Kevin MacDonald on Group Evolutionary Strategies

[Agrippa]

I just meant that being to closed-minded was indeed the reason for some civilisations to at least get weaker over time, since you should always be open for improvements, things which bring something good for the individuals and the collective, bring higher efficiency without having to lose potential.

Because being too closed minded and intolerant, can mean to overlook improvements because of your own prejudices, and that shouldnt be the case. On the other hand, what the Liberals mean with "open minded" is oftentimes something completely different and refers mainly to the idea that the individual should be allowed to do what ever it wants as long as it doesnt hurt others individuals directly (indirect effects and effects for the whole group mostly ignored) in its private space, whereas it has to follow the rules of the plutocratic state and Liberalcapitalistic economy otherwise. There is a soft but useless, finally even destructive freedom of the private individual, and a not tolerated freedom to really change the system, to form group organisations etc. which could harm or at least encumber the Liberalcapitalistic mechanisms and plutocratic power. If you want to let the group come before the individual and are against the free market oriented society which is just a store for sociopathic plutocrats which have no interests in the group, than you are "not open minded" in their "politically correct" drivel because they want just "free" ("freed" from their wider social environment and group, helpless and manipulable) and purchasable individuals...
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.p...745#post330745

Thats not even real individual freedom, which isnt possible for anyone without immense financial ressources in such a society, its just the illusion of it, like "Democracy" in its current form should be a "beneficial myth", like the Neoconservatives call it, which should give the "people the feeling to participate". Thats another major point, they should have the feeling, no matter if they have real rights and participation or not...

[Martial]

Yet another great article by MacDonald, this time dealing with how "birth-rate competition" is a crucial part of inter-ethnic relations.



Full article:
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/paper-numbersGame.html

"Birth rate competition" is racist nonsence. Have you not heard enough fools proclaiming the largest problem in America to be the black birth rate? Mr. David Duke, the famed convicted felon, thinks so; do you want to be counted as one of his supporters?

[Horagalles]

"Birth rate competition" is racist nonsence.

"Racist" is smear terminology and not descriptive. It says more about the user then about the person group being labeled.

Have you not heard enough fools proclaiming the largest problem in America to be the black birth rate?

An ad hominem. Any Black birth rate shouldn't be a problem for White America anyway. I do not have to explain to you what influence birth rates have on future demographies, culture, economics, science, do I?!

Mr. David Duke, the famed convicted felon, thinks so; do you want to be counted as one of his supporters?

That's the next silly, insinuative ad hominem usually use by idiots void of logic. Do you want to be counted as one?

You completely lost the argument, while not even a single fact has been brought up.

[Enlil]

(I bookmarked this thread to read later, so sorry if this question has already been covered somehow.)

I wonder how MacDonald would explain that a huge majority of american jews (87%!) vote democrat, and do not adher to the neocon ideology at all. If this was an issue of some kind of ethnic strategy, wouldn't the ethnic group in question support the "jewish" ideology of neoconservatism?

[Flag-Soil]

(I bookmarked this thread to read later, so sorry if this question has already been covered somehow.)

I wonder how MacDonald would explain that a huge majority of american jews (87%!) vote democrat, and do not adher to the neocon ideology at all. If this was an issue of some kind of ethnic strategy, wouldn't the ethnic group in question support the "jewish" ideology of neoconservatism?

Leftist political movements are almost invariably created, run and financed by Jews. Communism/Marxism are Jewish ideas.

Jewish commitment to the left has often been motivated by the expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another way to dissolve white loyalties that might exclude Jews.The appeal of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that Jewish particularism will be exempt: "At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by whites would result in whites not perceiving Jews as in a different social category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a strong personal identity as Jews."

Neconservatism is a version of conservatism with strong jewish influences:
According to Prof. MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an ideology that had turned against Israel and they refashioned American conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial identification from the "respectable" right.

If the current state of America under the Republicans can at all be called Communist, that's why.

3 quotes on Jews and the left by Rabbis:

"The Jews welcome this revolution in the Christian world, and the Jews should show an example. It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism: all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, by Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 148).

Some call it Marxism -- I call it Judaism." (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935)

"The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism)." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 138).





I recommend Kevin McDonald's books, they are relatively cheap on Amazon. Seperation and it's Discontents is the best book for European readers IMO while The Culture of Critique generally covers american themes.

PDF of the Culture of Critique
http://www.prometheism.net/library/C...OfCritique.pdf

Chapters in Seperation and it's Discontents Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism

A Social Identity Theory of Anti-Semitism
The Ideology and Practice of Anti-Semitism
Reactive Anti-Semitism in the Late Roman Empire
Reactive Anti-Semitism During the Medieval Period
Naziism as an Anti-Semitic Group Evolutionary Strategy
Jewish Strategies for Combating Anti-Semitism
Rationalization and Apologia: The Intellectual Construction of Judaism
Self-Deception as an Aspect of Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy
Is Diaspora Judaism Ceasing to be an Evolutionary Strategy?


Chapters in The Culture of Critique

The Boasian School Of Anthropology And The Decline Of Darwinism In The Social Sciences
Jews And The Left
Jewish Involvement In The Psychoanalytic Movement
The Frankfurt School Of Social Research And The Pathologization Of Gentile Group Allegiances
The Jewish Criticism Of Gentile Culture: A Reprise
Jewish Involvement In Shaping U.S. Immigration Policy
Conclusion: Whither Judaism And The West?

[Horagalles]

I wonder how MacDonald would explain that a huge majority of american jews (87%!) vote democrat, and do not adher to the neocon ideology at all. If this was an issue of some kind of ethnic strategy, wouldn't the ethnic group in question support the "jewish" ideology of neoconservatism?

Which one is the target market of "neoconservatism"?! Since both Republican and Democrats are serving Jewish interest well, there is no reason for them to exclude any of those parties in the context of an "ethnic strategy". Your remark implies that there has to be something like formal consistency within their ethnic strategy. Something like non-contradiction of principles, this is Germanic-Western way of thinking and does not have to apply to other ethnicities, at all.

Bear in mind that the Jews have understood the importance of civil societies, hegemonial ideas and institutional ideas. It doesn't matter WHO is running the country, as long as you can influence the thought of his support base and of those that have to execute his command. Even (post-)modern societies are regulated by the subconscious and taboos. Formal ideas are merely a matter of external organisation, what counts is how people feel about issues.

Of course it could be that ethnic cohesion amongst Jews is fading. Most of them have built up some privat wealth and are often financially independent from their community. So the motive of "working together" might have become weaker.

[Oxygen]

Very interesting interviews with Dr. Kevin MacDonald of the A3P

Kevin MacDonald on Group Evolution

Dr. Kevin MacDonald describes how prevalent psychological traits that appear adaptive to a group, but maladaptive to individual members of the group, may be explained by selection pressures exerted by culture.

Altruism among genetically dissmilar persons, and monogamy, are examples of such group traits that are difficult to explain by natural selection acting only at the level of genes or individuals.

Culture can suppress expression of people's genetic tendencies that conflict with a desired group trait. For instance, a child's selfishness can be reduced by her teachers reinforcing altruism and discouraging selfish behavior. Over time, the frequency of genes tending to make group members selfish may decrease if the group's culture encourages members to choose only unselfish mates.

Kevin MacDonald, PhD, is Professor of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, where he teaches evolutionary psychology and developmental psychology.

He finds that certain Jewish group evolutionary strategies, such as unrestricted immigration, multiculturalism, financial and media control, and attempts at outlawing expression by calling it "hate speech," are leading to the displacement of European-derived people in America.

Jewish Intelligence and Goals

Kevin MacDonald is Professor of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach.

He discusses how Jews have used selective mating (eugenics) to increase their group intelligence over centuries. This explains why Jewish people have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group.

Dr. MacDonald further describes how to recognize Jewish intellectual movements, such as Freudian psychoanalysis, Boasian anthropology, and the Frankfurt School of social research.

MacDonald finds that certain Jewish group evolutionary strategies, such as unrestricted immigration, multiculturalism, financial and media control, and attempts at outlawing expression by calling it "hate speech," are leading to the end of white people in America.

Kevin MacDonald on Family Decline, Sexuality, and American Culture

Dr. Kevin MacDonald discusses how Jewish-influenced cultural changes since the 1960s have modified sexual values and reproduction patterns, leading to greater expression of destructive genetic traits in Western society.

He finds that Jewish group evolutionary strategies, such as unrestricted immigration, neoconservatism, multiculturalism, Zionism, financial and media control, and attempts at outlawing expression as "hate speech," are leading to the end of white people in America.

Jewish Moral Deception, Free Speech, and the Israel Lobby

Dr. Kevin MacDonald discusses how moral universalism advanced by Jewish intellectuals is really a double standard: non-Jews are expected to embrace "universal" values, but Jews are not.

In what MacDonald sees as a group evolutionary strategy, what is good for Jews is framed as "beneficial for all."

Loving universal values, citizens of Western countries tend to fall for this ruse, according to MacDonald, an evolutionary psychology professor.

Policies based on "universal" values include:

(1) mass immigration and multiculturalism for the United States and Europe, but not for Israel; and

(2) neoconservative justifications for wars waged by the US, but not Israel, against Israel's enemies. These justifications include "freedom" and "democracy."

[Oxygen]

Matt Parrott interviews Dr. Kevin MacDonald, a professor, relentless advocate for White American families, and author of Cultural Insurrections: Essays on Western Civilization, Jewish Influence, and Anti-Semitism. Topics include:

* Ethnic competition and the diversity racket;
* Christian Zionism;
* White culture.

About Kevin MacDonald

Professor MacDonald hosts The Occidental Observer, a site presenting original content touching on the themes of white identity, white interests, and the culture of the West. He’s the author of several insightful books. He’s appeared on The Political Cesspool, submitted several articles to VDare, and is a Director of the American Third Position.

http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=9311
Download link: http://reasonradionetwork.com/_archi...a-20101027.mp3

K-Mac is great as usual, very interesting and concise he reminds me a bit off William Pierce. Recommended listening, great download and listen to on your Mp3 player when your out and about.

[Vril]

K-MacDonald is the best academic source for references, proof, insight etc about zionist and jewish power and its ongoing organised drive to control and undermine our western native culture and society.

His books contain an incredible wealth of well documented information, which is not only helpful to convince anyone who is still ignorant or sceptial, knowledge thereoff helps tremendously in any discussion with hostile people about this very sensitive topic. I am currently reading ''The Culture of Critique'', which is truly brilliant. The only downside: that 400 page book is so complete with sources and proof, that at times it is hard to read and remain concentrated: simply too much information.

The guy is very thorough and intellectually honest. He started out from a very neutral position and after intensive study and writing 3 books about the subject, he became very aware and extremely sceptical vis-a-vis''the tribe'' (a bit like myself).

Anyone who is serious about defending our culture and understanding what is truly going on should make the effort to read this guy's work.