Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: Danes’ Growing Hostility To Mixed-Race Couples

  1. #11
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    24
    Thanked in
    24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Balder
    The slight problem is that the new laws also lead to difficulties for people who would let's say like to marry a Dutchman or a Canadian. I don't think people under 24 need to marry either. It's quite rare that such young people marry, except for some worker class neighbourhoods in Northern Europe.
    It is of no real difficulty for Nords of different ethnicities to marry each other, as the great majority of the cases that this law prevents are miscegenation. However this is only the beginning and in no way is going to save Denmark, much more has to be done. They should completely outlaw marriage with nonEuropeans altogether, as well as nonEuropean immigration.

  2. #12
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    24
    Thanked in
    24 Posts
    Anyone notice in all of these cases it's a female Dane that's married to a foreigner and working against the people and culture of Denmark? Certainly it's not exclusively females, but either this article does it on purpose to use women as a weapon against their people, or more women are engaging in miscegenation and betraying their families, race, and nation.

    I think if people want to miscegenate they should be allowed to leave. Such as the Amish do in America, they give their people a year to travel abroad and decide if they want to stay Amish and live in the community or leave and live in the outside world... if they leave, they can never return. It preserves the race and the culture, not a bad idea at all. Now, I don't think the nation should operate in such a strict manner, people should be allowed to travel and experience other cultures, but as a rule of immigration and miscegenation, there should be laws in place to prevent it. No nonEuropeans are allowed permanent residence nor citizenship (at least not first class), and miscegenation and interracial marriage are illegal. Our world has become a dangerous world, one that is global now, and threatens the continued existence of our people. Stronger measures must be taken to insure our integrity and way of life.

    So let them leave, it won't be so bad for the nation, to allow willful miscegenators and traitors to breed themselves out of the genepool. Although it is a sad case for the families involved. Daddy's little girl, who he raised from a innocent child, is now a perverse, miscegenous slt that only cares for her foreign lover. What a tragedy.

  3. #13
    Arkona
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordhammer
    However this is only the beginning and in no way is going to save Denmark, much more has to be done. They should completely outlaw marriage with nonEuropeans altogether, as well as nonEuropean immigration.
    That's racist and violates basic rights and freedoms of a human.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    cosmocreator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 18th, 2007 @ 06:36 PM
    Subrace
    Other
    Gender
    Age
    56
    Politics
    Living in the real world
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Simeon
    That's racist and violates basic rights and freedoms of a human.

    Something wrong with being racist?
    .

    IHR Revisionist Conference, April 24, 2004, internet broadcast:

    http://www.internationalrevisionistconference.c om/

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to cosmocreator For This Useful Post:


  6. #15

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    cosmocreator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 18th, 2007 @ 06:36 PM
    Subrace
    Other
    Gender
    Age
    56
    Politics
    Living in the real world
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern_Paladin
    Who determines these rights? Isn't it better that some individual rights be violated for the welfare of the race. Than the rights of the race be violated for the individual.

    You can continue this discussion here:

    http://www.forums.skadi.net/showthre...=8254#post8254
    .

    IHR Revisionist Conference, April 24, 2004, internet broadcast:

    http://www.internationalrevisionistconference.c om/

  8. #17
    Account Disabled on Request

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Friday, January 8th, 2010 @ 08:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Subrace
    Alpinid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Lappland Lappland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    3,286
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    22 Posts
    Why does there need to be laws against it if it is unnatural, strange, etc..?

  9. #18
    Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Monday, January 15th, 2007 @ 06:57 AM
    Posts
    48
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by More Nerdish than Nordish
    Why does there need to be laws against it if it is unnatural, strange, etc..?
    The issue, perhaps, is not whether it is subjectively unnatural or strange - although one could point out that opportunities for mixed-marriages are unnatural, since one wouldn't (for example) find an Arab living in Denmark or Sweden, except as a result of governmental social engineering policies. But in any case, at issue is the nature of the objective consequences of mixed marriages. Mixed marriages, which presumably seem subjectively desirable to the parties on the micro-level, have the objective macro-consequence (when carried out on a large scale) of changing the gene pool of population. If the majority of the population place a priority on their collective genetic preservation, then they would necessarily have to legally proscribe marriages by individuals that could be detrimental to that preservation, regardless of the personal preferences of the individuals affected.

    Of course the underlying issue here is what sort of rationale exists that can justify the majority's forcing (through government action) the minority to comply with majority preferences. Obviously, a liberal minority rights approach is not compatible with laws proscribing mixed marriages, but a majoritarian approach is compatible, depending on the sentiments of the majority.

  10. #19
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,132
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    24
    Thanked in
    24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by More Nerdish than Nordish
    Why does there need to be laws against it if it is unnatural, strange, etc..?
    Because it is akin to murder, something which destroys thousands of years of heritage just for someone's irrational and perserve lust for a foreigner. And overtime it is a corrupting force which will destroy the nation's unity, traditions, culture, and racial makeup.

    Statements like this and your one at Skadi "I personally don't care if 2 people of different races want to have sex - its not my business", have me wondering about your sense of racialism and care for the nation. This type of apathy is counterproductive, not only to the nation and your friends, but also to your own family.

  11. #20
    Arkona
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordhammer
    Because it is akin to murder, something which destroys thousands of years of heritage just for someone's irrational and perserve lust for a foreigner.
    Of what heritage? Sounds like that you think that your heritage was preserved intentially, while it was preserved purely because of geography.

    Statements like this and your one at Skadi "I personally don't care if 2 people of different races want to have sex - its not my business", have me wondering about your sense of racialism and care for the nation. This type of apathy is counterproductive, not only to the nation and your friends, but also to your own family.
    Your attitude is the reason why a lot of people support promotion of "multi-culturalism". No man - no problem.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. "Forbiden Love": Mixed-Race Couples in Early America
    By Nachtengel in forum The United States
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Friday, March 13th, 2009, 09:17 PM
  2. Why the human race is growing apart
    By Ćmeric in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Thursday, February 21st, 2008, 08:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •