Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Dr. Brandt on National Socialism and Post-WWII Germany

  1. #1
    Account Inactive friedrich braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, November 3rd, 2008 @ 03:04 AM
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Gender
    Age
    49
    Politics
    Eugenics
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,089
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Cool Dr. Brandt on National Socialism and Post-WWII Germany

    Dr. Brandt on German National Socialism and post-world war II Germany (taken from The Phora).

    You are so full of it, you liar!

    You say that the parties are elected. Tell me ass-face, when were the first elections held? And furthermore, tell me, where did the parties come from?

    In 1948 the Allies established a "parliamentary Council" (Just like the "provisional authority in Iraq today). They set up a "parliament" based upon the elections of 1932 - excluding of course - All Nationalist Parties (NSDAP, DNVP, Stahlhelm etc. etc.) With this phony rump parliament, which excluded almost 60% of German voters of 1932, they then ran their phony parliament. And of course - only people were allowed to vote in the coming "elections", that were not members of the NSDAP or any of it's sub-organizations, or were involved in any other patriotic organization. At the same time millions of German soldiers were still being held in camps to rot and starve away or were sent off to slave-labour camps all over Europe. The riff-raff, which crawled out of the camps and the imported immigrants, which fought the War on the other side, were then placed at the top. They then banned every single Newspaper and founded new ones, which they edited themselves. (Fweedom of Press). Of course Germans couldn't publish anything, without getting a license from the military authorities, which obliged them to stay within a strict frame of political correctness or they would lose their license again.
    The "Parliamentary Commission" then was given the task to write a constitution. General Clay then approved this “constitution” with his signature and NOT through a plebiscite of the German people or their representatives.

    As for the soviet-Sector: They had just as many parties as in the west. Exact copies actually. CDU, FDP etc. They were called "block-parties" because they just sang to the tune the soviets played, like the rest of the "DDR-Regime". In the West it is no different at all! Watch what happens if any politician would make the suggestion of leaving NATO. LOL - he'd be politically dead over night!

    As for Nationalism not being popular: What do you shit-tanned mutt knows about my country? Nothing - so shut your ugly ape-trap!
    In the 1950ys the "Socialist Reichs-Party" was outlawed. It managed to get over 35% in north Germany and its popularity was spreading fast. In the 1960ys the NPD managed to get into the Bundestag. What did the Kosher-Nostra of the establishment do? It declared the entire elections for "dubious" and found some "irregularities" and then simply repeated the elections and - oh wonder - the NPD didn’t make it into parliament again.

    So yes - the BRD can very well be compared to the Stalinist puppet-state.

    A constitution, written by enemy occupants. Parties that were installed by enemy troops. Newspapers and publishing companies that were set up by enemy intelligence officers. Laws that forbid critique on enemy-troops or "incitement of hate against them". The destruction and dismemberment of the state of Prussia through allied decree. The whole range of Judeo-American DeMOCKracy. I know you consider this "Freedom" - we certainly don't!


    [/quote]Your belief system is loathed, almost universally. [/QUOTE]

    By Jews, Nigger-Mongrels and other trash. Sure is not a criterion for real human beings.

  2. #2
    Account Inactive friedrich braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, November 3rd, 2008 @ 03:04 AM
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Gender
    Age
    49
    Politics
    Eugenics
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,089
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post

    I love, I love, I love Dr. Brandt's Teutonic fury!

    He's the prototype of the ideal German.

    I love such real, red-blooded Germans, until Germany still possess people like that, maybe everything isn't lost...yet.

    God, if only all Germans were like that! *Sigh*

  3. #3
    Senior Member Ederico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 4th, 2007 @ 10:37 PM
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,269
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Wink

    I didn't read it all, I have a bunch of pages open and I am busy reading some IT stuff. Just a little comment:

    Your belief system is loathed, almost universally.
    By Jews, Nigger-Mongrels and other trash. Sure is not a criterion for real human beings.
    That part is great, and I think I know who the quoted person is, STD by any chance? (And I am not referring to Sexually Transmitted Diseases, though the guy in question could be one, lol)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 25th, 2007 @ 10:29 AM
    Subrace
    nordiſch-weſtiſch
    Location
    Deutſchland
    Gender
    Family
    Single
    Politics
    Volk und Raſſe
    Posts
    1,628
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Post

    I had the same suggestion. Doc Brandt is a masterly performer when "taking care" of that swollen-headed maniac Negro.
    Man ſei Held oder Heiliger. In der Mitte liegt nicht die Weisheit, ſondern die Alltäglichkeit.

    SPENGLER

  5. #5
    Account Inactive friedrich braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, November 3rd, 2008 @ 03:04 AM
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Gender
    Age
    49
    Politics
    Eugenics
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,089
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Edric
    I didn't read it all, I have a bunch of pages open and I am busy reading some IT stuff. Just a little comment:



    That part is great, and I think I know who the quoted person is, STD by any chance? (And I am not referring to Sexually Transmitted Diseases, though the guy in question could be one, lol)
    That's the loathsome fellow.

Similar Threads

  1. Chauvinism, National-Socialism or Racial-Socialism?
    By Lusitano in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, May 4th, 2006, 06:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •