Classify Mila Kunis

[Deuce420]

I know she's kind of dark, but, any man that says otherwise must be a flammer, but this girl is HOT!!!!!

Someone please tell me her racial-makeup, ie, if she's White or not.

Hopefully, she is, cause if she's not, then she's a dangerous temptress for my loins.


http://www.milakunis.com/photos.asp?...m_group_id=681

[rusalka]

I know she's kind of dark, but, any man that says otherwise must be a flammer, but this girl is HOT!!!!!

Someone please tell me her racial-makeup, ie, if she's White or not.

Hopefully, she is, cause if she's not, then she's a dangerous temptress for my loins.


http://www.milakunis.com/photos.asp?...m_group_id=681

I think you should post this thread to Racial Classifications/Anthropology (Physical) instead. No one would notice it here. As for her "whiteness", I don't see anything but white, personally.

[Awar]

I think someone said she's a jew...
I don't think she is very dark though, she has brown hair, white skin and light eyes.

She looks sort of Danubian perhaps....although I'm not sure.

[The Blond Beast]

I think someone said she's a jew...
I don't think she is very dark though, she has brown hair, white skin and light eyes.

She looks sort of Danubian perhaps....although I'm not sure.

She is a Jew, and not suprisingly, she has dark hair, skin, and eyes (although her facial structure is somewhat pleasant).

[Awar]

She has blue eyes, dark-brown hair and pale skin....what are you talking about.

As a kid... there is no chance of contact lenses. Those are not dark eyes.

[rusalka]

She has blue eyes, dark-brown hair and pale, white skin....what are you talking about.

I think in this picture she looks quite pale and like she has at least light-mixed eyes:
http://www.milakunis.com/photos.asp?...m_group_id=681

In this one she looks darker, but still apparently with light or light-mixed eyes:
http://www.milakunis.com/photos.asp?...m_group_id=681

I think she only looks signifcantly darker in this photo:
http://www.milakunis.com/photos.asp?...m_group_id=681


Still, colouring of photographs can be very misleading. Just look at these three sets of photos, it's like she's not even the same person. I can't really tell which photo resembles her most without seeing her; but you can't fake light eyes unless they were contacts (which I doubt). The hair could be dyed lighter though, and you can make someone look much more paler, or bronzed depending on the lighting and processing. I can't really tell sub-racially maybe she has at least some Alpinid trait, because her face is broad; but then maybe it's a more Eastern influence. All in all her face doesn't strike me as anything other than "non-white".

[The Blond Beast]

She has blue eyes, dark-brown hair and pale skin....what are you talking about.

As a kid... there is no chance of contact lenses. Those are not dark eyes.

Light brown/Hazel still constitutes "dark" as far as I'm concerned.

[cosmocreator]

Her interorbital seems large. I'd say she's Turkic.

[The Blond Beast]

Her eyes in this photograph look relatively dark (i.e. light brown) - in other words, not light.

[rusalka]

Her eyes in this photograph look relatively dark (i.e. light brown) - in other words, not light.

Her eyes in the other photo look relatively light, on the other hand. Like I said, with these photos, which are of terrible quality, and size, it's hard to tell. I think I'd go with hazel or a mixed green tone; but then, in the childhood photo it looks bluish. Web photographs are sure to confuse us all, they can only show a certain range of color.