Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: G.F. Debetz on Eyelid Form

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    State
    Essex Essex
    Gender
    Politics
    Putinism
    Posts
    5,212
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post G.F. Debetz on Eyelid Form

    http://www.dienekes.com/blog/archives/000209.html

    G.F. Debetz on Eyelid Form

    Debets G.F. ,Anthropological Investigations in Daghestan, in Contributions to the Physical Anthropology of the Soviet Union, p. 87:

    "Eyelid Form

    This feature, which is so important for the differentiation of Europeoid from Mongoloid types, did not reveal any differences among Caucasian [Caucasian means from Caucasus, not 'Caucasoid'] nationalities. Observations of Georgian anthropologists showed certain distinctions of Caucasians from Russians: in the latter the eyefold was somewhat larger, the eye slit somewhat narrower and the position of the orbit a little more inclined. However, it is doubtful if one can consider these characters as being posessed by all Northern Europeoids. The results obtained by the Baltic Expedition, in which the author participated, showed that the Lithuanians, for example, do not disclose any difference from the Caucasians in regard to eyelid structure. In all probability, the distinctions of Russians from Caucasians should not be explained by the fact that the eyelid structure of Northern Europeans is different from that of Southern Europeans, but by the fact that the Russians absorbed elements which are characterized by some Mongoloid traits."

    Caricature of Boris Yeltsin emphasizing tilted outer rim. Yeltsin is of Baltic type with a slight Mongoloid admixture.


  2. #2
    Member Pomor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, December 25th, 2005 @ 06:45 AM
    Subrace
    north-europid
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Occupation
    student
    Politics
    Apolitical
    Posts
    705
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    http://www.dienekes.com/blog/archives/000209.html

    G.F. Debetz on Eyelid Form

    Debets G.F. ,Anthropological Investigations in Daghestan, in Contributions to the Physical Anthropology of the Soviet Union, p. 87:

    "Eyelid Form

    This feature, which is so important for the differentiation of Europeoid from Mongoloid types, did not reveal any differences among Caucasian [Caucasian means from Caucasus, not 'Caucasoid'] nationalities. Observations of Georgian anthropologists showed certain distinctions of Caucasians from Russians: in the latter the eyefold was somewhat larger, the eye slit somewhat narrower and the position of the orbit a little more inclined. However, it is doubtful if one can consider these characters as being posessed by all Northern Europeoids. The results obtained by the Baltic Expedition, in which the author participated, showed that the Lithuanians, for example, do not disclose any difference from the Caucasians in regard to eyelid structure. In all probability, the distinctions of Russians from Caucasians should not be explained by the fact that the eyelid structure of Northern Europeans is different from that of Southern Europeans, but by the fact that the Russians absorbed elements which are characterized by some Mongoloid traits."

    Caricature of Boris Yeltsin emphasizing tilted outer rim. Yeltsin is of Baltic type with a slight Mongoloid admixture.
    There is nothing mongoloid and/or Baltic about Yeltsin, he has a desease which is called alcoholism, thats what makes him look like he does. He is actually a high-skulled BA. This is a pic a while ago posted by LG. His nose was broken a couple of times thats why it looks like that.



    An article itself is BS.

  3. #3
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 24th, 2005 @ 11:12 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Location
    Everywhere
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Politics
    Non-hateful Nationalist
    Posts
    1,059
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    LOL, two can play the 'who is more Mongoloid' game Loki:

    Frequencies of the Mongoloid epicanthic eyefold for a few groups:

    Estonians: 2.2% (weakly developed)

    Ijores: 1.8% (weakly developed)

    Finns (proper): 1.9% (weakly developed)

    Karelians: 1.8% (weakly developed)

    Vepses: 1.8% (weakly developed)

    Saami: 7% (weakly developed)

    Finnish Swedes: 1.7% (weakly developed)

    Source: Anthropology of the Balto-Finnish Peoples by Karin Mark, p.91-92, table 23.

    Russians: 0.14% weakly developed epicanthus

    I think the number of epicanthic eyefolds is a better indication of the amount of Mongoloid admixture in a population then 'eylid form' alone.

    Just wait until I get Cheboksarov's stats on the number of epicanthi in Germans, then we'll talk
    Last edited by Prodigal Son; Friday, October 17th, 2003 at 08:06 PM.

  4. #4
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 24th, 2005 @ 11:12 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Location
    Everywhere
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Politics
    Non-hateful Nationalist
    Posts
    1,059
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki
    but by the fact that the Russians absorbed elements which are characterized by some Mongoloid traits.
    ROFL, so did Finns, Balts, Germans and Swedes. "Elements which are characterized by some Mongoloid traits" is a rather vague term (to say the least). Most importantly, its a term that cannot be used top quantify admixture. Get me some genetic studies and some anthropometric stats and then we'll talk.

Similar Threads

  1. Which Form of Government Were You Born Under?
    By Bärin in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: Monday, June 30th, 2008, 11:37 AM
  2. Introductions form the States
    By Balto Slav in forum Introductions & Greetings
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, September 25th, 2006, 04:57 PM
  3. Bavaria’s Last Form of Self-Governing
    By friedrich braun in forum The German Countries
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, October 6th, 2004, 09:53 PM
  4. Debetz' Racial Classification Scheme
    By Arkona in forum Physical Anthropology
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: Saturday, September 25th, 2004, 07:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •