announced that the clock is counting down to the start of unilateral moves. If Sharon truly means to move forward, it is hard to see what considerations other than the demographic can be underlying the stark change in his thinking.

    Undoubtedly, progress within the framework of the road map would be preferable from Israel's point of view. A unilateral arrangement can offer no long-term solution to Israel's conflict with the Palestinians and the broader Arab world. At the same time, the urgency of the hour demands action.

    There are growing voices on the Palestinian side calling for the abandonment of the two-state solution and the adoption of a strategy of demanding a single state, based on an imminent Arab majority, between the river and the sea. Given the stated lack of will of the Palestinian administration to confront terror organisations, progress on the road map is unlikely.

    To rule out the possibility of an imposed, unilateral arrangement would effectively make the future of Israel hostage to the Palestinian Authority. This is something a Likud government is unlikely to be willing to do.

    As such, unilateral disengagement will and should remain an option for Israel, should it become clear that the Palestinian national movement has decisively and finally abandoned the path of partition.

    · Jonathan Spyer is a former adviser on international relations to Ariel Sharon's government; he is currently a research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Centre, Herzliya, Israel

  2. #2
    Senior Member Demigorgona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Tuesday, October 26th, 2004 @ 05:34 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Location
    canada
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Politics
    Creator
    Posts
    413
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Re: Israel's demographic timebomb

    I seriously hope the arabs breed them out. I wonder what they think of multiculturalism in Israel. Or how about the death other their race and culture? It's about time they were given their own medicine.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Vetinari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, June 15th, 2012 @ 04:40 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Religion
    Lovecraftian
    Posts
    244
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Re: Israel's demographic timebomb

    Quote Originally Posted by Demigorgona
    I seriously hope the arabs breed them out. I wonder what they think of multiculturalism in Israel. Or how about the death other their race and culture? It's about time they were given their own medicine.
    If the arabs don't outbreed them then the blacks will:

    Israel to take all Ethiopian Jews

    The Israeli Government are to speed up the moving of the remaining 18,000 Ethiopian Jews to the Middle East.

    However, the emigration of the Falasha Mura community would not start next week as had earlier been reported, says Israel's foreign ministry.

    Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom admitted at the end of a two-day Ethiopia visit, that the issue was a complex one.

    The Falasha Mura are the last remaining Jewish community in Ethiopia and have long been persecuted for their beliefs.

    The last mass emigration of Ethiopian Jews to Israel was in 1991.

    There are around 80,000 Ethiopian Jews living in Israel, many of them airlifted there during times of crisis.

    Ethiopian Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin, speaking alongside Mr Shalom, said a mass migration was not needed as Ethiopians were free to travel wherever they wished.

    "The Ethiopian Government has no objection for the Ethiopian Jews to travel to Israel," he said, but added that "in today's Ethiopia, there is no need for an organised intervention as in the 1980s and 1990s".

    Mr Shalom visited the northern Gondar region on Wednesday to meet members of the Falasha Mura, many of whom were forced to convert to Christianity.

    Israel organised the airlifting of 20,000 Ethiopian Jews to Israel in 1984 and another 15,000 members of the community in 1991.

    Many were resettled on the volatile West Bank and have suffered from discrimination and high unemployment.

    Some Falasha Mura say the Israeli Government has prevented their relatives from joining them.

    The authenticity of their Jewishness has also been challenged by religious figures.

    The Israeli Government announced last year that 20,000 more Ethiopian Jews could come to Israel under the country's law of return which says that Jews anywhere in the world have the right to Israeli citizenship.

    But Ethiopia blocked the move, arguing that a migration en masse was unnecessary when Ethiopians were free to leave the country.


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3377897.stm

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, January 5th, 2018, 08:29 PM
  2. A sobering look at US demographic projections
    By Lenny in forum The United States
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: Friday, August 22nd, 2008, 07:59 PM
  3. Return of the Population Timebomb
    By Schmetterling in forum General Anthropology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Thursday, May 8th, 2008, 06:00 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •