Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Big Lie About The Berlin Olympics

  1. #1
    Senior Member Pera_Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Friday, January 16th, 2004 @ 08:18 PM
    Zemun, Serbia
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post The Big Lie About The Berlin Olympics


    In its broadest scope, the Holocaust myth involves much more than the supposed gassing of the famous "six million." It includes every related lie which the Jewish propagandists have invented about Germany and the Germans in the period 1933-1945. One of the most brazen of these lies concerns the Olympic games of 1936, which were held in Berlin.

    According to the story, which is being given renewed currency by the controlled media as the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles draw nearer, Adolf Hitler intended for the 1936 games to prove to the world his "master-race theory" of Aryan superiority. But the theory was shattered, the story goes when U.S. Negro sprinter and jumper Jesse Owens defeated the Nazi athletes. Humiliated and enraged, Hitler then showed his lack of sportsmanship by snubbing the Black champion.

    The truth of what happened at the 1936 Olympic games was witnessed by 4.5 million spectators from all over the world, and it has been related numerous times since then -- but never by the controlled news media in the United States, which unvaryingly parrot the same, old lie whenever the occasion arises. [See, for example, Adolf Hitler by John Toland (Doubleday, 1976, pp.392-3] And it is that lie which the average American, whose greatest single source of information is Jew-controlled television, believes. Checking out the story of the "gas ovens" and the "six million" may be too much for anyone but a scholar experienced in historical research, but any sports fan willing to spend two or three hours in a library reading un-biased accounts of the 1936 Berlin games can convince himself that today's Jewish version of what happened there and then is almost exactly contrary in every particular to the truth.

    He can learn that the behavior of Hitler and his government exemplified the ideals not only of sportsmanship, but also of hospitality, in the view of nearly everyone who was there; that if anyone behaved in an unsportsman-like way, it was the U.S. team, which was under orders not to extend the customary courtesy of the Olympic salute to the Tribune of Honor, where Hitler sat; that Hitler did not snub Owens, and the Black athlete himself later said, "When I passed the Chancellor he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back at him. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour in Germany"; and that, far from being humiliated by the results of the games, Hitler was elated, because the Germans won more gold, more silver, and more bronze medals (89 altogether, compared to 56 for the Americans)(1) than anyone else. (In the words of historian John Toland, "The games had been an almost unqualified Nazi triumph.")

    It would require more study to learn that the National Socialists never theorized that Aryans are inherently better in every type of athletic endeavor than non- Aryans; that instead they recognized that each race's peculiarities give it certain advantages and certain disadvantages in competing against other races; and that the particular form of the "master-race theory" attributed to Hitler is a Jewish invention. But what really should be learned from the lie about the 1936 Olympics is just how credible is the Holocaust myth of which it is part and parcel.



    Based upon population, the U.S. is an athletic also-ran.

    by Robert Frenz

    For the most part I ignored the 1984 Olympic Games. Although sports represent a certain level of achievement, I find it difficult to elevate them to the empyrean heights reserved for athletic events by the media. The fact that a gold medalist in 1984 broke a record set by a gold medalist in some other year does not indicate any evolutionary gain, at least to me. The measure of human progress, now and in the future, will always be tied to the mental apparatus of man, not the physical. The abilities of our race should not be linked to the ability to run down a rabbit, leap over a shrub or wrestle a baboon.

    Some Olympic contests, such as running from here to there and jumping over a sand pile, come across as rather trivial events when compared, let us say, to gymnastics. The latter demands a much higher level of mental/physical activity than the former. Yet, the gold medal is the same.

    While popping my TV set from one channel to another recently, I paused for a moment to hear Don Rickles mention that "if it weren't for the Negro, there wouldn't be any Olympics." Should we really be so thankful for our black minority? I decided to do a little research.

    My data source was the World Almanac. I checked the awarding of medals for 1976 and 1980, both the Summer and Winter Games. Instead of merely counting medals, I assigned a value of 3 to each gold medal, 2 to each silver and 1 for each bronze. In my view this would represent a better assessment of national performance than a mere medal count.

    It seems only reasonable that nations with large populations should accumulate a larger number of medal points than small nations. Nation X, for example, with 14% of the total population of the countries participating, might capture 16% of the total number of the medal points possible. Multiplying 16% by 100 and then dividing this product by the total population (14%) would yield a value of 114. All other things being equal, nations should have a points/population value of 100. A number higher than this represents above average performance while a lower value indicates the opposite (see tables).

