Where does my statement suggest that?Originally Posted by RedJack
Where does my statement suggest that?Originally Posted by RedJack
If the modern Balkanoids are in any way different from ancient Balkanoids,Originally Posted by Mimas
then, they wouldn't be so overwhelmingly made out of 8000-25.000 yr. old
LOCAL haplogroups.
Perhaps non-Balkanoid women invaded Balkans, but, as for Y-chromosome (male ) lineages, by far, most are local, and the only noticeable differences in variation are among Slavic-speaking peoples ( explainable by the well-documented Slavic intrustion into the Balkans ), and not some mythic "nordic" conquest.
Those Dorians obviously were ethnically cleansed by swarthy Levantines because of their blond hair and noble appearance.Originally Posted by Awar
Tolerance is a proof of distrust in one's own ideals. Friedrich Nietzsche
I've just read on BIASUTTI texts a note about the blond presence in ancient Greece. His studies made him certain of the connection between the light complexioned presence and a slavic depigmented element in the areaOriginally Posted by Awar
Is that fromOriginally Posted by Zyklop
Arthur Kemp's "March of the Titans: or, how the noble blonde aryans got pwn3d on every corner of earth"
I didn´t read Arthur Kemp but if we seriously believe in a civilization that originated in the Balkans, we can as well believe in UFO origins of the Nordic race.
Tolerance is a proof of distrust in one's own ideals. Friedrich Nietzsche
Not only did many civilizations originate in the Balkans, but also up to 60% of the male lineages of Scandinavia and Germania have originated in the Balkans and Anatolia, the rest being of Iberian, Caucasus and Uralic origin.Originally Posted by Zyklop
So, face it... not only did Europe become civilized from the Middle-East-via-Balkans, the purest Germanics are also of clear, male Balkan origin.
If you base your prejudices against the people of the Balkans on the
poor economic situation, you must be a young lad, since this economic situation was much better only 15 years ago.
With "civilization" I didn´t exactly mean Paleolithic hordes
And, since you mention it, my "prejudices" (which hardly exist) against Balkan people are mostly based on experiences in everyday life.
Tolerance is a proof of distrust in one's own ideals. Friedrich Nietzsche
I think there are huge differents between the various peoples of the Balkan, much bigger ones than f.e. in Germany of course.Originally Posted by Zyklop
Both between ethnic groups, city-country, social group etc.
So its hard to generalize it, especially if its about f.e. criminal Albanian immigrants or Gypsies etc...
Magna Europa est patria nostra
STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM!
Neither did I. Palaeolithic populations of Europe were becoming civilized during their contact with Neolithic newcomers from the Middle-East.Originally Posted by Zyklop
Agriculture which sparked the appearance of first civilizations in Europe.
Though, Europe only became more advanced than other areas on earth
a few hundred years ago, thanks to industrialism.
Well, your idea is that "Balkan people couldn't have created any civilization",And, since you mention it, my "prejudices" (which hardly exist) against Balkan people are mostly based on experiences in everyday life.
and that's based on nothing really.
Through most of its history, Balkans was more advanced, or on par with the rest of the continent. ( I say continent, because the word 'Europe' was originally used only for the Balkans area ).
The only setbacks were experienced due to invasions and wars ( which would set-back any area ), like the recent wars, or the negative rule of communism.
Bookmarks