Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Why the US is planning war with Iran

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Alois B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, September 1st, 2006 @ 07:16 AM
    Subrace
    Cyborg
    Location
    The Distributed Reich
    Gender
    Politics
    NS Libertarian
    Religion
    Schwarze Sonne
    Posts
    22
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Lightbulb Why the US is planning war with Iran

    In November 2000, Iraq stopped accepting U.S. dollars for its oil. Counted as a purely political move, Saddam Hussein switched the currency required to purchase Iraqi oil to the euro. Selling oil through the U.N. Oil for Food Program, Iraq converted all of its U.S. dollars in its U.N. account to the euro. Shortly thereafter, Iraq converted $10 billion in its U.N. reserve fund to the euro. By the end of 2000, Iraq had abandoned the U.S. dollar completely.

    Two months after the United States invaded Iraq, the Oil for Food Program was ended, the country’s accounts were switched back to dollars, and oil began to be sold once again for U.S. dollars. No longer could the world buy oil from Iraq with the euro. Global U.S. dollar supremacy was restored. It is interesting to note that the latest recession which the United States endured began and ended within the same time frame as that during which Iraq was trading oil for euros. Whether this is a coincidence or related, the American people may never know.

    In March 2006, Iran will take Iraq’s switch to the petroeuro to new heights by launching a third oil exchange. The Iranians have developed a petroeuro system for oil trade which, when enacted, will once again threaten U.S. dollar supremacy far greater than Iraq’s euro conversion. Called the Iran Oil Bourse, an exchange that only accepts the euro for oil sales would mean that the entire world could begin purchasing oil from any oil-producing nation with euros instead of dollars. The Iranian plan isn’t limited to purchasing one oil-producing country’s oil with euros. Its plan will create a global alternative to the U.S. dollar. Come March 2006, the Iran Oil Bourse will further the momentum of OPEC to create an alternate currency for oil purchases worldwide. China, Russia, and the European Union are evaluating the Iranian plan to exchange oil for euros and giving the plan serious consideration.

    If you are skeptical regarding the meaning of oil being purchased with euros versus dollars and the devastating impact it will have on the economy of the United States, consider the historic move by the Federal Reserve to begin hiding information pertaining to the U.S. dollar money supply starting in March 2006. Since 1913, the year the abomination known as the Federal Reserve came to power, the supply of U.S. dollars was measured and publicly revealed through an index referred to as M-3. M-3 has been the main staple of money supply measurement and transparent disclosure since the Fed was founded. In his report, What’s the Fed up to with the money supply?, Robert McHugh writes, “On November 10, 2005, shortly after appointing Bernanke to replace Greenbackspan, the Fed mysteriously announced with little comment and no palatable justification that they will hide M-3 effective March 2006.” (To learn more about Robert McHugh's work, please visit https://www.technicalindicatorindex.com/Default.asp)

    Is it mere coincidence that the Fed will begin hiding M-3 the same month that Iran will launch its Iran Oil Bourse, or is there a direct threat to the stability of the U.S. dollar, the U.S. economy, and the U.S. standard of living? Are Americans being set up for a collapse in our economy that will make the Great Depression of the 1930’s look like a bounced check? If you cannot or will not make the value and stability of the U.S. currency of personal importance, if you are unwilling to demand from your elected officials, an immediate abolishment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the fiat money scheme that the banking cartel has used for nearly a century now to keep our government and our people in a state of perpetual debt, than you are faced with but two alternatives, abject poverty, or invading Iran.

    The plans to invade Iran are unspoken, but unfolding before our very eyes. The media has been reporting on Iran more often, and increasingly harshly. For the U.S. government to justify invading Iran, it must first begin to phase out the War in Iraq, which it is already doing. Next, it must portray the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as a threat to the region and the world. Finally, once naive American people are convinced the “weapons of mass destruction” that were to be found in Iraq are actually in Iran, coupled with the almost daily media coverage of Iran’s nuclear power / weapons program aspirations, and what we will soon have on our hands is another fabricated war that will result in tens of thousands of civilian lives being lost, all because the political elected pawns in Washington DC lack the discipline to return our currency to a gold or silver standard, end the relationship with the foreign banking cartel called the Federal Reserve, and limit the activities of the U.S. government to those articulated in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution for the United States of America.

    When a wayward and corrupt fiscal policy and fiat currency, coupled with runaway government spending, forces a nation to only be able to sustain the value of its currency with bullets, the citizenry of the country involved in wars primarily to sustain its currency have historically first became slaves to their government, and then to the nations that finally conquer them. If you question the validity of such a premise, or whether it could happen to the United States of America, study the fall of the Roman Empire. If you read the right books on the subject, you’ll quickly discover that towards the end of the Roman reign, the Roman Empire was doing exactly what America is doing today; attempting to sustain a failed fiat money system with bullets.

    Understanding fiat money is not an easy task, and the Federal Reserve, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund have purposely made it that way. They do not want the American people to realize that the money in their wallet loses its value with each new dollar that they print. They do not want people to understand that our money does not become money until it is borrowed. When the Federal Reserve has money printed, when it is in uncut sheets of paper, it is not yet money. After it is cut, bundled, and placed into the Federal Reserve vaults, it still is not money. It only becomes money once it is borrowed. Consequently, if all debt were to be paid, if the United States didn’t have an $8 trillion national debt and the American people were debt free, and if all loans of U.S. dollars made to foreigners were paid in full, there would be exactly zero U.S. dollars in circulation because it will have all been returned to the vaults of the Federal Reserve. This might seem hard to fathom, but it is the gospel of fiat money.

    The major news media in the United States, fed by Washington DC which in turn is fed by the Federal Reserve, literally, has already begun conditioning the American people for invading Iran. Media accounts of Iran’s nuclear ambitions along with amplification of the potential instability and core evilness of Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is setting the stage to spring the invasion of Iran on the American people. There does appear to be a direct correlation between the winding down effort underway in Iraq and the increase of anti-Iran rhetoric. How American soldiers ultimately arrive in Tehran is uncertain at this time, but it is reasonable to expect that if the Iran Oil Bourse opens for business in March 2006 as planned, it will only be a matter of time before the United States will have to blow it up.

    If the United States invades Iran, or if Israel starts military actions by launches missiles at Iran’s nuclear power facilities, which then opens the door for the United States to intervene, most Americans will believe that our military actions in Iran will be to defend freedom and liberty while spreading democracy, when the truth is that we’ll be fighting a war in Iran because of our nation’s relationship with the Federal Reserve, a so-called bank that is not owned by the federal government, maintains no reserve, and isn’t a bank at all, but a cartel. Just like our war in Iraq, Americans and foreigners will die in battle so that the historical power bankers and brokers; cartel members such as Rothschild, Morgan, Lehman, Lizard, Schrader, Lobe, Kuhn, and Rockefeller to name a few, can continue collecting interest on every single U.S. coin and dollar bill in circulation, while controlling the U.S. Congress to the extent that the U.S. taxpayer becomes the collateral and lender of last resort to cover bad loans and unpaid debts that these institutions create by loaning money to third world countries, some of which are devout enemies of the United States. Remember the $400 billion savings & loan bailout approved by the U.S. Congress during the Reagan Administration? America is still paying for it – you and me, and so will our children and grandchildren.

    It is well overdue for Americans, every American, to do whatever it takes to fully understand the relationship between the United States and the Federal Reserve, along with the grave consequences of our current fiat money system. For even if the United States wanted to continue to sustain the supremacy of the U.S. dollar with bullets, it is historically, impossible. When bullets become the commodity to secure a currency, it is a clear sign of devastating calamity looming. To ignore the warning signs is to suffer like you have never suffered before, or to die. Harsh words, but true.


    About the Author:
    Ed Haas is a freelance writer and author originally from Mt. Penn, Pennsylvania. He currently resides in beautiful Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. To learn more about Ed's work, please visit craftingprose.com. http://www.craftingprose.com

    Source
    "National Socialism will not be the last word. Things must be concealed in the background which we cannot imagine at present, but we may expect to them to appear in the course of the future." - Carl Jung

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Monday, March 5th, 2007 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Occupation
    Student
    Posts
    375
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    The U.S. certainly has the strategic upper hand to deal with Iran (Iraq and Afghanistan).

    Iran is one of the few governments advocating the destruction of "Anglo-Saxon civilization" , so if Iran stays on the map or not would mean nothing to me as long as Israeli troops stay there to occupy. There will be no more coddling the Ayatollahs as Jimmy Carter had done.
    Last edited by Ahren_; Sunday, January 15th, 2006 at 02:01 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    dehook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 @ 06:13 PM
    Status
    On Holiday
    Ethnicity
    Faroese
    Ancestry
    sdsds
    Subrace
    sds
    Country
    Switzerland Switzerland
    State
    Brussels Brussels
    Location
    dfdf
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    sfds
    Occupation
    dgdfg
    Politics
    dfdf
    Religion
    Whatever
    Posts
    126
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahren
    The U.S. certainly has the strategic upper hand to deal with Iran.

    Iran is one of the few governments advocating the destruction of "Anglo-Saxon civilization" , so if Iran stays on the map or not would mean nothing to me as long as Israeli troops stay there to occupy. There will be no more coddling the Ayatollahs as Jimmy Carter had done.
    Yes, it's scary. Jews are largely behind the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization, but if America withdraws its aid the Israelis will be less able to defend themselves against the Arabs. Israel will go down, then they move on to the next target, and the next, until they've finished their "master plan" and attacked all of their "29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and in the West". I hate Israel as much as anybody, but I can't help but think that there isn't much choice. It's a war between barbarism and civilization. I get the feeling that European-Americans who care about their heritage are in a sort of catch-22 situation at the moment, when it comes to their political decisions. I'm starting to sound like a neocon now so I'll shut up...
    Last edited by dehook; Saturday, January 14th, 2006 at 02:09 PM.

  4. #4
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010 @ 01:24 AM
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Location
    Transnistria
    Gender
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran



    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt.

    « -Oh my God, but you're a neo-nazi?!...
    -But why neo? »

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Imperator X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Last Online
    Saturday, April 4th, 2009 @ 01:47 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Subrace
    Nordid/Atlantid.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Massachusetts Massachusetts
    Location
    Boston
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Family
    Single, looking
    Occupation
    Looking
    Politics
    Constitutionalist
    Religion
    Hindu - Shakta
    Posts
    792
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    It has been my firm opinion all along that we should've invaded Iran instead. Consider: Iran is the seat of militant Islam, it is a Shi'a theocracy. It is the seat of major Islamic education centers, madrassas. Iran is the true possessor of WMDs, just look at them conspiring to develop 20 nuclear facilities.

    Saddam Hussain was a secularist, he was no Islamic miltant and actually helped to keep militantcy down. The Baath party, while totalitarian, was essentially socialist. What are most of the governments of Western Europe? Socialist. You are not going to get much more civilized of a government than that in that part of the world.

    Certain inpertinent points which only I would appreciate about the toppling of Iran, which I will bring up for the Hell of it:

    Iran has been heckling Hindu India for years, the Shi'as established Hyderabad and, along with their Sunni counterparts the Mughals, oppressed Hindus.

    The Muslims ousted the original ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism from Iran forcing the Zoroastrians to migrate to India, so vengeance for the moderate Persians and assorted Persian folk cults/tribes has been a long time coming.

    In closing, this whole situation with IRAQ is stupid, they oust Saddam Hussain a secular dictator and replace him with an Islamic cleric (Ayatollah Sistani) who is Shia and along the same lines as the Ayatollah of Iran. What does this create? One big Shi'a powerbloc that is just waiting to fund terrorist campaigns against Hindu India and the entire world.
    SVMDEVSSVMCAESARSVMCAELVMETINFERNVM

  6. #6
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Monday, March 5th, 2007 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Occupation
    Student
    Posts
    375
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    Eliminating the Mujahideen from the planet would be a good start. The barbarism they got away with in Bosnia and Kosovo should never be forgotten. Whether they are Shiite Hezbollah or Sunni Al Qaeda, they are breaking international law by existing. It is an illegal army which does not play by the rules of war and uses U.S. and U.N. liberal policy to mock us. Any country harboring these rodents should be held accountable.

    But this conflicts with my other opinion which is that Europeans should not expand beyond their capabilities. As the Roman empire expanded rather quickly and without much forsight into the future, they ended up having to comply with foreigners to keep themselves safe from revolt or invasion. It was a real tragedy that European powers could not help one another when they had the chance to neutralize the real enemies.
    Last edited by Ahren_; Sunday, January 15th, 2006 at 12:32 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    CountBloodSpawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, June 18th, 2006 @ 12:29 AM
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    northeast
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Family
    Single
    Occupation
    dark sith lord
    Politics
    National-Socialism
    Religion
    Odinism
    Posts
    233
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    why invade that part of the world at all? Iran and Iraq have posted no direct threat to america or our people at all,not to mention at all if anything Iran and Iraq could have made great business and trading partners(that Bush and his stupid democracy speech,he wouldn't know good international diplomacy if it bit him in the ass) the states army actually should have invaded Columbia, its a main source of communist insurgencey in our part of the world(insurgencey that has showed hostility toward the USA) ,illegal business that has created much corruption within american borders, not to mention we would be gaining imperial power again in the southern american part of the world/also great amounts of wealth and land seized on Columbia for our people as a result, we would be returning to the good old days of manifest destiney that Teddy Roosevelt lived up to

  8. #8
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Monday, March 5th, 2007 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Occupation
    Student
    Posts
    375
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    I don't see narco-terrorism as top priority for the U.S. at the time. In fact I think Drug addiction is a somewhat efficient way at ridding society of weak and unwanted people.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    CountBloodSpawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, June 18th, 2006 @ 12:29 AM
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    northeast
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Family
    Single
    Occupation
    dark sith lord
    Politics
    National-Socialism
    Religion
    Odinism
    Posts
    233
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahren
    I don't see narco-terrorism as top priority for the U.S. at the time. In fact I think Drug addiction is a somewhat efficient way at ridding society of weak and unwanted people.
    all drug addiction does is provide obstacles
    and health hazards for our people, ones who are truely weak usually get rid of themselves one way or another

  10. #10

    Re: Why the US is planning war with Iran

    The first article was very good and gives us something to consider. I think it may be the motivation for non-Jewish financial interests to go along with plans for Iran's demise but otherwise there are problems with it. For instance, King George the Easedropper couldn't understand it in a million years even with all his advisors coaching him. For King George there are only three basic reasons to attack Iran: Israel, Israel and Israel. Look at what he said after meeting with Angelia Merkel, words saying that threatening Israel was unacceptable. Unacceptable to who? To the wacko Christian Fundamentalists, that's who. Bush is a simple minded moron who should never be credited with higher brain functions. "His" Neo-Cons lead him around by the nose, sprinkling in biblical prophesy as motivation.

    The simple fact is that a land invasion of Iran is impossible for the US military to maintain and win at this time. Air strikes will not do the job. Israel would have to overfly Iraq, now under US control and Iran would see this, rightly, as an attack by both countries. Israel hasn't got the muscle to deal with Iran by itself.

    The fact that it is all an Israeli problem is evidenced in Bush's statements about Iran threatening its neighbors. Neighbors alike Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Afghanistan, and Pakistan could care less. They are certainly not threatned. If Iran had missiles which could hit Europe, it would be Bulgaria or Greece. Are Bulgaria and Greece showing signs of fear? Iran's neighbor, Russia, is selling Iran missiles. No sign of fear there. China is and will take Iran's side in the United Nations. Iran can't possilbly hit the USA. So who is fearful? Only Israel.

    Bush and his Red State religious wackos actually think the purpose of the United States of America is to safeguard Israel. They actually think that the lives of our soldiers should and must be sacrificed so that the lives of Israeli boys can be spared. They think the entire economy of the United States and its entire military should be on call for Israel's benifit. Even the civil and Constitutional Rights of the American people should be subjugated to the greater good of rounding up Israel's enemies. I swear this is the truth no matter how crazy it must sound to Europeans.

    Why is the US planning war with Iran? The reason is that nobody, no agent of our press, no governmental official, nobody rising above the level of bar-room talk will question where this President's loyalities lie. Do his primary loyalities lie with Israel or the United States? He needs a loyality check but in the Land of the Free, nobody will give it to him or even question him on this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. War With Iran: An Oncoming Catastrophe?
    By DreamWalker in forum The United States
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Friday, April 23rd, 2021, 09:31 AM
  2. The 200 Years War: The Tragedy of Iran
    By Ahnenerbe in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Monday, August 1st, 2016, 11:59 PM
  3. Deep War Planning and the Shadow Government
    By Zimobog in forum The United States
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 1st, 2010, 04:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •