Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Nordic sub-subtypes?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Stríbog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, January 12th, 2005 @ 11:45 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid-Baltid (Aistin)
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    Where Rust Belt meets Farm Belt
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Occupation
    college student
    Politics
    Environmentalism and eugenics
    Religion
    occultism & Nature worship
    Posts
    2,163
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post Nordic sub-subtypes?

    According to Nordish.com, the Brünn and Borreby subtypes are native to northern Europe, and derived from aboriginal upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers. I was wondering if anyone else was confused by this? This would mean that Brünns and Borrebies were non-Indo European, and technically non-Aryan? According to that site, the only pure Aryans were Halstatt and Keltic-Nordic? This seems a little far- fetched to me. I would be more inclined to think that Brünns, Borrebies, and the Fälish, Anglo-Saxon and Trønder hybrids were all simply deviant branches of the Aryan invaders, that mutated to have slightly different phrenological phentoypes. There would be more evidence, especially linguistic, if the Brünn and Borreby types were non-Indo European. There would be some form of preserved record of their language, as there is with the Picts and Basque, both confirmed non-IE aboriginal Atlantids. I am inclined to believe that the only aboriginal Europeans are the Atlanto-Mediterraneans, and that all others are variants of Aryan invaders.

  2. #2
    Account Inactive Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 2nd, 2006 @ 08:42 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    GreatRussia
    Gender
    Politics
    Rossialism
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    NordischesBlutundEhre,

    Anthropology is not about Aryans

    Indo-European is not a racial classification too...

    Halstatt- and Keltic-Nordics are not not pure Aryans (besides, Keltic-Nordic type has Alpine, Dinaric and UP admixture), they never were Aryans, perhasp, they've absorbed some Aryan blood, but, no, they weren't the original Aryans/Indo-Europeans/Indo-Germans.

    Aryans were of the very distinct type, known as Aisto(Ancient)-Nordic, Battle-Axe, Corded Ware, Kurgan Folk etc. Unlike Nordics, they were both long and high skulled, their skulles were massive and approximated UP means.

    Troenders (perhaps) have more Aryan blood, than other Nordics and Nordic/UP types. Anglo-Saxons also have more Aryan blood, but less than Troenders.

    The Battle-Axe/Corded Ware, Aisto-Nordic type survived only in Eastern Europe, whether in the pure form, or, as UP influenced, as a West-Baltic type (Finland, Baltic States, Poland, Whiterussia, North-Western Russia), where this type is still common or even dominant.

    There are individual Battle-Axes among western Nordic population, but they are *much* fewer than among West-Baltic population.

  3. #3
    Account Inactive Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 2nd, 2006 @ 08:42 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    GreatRussia
    Gender
    Politics
    Rossialism
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Oh, I forgot...

    Perun mit uns!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, January 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Hyperborea
    Gender
    Politics
    n/a
    Religion
    Doughty Heathen
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Nordic sub-subtypes?

    Originally posted by NordischesBlutundEhre
    According to Nordish.com, the Brünn and Borreby subtypes are native to northern Europe, and derived from aboriginal upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers. I was wondering if anyone else was confused by this? This would mean that Brünns and Borrebies were non-Indo European, and technically non-Aryan? According to that site, the only pure Aryans were Halstatt and Keltic-Nordic? This seems a little far- fetched to me. I would be more inclined to think that Brünns, Borrebies, and the Fälish, Anglo-Saxon and Trønder hybrids were all simply deviant branches of the Aryan invaders, that mutated to have slightly different phrenological phentoypes. There would be more evidence, especially linguistic, if the Brünn and Borreby types were non-Indo European. There would be some form of preserved record of their language, as there is with the Picts and Basque, both confirmed non-IE aboriginal Atlantids. I am inclined to believe that the only aboriginal Europeans are the Atlanto-Mediterraneans, and that all others are variants of Aryan invaders.
    This theory is untenable for several reasons.

    1. The oldest known types in Northern Europe, are Upper Palaeolithic types, such as the cranium from Cheddar Gorge, England.

    2. Genetic surveys (those of Sykes and Cavalli-Sforza), reveal that at least 70% of European genetic variation is Palaeolithic in origin. Therefore, most Europeans are descended from pre-Indo-European migrants.

    3. There is no evidence of a mass migration into Northern and Western Europe. The Kurgan culture (Proto-Indo-Europeans), seem to have spread their language and culture through elite dominance, meaning small numbers of migrants.

    4. The Kurgan "Waves" seem to petre out in central Europe, with the I-E languages being spread further north and west by acculturated Battle Axe, Corded Ware and Bell Beaker peoples.

    5. The languages of the pre-Indo-Europeans have been preserved. For instance, there is a "Vasconian" sub-strata in German (related to Basque), which is believed to be a remnant of the language spoken by the Megalith builders. Many terms in German dealing with hunting, fishing, the sea, etc., seem to derive from this lost language.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, January 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Hyperborea
    Gender
    Politics
    n/a
    Religion
    Doughty Heathen
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Originally posted by Ross
    NordischesBlutundEhre,

    Anthropology is not about Aryans

    Indo-European is not a racial classification too...

    Halstatt- and Keltic-Nordics are not not pure Aryans (besides, Keltic-Nordic type has Alpine, Dinaric and UP admixture), they never were Aryans, perhasp, they've absorbed some Aryan blood, but, no, they weren't the original Aryans/Indo-Europeans/Indo-Germans.

    Aryans were of the very distinct type, known as Aisto(Ancient)-Nordic, Battle-Axe, Corded Ware, Kurgan Folk etc. Unlike Nordics, they were both long and high skulled, their skulles were massive and approximated UP means.

    Troenders (perhaps) have more Aryan blood, than other Nordics and Nordic/UP types. Anglo-Saxons also have more Aryan blood, but less than Troenders.

    The Battle-Axe/Corded Ware, Aisto-Nordic type survived only in Eastern Europe, whether in the pure form, or, as UP influenced, as a West-Baltic type (Finland, Baltic States, Poland, Whiterussia, North-Western Russia), where this type is still common or even dominant.

    There are individual Battle-Axes among western Nordic population, but they are *much* fewer than among West-Baltic population.
    The Battle-Axe people were only acculturated Corded Ware Nordics, deriving from the "Old European" population. The people of the Kurgan culture (Proto-Indo-Europeans), were predominantly Cro-Magnon in type, with a Nordic minority.

  6. #6
    Account Inactive Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 2nd, 2006 @ 08:42 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    GreatRussia
    Gender
    Politics
    Rossialism
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Battle-Axe people have INTRODUCED indo-european language and culture to other europeans.

    Slavic and Baltic languages are the closest to the original IE language.

    Heimdall,

    Lundman was wrong?!

    With what anthropological type YOU do associate Aryan/IE culture/language? With Danubian Nordics??

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, January 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Hyperborea
    Gender
    Politics
    n/a
    Religion
    Doughty Heathen
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Battle-Axe people have INTRODUCED indo-european language and culture to other europeans.

    Only to certain parts of Northern Europe, not everywhere.

    Slavic and Baltic languages are the closest to the original IE language.

    Actually, the Baltic language Lithuanian, is the closest to Proto-Indo-European, the Slavic languages much less so.

    Heimdall,
    Lundman was wrong?!


    About certain things, yes, he was.

    With what anthropological type YOU do associate Aryan/IE culture/language? With Danubian Nordics??

    The original Proto-Indo-Europeans (Kurgan culture bearers), were predominantly "Proto-Europoid," that is, Cro-Magnon in type. Later on, groups such as the Battle-Axe Nordics, who had absorbed the PIE culture from the migrating Kurgan people, helped to spread the IE languages throughout the rest of Europe.

  8. #8
    Account Inactive Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 2nd, 2006 @ 08:42 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    GreatRussia
    Gender
    Politics
    Rossialism
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Battle-Axe people have INTRODUCED indo-european language and culture to other europeans.

    -- Only to certain parts of Northern Europe, not everywhere.
    =====
    But it were they, weren't they?


    =====
    Slavic and Baltic languages are the closest to the original IE language.

    -- Actually, the Baltic language Lithuanian, is the closest to Proto-Indo-European, the Slavic languages much less so.
    ======

    Slavic and Baltic languages are closely related, and much more close to each another, than to other languages. There used to be Slavo-Baltic language, and, of course, as Balts were in isolation and Slavs were open to various influences, Baltic is more preserved, than Slavic. So they're in the same league. Other languages are much less so

    ========
    Heimdall,
    Lundman was wrong?!

    About certain things, yes, he was.
    =========
    In what he was wrong?
    =========

    With what anthropological type YOU do associate Aryan/IE culture/language? With Danubian Nordics??

    -- The original Proto-Indo-Europeans (Kurgan culture bearers), were predominantly "Proto-Europoid," that is, Cro-Magnon in type. Later on, groups such as the Battle-Axe Nordics, who had absorbed the PIE culture from the migrating Kurgan people, helped to spread the IE languages throughout the rest of Europe.
    =========

    But there were Aistos among them, right?

    There were OTHER groups? What groups?

    What was the fate of Cro-Magnons of Kurgan type?

    regards

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, January 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Hyperborea
    Gender
    Politics
    n/a
    Religion
    Doughty Heathen
    Posts
    113
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    But it were they, weren't they?

    Them and the Corded Ware people, in Northern Europe, presumably.

    In what he was wrong?

    That the original Indo-Europeans were predominantly Nordic, for instance.

    But there were Aistos among them, right?

    The literature I've read, only calls them "Nordoid," with no further specifications. In any case, they were a minority, and only the Cro-Magnon element is regarded as a truly "Kurgan" type.

    There were OTHER groups? What groups?

    Corded Ware, Linear Ware, possibly the Bell Beaker people, etc.

    What was the fate of Cro-Magnons of Kurgan type?

    They migrated, interbred with the local populations, declined in numbers, and were generally squeezed out by later nomads of the steppes.

  10. #10
    Account Inactive Ross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 2nd, 2006 @ 08:42 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    GreatRussia
    Gender
    Politics
    Rossialism
    Posts
    1,009
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    But it were they, weren't they?

    Them and the Corded Ware people, in Northern Europe, presumably.
    =========
    BA and CW are not the same racially? And LW weren't Nordoid?

    =========
    What was the fate of Cro-Magnons of Kurgan type?

    They migrated, interbred with the local populations, declined in numbers, and were generally squeezed out by later nomads of the steppes.
    ==========
    Any remnants?

    That's from that super-book on Aryans?

    PS. Were bramins blond?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: Monday, April 4th, 2011, 11:26 PM
  2. The Nordic Woman: Feminine Magic in the Nordic Myths
    By Frans_Jozef in forum Customs & Rituals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Monday, November 27th, 2006, 02:32 AM
  3. Are subtypes by nature attracted to each other?
    By IlPrincipe in forum Physical Anthropology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Thursday, September 28th, 2006, 10:00 PM
  4. Classify Stefan Kiessling: Halstatt Nordic/East Nordic?
    By fareast in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Friday, August 11th, 2006, 06:17 PM
  5. Help me? (2) - Med subtypes
    By hardcorps in forum Mediterranid
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Friday, November 12th, 2004, 08:12 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •