Perhaps others well-read in genetics can comment on this.
"Genes that form part of a cell nucleus possess an internal equilibrium as a group, just as do the members of social institutions. Genes in a population are in equilibrium if the population is living a healthy life as a corporate entity. Racial intermixture can upset the genetic as well as the social equilibrium of a group, and so, newly introduced genes tend to disappear or be reduced to a minimum percentage unless they possess a selective advantage over their local counterparts."
Coon states the above for neither political or social purpose but merely to show that "were it not for the mechanism cited above, men would not be black, white, yellow or brown. We would all be light khaki, for there has been enough gene flow over the clinal regions of the world during the last half million years to homogenize us all had that been the evolutionary scheme of things."
Hybrids tend to return to one of their parental stocks.
Each subspecies has a "status quo" that include not only variances in bones and teeth but also skin, hair, lips, ears and also differences seen only with a microscope.
I've thought for some time now that subspecies, when mixed, will revert back to a parental stock. It may take a thousand years or more but it will occur. This has just been an idea for me and I've had nothing to back it up.
If it is true, then those ill-willed proponents of race-mixing have no intention of creating a mixed, yet homogenized, utopia but instead want to create genetic and social chaos. I believe here in Canada and the US the result will break the countries apart. And I think that is their intention.
Bookmarks