Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: What Terminology to use?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Wednesday, October 29th, 2003 @ 02:10 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post What Terminology to use?

    I see the following traditional terms are used frequently on these forums: Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid and sometimes Australoid.
    From the dictionary: 'They are now controversial in both technical and nontechnical usage, and in some cases they may well be considered offensive.'

    In addition the terms mongrel and half/mixed-breed are by definition used for animals or plants, not humans.

    What are your opinions?

  2. #2
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,208
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by 21wqre2
    I see the following traditional terms are used frequently on these forums: Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid and sometimes Australoid.
    From the dictionary: 'They are now controversial in both technical and nontechnical usage, and in some cases they may well be considered offensive.'
    Their "offensiveness" has everything to do with the political climate of the day. They are still 100% valid, though.

    In addition the terms mongrel and half/mixed-breed are by definition used for animals or plants, not humans.

    What are your opinions?
    Humans are animals.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Wednesday, October 29th, 2003 @ 02:10 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    Their "offensiveness" has everything to do with the political climate of the day. They are still 100% valid, though.
    Race: 'The biological aspect of race is described today not in observable physical features but rather in such genetic characteristics as blood groups and metabolic processes, and the groupings indicated by these factors seldom coincide very neatly with those put forward by earlier physical anthropologists.'

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    Humans are animals.
    Animal: '1.A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.
    2.An animal organism other than a human, especially a mammal. '

    http://dictionary.reference.com

  4. #4
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,208
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by 21wqre2
    Race: 'The biological aspect of race is described today not in observable physical features but rather in such genetic characteristics as blood groups and metabolic processes, and the groupings indicated by these factors seldom coincide very neatly with those put forward by earlier physical anthropologists.'
    We know about genetics here at Skadi. Just browse our genetics subforum... you will realise that different races have different gene markers.


    Animal: '1.A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.
    2.An animal organism other than a human, especially a mammal. '

    http://dictionary.reference.com
    Thus, by your own quotation, humans are animals (ref.1). Ref. 2 is only applicable for religionists who somehow think that humans are in a class of their own. They are not. Humans are just one species of animal.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Wednesday, October 29th, 2003 @ 02:10 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    We know about genetics here at Skadi. Just browse our genetics subforum... you will realise that different races have different gene markers..
    I believe that when i see the dictionary definition change from what it is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    Thus, by your own quotation, humans are animals (ref.1). Ref. 2 is only applicable for religionists who somehow think that humans are in a class of their own. They are not. Humans are just one species of animal.
    The first pointer is the definition of an animal, the second pointer then explains humans are an exception of this. Religionists are not even mentioned.

Similar Threads

  1. Terminology: Afrikaner vs Boer
    By Hauke Haien in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: Saturday, March 16th, 2019, 10:13 AM
  2. German or Dutch: Which Terminology is Correct?
    By Huzzey in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 26th, 2008, 09:08 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Tuesday, December 20th, 2005, 03:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •