Page 1 of 11 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 105

Thread: On Australia's Future: Was Hitler Right?

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Freethinker
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Thorburn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 05:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Subrace
    Europid
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    Midgård
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Reason, Freedom, Justice
    Religion
    Truth, Greatness, Beauty
    Posts
    1,318
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    130
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    274
    Thanked in
    86 Posts

    Re: On Australia's future

    Quote Originally Posted by Bridie
    Hi all!

    Still just sorting some things out in my head.

    I am wondering how many people here agree with this statement of Hitler's....


    .... quote taken from : http://www.angelfire.com/planet/panca/nutzi_strange.htm
    (and I thank Furius for that link in his sig! )

    Also, I've heard it said before on this site that Europe should be the racially pure, core area.... well, what would those who believe this have become of former colonies like Australia and New Zealand? It doesn't matter if we perish?

    TIA.
    You know, Bridie, I wonder why it would matter at all to an Australian living in the 21st century what Hitler said in his last days about Australia.

    Naturally, Anglo-Saxon affairs and even more so the affairs of a small predominantly Anglo-Saxon offshot on the other side of the planet were only of peripheral concern to him; in particular during a time where hundreds of millions of people in Europe fell under the joke of Stalinism, with Australians being one of the allies of Uncle Joe.

    Hitler was an important representative of German National-Socialism in the 30s and early 40s of the former century. Quite a few of his statements in the last years of his life reflect also bitterness. His perspective was pro-Germanly biased (like the perspective of a nation's good leader should be). He was not God. He was not infallible. He has no patent on Germanic preservation and even less so racialism and nationalism in other countries. Times are changing. Consciousness develops and grows.

    He might, judged from a more objective perspective 60 years later, have been simply wrong in this question. Sue him.

    Australians are a pretty awesome people and no pseudo-intellectual talk about convict ancestors is gonna change that. Inherited characteristics of a populace regress to the mean anyway. Australia's prison population rate is lower than the European average.
    This is a placeholder for a signature.

  3. #3

  4. #4

    Re: On Australia's future: Was Hitler right?

    You know, Bridie, I wonder why it would matter at all to an Australian living in the 21st century what Hitler said in his last days about Australia.
    I doubt that to many (if any) other Australians it would matter. The only reason that it concerns me at this time is that I've recently become aware of just how little some Europeans seem to think of Australia and her people, and how limited some common views are. I knew we were isolated from the rest of the developed world, but it never really occured to me that we are so alone in it. Does that make any sense at all?

    The Brits abandoned us in the 2nd world war, the Germans were against us.... the US supported us, but is now in the clutches of multiculturalism/multiracialism to the point of no return, I can't help but think. The Japs (perhaps Australia's biggest threat and enemy ever) seems to be every NS's best buddies.....

    By asking this question I'm attempting to gauge whether or not as an Australian I'm wasting my time supporting a cause that does not support me and my people.


    He was not God. He was not infallible. He has no patent on Germanic preservation and even less so racialism and nationalism in other countries. Times are changing. Consciousness develops and grows.
    I'm glad you acknowledge that Thorburn.... but I wonder how many here would agree with you. You don't seem a typical Germanic preservationist (as an advocate for liberalism (??), among other things) to say the least, so I'm wondering how representative your views could be?


    He might, judged from a more objective perspective 60 years later, have been simply wrong in this question. Sue him.
    Of course, I couldn't care less whether he was right or wrong. I only care here what other Germanic preservationists think. And sue him? Not getting narkie are ya Thorburn?



    It has been said that the convict origins thing about Australia makes Australians suspicious of authority.
    I think that's true. Probably why so many Aussies think that communism is a great idea. Oftentimes Aussies are very critical and distrusting of hierarchies.


    if you lined up British troops next to American troops next to Australian troops, you could look at them and tell which was which even if naked. He said the Brits were skinny and small. The Americans were bigger than the Brits but the Australians were the biggest, tall and muscular and had many blonds. He always refered to "big Australians" when talking about Australians.
    Its strange isn't it Dr SW? I've heard this too. My Aunt reckons its because we have so much space here that we feel free to grow so big! rofl (I hope she was only joking when she said that! ) Maybe its our relatively very active, outdoorsy lifestyle? But then again, maybe its just rubbish - it doesn't make any sense to me, since gentically, we're basically all Anglo-Celts.


    Australians I have met as a whole are better than average people. So, I want Australians to multiply and fill the continent themselves.
    What a huge compliment. I want us to fill up our continent ourselves too.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Patrioten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Online
    3 Weeks Ago @ 11:44 PM
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    Gender
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Protestant
    Posts
    1,919
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Sv: On Australia's future: Was Hitler right?

    I think your worries are unfounded. There is always going to be people here who hate every person outside of their neighborhood with passion, it is not represetative for the majority here and certainly such people shouldn't keep you from visiting this forum. All people that belongs to the indigenous Europid subraces is equally worth preserving, whether they live in America, Australia, South Africa or in some small comunities in South America. Every drop of our blood is precious and i would very much like to see a new order in those places as well, ensuring sub racial and cultural preservation.


    If you feel that you need more support to stay here on Skadi, just say so and i think people here can fill this thread up pretty fast , would be a shame if you disappeared without a damn good reason .

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Furius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Monday, December 20th, 2010 @ 08:26 AM
    Ethnicity
    Australian
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Location
    Aussie
    Gender
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Religion
    n/a
    Posts
    158
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Re: On Australia's future: Was Hitler right?

    By asking this question I'm attempting to gauge whether or not as an Australian I'm wasting my time supporting a cause that does not support me and my people.
    It depends on what cause you are referring to.

    If you mean the cause of racial preservationism, then that is always worth supporting. Our fight for the survival of our people is the only one that really matters in the long run. Us nationalists are the true advocates of diversity in the world, and to fight against the genocide of our people is a just and noble cause.

    (Hmmm, "a just and noble cause" - almost poetic isn't it? Sounds a bit like something from a Arthurian saga.)

    If you mean Hitler's cause, then that is one "that does not support me and my people". It was never meant to. It was an ideology of pan-Germanic imperialistic fascism. It was not meant to be pan-European, and it did not intend to extend to the "colonies".

    At the time, many of the Western democracies were racialist in nature (good examples are Australia and the USA), as that was "common sense" at the time. It wasn't a war for racialism. For the Nazis, it was a war for German expansionism, anti-liberalism, and anti-communism.

    Thank god that we don't live in a Nazi-controlled world, it would be an Orwellian 1984-style existence of authoritarianism and suppression of free speech (and other freedoms). We don't need to be fascists or authoritarians to have a pro-White society. The days of the White Australia Policy showed that.

    What we need is to wake people up to the fact that the fight for a predominantly White Australia is not a fight for "racism"; it is a fight against anti-White genocide, and is for true diversity world-wide (in fact, in fighting racial genocide, which is the height of racism, then we are actually "anti-racists" - and we should never hesitate to call the Multiculturalists "racists", because that is what they are, anti-White racists, who want our people to disappear from the face of the earth).

    In modern times, the Multiculturalists are the "new Nazis", the haters, the bigots, the authoritarians, the fascists against free speech, who will jail people for telling the truth; whereas we Nationalists are the true fighters for freedom, truth, and the preservation of human biodiversity.



    [Hmmm, I didn't mean to go off-topic at all, but it is all relevant to the question at hand]

    People worth supporting:


    Australia First Party
    http://www.australiafirst.net
    Australian Nationalism Information Database
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~natinfo
    European People's Anti-Defamation Organisation (EPADO)
    http://www.epado.bravehost.com
    People Against Nazism, Communism, & Authoritarianism (PANCA)
    http://www.angelfire.com/planet/panca

  7. #7
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, March 3rd, 2007 @ 11:37 PM
    Subrace
    Corded Nordic + some Cromagnoid
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Location
    Sydney
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Family
    Single
    Politics
    Nazi Sympathizer
    Posts
    16
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: On Australia's future: Was Hitler right?

    i came to sydney australia with my parenter in 1984 and lived here ever since, now i agree with hitler i look up to the germans long live the nazi's

  8. #8

  9. #9
    Bloodhound
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Jäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Atlantean
    Gender
    Posts
    4,401
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    72
    Thanked in
    43 Posts

    Re: On Australia's future: Was Hitler right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bridie
    I doubt that to many (if any) other Australians it would matter. The only reason that it concerns me at this time is that I've recently become aware of just how little some Europeans seem to think of Australia and her people, and how limited some common views are.
    [...]
    The Japs (perhaps Australia's biggest threat and enemy ever) seems to be every NS's best buddies.
    The japanese get envyed a lot, because of their racial awarness and a still working society. Of course, like everyhwere else exposed to jewish liberalism, they are degenerating, out of false tolerance, but it seems slower than average.

    Australia is for many of too less importance to think about it, not because they are not strong or competent, but because they are to silent to us.
    They are far away and you rarely hear some voice for our cause out of there.

    On Hitler, from his Tabletalks
    What is happening in the Far East is happening by no will of mine. For years I never stopped telling all the English I met that they'd lose the Far East if they entered into a war in Europe. They didn't answer, but they assumed a superior air. They're masters in the art of being arrogant ! I was moved when Mussert said to me: "You will surely understand me at this hour. Three centuries of effort are going up in smoke."
    Himmler intervened: "We must consider this much compensation,that in this way the Dutch people will maintain its integrity, whereas,before, it was running the risk of corrupting itself with Malayanblood" Hitler continued: The Japanese are occupying all the islands, one after the other. They will get hold of Australia, too. The white race will disappear from those regions.
    http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/books/table/css/table.htm (great site)

    So Hitler thought it would be the british concern to regulate things in the Far East, not his.

    From Albert Speer's Inside The Reich
    [Hitler had some reservations] about the alliance with the yellow race [of the Japanese]. But then, he would remind that the Allies had mobilized with Japan against Germany in the first World War. Moreover, he considered Japan an ally that ranked as a world power, whereas he was not sure that Italy was in this class.
    [Hitler said] "You see, it's our misfortune [for us Germans] to have been born with the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who consider sacrifice for the country as the highest good? The [Muslim] religion would have been more compatible as well. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?
    Here are some quotes from Hitler on Japan
    http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=102568

    Quote Originally Posted by Bridie
    By asking this question I'm attempting to gauge whether or not as an Australian I'm wasting my time supporting a cause that does not support me and my people.
    Germanic preservation is not bound to NS, and many on this forum are not NS.
    "Nothing is more disgusting than the majority: because it consists of a few powerful predecessors, of rogues who adapt themselves, of weak who assimilate themselves, and the masses who imitate without knowing at all what they want." (Johann Wolfgang Goethe)

  10. #10
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 25th, 2007 @ 10:29 AM
    Subrace
    nordiſch-weſtiſch
    Location
    Deutſchland
    Gender
    Family
    Single
    Politics
    Volk und Raſſe
    Posts
    1,619
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    AW: Re: On Australia's future

    Quote Originally Posted by Tryggvi
    [...] in particular during a time where hundreds of millions of people in Europe fell under the joke of Stalinism [...].
    Man, if I ever saw a lapsus calami ... But actually I think there was more fun with the National Socialists.

Page 1 of 11 123456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, February 4th, 2012, 02:30 PM
  2. Adolf Hitler Spech [October 1941]: Hitler Explains His Reasons for Invading USSR
    By Nordlicht in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Thursday, February 10th, 2011, 02:45 AM
  3. Australia: Cardinal Accuses Atheists of Being "Frightened by the Future"
    By Sindig_og_stoisk in forum Agnosticism, Atheism, & Irreligion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Thursday, December 2nd, 2010, 09:05 AM
  4. Australia’s Economic Future in the Hands of Aboriginals!
    By Siebenbürgerin in forum Australia & New Zealand
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, May 22nd, 2010, 06:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •