Age of Female Sentinels, part two

Destroying Patriarchy by the Jewish Elite

by Eduardo

2 November 2003

Establishing the Gynarchy


Through classical conditioning,[1] repetition plays an important role in increasing the likelihood of individuals to respond to a conditioned stimulus.[2] Hence, satisfying needs like hunger, fear, or social acceptance can be greatly influenced by external stimuli.[3] It is here that we observe how "invented" societal trends and fashions are often designed for a conditioned response. It is also here we learn why men are often afraid to speak out and why women adapt so well to social conditioning. The medium most often used to convey these messages is through television. Indeed, it is television that is the destroyer of intelligent thought and kindred community.

"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have." - Richard Salant.[4]

Richard Salant, former president of CBS news

In psychology, it is well known that individuals in general, will seek consistency in their thoughts, feelings, and actions.[5] People want their attitudes to be consistent with their knowledge. They also want their attitudes about objects in their environment to be consistent, and they want their actions to be consistent with their knowledge. The theory of Cognitive Dissonance states that people will experience feelings of discomfort when they have knowledge, hold attitudes, or take actions that conflict with another.[6] When dissonance occurs, the individual will seek to reduce it by changing the inconsistent cognitive elements. It may be as extreme as eliminating it completely, or downplaying the new knowledge they obtained. This is why people in general will refuse to believe the events that are now happening around them. This is especially true for women. It is because these events disagree with their view of what they already learned and know. The shattering of a world in which everyone "agrees" is often too stark of a reality for women to accept.

The effect of propaganda on the masses goes beyond manipulating public behavior. It becomes public policy. Anyone who is deemed publicly at odds with it can be diagnosed as mentally insane.[7] Szasz argues that such programs are really modes of coerced behavior and control. He affirmed:

"They establish themselves as agents of social control and at the same time disguise their punitive interventions in the semantic and social trappings of medical practice."[8]

If we look at the history of the mental health movement, we will find Jewish communist/Zionist origins. Again, we find a disproportionate number of Jews in positions of power in this field.†

Thomas Szasz, a psychiatrist who is an
outspoken critic of his profession

The Jewish media and their canards have propagated the destruction of patriarchal sovereignty. They have targeted women to carry out their agenda. The Jewish elite knows that the annihilation of individual sovereignty of white men will bring to an end the same patriarchal framework that brought about the U.S. Constitution, Accordingly, they will usher in the new society - the Gynarchy.

Females Replace Traditional Male Roles

The traditional roles of women and men were recognized long ago to be starkly different. The subject, a taboo in today's society, is required for better understanding how males and females are used in carrying out the plans of the financial elite.

Female roles were to be made indistinguishable from male to establish the appropriate social order. Heuristically, females had a very desirable characteristic that males didn't - they were not a threat to the ruling order and could be easily controlled, especially under the persona of strong "male-providers" providing for their welfare and security. Caucasian men on the other hand were a far greater risk. They were considered having undesirable tenets of rugged individualism, personal creativeness, and were most of all unpredictable.[9],[10] This was not the case for Negroes though.[11]

To gain the benefits of a 'predictable society,' the roles of both genders in the "new society" needed to be established.[12] In any conquered nation, the first act of an autocracy is the vilification of the male citizenry.

"By attacking the character and morals of Man himself, and by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated by a very marked degree . . . The first thing to be degraded in any nation is the state of Man, himself. Nations, which have high ethical tone, are difficult to conquer. Their loyalties are hard to shake, their allegiance to their leaders is fanatical, and what they usually call their spiritual integrity cannot be violated by duress. It is not efficient to attack a nation in such a frame of mind. . . . Thus, the first target is Man, himself."[13]

Indeed, males had to be broken and at the same time females assigned as their replacements in the public sector for destroying the patriarchal hegemony. This was accomplished through the mass media propagating equal rights (affirmative action), influencing women to compete against males in the workplace, and using abortion as strictly a "women's right." Indeed, this propaganda was contrary and destructive to the Euro-American cultural mores.

Leading feminist organizations such as NOW advance the lesbian agenda. The feminist movement is supportive of homosexuals and pedophiles.

With both women and men in the workplace, the ensuing void left in the home provided great opportunity to gain influence over their children. Through a centralized bureaucracy of compulsory education, government would then fill in as parens patriae.[14]

"...loyalty is to his family unit, his parents and brothers and sisters. This is destroyed by making a family unit economically non-dependent, by lessening the value of marriage, by making an easiness of divorce and by raising the children wherever possible by the State."[18]

It has long been known that white males disdain welfare and build inventions to lesson their burden.[15] Women are correctly observed to be different. Today, they are coaxed into the consignment of the feminist's influence.[16] They are taught not to have children and that sex is a form of rape. And as a corollary, more women are greatly stressed and suffer from depression.

"Couples are often weighed down by double careers and childcare, which has an impact on their ability to enjoy sex."[17]

Gallup and coworkers conclude that the women who were directly exposed to semen were less depressed. The researchers think this is because mood-altering hormones in the ejaculate are absorbed through the vagina.[18]

The "Great Lie" has caused women to postpone their child-bearing years. The consequences are substantial. The average white female has greatly shortened her fertility years, and a severe racial population decline has resulted. Indeed, the continuing wane of the Caucasian race is not by coincidence.

The controlled media have publicly rewarded females by apotheosizing them for adopting a self-indulgent decadence. This Great Lie propagated from media is made to sound fashionable - haut monde. In truth, it deceives women by replacing the most important role women have to their families and kindred - producing the next generation of their race.

Thus, the inherent and beautiful predisposition of the organic female, with her inward productivity is abandoned and left barren in the modern age. Instead, the heavy yoke of corporate employment has placed an errant "economic stress" on traditional relationships. With both preoccupied in the workplace, their children, if any, are orphaned by "compulsory" education. And through the indoctrination of the public schools, children are easily housebroken, trained, and assigned a station in the workplace that otherwise, would not exist if both parents properly tended their siblings.

The case of John Singer who was shot and killed on January 18, 1979, by state agents for refusing to send his children to a public school is testimony to who really controls the children.[19]

"[A]ccording to the courts of this land, ... "A child is primarily" not his parents' offspring but "a ward of the [S]tate"; ... parents hold relationship he owes allegiance to the government"; ... parents serve as a mere "guardianship" which "the government places [the child] under"; ... parental authority must be "at all times exercised in subordination to the paramount and overruling direction of the [S]tate"; ... "the natural rights of a parent to the custody and control of...his child are subordinate to the power of the [S]tate" deciding whether parent or State will control a child's education, the child's academic progress under the parents - even as measured by State-approved tests - has been termed by State prosecutors as "irrelevant and immaterial"; and finally...such legal principles and policies form the basis of all this nation's compulsory education laws. (pp. xix-xx)"[20]

Making of the Gynarchy

"As for My people, children are their oppressors, And women rule over them." Isaiah 3:12.

Egalitarianism has been a principal tool for destroying the hegemony of Anglo-European patriarchy and replacing it with a Gynarchy. The foundation for the coming Gynarchy has already been established. Essentially, "political" egalitarianism dictates disparate inequalities of race, gender, and religion and makes them the same. For example, we can easily see this in the "Big Tent" assertion that all religions are equal. Others point out that Jesus isn't the only way to heaven. Buddha, Mohammad, and others, they say, are equivalent alternatives. Egalitarianism preaches that men and females are equal, regardless of physiology and cognitive measurements. This same sophistry is applied to race. We are told that all races are equal when empirical evidence proves the contrary.[21] The outcome of racial egalitarianism has been the Civil Rights Act, forced integration, multiculturalism, hate crimes, and now the open campaign for miscegenation. These have all been ingrained into public policy. Lawyers have been the faceless profiteers and bullies using the banderole of Affirmative Action to line their own pockets. Courageous lawyers like Edgar Steele readily admit attorneys and judges are destroying America.[22] However, the same has been occurring in Canada, Europe and Australia. Affirmative Action has been used discriminately to create an unwritten quota system with which corporations are now forced to comply.[23] The Feminist movement[24] profited greatly from women becoming "victims" of male dominance. It is no secret that the movement was hijacked by lesbians decades ago.[25]

A crucial part of the coming Gynarchy is social-constructionism.[26] It is the predominant philosophy in academia, and it declares that sexuality is a social operant, and that there is no essential, innate, immutable characteristic of a person that can be termed heterosexuality or homosexuality. Through social-constructionism, the acceptance of homosexuality is promoted.

The teachings of Bachofen[27] and the Magna Mater (Great Mother) are subsequently promoted as well. Females are more easily influenced and predictable than males. Consequently, they are targeted with propaganda made to sound fashionable.

Played by actress Lucy Lawless, Xena the warrior princess overpowers a man. The television series attracted a large following of feminists, lesbians, and bisexuals.

The concept of a matriarchal society is to be reinforced at every turn. Through the use of television and education, women were to be championed in traditional male roles. The repetitious airing of female heroines are used to uplift young girls' self-esteem and at the same time create doubt in an already confused and skeptical male. With an erotic splendor, "mighty" women are shown at every opportunity taking revenge against white males. Already programmed with the ideals of superiority and disrespect, young females now mimic and "act out" these hidden hostilities against men. The Jew-manufactured female is now more fearless, confrontational and likely to strike or even kill a male. She knows full well her legal status as a "victim" can get her off Jew-free. In both academia and political circles, feminists proclaim all men are potential rapists and threats to women. Young girls have become super bitches armed with the power to condemn men at will. The girl needs only to claim being a victim and all too often innocent men are bankrupted or jailed. This type of manipulation (of males) is now fashionable and 'hip' to an ever-growing number of women.

"But what ever a 'new man' did, he could never atone for the sins of other men. Any man who disobeyed his partner, was subjected to expulsion from the matrimonial home and in many cases, from a relationship with his children. Now, there were a legion of feminist lawyers and therapists to make their 'sisters' were fully supported in the battle to destroy men."[28]

In the workplace and at home, the white male suffers. His natural predisposition for productivity enslaves him to the female whim. At work, women are held to a far different standard than males. Females are feared as being potential lawsuits and as a consequence are given great latitude. There is little doubt that women recognize this and play it to their advantage. The rise of the "super bitch" can be observed in the workplace. At home every wife knows she can financially destroy her husband if she divorces him. Again, females exploit their advantage at whim. In effect, an artificial family headed by a super bitch has been created by the Jewish-Feminist ideologues.

Dominant females and passive men mark the coming Gynarchy. Under matriarchal control, male behavior is to be determined by women.[29] The occurrence of this, in part, has already been dictated by radical feminist organizations. The demand for "passionate" men for example was really a call for passive males. Females if given a free choice, will prefer males who express female characteristics. As Dawkins clarifies, this is because of the 'selfishness of the gene'[30] -- the gene promotes itself. This explains for example, the female affinity for homosexuals - male homosexuals express female characteristics.[31]

The dutiful and courteous male of yesteryear has not been good for consumerism or capitalism either. As a result, a "made-over" male has been created. The new "metrosexual" male is described as emasculated and acts gay. The e-Magazine stated metrosexuals are well dressed, narcissistic and bun-obsessed (hetero-sodomy).

The Metrosexual male expresses female characteristics

"The stoic, self-denying, modest straight male didn't shop enough (his role was to earn money for his wife to spend), and so he had to be replaced by a new kind of man, one less certain of his identity and much more interested in his image..."[32]

"We might be close to a time similar to the Reformation where the fundamental structure of authority is about to change... What if the equation of civilization with patriarchy were broken? What if boys did not psychologically disconnect from women and dissociate themselves from vital parts of relationships?"[33]

In the United States and other Western nations, our laws, education system,[34] religion, and ethnic customs have been greatly emasculated.[35] Indeed, it is a manifest finding that our culture and tradition is under attack by an ever-present enemy.

Females Assure 'Predictable' Society

Western civilization is increasingly measured by consumer behavior. The term, which once really applied to personal choices, now covers everything from consumer products to voting. A predictable society is one that is herd-like in character and easily controlled. It is one that is linear and becomes female in nature. American society today possesses all the female preferences for welfare (versus individual rights), passive (versus aggressive), dependent (versus independent), fashionable (versus traditional), ambiguous (versus unambiguous), inclusive (versus exclusive), integration (versus segregation and elimination), relationships (versus content), communal (versus individual), herd-like (versus individual), libertine (versus Moral Law), liberal (versus conservative) and democracy (versus republic). These contrasting attributes are gender specific and reflected in government policy. Myer-Levy of the University of Chicago Business School has provided us a method of analyzing male and female operants. Through her research she showed why women are easily sold fashion and men are not. In the simplest definition, it is the difference between how women and men view the world. Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends, trying to feel accepted? Are women's decisions prejudiced as a result? In her study, she sums it up by stating women "integrate," and men "eliminate."[36],[37] She further describes women as inclusive as opposed to exclusive. The author uses the words "affiliate" and "projected association" to describe the same. This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males. Myer-Levy's "Selectivity hypothesis" is important because it reveals that feminine and masculine interpretation can be applied not only to advertising such as in magazine ads,[38] but also to demographics as populations; businesses, governments, law, race, creed, culture, and religion. In fact, it can be demonstrated heuristically that Jews and Negroes exhibit herd-like female attributes.

It is in a politician's interest to foster a manipulated electorate and in the aggregate, women may be regarded as voting cattle. Indeed, women make it quite possible for control of the political landscape. The addition of women to the voting population makes modeling political and economic outcomes possible. This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all-white-male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).

"When male animals fight, they usually fight for territory. They may only fight virtually, and just posture and threaten, but it is still a struggle for dominance. The loser retreats, surrendering his claim on the territory. The point is that in nature, females come with the territory. Whoever dominates the territory also dominates, controls and mates with the females. In human society, the fact that females have intelligence and language only enables them to employ specious arguments to justify their actions, as in the case of the alien takeover of our territory. The laws of nature are paramount. Man cannot defy them."[39]

If we analyzed voting in terms of consumer behavior (selecting a product preference), we clearly see the influences of femininity on the aggregate model. Consumer purchases are a matter of individual choice, which is considered non-linear and unpredictable. On the other hand, trend setting and fashions tailored to a culture's specific demographics tend to influence the masses. Despite recording information about the consumer's purchases, consumer behavior scientists cannot predict accurately whether an individual will purchase a product (or vote) or not. However, a population required for predicting an outcome becomes greatly influenced by women added to the population mix. Consequently, women are a major factor in solving this buying threshold problem in mathematical terms. The article "Argument Against Women's Suffrage" by John Lott, Jr. of Yale University and Lawrence Kenny of the University of Florida seems to verify this. Women tend to greatly reduce the sampling population needed to predict an outcome, thereby establishing a more predictable society, (i.e. a controlled society).

There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions. Kenski and Jamieson conducted surveys concerning knowledge of candidates during political campaigns in 1996 and 2000.[40] During both campaigns men were more likely to answer questions about political issues correctly. In 1996, if women did not know the correct answers, they were more likely to say, "I don't know." In 2000, women were still more likely to answer more questions incorrectly, but were less likely to say, "I don't know." Jamieson declared, "Local news watching makes you dumber."[41] This implies that women are more susceptible to propaganda, misinformation, political advertising/sound-bites, and the Big Lie. Another interesting relationship that appears to back up the gullibility claim involves the "Trends in International Math and Science Study" (TIMSS) assessments. TIMSS is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment for reliable and timely data on the mathematics and science achievement of students. A surprising result showed that 12th grade girls scored lower on a third of the multiple choice questions than if they had guessed. This alludes that there was some factor that influenced them to answer the questions wrong. Was it false women's intuition? Indeed, it is not that girls are stupid. On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don't know what they think they know.

Certainly women appear to be the dupes and patsies for advancing the one-world government. As Jamieson suggested, television makes you "dumber" and it does this by appealing to the emotions. It should not be of any surprise that women are by far the largest viewers of television. Negroes, followed by Hispanics, are the next largest viewer market. Canli suggests women's brains are wired both to feel and to recall emotions more keenly than the brains of men.[42] The study found that women's neural responses to emotional scenes were much more active than men's. The female memory for emotion is influenced by sound-bites and emotional imagery - something that typifies what television does so well.

"Hell hath no fury until it come to a woman's scorn." -- Rachel Hartnett, "A Second Chance"

Gilligan found that women view themselves as part of a network of relationships and feel that sustaining these relationships is of primary importance.[43] Her theory states that men tend to place more emphasis on rights while women place more attention on care, both the rights and care orientation can be found in the reasoning of women and men. These findings may explain why we see a lot of empathy, intuition, nurturing behavior, verbal ability and emotional sophistication in women -- and may explain why women often find it easy to be tuned in to the needs and feelings of others. But they also suggest that women are more "tied in" to their mood states, and thus more prone to clinical depression. Gilligan's research may explain why females are often deceived by media and political propaganda.[44]

Taylor and Klein report that the hormone oxytocin may be a key to why females respond very differently to stressful situations than males.[45] Oxytocin is a mood regulator produced by both men and women. However, the male hormone, testosterone seems to act as a stabilizer to its effect, while the female hormone estrogen amplifies the role of oxytocin. They state oxytocin is involved in social interaction and that being close to others reduces anxiety. Citing hundreds of human and animal studies, the researchers reported a hard-wired tendency for females to handle stress when threatened or fearful by seeking social contact, especially with other females, and nurturing their young. "Females are more likely to protect their children and bond with other females who can help provide protection in the process" stated Klein. Bonding with other females is one of many ways females seek security. Affiliation seems to be a natural and fundamental operant for females and integrated[46] in many forms of achieving a male-provider.[47] The "Tend and Befriend" reflex may help explain the strong sense of affiliation among lesbians, says Bourget.[48] It may also explain why in part women are more of a collective herd in society than males.

Sheppard proposed this same association by stating:

"It appears that the perception of differences in the brain is modulated in a manner which is identical to an audio expander or compressor. The hypothalamus acts as a hormonal amplifier (expander) in females, acting to increase certain hormones until they reach a peak at the end of the menstrual cycle. In the male, the hypothalamus acts as a stabiliser (compressor), not amplifying hormonal variations but smoothing them out."[49]

He concludes by observing:

"Males make large differences larger and small differences smaller, Females make large differences smaller and small differences larger."

The significance of this statement may explain the female abhorrence of conflict and violence. Further, it explains the inclination of females to minimize differences in age and attractiveness, as well as the wide disparity in practical ability between men and women. As a corollary, females disclaim large differences between the sexes, between children and adults, between the different races of man and between humans and animals. It may also explain the greater acuity females possess in interpreting non-verbal communication, which mainly accounts for 'female intuition.' Negro males and other races are generally more responsive to signals and easier for females to manipulate.[50]

Females respond very differently to stressful situations than males, (Taylor and Klein). A recent survey suggests that stress affects women's truthfulness as well. The female magazine That's Life conducted a "Scruples and Lies" survey with 5,000 women and found that 94 percent confessed to telling lies, with 48 percent lying on a daily basis. The vast majority (84 percent) said they lie with a clear conscious. Many women said deceit was justified as a way of sparing other people's feelings. Indeed, sympathy has been a long part of the female makeup. How far does this affect the present society? Could the ad hominems and theatrics of lawyers in the courtroom be exploiting women in juries? How many criminal Negroes have been acquitted because of women's sympathy and deception to a greater lie? Are gay rights being advanced because females don't "feel" threatened by them and therefore sympathize with them? How many women have bought into the lies about homosexuality? How many females have bought the lies of rampant male "abuse" and abject domination in society's co-ed juries?[51] The importance of a fair trial is weighed by the juror's ability to accurately assess the facts of guilt without being deceived by the emotional appeal of a greater lie. As our founding fathers intended, citizenship requires responsible voting decisions and discernment of complex issues.

"Were our State a pure democracy [republic][52]...there would yet be excluded from their deliberations...women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, should not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men."[53] -- Thomas Jefferson

A predictable society benefits only those that manipulate and control a nation's riches. Long ago international Zionist financiers bought out and usurped our nation's major media. In turn, they financed the Zionist communist propaganda in universities and think-tanks for influencing our nation's culture.[54] Women, in turn have unwittingly corroborated and remade our republic into a society run by Talmudic Communist Jews. These enemies of individual liberty and personal property are in control of our society. They have advanced their agenda to the letter that was once promulgated by the Bolshevik Lenin:

"Corrupt the young, get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial, destroy their ruggedness. Get control of all means of publicity and thereby: Get the peoples' mind off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and plays, and other trivialities. Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. Destroy the people's faith in their natural leaders by holding up the latter to ridicule, contempt and obloquy. Always preach true democracy but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. Encourage government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear with rising prices, inflation and general discontent. Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a soft and lenient attitude on the part of the government towards such disorders. By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues: honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness. Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view of confiscating them and leaving the population defenseless." -- Communist Rules For Revolution[55]

† The mental health movement's exploitation can be traced to Freud, Trotsky, and Jewish Marxism.[56] I will examine this field in depth in a coming essay.



 [1] Classical conditioning occurs when an individual learns to associate an unrelated stimulus with a particular behavioral response that has previously been elicited by a related stimulus. Ivan Pavlov, (1849 - 1936) a Russian physiologist pioneered the Theory of classical conditioning.

[2] Daniel Katz, "The functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes," Public Opinion Quarterly, Summer, 1960, p. 163-204.

[3] Individuals learn to associate unrelated stimuli, as the words Jews, Holocaust, Negroes, Blacks, Whites, Caucasians are associated with guilt, fear, racist, fascist, Nazi, social acceptance, etc.

[4] Richard Salant, an American Jew, is the former President of CBS News.

[5] William Cummings, M. Venkatesan, "Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence," Journal of Marketing Research, Aug. 13 Aug., 1976, p. 303-08.

[6] Ibid., p. 329.

[7] The most significant example is Ezra Pound. A political prisoner greatly feared and locked up at St. Elizabeth's Hospital for 13 years.

[8] Thomas S. Szasz, M.D., The Manufacture of Madness. P. 136. N.Y.: 1970. Szasz is a prominent American psychiatrist and outspoken critic of his own discipline as it is presently practiced, once described the mental health movement as essentially "Communist ideology in medicine."

[9] Ibid., p. 11 - "Any tenets of rugged individualism, personal determinism, self-will, imagination and personal creativeness are antipathetic to the good of the Greater State."

[10] Read Paul Herrmann, Conquest by Man, 1954, for an understanding of the vast civilizations established by whites.

[11] Dr. Zekeh Gbotokuma, "Capitalist Nigger," According to the Black author, the Negroid race is a non-productive race because, "We are a consumer race," "we produce nothing and consume what others produce." This state of affairs is due to the fact that Blacks don't possess "the killer-instinct of the Caucasian Race" and "whatever-it-takes" attitude. Here.

[12] Brock Chisholm, The Responsibility of Psychiatry, p. 9, William Alansen White Memorial Lecture, Oct. 23, 1945.

[13] Kenneth Goff (presented by), The Soviet Art Of Brainwashing, A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.

[14] Black's Law Dictionary, sixth ed., literally "parent of the country," refers traditionally to the rule of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability, such as juveniles or the insane, and in child custody determinations, when acting on behalf of the state to protect the interests of the child. It is principle that the state must care for those who cannot take care of themselves, such as minors who lack proper care and custody from the parents. It is a concept of standing utilized to protect those quasi-sovereign interests such as health, comfort and welfare of the people, interstate water rights, general economy of the state, etc.,

[15] The question posed -- "How little can you live on?" provides stark and antipodal answers between males and females. Almost universally, males admit they can survive on far less than females.

[16] Henry Makow, Ph.D., "Feminism, New World Order And Rockefeller's New War," , See Valerie Solanas, The Anti-Male Scum Feminist Manifesto," 1971.

[17] Claire Smith, "Women had more fun in the 50s," Quote attributed to John Bancroft, Director of the Kinsey Institute,

[18] Rowan Hooper, "Happiness and how to achieve it,"

[19] Carl Watner, The Voluntaryist, Whole Number 59 Ð Dec. 1992,

[20] Blair Adams, "Who Owns the Children," Waco, Texas: Truth Forum, 1991, Fifth ed.

[21] Charles Murray, Richard Herrnstein, The Bell Curve, New York: The Free Press, 1994

[22] Edgar J. Steele, J.D., "Injustice For All," ,

[23] Corporations are entities created by government and by definition have certain "privileges" chartered by the same and governed under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Code of Commerce.

[24] Leading feminist organizations such as NOW advance the lesbian agenda. The feminist movement is supportive of homosexuals and pedophiles.

[25] On March 4, 1973, the Jewish feminist Betty Friedan tells the New York Times "man-hating lesbians" are trying to take control of National Organization of Women (NOW). Lesbians soon succeeded and have dominated ever since.

[26] A school of thought now dominant in Women's and Gay studies that holds that categories of gender and sexuality like masculine/feminine and hetero/homo derive from cultural influences, not from essential features of an individual's biology or psychology as essentialists believe. See The published curriculum guidelines for the State of Michigan mentions, "Socio-constructionism" and S. L. Vygotsky as the "leading light" of this new movement.

[27] Johann Jacob Bachofen, Myth, Religion, and Mother Right: Selected Writings of J.J. Bachofen, trans. Ralph Manheim (Princeton: Princeton/Bollingen, 1967). An influential Swiss social philosopher who suggested the existence of ancient matriarchal cultures, (1815-1887).

[28] Erin Pizzey, "How The Women's Movement Taught Women to Hate Men,"

[29] See "Gynarchy International" at

[30] Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, London: Paladin. 1979

[31] Simon Sheppard, "The Science of Sex,"

[32] Mark Simpson, "Meet the metrosexual," eMagazine,

[33] Carol Gilligan quoted by Christina Hoff Sommers in The War Against Boys, Touchstone, 2000. Article from "Soundbites from Christina Hoff Sommers,"

[34] Richard Cohen, "The Problem with Boys," Washington Post, May 20, 2003; Page A19. Cohen writes a good article lamenting the lack of male role models in the education system and promulgating its statistical and tragic effect on males.

[35] Steven Stark, Atlantic Monthly, July,1996. Notes that throughout this century American policies and programs have grown increasingly "maternal."

[36] Joan Meyers-Levy , "Mixed Messages - How Men And Women Differ In Their Responses To Marketing Messages,"

[37] Malcolm Gladwell, "Listening to Khakis," The New Yorker,

[38] Ibid. "Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects."

[39] Simon Sheppard, ""Females and the Laws of Nature,"

[40] Kathleen Hall Jamieson, "The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?" Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

[41] Samuel Silver, "The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!," Jewish World Review, Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761

[42] Paul Recer, "New study says female brain is wired for emotion," Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study.

[43] Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1982.

[44] Samuel Silver, "The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!," Jewish World Review, Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761

[45] Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, "Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight."

[46] The word "integrate" means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, "Females integrate, Men eliminate"). The author uses the words "affiliate" and "projected association" to describe the same.

[47] A male-provider can be defined as any person, shelter, organization, or entity that provides protection and security. The author often uses the phrase, welfare and security to describe male-provider traits.

[48] Jon Garbo, "Women's Response To Stress Healthier," Gay Health, Shaun Bourget, M.A., M.F.T., is a marriage and family therapist from Beverly Hills, California

[49] Simon Sheppard, "The Science of Sex, The DSoD Theory,"

[50] Ibid.

[51] Murray Rothbard, 'Date Rape' On Campus,", Feb. 91,

[52] The modern meaning has changed. Democracy and republic were interchangeable in Jefferson's time. Republic - Authority is derived through the election of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard for consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment and progress. - Military Training Manual TM2000-5, 1928.

[53] Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval (Sept. 5, 1816), in 10 Writings of Thomas Jefferson 45-46, n. 1 (P. Ford ed. 1899).

[54] The Media includes all the organs of propaganda including "Hollywood" cinema, sitcoms, and national news.

[55] "Communist Rules For Revolution" was captured at Dusseldorf in May 1919 by Allied Forces. It was secured and stamped with the seal of Florida State Attorney, George A. Broutigam. This material testimony was taken from someone he terms "a known member of the Communist Party." According to this Communist's testimony this strategy is still part of the Communist plan to overthrow free societies such as the United States.

[56] <#_ftnref56> Alexander M. Etkind, "Russia, The Reception of Psychoanalysis in Russia until the Perestroika," Bolshevik, Lev Trotsky (aka Levi Davidovich Bronstein) was the most powerful figure who supported early Soviet psychoanalysis. He believed human nature should be reconstructed to let Bolsheviks pursue their goals.