    The Winter Olympics Games are distinguished by an almost total absence of non-whites. Consequently, the Winter Games could be used as a means of ranking white racial performance along national lines. It should be noted that the absence of a country from the tables indicates that it either was not a participant or did not win any medals. Table I tells us that the U.S. scored a mediocre 31 in the 1976 Winter Olympics.[2] Liechtenstein, with a population of 20,000, performed extraordinarily well. Table III shows the U.S. with a 51, still well below 100. While this represents an improvement, it nonetheless reveals a rather dismal overall rating. Finland's score on Table II may indicate why a handful of Finnish skiers raised so much havoc with invading Soviet troops in 1940.

    Let's move on to the Summer Games. With a boycott here and a boycott there, Table II tells us that the U.S. did about what one would expect on a random basis. Table IV, with no listing of the U.S., tells us that Carter refused to let Americans go to Moscow. Both Tables II and IV are worth a second look. We see the usual high ranking of Nordic-populated countries as well as the low ranking of largely non-white nations which contributed a plethora of runners of one sort or another. The preponderance of Northern Europeans in water events served to increase the ranking of Nordic-populated countries. If we can assume that U.S. Majority athletes fare as well as their Northern European counterparts in swimming, as in skiing, then how can we explain the much better showing, in a relative sense, of the U.S. in the Summer as opposed to the Winter Games? Could it be that Don Rickles is partially right? Is the U.S. in such sad straits that, as a competing nation, it can only appear average when the black contribution is added?

    Table I -- 1976 Winter Olympics

    1. Liechtenstein 36,295
    2. Norway 1,430
    3. Finland 1,146
    4. East Germany 821
    5. Austria 581
    6. Switzerland 572
    7. Holland 261
    8. West Germany 112
    9. Canada 93
    10. Sweden 88
    11. USSR 83
    12. Italy 51
    13. Czechoslovakia 48
    14. USA 31
    15. Britain 20
    16. France 7

    Table II -- 1976 Summer Olympics
    1. Bermuda 2,355
    2. East Germany 1,462
    3. Bulgaria 658
    4. Finland 424
    5. Hungary 400
    6. Cuba 381
    7. New Zealand 365
    8. Trinidad 334
    9. Jamaica 301
    10. Romania 255
    11. Sweden 213
    12. Poland 169
    13. Mongolia 165
    14. Norway 155
    15. West Germany 146
    16. Switzerland 139
    17. USSR 127
    18. Denmark 124
    19. Czechoslovakia 117
    20. Belgium 116
    21. USA 113
    22. Yugoslavia 86
    23. Canada 86
    24. Holland 63
    25. Britain 54
    26. Japan 54
    27. Italy 53
    28. Australia 53
    29. Portugal 51
    30. Puerto Rico 39
    31. North Korea 38
    32. France 35
    33. South Korea 31
    34. Venezuela 19
    35. Austria 17
    36. Spain 14
    37. Iran 11
    38. Mexico 8
    39. Thailand 3
    40. Brazil 2
    41. Pakistan 2

    Table III -- 1980 Winter Olympics
    1. Liechtenstein 162,262
    2. Norway 1,543
    3. Finland 1,406
    4. East Germany 1,213
    5. Austria 833
    6. Switzerland 536
    7. Sweden 508
    8. Holland 236
    9. Hungary 79
    10. USSR 75
    11. Canada 52
    12. USA 51
    13. West Germany 48
    14. Bulgaria 47
    15. Italy 29
    16. Czechoslovakia 27
    17. Britain 23
    18. France 8
    19. Japan 7

    Table IV -- 1980 Summer Olympics
    1. East Germany 2,140
    2. Bulgaria 1,129
    3. Hungary 730
    4. Cuba 612
    5. Mongolia 493
    6. Finland 436
    7. Sweden 353
    8. Denmark 274
    9. Romania 266
    10. USSR 222
    11. Poland 196
    12. Jamaica 190
    13. Austria 184
    14. Czechoslovakia 172
    15. Guyana 155
    16. Switzerland 133
    17. Ireland 120
    18. Australia 112
    19. Yugoslavia 99
    20. Britain 95
    21. Italy 83
    22. France 80
    23. Greece 71
    24. North Korea 60
    25. Zimbabwe 53
    26. Lebanon 52
    27. Holland 49
    28. Belgium 42
    29. Spain 41
    30. Ethiopia 37
    31. Tanzania 28
    32. Uganda 20
    33. Venezuela 15
    34. Mexico 10
    35. Brazil 9
    36. India 1

    (1) In 1936, Germany had a population of 68 million while the U.S. had 130 million. With nearly double the population and all people being "equal", the U.S. should have gathered up twice as many medals as did Nazi Germany -- which they did not. With this in mind, I have included an article I wrote in 1985 which was published in the now defunct Instauration; translated into German and published in East Germany. Germany won over 3 times as many medals, per capita, as did the U.S. in 1936. We sure did show those Nazis up, didn't we?
    (2) In the 1976 Winter Olympics Games, 37 gold, 37 silver and 39 bronze medals were awarded. This represents a maximum of 224 points. The total population of the nations winning awards was 805,750,000. At the time, the U.S. population was 219.5 million. American athletes were awarded 3 golds, 3 silvers and 4 bronzes, yielding a point value of 19. The U.S. captured 8.5% (100 x 19/224) of the points with a population of 27.3% (100 x 219500000 / 805750000) of the total. Dividing 8.5 by 27.3 and multiplying by 100 yields the figure of 31 found in Table 1.

    Source: National Vanguard May 1984

  2. #2


    This is what Owens said about his alleged snub:
    "Of course I’ve know all along that there was nothing in that story about Hitler," he said. "But for years every time I’d meet a stranger he’d asked about it. It was taken for granted everywhere and finally I got tired of denying it.

    And you know, when I visited that stadium again, remembering all that really did happen the first time and having to speak to the new crowd full of young people, I suddenly thought what a good thing it might be that the error had become fact. I seemed to feel that it might be wrong to destroy the myth now. Let it stand, I told myself. Let people believe it and it may do some good."

    He was actually treated much worse back in the USA, where the President refused to meet with him or acknowledge him.
    Last edited by Chris; Tuesday, September 3rd, 2002 at 02:07 PM.

  3. #3
    New Member
    aoibhgreine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last Online
    Friday, May 13th, 2011 @ 11:44 PM
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Lightbulb Popular Myth Debunked: Hitler Snubbed Jesse Owens

    -In this audio fragment- author and investigative journalist Michael Collins Piper talks about an article in the Jewish newspaper Forward, which reviews a new book Triumph: The Untold Story of Jesse Owens and Hitler’s Olympics. The book reveals that the popular story about Hitler snubbing Jesse Owens was a complete fabrication.
    The audioexcerpt is from M.C. Piper's Jan. 23 radio broadcast.

    - Forward article Jesse Owens, Man and Myth at the 1936 Olympics:

    [...] ”American newspaper accounts filed by onsite journalists reported that Owens and Hitler exchanged waves after Owens won the 100-meter dash. Of course, the Nazi leader didn’t welcome Owens in his box, as he did some of the early “Aryan” winners. By the time Owens won the 100-meter, international Olympic officials had told Hitler not to honor any gold medalists that way, because Hitler left the Olympic stadium before greeting Cornelius Johnson, an earlier U.S. black gold medalist. “Hitler didn’t receive Owens, but he did not snub him — at least, that’s not how Hitler’s actions were reported by eyewitnesses, or by Owens at the time," Schaap writes.

    [...] Nor was Owens’s personal life scandal-free: During the run-up to the games, his flirtations with an actress in California while he had a serious girlfriend and child back in Ohio were well covered in the media.

    As far as the supposed Hitler snub is concerned, only when Owens became a regular on the lecture circuit did he begin describing the incident that way. On the book’s final page, Schaap briefly speculates about Owens’s turnabout: “In his mind, he easily justified his dissembling. Denied by white America the opportunities for wealth that he thought he was owed, he exaggerated his stories to make a good living.”

    - Book Triumph: The Untold Story of Jesse Owens and Hitler’s Olympics:

    From the start, American participation in the games was controversial.
    A boycott, based on reports of Nazi hostility to Jews, was afoot, but it was thwarted by the president of the American Olympic Committee.
    At the games themselves the plots and intrigues continued: Owens was befriended by a German rival, broad jumper Luz Long, who helped Owens win the gold medal at his own expense. Two Jewish sprinters were, at the last moment, denied the chance to compete for the United
    States out of misguided politeness to the Nazi hosts. And a myth was born that Hitler himself had snubbed Owens.

    Click here for a 1936 interview those evil, hateful, white supremacist naaaaatziess had with Jesse Owens during the XI Olympiade of 1936 in Berlin.

    Although Owens is one of the rolemodels of the present-day multicult religion, we – the hoi polloi – are totally shielded off from this interview by the controlled media. Why should that be..?

    Mr. Owens, How do you like the Olympic village?
    Mr. Owens, wie gefälts ihnen in das Ölympischen dorf?

    I think it's one of the seven wonders of the world.

    Eines des zieben weltwunders sagt er, und das ist ein lob das wir uns gern anhören, wir Deutschen. |One of the seven wonders of the world he says, and that's a compliment we Germans willingly hear.|

    Do you get American food?
    Bekommen Sie auch Amerikanische verpflegung?

    Yes, we do - we have American cooks and the food is very fine, cooked in American style.

    Es ist ein Amerikanische kuche und das ganse essen ist im Amerikanischer Stile.

    Listen to the whole interview

    (downloadable mp3 ---> -source- )

    Related information:

    The Jesse Owens Myth: Who really snubbed 1936 Olympic champion Jesse Owens?

    Last edited by aoibhgreine; Friday, January 26th, 2007 at 08:31 AM. Reason: transcription added

  4. #4
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 13th, 2018 @ 10:14 AM
    Prolonged Absence
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    22 Posts

    Re: Popular Myth Debunked: Hitler Snubbed Jesse Owens

    I find the whole issue rather petty. When Owens participated in the '36 Olympics, he could use the same facilities as the other participants. If this same athlete had to perform in the United States, however, he was segregated from white athletes.

  5. #5
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, April 25th, 2009 @ 04:50 AM
    German, Scotts
    United States United States
    Texas Texas
    Single, looking
    Truck driver
    Transcendental Idealist
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Re: Popular Myth Debunked: Hitler Snubbed Jesse Owens

    Quote Originally Posted by Siegfried View Post
    I find the whole issue rather petty. When Owens participated in the '36 Olympics, he could use the same facilities as the other participants. If this same athlete had to perform in the United States, however, he was segregated from white athletes.
    The National Socialists in Germany were not hateful toward other races; they hated having other races among them. There's a big difference. American neo-Nazis often want to cleanse the earth of other races, a goal that many National Socialists would have found abhorrent. Nationalism for all means Nationalism for Germans, and other whites.

    This is why I support Pan-Nationalism:

    1.3 What is Pan-Nationalism?

    Pan-Nationalism is the idea that every ethnic group on earth deserves
    its own nationalist state, including those of mixed ethnicity. Where
    individual groups may elect to be nationalist, pan-nationalism is the
    idea that all groups will work for the right to nationalism for all
    groups. Pan-Nationalism is the idea that the best way for humanity to
    rule itself is for each ethnic group to have national autonomy, and be
    independent of oversight or critique by others.

    Nationalism FAQ

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    BeornWulfWer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    Friday, February 8th, 2019 @ 11:19 PM
    West Country Zider 'ead.
    England England
    Wessex Wessex
    Uncer Dæg Willa Becuman
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    12 Posts

    What a great piece!

    I had always held the belief that Hitler had snubbed Owen's. To now hear the man himself said this was not so is remarkable.

    I wonder if the books and stories of this event will be altered accordingly?...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    SwordOfTheVistula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Sunday, July 1st, 2012 @ 01:21 PM
    50% German, 25% English, 25% Irish
    United States United States
    Virginia Virginia
    Washington DC
    Single adult
    Construction, writer/editor
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    78 Posts
    Funny thing is, Jesse Owens only got the opportunity to run in the Berlin Olympics because a 'white' athlete (under American standards of the time) was bumped off the team allegedly due to his jewishness, Marty Glickman.
    Contact Congress on immigration
    Contact Congress to reject banker bailout
    "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." --Ben Franklin

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Thursday, January 19th, 2012, 06:23 PM
  2. The Big Lie..Scottish Revenue Taxes
    By Oresai in forum Scotland
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, October 19th, 2008, 07:25 AM
  3. The 1936 Olympics in Berlin
    By Demigorgona in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Friday, September 26th, 2008, 01:02 PM
  4. Nuclear Radiation: The Big Lie
    By Alizon Device in forum Self-Reliance, Off Grid, & Gardening
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Saturday, September 23rd, 2006, 09:12 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts