Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Joint Genome Institute Sequences DNA of Prehistoric Cave Bears

  1. #1
    Disinterested
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 13th, 2005 @ 10:17 PM
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Gender
    Politics
    Folkish
    Posts
    1,403
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Joint Genome Institute Sequences DNA of Prehistoric Cave Bears

    Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    The genomic DNA sequencing of an extinct Pleistocene cave bear species -- the kind of stuff once reserved for science fiction -- has been logged into scientific literature thanks to investigators from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI). The study, published in the June 2 online edition of the journal Science, has set the research community's sights on traveling back in time through the vehicle of DNA sequencing to reveal the story of other extinct species -- including our nearest relatives, the Neandertals.

    Until now, researchers have been stymied in attempting to sequence genomes of extinct species. The DOE JGI scientists overcame many of the difficulties normally associated with recovery of DNA from ancient samples. DNA starts degrading at death when microbes attack the decaying carcass to utilize the nutrients present in the dead organism as an energy source. What remains -- and confounds efforts to sequence and characterize these artifacts -- is an overabundance of microbial contaminants, along with the occasional DNA fingerprints contributed unwittingly by modern fossil hunters or lab workers.

    "Among the limitations of previous ancient DNA studies was that they were restricted to mitochondrial DNA sequences," said Eddy Rubin, DOE JGI director, in whose laboratory the work was conducted. "While mitochondria are great for learning about evolutionary relationships between species, to understand the functional differences between extinct and modern species we really need genomic DNA, and nobody has been able to purify and sequence large quantities of DNA from these old samples.

    "We applied the standard techniques that we normally use for modern genome projects to ancient DNA specimens -- a brute-force, high-throughput sequencing approach," Rubin said. "With this strategy, we weren't terribly concerned that much of what we were sequencing were microbial contaminants, but hoped that among the large amounts of sequence that we were generating would be some of the ancient DNA we really were interested in.

    "We were looking for the proverbial needle in the haystack," Rubin said. "It worked -- among the expected lion's share of contaminants we recovered reasonable amounts of 40,000-year-old cave bear DNA and useful information from it. We were lucky in that we had a very powerful magnet, in the form of industrial-strength computing, to tease out the interesting data from a hodgepodge of different DNAs."

    It turned out that about 6 percent of the sequence from the sample yielded cave bear sequence; the rest represented a mosaic of microbial contaminants. Nevertheless, within that fraction was a range of genomic sequence types, including fragments of 21 genes identified by comparing the cave bear samples to the complete dog genome sequence that exists in public databases. Dogs and bears, which diverged some 50 million years ago, are 92 percent similar on the sequence level.

    The samples of cave bear bones and teeth from the study were collected from two cave locations in Austria. Extinct for more than 10,000 years, these particular cave bears, Ursus spelaeus, whose remains are found in abundance, were related to the ancestors of modern brown bears and polar bears. Fossil and cave-painting evidence shows that ancient humans interacted with the cave bears.

    "When people hear about our success, they immediately think about how this strategy could work for dinosaurs," Rubin said. But barring some fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of DNA decay, he says it is highly unlikely that viable DNA will be recovered from 150- to 200-million-year-old Jurassic age samples.

    Currently, the theoretical age limit is about 100,000 years for samples preserved in the same conditions that the cave bear specimens were found -- relatively dry, high altitude, with moderate temperatures -- perhaps longer if frozen.

    "We picked cave bear as an initial test-case ancient DNA target because the samples we used in the study are roughly the same age as Neandertals," Rubin said. "Our real interest is in hominids, which include humans and the extinct Neandertal -- the only other hominid species that we have to compare with humans.

    "Our nearest living relative is the chimp, and that's five million years of divergence," he said. "Although we are very similar on a sequence level, there are obvious phenotypic differences. Next, we would like to access and evaluate genomic information about other hominid species, Neandertals in particular, as they represent probably our closest prehistoric relative."

    Another possibility is to apply the techniques to the remains found recently in Indonesia of the Flores Man, nicknamed "the Hobbit." Although younger, at 18,000 years old, the skeletons were found in a tropical environment that may have accelerated the DNA degradation process. The Flores Man is believed to have derived from a more ancient hominid lineage, Homo erectus, which diverged from modern humans some two million years ago -- as compared to Neandertal, which diverged 500,000 years ago.

    The approach would be to optimize the protocols that succeeded in the cave bear project to extract useful quantities of DNA from Neandertal and Flores Man, so that two hominid species could be compared to humans. Then, by including chimps in that comparison, Rubin said, researchers would gain insight into the genomic changes between chimps and hominids and help describe the chain of evolutionary events that led to humans.

    "This research represents the merging of two previously unrelated fields -- ancient species investigations and powerful high-throughput DNA sequencing technology, DOE JGI's forte," said Dr. Aristides Patrinos, DOE's associate director of science for Biological and Environmental Research, whose office supported the published work. "This is yet another of the many advances enabled by the original investment made by DOE in the Human Genome Project."

    First author on the Science paper was Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory postdoctoral fellow James Noonan, who joined DOE JGI's Chris Detter and Doug Smith, and collaborators at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany and the Institute of Paleontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

    The DOE Joint Genome Institute, supported primarily by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science, is among the world leaders in whole-genome sequencing projects devoted to microbes and microbial communities, model system vertebrates, aquatic organisms, and plants. Established in 1997, JGI now unites the expertise of four national laboratories -- Lawrence Livermore, Lawrence Berkeley, Los Alamos, and Oak Ridge -- along with the Stanford Human Genome Center to advance the frontiers of genome sequencing and related biology. Additional information can be found at the JGI Website.

    Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a mission to ensure national security and to apply science and technology to the important issues of our time. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by the University of California for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration.

  2. #2
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 07:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    This work must be the basis for the new effort on the genome of the Neandertals which is being done by these same people. It is interesting that the cave bear is related to the Brown and Polar bears.

  3. #3
    Disinterested
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 13th, 2005 @ 10:17 PM
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Gender
    Politics
    Folkish
    Posts
    1,403
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Solar Wolff
    This work must be the basis for the new effort on the genome of the Neandertals which is being done by these same people. It is interesting that the cave bear is related to the Brown and Polar bears.
    Why is this surprising to you?

  4. #4
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 07:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    Quote Originally Posted by atlanto-med
    Why is this surprising to you?
    The other large Pleistocene bear, the shortfaced bear is most closely related to a small bear in the Andes. It is only distantly related to the polar bear which is more closely related to the American black bear than the Brown bear of Europe, Asia and America. The cave bear looks more different from the Brown, Polar and American black bear than the shortfaced bear yet it seems to be more closely related to them.

    Also, the methodology used to do this work is new (at least to me).

    Oh yes, regarding the short faced bear, there is an eskimo legend about very large black and white bears which were different from polar bears and survived into recent times. A hunter on the Kamchatka Peninsula shot a large, strange bear and took the pelt to Moscow. He didn't believe it to be a Brown Bear. Legends there also talk of a very large, rare bear. Perhaps a Pleistocene survival.

    Something else that surprises me is that nobody else is interested in this thread yet they find typing Jenna Jamison interesting.

  5. #5
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Country
    Flanders Flanders
    Gender
    Posts
    5,485
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    26
    Thanked in
    23 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Solar Wolff
    The other large Pleistocene bear, the shortfaced bear is most closely related to a small bear in the Andes. It is only distantly related to the polar bear which is more closely related to the American black bear than the Brown bear of Europe, Asia and America. The cave bear looks more different from the Brown, Polar and American black bear than the shortfaced bear yet it seems to be more closely related to them.

    Also, the methodology used to do this work is new (at least to me).

    Oh yes, regarding the short faced bear, there is an eskimo legend about very large black and white bears which were different from polar bears and survived into recent times. A hunter on the Kamchatka Peninsula shot a large, strange bear and took the pelt to Moscow. He didn't believe it to be a Brown Bear. Legends there also talk of a very large, rare bear. Perhaps a Pleistocene survival.

    Something else that surprises me is that nobody else is interested in this thread yet they find typing Jenna Jamison interesting.
    Perhaps this thread would avail itself with a captivated audience if the DNA of prehistoric beavers had been sequenced.........
    Last edited by Dr. Solar Wolff; Monday, July 11th, 2005 at 10:08 PM.

  6. #6
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 07:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    Sorry Frans--somehow I tried to respond and found myself in your post but I deleted it.

    I wanted to say that more interest in this thread might be present if instead of bears or beavers, it dealt with prehistoric porn stars. I realize this is what you were getting at also, Frans.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Oskorei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, December 14th, 2008 @ 06:15 PM
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Subrace
    Tydal/Litorid/Nordid
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    Location
    Gothenburrah
    Gender
    Politics
    Identitär
    Religion
    Indo-europeisk Traditionalist
    Posts
    2,172
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    The first thing that comes to mind when I read this thread is:

    Will it be able to clone various pre-historic animals using this knowledge? I am thinking both cave bear, and sabre tooth tiger, mammoth, and so on.

  8. #8
    Disinterested
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 13th, 2005 @ 10:17 PM
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Gender
    Politics
    Folkish
    Posts
    1,403
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    Quote Originally Posted by Oskorei
    The first thing that comes to mind when I read this thread is:

    Will it be able to clone various pre-historic animals using this knowledge? I am thinking both cave bear, and sabre tooth tiger, mammoth, and so on.
    Yes, it should be.

  9. #9
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, September 5th, 2008 @ 07:36 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    4,095
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    16 Posts

    Post Re: Joint Genome Institute sequences DNA of prehistoric cave bears

    It doesn't sound to me as if it could using this methodology. What I got was that big chunks would be forced out of the other biologic polution caused by bacteria. I am not sure the big chunks could be used to clone anything unless they were put together properly or almost properly. But, we could get big pictures of how an organism's genome looked. Also, these bases are as dead as disco, so may carry a chemical signature but would they be biologically active? How about your feedback on this Atlanto-med and others???

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: Monday, May 28th, 2018, 10:59 PM
  2. Evidence for Herbivorous Cave Bears (Ursus Spelaeus) in Goyet Cave, Belgium
    By Catterick in forum Natural Sciences & Environment
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Tuesday, September 6th, 2016, 01:16 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, March 7th, 2005, 12:42 AM
  4. Replies: 20
    Last Post: Thursday, December 23rd, 2004, 05:04 AM
  5. mitochondrial DNA control region sequences in the Lithuanian population.
    By Euclides in forum Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Haplogroups
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, May 12th, 2004, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •