Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: South Africa: The World’s Most Extreme Affirmative Action Program

  1. #1
    Account Inactive
    friedrich braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Monday, November 3rd, 2008 @ 03:04 AM
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Gender
    Age
    51
    Politics
    Eugenics
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,086
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    The World's Most Extreme Affirmative Action Program

    POLICY MATTERS

    The World's Most Extreme
    Affirmative Action Program
    Aiming for prosperity would be better.

    BY ROBERT GUEST
    Sunday, December 26, 2004 12:01 a.m. EST

    In South Africa, virtually all the poor people are black. It does not follow that all black South Africans are poor, but the South African government has for the past 10 years acted as if the two words were interchangeable. Any program whose stated aim is to uplift those who were crushed by apartheid is assumed, ipso facto, to be a good thing. This has culminated in something called "Black Economic Empowerment," a process whereby white-owned firms are encouraged to surrender large dollops of equity to black businessmen. This is "voluntary," but firms that stay white cannot win government contracts, and many assume that if they do not yield now, they will end up being nationalized, Mugabe-style, in a decade or two.

    The government wants about 25% of most industries to be in black hands by 2010. The new black capitalists are supposed to pay a "market" price for their acquisitions, but they don't have the money, so they don't.

    Fretting about the color of one's shareholders is a distraction from the humdrum task of making things that people might want to buy. But at least it's giving a leg-up to poor blacks, right? Wrong. Since the aim, as far as business is concerned, is to placate the government, the blacks who have been "empowered" have largely been senior members of the ruling African National Congress. The bulk of the "empowerment" seems to involve just four very rich men, three of them contenders for the presidency in 2009, when Thabo Mbeki stands down.





    "Black empowerment" has become such a naked carve-up that several of the ANC's traditional allies have started to complain. Labor unions are threatening to obstruct the most egregious deals, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu has lamented that black empowerment was benefiting only "a small elite." Mr. Mbeki responded with a furious rebuttal, in which he accused the archbishop of being ignorant and untruthful.
    South Africa matters, because if it fails, the rest of Africa hasn't a prayer. Yet if it booms, it could do for the poorest continent what Japan did for East Asia. It has Africa's most sophisticated economy, by far. The roads are smooth, ATMs work and, most importantly, it is the only sizeable country south of the Sahara where the rule of law prevails. Its relatively peaceful transition from apartheid to multiracial democracy was rightly hailed as a miracle. The white minority gave up power without a civil war. The ex-guerrillas who took over in 1994 have governed quite well ever since. Rather than seek revenge for the old regime's atrocities, they have sought to reconcile black and white. Most impressively, the new ruling party has ditched the Marxism it used to espouse and pursued the soundest macroeconomic policies in living memory.

    But still, there has been no take-off. Economic growth sputters along at a whisker above population growth. The poor have grown poorer since '94, partly because of AIDS, but also because about half of all blacks are jobless. Only rapid economic growth can solve that problem, but the government has not made this a priority. I once asked Mr. Mbeki if he thought South Africa could achieve double-digit growth like East Asia; he appeared not to have considered the possibility.

    Instead, the focus is on redistribution. And not the conventional sort, from rich to poor, but from white to black, which is not the same. South Africa has embarked on probably the most extreme affirmative action program anywhere. Private companies above a certain size are obliged to try to make their workforces "demographically representative" (i.e. 75% black, 50% female, etc.) from factory floor to boardroom. This is not a minor irritant, like affirmative action in the U.S. The group which must be given preference constitutes a large majority. But because, under apartheid, blacks were deliberately deprived of education, there is a gaping shortage of blacks with commercially useful skills. Less than 2% of chartered accountants, for example, are black.

    This can only be fixed by improving schools. But the ANC's first impulse, when it came to power, was to try to raise the proportion of teachers who were black, by paying a large number of the most experienced white teachers to retire. Scandalously, black pupils' exam results got worse in the early years after apartheid ended. They have since recovered, but still, barely 1% of black high school students pass higher grade math, and very few opt for tough subjects at university, such as science or engineering.

    Unlike private companies, the government finds it easy to hire by race rather than merit, because it has no competitors and cannot go bust. This is nice for the blacks it employs, but less good for the much larger number who depend on the state for health care, water, roads and pensions. The state does not even try to deliver these services cost-effectively. Black-owned contractors can charge more and still win public-works contracts, so poor blacks get fewer clinics than they otherwise would have. Legions of white managers have been pushed out to make way for inexperienced blacks, and then hired back as expensive consultants to tell their replacements how to do their jobs.





    The most insidious effect of the new racial laws has been to provide a cloak for the sort of cronyism that has wrecked the rest of Africa. The black tycoons who made fortunes by parlaying political connections into a share of someone else's business actually believe they are helping to "de-racialize" the economy. They regard themselves as role models for black youth, and magazine covers reinforce this delusion. The idea that wealth needs to be created is little aired.
    The new backlash against "black enrichment" may curb the four biggest black tycoons, but there is no serious talk of a South Africa where all are equal before the law. It is perhaps worth noting a parallel with Malaysia, another place where affirmative action is aimed at a large majority. Malays are now richer in Singapore, where they do not receive preferences, than in Malaysia, where they do.

    Mr. Guest, Africa editor of the Economist, is author of "The Shackled Continent: Power, Corruption and African Lives" (Smithsonian, 2004).

  2. #2
    celticlove
    Guest
    In my opinion, South Africa nearly collapsed when it was ripped from the hands of the Africaaners during the Boer war, and now, after the end of Apartheid, with AIDS rampant, and the utter disregard for White South Africans e.g. the murder of White farmers (counts of which events have been accumulating), black South Africans have what they want--their country back. And with their 'abilities' and proposed governmental strucutre they can now be free to govern themselves as they wish--with loincloths and spears. I just hope the Brits and Africaaners can get themselves out quickly enough-and that Zach DeBeer rounds up all the diamonds before they do.

  3. #3
    Stig NHF
    Guest
    I'm sure Niederland and England could use some hundred thousand whites who are racially aware.

  4. #4
    Account Inactive
    Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    43
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stig NHF
    I'm sure Niederland and England could use some hundred thousand whites who are racially aware.
    They should come here. This is where ZOG must be confronted and crushed.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Mac Seafraidh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, April 20th, 2018 @ 08:21 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    German, Irish, Italian, and either Flemish or Walloon
    Subrace
    Alpinid/Borreby
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    State
    Delaware Delaware
    Location
    U$$Rael
    Gender
    Age
    39
    Family
    Single, looking
    Occupation
    Forum activist
    Politics
    Fascism and National Socialism
    Religion
    Atheism
    Posts
    1,598
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Post South Africa: The World’s Most Extreme Affirmative Action Program

    In South Africa, virtually all the poor people are black. It does not follow that all black South Africans are poor, but the South African government has for the past 10 years acted as if the two words were interchangeable. Any program whose stated aim is to uplift those who were crushed by apartheid is assumed, ipso facto, to be a good thing. This has culminated in something called “Black Economic Empowerment,” a process whereby white-owned firms are encouraged to surrender large dollops of equity to black businessmen. This is “voluntary,” but firms that stay white cannot win government contracts, and many assume that if they do not yield now, they will end up being nationalized, Mugabe-style, in a decade or two.

    The government wants about 25% of most industries to be in black hands by 2010. The new black capitalists are supposed to pay a “market” price for their acquisitions, but they don’t have the money, so they don’t.

    Fretting about the color of one’s shareholders is a distraction from the humdrum task of making things that people might want to buy. But at least it’s giving a leg-up to poor blacks, right? Wrong. Since the aim, as far as business is concerned, is to placate the government, the blacks who have been “empowered” have largely been senior members of the ruling African National Congress. The bulk of the “empowerment” seems to involve just four very rich men, three of them contenders for the presidency in 2009, when Thabo Mbeki stands down.

    “Black empowerment” has become such a naked carve-up that several of the ANC’s traditional allies have started to complain. Labor unions are threatening to obstruct the most egregious deals, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu has lamented that black empowerment was benefiting only “a small elite.” Mr. Mbeki responded with a furious rebuttal, in which he accused the archbishop of being ignorant and untruthful.

    South Africa matters, because if it fails, the rest of Africa hasn’t a prayer. Yet if it booms, it could do for the poorest continent what Japan did for East Asia. It has Africa’s most sophisticated economy, by far. The roads are smooth, ATMs work and, most importantly, it is the only sizeable country south of the Sahara where the rule of law prevails. Its relatively peaceful transition from apartheid to multiracial democracy was rightly hailed as a miracle. The white minority gave up power without a civil war. The ex-guerrillas who took over in 1994 have governed quite well ever since. Rather than seek revenge for the old regime’s atrocities, they have sought to reconcile black and white. Most impressively, the new ruling party has ditched the Marxism it used to espouse and pursued the soundest macroeconomic policies in living memory.

    But still, there has been no take-off. Economic growth sputters along at a whisker above population growth. The poor have grown poorer since ‘94, partly because of AIDS, but also because about half of all blacks are jobless. Only rapid economic growth can solve that problem, but the government has not made this a priority. I once asked Mr. Mbeki if he thought South Africa could achieve double-digit growth like East Asia; he appeared not to have considered the possibility.

    Instead, the focus is on redistribution. And not the conventional sort, from rich to poor, but from white to black, which is not the same. South Africa has embarked on probably the most extreme affirmative action program anywhere. Private companies above a certain size are obliged to try to make their workforces “demographically representative” (i.e. 75% black, 50% female, etc.) from factory floor to boardroom. This is not a minor irritant, like affirmative action in the U.S. The group which must be given preference constitutes a large majority. But because, under apartheid, blacks were deliberately deprived of education, there is a gaping shortage of blacks with commercially useful skills. Less than 2% of chartered accountants, for example, are black.

    This can only be fixed by improving schools. But the ANC’s first impulse, when it came to power, was to try to raise the proportion of teachers who were black, by paying a large number of the most experienced white teachers to retire. Scandalously, black pupils’ exam results got worse in the early years after apartheid ended. They have since recovered, but still, barely 1% of black high school students pass higher grade math, and very few opt for tough subjects at university, such as science or engineering.

    Unlike private companies, the government finds it easy to hire by race rather than merit, because it has no competitors and cannot go bust. This is nice for the blacks it employs, but less good for the much larger number who depend on the state for health care, water, roads and pensions. The state does not even try to deliver these services cost-effectively. Black-owned contractors can charge more and still win public-works contracts, so poor blacks get fewer clinics than they otherwise would have. Legions of white managers have been pushed out to make way for inexperienced blacks, and then hired back as expensive consultants to tell their replacements how to do their jobs.

    The most insidious effect of the new racial laws has been to provide a cloak for the sort of cronyism that has wrecked the rest of Africa. The black tycoons who made fortunes by parlaying political connections into a share of someone else’s business actually believe they are helping to “de-racialize” the economy. They regard themselves as role models for black youth, and magazine covers reinforce this delusion. The idea that wealth needs to be created is little aired.

    The new backlash against “black enrichment” may curb the four biggest black tycoons, but there is no serious talk of a South Africa where all are equal before the law. It is perhaps worth noting a parallel with Malaysia, another place where affirmative action is aimed at a large majority. Malays are now richer in Singapore, where they do not receive preferences, than in Malaysia, where they do.

    (Posted on December 28, 2004)

    http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...orldas_mos.php

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Constantinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 15th, 2006 @ 06:03 PM
    Location
    Flanders
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Posts
    990
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    If they can hold their ground for 25 more years, the country will be theirs again. AIDS, gotta love it.

  7. #7
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 24th, 2005 @ 11:12 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Location
    Everywhere
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Politics
    Non-hateful Nationalist
    Posts
    1,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CONSTANTINUS
    If they can hold their ground for 25 more years, the country will be theirs again. AIDS, gotta love it.
    LOL, you should visit South Africa sometime to gain an appreciation for the situation, Stan. (I will be visiting for the second time in April).

    First of all, AIDS does not kill fast enough to compensate for the high birthrates of the blacks. Second of all the country is currently under a deluge of illegal immigrants comparable to what is currently taking place in the American Southwest. Last of all, due to a massive exodus-like immigration trend and abysmally low birthrates the 'white' percentage of the population has declined to approximatel 8% (and is decreasing at a rate of approximately 0.4% a year).

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Constantinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 15th, 2006 @ 06:03 PM
    Location
    Flanders
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Posts
    990
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

Similar Threads

  1. What's Affirmative Action Like In Europe?
    By Caledonian in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 8th, 2011, 08:19 PM
  2. Affirmative Action to Stay
    By Liberator Germaniae in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 21st, 2007, 09:20 AM
  3. Affirmative Action Slows Down in Namibia
    By Liberator Germaniae in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, October 6th, 2006, 10:16 AM
  4. Affirmative Action strikes again!
    By Nordhammer in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Saturday, June 18th, 2005, 12:14 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •