What makes Semites, Dravidians, and North african Hamites

[anfernee]

caucasoid, in other words the same racail classification as aryans. i disagree with the notion that arabs, indics(dravidians) and north africans hamites are caucasoid and it'd be equally as unwise to put yorubas as caucasoids, eurocentric anthropoligists are biased and racist, to put arabs as caucasoids then south europeans who are mixed with arabs would be totally white and caucasoid just like them (north europeans), perfect solution, right? its sickening this racial classification to me the races should go like this

negroid (subsaharan africans)
caucasoids(europe, central asia, parts of north india)
mongoloids(east asians, southeast asians, amerindians)
semites(dravidians and arabs, jews)
hamites(north africans)

or something like that, anyway, the racial classification is bsed on evolution which is false so the racial classifcation is false. semites and hamites and dravidians are not caucasoids

[Awar]

ummm......dravids are a totally different racial type, and language group from both semites and hamites.

Dravids look similar ( to us who superficially view them ) to mestizos, because Dravids are a similar mix of similar ingredients.

Anyway, how would you classify Iranians of Iran, Iranians of Caucasus, Pakistani, Afghanistani, Tajikistani people etc?

Anyway, all numbered sure do look like caucasoids to me.

[anfernee]

true about dravids....they descend from the elamites of southwest persia, my point is, aryans are distinct from semites, hamites and dravidians just like all them are distinct from negroes or whatever etc
semites and hamites and dravidians cant look european nor can they look chinese! its the same thing/difference thats how fucked up the racial classifcations are.....
aryans from iran, north pakistan, afghanistan are whites/caucasoids and look generally similar to europeans
do you want to see pictures of them? i can show, they look european, they aryan