Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Non-Coon Views on Alpines/Brachycephally?

  1. #1
    Purifier
    Azdaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, April 25th, 2012 @ 01:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic/Germanic
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Non-Coon Views on Alpines/Brachycephally?

    I know that Coon saw Alpines as UP derived, and Nordics as Med derived. But now I am also aware that other anthropologists whom I am unfarmiliar with - such as Lundman - said that Nordics were UP derived. This makes sense for a couple of reasons, but I really want to zero in on one:
    Cro-Magnon man was dolichocephalic, as are Nordics.
    Now if Nordics are UP derived, what I would like to know is: where do Alpines come from?
    And also, regardless of what the answer is, I'd also like to know some theories on what causes brachycephally.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, July 27th, 2006 @ 09:12 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Gender
    Politics
    Race Realism/Hereditarian
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Posts
    598
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    And also, regardless of what the answer is, I'd also like to know some theories on what causes brachycephally.
    I once read that brachycephally is positively selected in colder climates, as it provides a greater volume to surface area ratio.

  3. #3
    INSOLENT ARROGANCE
    Conquistador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 4th, 2011 @ 07:31 PM
    Subrace
    Mediterranean-Dinaric
    Gender
    Posts
    455
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Non-Coon views on Alpines/Brachycephally?

    Originally posted by Azdaja
    ...what I would like to know is: where do Alpines come from?
    And also, regardless of what the answer is, I'd also like to know some theories on what causes brachycephally.
    Another cause may be inbreeding; certain groups may retain certain genes per sucessive generation for brachycephally while dolichocephally becomes a recessive trait.

  4. #4
    THE SEVENTH SON
    OF A SEVENTH SON
    hardcorps's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, July 26th, 2009 @ 11:52 AM
    Ethnicity
    Northern
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Location
    Transcending existentialism
    Gender
    Politics
    Preservation
    Posts
    147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Non-Coon views on Alpines/Brachycephally?

    Originally posted by Azdaja
    Now if Nordics are UP derived, what I would like to know is: where do Alpines come from?
    And also, regardless of what the answer is, I'd also like to know some theories on what causes brachycephally.

    This is just a theory I came up with, it may be highly suspect!:

    Overweight/rotund/stocky people tend to be brachycephalic (and vice versa). The 'fat genes' cause brachycephaly (?). Dolicos tend to be of more ectomorphic (skinny) build. Other genes may cancel out the effect of the 'fat genes' on body type but still leave the 'fat genes' dominant in the skull formation, causing brachycephaly.

    I would think lower selection pressures allowed the accumulation of fat-causing genes in the Europid race. Those areas of Europe that were more contantly involved in wars and activities requiring physical strength and speed (hunting) disallowed the widespread accumulation of those genes. Fat-causing genes always existed but were only able to accumulate in easier, less warlike, and less hand-to-mouth times times and places. Could Alpines have been UPs that had an easier time of it than their Nordic UP-derived cousins? I have no idea!!! :

    This theory would explain the 'cropping up' of a brachy among a family of dolicos. The brachy just lucked out in receiving all of the possible fat-related genes from both parents.

    PS I believe it is fairly widely held that genes do play a role in people's ability to gain and lose weight.
    Last edited by hardcorps; Wednesday, June 4th, 2003 at 04:51 PM.
    If I rest, I rust.
    - Martin Luther

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 10th, 2012 @ 02:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Afrikaner
    Ancestry
    Slavic
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    2,292
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Re: Non-Coon views on Alpines/Brachycephally?

    Good post! give the man a cigar:chill


    Originally posted by hardcorps
    This is just a theory I came up with, it may be highly suspect!:

    Overweight/rotund/stocky people tend to be brachycephalic (and vice versa). The 'fat genes' cause brachycephaly (?). Dolicos tend to be of more ectomorphic (skinny) build. Other genes may cancel out the effect of the 'fat genes' on body type but still leave the 'fat genes' dominant in the skull formation, causing brachycephaly.

    I would think lower selection pressures allowed the accumulation of fat-causing genes in the Europid race. Those areas of Europe that were more contantly involved in wars and activities requiring physical strength and speed (hunting) disallowed the widespread accumulation of those genes. Fat-causing genes always existed but were only able to accumulate in easier, less warlike, and less hand-to-mouth times times and places. Could Alpines have been UPs that had an easier time of it than their Nordic UP-derived cousins? I have no idea!!! :

    This theory would explain the 'cropping up' of a brachy among a family of dolicos. The brachy just lucked out in receiving all of the possible fat-related genes from both parents.

    PS I believe it is fairly widely held that genes do play a role in people's ability to gain and lose weight.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, August 5th, 2012 @ 03:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Germany, Ireland
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Pennsylvania Pennsylvania
    Gender
    Politics
    straight
    Posts
    78
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    I don’t know if I agree with the war scenario. I personally think of the differences between the two as not of a lower form of evolution, per say, but rather just a difference path evolution chose to take. I’m a fairly tall, strong, lean guy but I know I could never lift what some of these short, stout guys at my gym do. I know I’d kill them on the treadmill, sit-ups, and pull-ups but when it comes to squats, dead-lifts, and benching, the weight they do would break my bones. I can’t even comprehend myself lifting that much. There's a guy standing like 5'3 and benches up around 440lbs. It's ridiculouseyes:

  7. #7
    THE SEVENTH SON
    OF A SEVENTH SON
    hardcorps's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, July 26th, 2009 @ 11:52 AM
    Ethnicity
    Northern
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Location
    Transcending existentialism
    Gender
    Politics
    Preservation
    Posts
    147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Thanks providenje!

    I would like to elaborate and answer a few possible objections. (Please remember these are just my own musings, I would love for you to disagree and educate me on alternate explanations.)

    'I personally think of the differences between the two as not of a lower form of evolution . . .'

    I hope I was not implying any concept of higher or lower. Alpine women can be very attractive (but are probably not my absolute preference in pure form) and the average IQs of the white caucasian nations were all relaitively close, as I recall.

    '. . . just a difference path evolution chose to take.'

    I can't see how the major physical differences between Alpine and Nordic could be as random as water splashing. It was caused, somehow.

    The question I did not address was why it should be that, in a society with low selection pressures, that fat-related genes would come to grow in influence. These are my feelings: endomorphs (rotund) and mesomorphs (naturally muscular types) are perceived as being more inclined to social activity.

    Ectomorphs are considered, according to the originator of the somatypes theory (his name forgotten!), to be more reserved and 'bookish,' more introverted. (I wonder if it could ever be shown that 'bookishness' led a higher proprtion of dolicos into the Catholic priesthood?) I understand the Nordic countries have generally had a lower reproduction rate than Alpine ones. Perhaps in a more stable society dolicos tend to have less offspring, per capita.

    Also, true sexual selection may have had a role. I know at certain times and places Europids have glorified the 'bigger woman' (see the primitive Venus carvings). Over time that would have presumably resulted in the dominance of fat-related genes. I do not know, however, if that cultural more is known to have directly coincided with the Alpines' developmental period.

    'I’m a fairly tall, strong, lean guy but I know I could never lift what some of these short, stout guys at my gym do. I know I’d kill them on the treadmill, sit-ups, and pull-ups but when it comes to squats, dead-lifts, and benching, the weight they do would break my bones. I can’t even comprehend myself lifting that much. There's a guy standing like 5'3 and benches up around 440lbs.'

    In primitive war conditions, speed (a lean body) and leverage (height, which is also a defining characteristic of the Nordics) are far more important than brute strength. Have you ever seen a boxing match with a tall skinny guy and a shorter, stouter opponent? Observe the extreme advantage leverage gives.

    This fighting advantage gives the same survival advantages in hunting with a spear. (Perhaps I should not have mentioned strength, per se, as being overly advantageous in military and food-gathering pursuits. I think it is far easier to turn a chubby body, very generally speaking, into a muscular one than a skinny physique into a muscular one.)


    PS In talking about the relative merits of Alpine or Nordic types in the racially-formative survival struggle, I'm just generalising. The exception proves the rule. Many brachy-rotund types, for example, would have made up for a lack of leverage and speed with a martial, battle-hungry spirit. Also, of course, there are many extroverted ectomorphs and equally as many bookish, intellectual bracycephalics.

    PPS To reiterate, this is just me arguing a point. I have the highest respect for both subraces.
    Last edited by hardcorps; Thursday, June 5th, 2003 at 04:25 PM.
    If I rest, I rust.
    - Martin Luther

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 @ 09:33 PM
    Ethnicity
    eurafrican
    Ancestry
    eurafrican
    Country
    Other Other
    Location
    south of heaven
    Gender
    Age
    48
    Occupation
    fireman
    Politics
    liberal
    Posts
    340
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Alpins

    Hi,
    As
    far as know alpinization is a process and alpin is in fact not a subrace but is a status. It is a neotenic responce to relatively unfavorable conditions. The
    brachycephaly, stockyness, sturdyness of alpins are infantile properties which is a saviour against cold. In that sense alpin is stronger against cold and is more suitable for rocky mountains and is more balanced against gravity in snowy places. Generally speaking alpin
    is a forest dweller accustomed to high places.
    Brachycephaly in mediveal times is queationable no natural selection will take place in a few hundred years unless there is a huge massacre or
    a natural selection is carried out by plaque but this time we would need comparative studies of graves.
    cheers

  9. #9
    Account Inactive Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    There is also the low-skulled/high-skulled dichotomy. UPs are supposed to be high-skulled, Atlanto-Mediterraneans low-skulled, Dinarics high-skulled, and Nordics split between the two. Does this shed any light on the issue?

  10. #10
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Country
    Flanders Flanders
    Gender
    Posts
    5,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Post

    The Upper Paleolithic Europeans are usually described and equated to
    us modern people, but it's truism is a simplification of a wider
    problem, namely the factor of gracilization as either a circumstance
    of adaptation, acclimatisation, change of subsistence and diet,
    either as following overpowering by newcoming, meridional elements,
    gene flow and mongrelization, and by its very indefinete nature,
    leading to gradual, but not in time and space locked smoother,
    juvenile or even more effeminated developing of body bulk, cranial
    size and facial structure.
    The present-day population of Europe, except probably in Northwest
    Europe were "archaic" cromagnid traits in various solutions persist,
    are marked by a reduction of the cranial robusticity.
    Another and even more protomorphic stronghold was NE Europe, where
    the gracilization process was retarded untill a few millenia before
    Christ.
    The modification touches in the first place the bizygomatic breadth,
    but it goes even farther, perhaps with its cumulation in the Early
    Middle Ages, where another by-effect of gracilization, neoteny,
    leading to the increase of roundheadedness presents itself with a
    reduction of the mandible and leptoprosopy.
    Anyway, the receding forehead made place for a steeper frontal angle
    and the prominence of the superciliary arches remitted.
    The cranial lenght and size of the orbits are also indicative for a
    refinement of the facial skeleton and is esimated to be correlating
    with a reduction of the facial width.
    Skull lenght reduces in cohesion with superciliary coarseness and a
    lessening of the convexity of the backhead, but brachycephaly was
    posterior to these events in SE Europe, where it differs in size
    (small to medium) compared to the Northwesterners.

    As a rule the more coarse-boned the skeleton appears, the likelier
    the cranial index attains low values and diminishes the facial index,
    which result in the dysharmony opposing the skull against the facial
    outline, best characterized by the dolichocranial but strikingly
    euryene Cro Magnon race and usually denoting as a pars pro toto on
    all recent Paleolithic Europids. The <<Proto-europoid>> traits of a
    large development of the face below the orbits, the receding forehead
    and prominence of the browridges among the modern European races
    indicate positively a neanderthaloid phase in their evolutionary
    line, retained as a nearly perfect recombination leading to a
    Predmost variety, stressed by the fact that the cranial
    skeleton's
    robusticity adds to the imparity of a more gracile(less boreal?) body
    composure.
    Whether somatic modifications originate from changing patterns in
    subsistence and diet, from mainly proteine based food over to carbo-
    hydrate enriched meals, locked unto the transition from
    hunting/foraging to an agricultural economy, is questionable: the
    Pygmees are still predominantly hunters, but their body build and
    skull structure don't reflect any greater robusticity than the
    neighbouring agriculturalist and even the Mesolithic Mediterreneans
    of Muge in Portugal or the Palestine Natufians don't show
    manifest
    differences to modern-day Mediterrenean populations.
    However, the Early Neolithics still and very notably among the
    Cardial Ware people were very active game hunters and fishers, any
    modification could have been a slow, even revoked process that
    occured unevenly in geographical distribution and on several epochal
    occasions and bound to the foundations and character of a given
    society with special <<assortative mating>> rituals, by which a
    population becomes rather beyond the inherent racial composition
    micro-evolutionary polytypical: a homogenious polymorphism which as
    local formation with conditioned by selective pruning and isolation
    may land a new race, as stated by the German ethnologist R.
    Thurnwald:
    << Das Ineinander-Heiraten nahe Verwandter, wie es durch die vielen
    heiratsordnungen der Naturvölker bedingt wird, führt in
    Verbindung
    mit Isolation und Ausles zu einer Specializierung der erblichen
    Anlagen in Auseinandersetzung mit den gegebenen Umwelt.
    Daher haben wir es zunächst mit Lokalrassen zu tun.
    Aus der Ähnnlichheit verwandter und benachbarter Lokalrassen
    abstraheren wir weitere Rassentypen.
    Von solchen durch lange Zeiträumen gezüchteten Primärrassen
    müssen
    wir sekundären Typen und Volksgestaltung unterscheiden, die das
    Ergebnis von Mengung und Mischung ist.>>
    So, this option allows to see an anthropological continuum in Europe
    only faintly contaminated by alien incursion, limited in duration and
    spread, as well in contigency, basically a Cromagnid-Predmost trunk
    rivalling and loosing field to the Magdalénian derivatives, but
    independently or in various solution or interspersed will evolve in
    the present Paleo-Atlantids allied with their gracilized Nordid and
    Mediterranid descendants.
    Hence the presence alongside of Nordids, Mediterranids and Cromagnids
    in the Körös Culture, prolonging untill the arrival of the
    Alpine and
    Taurid Celts in the Carpathian Basin, and so on, by which the
    newcomers only reinforce in stead of replace the local composition,
    very much as the Frankish invaders would secure the Nordid character
    in North and Northeastern France.
    The theory of Mediterrenean diffusion becomes forestalled, since
    gracility was long since an acquisition of the Predmost race, who
    epitomed the Old Europeans and has to be considered as ancestral to
    perhaps all, including the large-headed as partly <<foetilized>>
    brachycephals, racial stocks of our Continent.

    The swing towards brachycephaly can be interpreted as another process
    to gracilization, but probably much more than a progressive
    refinement of cranial traits it makes compulsoryly for neoteny, i.e.
    retaining juvenile or even foetal somatic features during adulthood,
    with no significant relationship to climatical habitat. Though
    brachycephaly would be advantageous in cold areas, roundheadedness is
    found as well at latitudes normally not associated with low
    temperatures(the Central African Pygmees, the Polynesians in the
    South Seas and many Amerindians) nor goes it hand in hand with
    general reduction of bodysize and limb proportions.
    Temperature doesn't seem either to tamper with head lenght, but
    in
    hot dry areas the head breadth tends to smallness, albeit that the
    Magdalénian Chancelade type introduced a diminuative head lenght
    compared to Cro Magnon and Combe Capelle, and a narrower skull than
    often the case among Cromagnids and even many Neanderthalers(La
    Chapelle: Cr. Breadth 156mm, La Ferrassie: Cr. Breadth 159mm; Cro
    Magnon: Cr.Breadth: 150mm), so at least in the Europid branch the
    zoomorphological and climatic rules, whereby adaptation to cold
    stress results in shaping the body bulk as much as possible
    spherical, to expose only a small surface area to a cool surrounding
    that inflicts severe heat loss, wouldn't apply unambiguously and
    not
    in the direction of a fully-fledged stabilized acclimatized
    speciation for sure; the cold and dampness of the Final Bronze Age in
    Europe may have necessitate an increase of brachycephalic types, as
    well in the arctic condition of the Solustréan, though the
    cephalic
    index must have stayed within the range of high mesocephaly, in
    Japan and maong the protomorphic Uralics coldness verges on
    dolichocephaly, the Neanderthalers were all dolichoid, bar those of
    Krapina who lived in the warm prae-Würm!
    Brachycephaly for the most should be conceived as connected to the
    problem of neoteny, as Louis Bolk would put it, " …fetal
    conditions
    that have become permanent".Asley Montagu hints to the fact that
    up
    to the sixth fetal month the head tends to be long:"…the
    transforming
    process in some groups of humanity were retarded and, growing weaker,
    the initial fetal form of the skull was incresingly retained, until ,
    finally, brachycephaly was established as the persisting form of the
    head. After the sixth month the fetal cephalic index varies from
    mesocephalic 75.9-79.9 to brachycephalic 80.0 to 84.9.".
    The latter means are characteristically for the Furfooz and Möen-
    Borreby-Plau races, races known for being ortognathious and rather
    large body sizes, which are further expressions for neoteny, which
    classify them as more as modern evolved races than singular
    unadultered UP survivors(though moderation or absence of browridges
    aren't associated with these Northwesterners, except the Furfooz
    race
    which underwent and ahead to its primary forms of the Mesolithic
    facial reduction and a lower stature, growing more paedomorphic but
    never excatly attaining the infantil-boreal character of the Ofnet
    brachycephals or the Lappids).

    The greatest error in writing a racial history of Europe was the
    exagerration of the distribution and role of the Alpine race, which
    like a devil in disguise gleefully reveals itself in local centers of
    brachycephalization..
    The combination of globular or shortheadedness, shrunken body
    proportions and, small statures and finally a brunet complexion are
    in most textbook the criteria on which the Alpine race is determined.
    In previous articles I have gone down to the specifics on which
    Alpines can be recognized and distinguished from more southerly and
    mountain dwelling races in Europe.
    Suffice to say that the Alpine skull is capacious(Vallois states that
    it attains 1450cc, but can reach up to 1600cc!), at least of medium
    lenght but broad, globular or broken up like in Borreby and
    platicephalic(low to moderate vaulted; the Scandinavian Alpine has a
    LHI of ca.70), the body is stocky, pykno-mesomorphic but more gracile
    forms are as common, the stature is medium(ca.165cm); both Coon and
    Biasutti agree that the complexion runs from blond to brunet, but
    formost the intermediary pigments are the rule.
    The brachycephalics of the Belgian province Luxemburg should probably
    be considered as exponents of the Alpine race in its truest form; the
    means for head lenght and breadth are 186mm and 157mm, still
    profoundly large-headed(L+B) and 3-4 units smaller than the Belgian
    mean(190/1mm+160mm), which is more of Borreby inspiration; btw, is it
    mere coincidence, elicit by precipitancy and overworking,,or repeats
    the Luxemburger average head lenght not the same as in the Ibero-
    Insular and Danubian groups, races who emerged during the Neolithic
    period and represent a more linear, slender body build in association
    with small stature(smaller than the modern Alpine who is 165cm tall,
    while the Ibero-Insular falls down on 160cm and the Danubians were
    as moderate as the Alpines and reach as well minima like 153cm) ;
    the Alpine maintained its bulkier built, but grew more pyknomorphic,
    but all three miss the bony eminencies, muscularity and coarse
    lateral built of the Cromagnoid races.
    Alpines, Danubians and Ibero-insulars evolve paedomorphic traits.
    The face height of the Alpine ranges from 120-122mm, the breadth is
    large, 140mm; anthropometrically these measures overlap or approach
    the means of the Borreby-derived population of Jaeder and Fehmarn, in
    this respect the face is higher than the Danubian(116mm) whom is by
    10units narrower(130mm) and the Ibero-Insular has too a rather short
    face, which appears the opposite by its narrow breadth, although
    it's
    by its facial index leptoprosopic, 89.23, while Alpines and Borreby
    alike are mesoprosopic.
    The Ibero-Insular has a straight-bridged nose, as has Alpines and
    Borreby; these two have, though, noses which are short, broad(yet
    coverting to leptorhinity) and assume a thick, elevated tip, but
    according to Biasutti the norm is a short, rather high-rooted nose
    with a straight bridge, while the retroussé type characterizes the
    East Baltic race. The snub nose is common possession of the Upper
    Palaeolithic races; since I have proven on Körös and the
    Linearband
    the nativity to Europe of these cultures and the mixed composition,
    containing Nordic, Mediterrenean and Cromagnid elements, all
    experiencing a make-over process of physical, i.e. postcranial and
    constitutional gracilization, and since the Danubian dolichoid type
    doesn't rule out an appraisement in either a Nordic as a
    Mediterrenean sense, by which it should be conceived as a primitive,
    mixomorphic type, the possessing certain qualities midway these two
    races, flowing morphologically into each other, but consitute a
    decissive, morphological and biological unit. The sparse Cromagnid
    component reflects an interstadial condition during the racial
    evolution and formative process in which nevertheles the group
    confirms to a single, close-knitted and panmictic breeding stock, far
    more than absorption and cross-breeding with residual mesolithic
    locals. Finally, we don't know much about the ratios of certain
    taxons in these early neolithic entities, personally, after Murat in
    our backstream conversations reminded me that the outline of the
    occiput of the Borreby is comparable to the Pontic race and Kossinna
    hints on some Danubian influence on the formation of Borreby in the
    upswept occiput, I urge a more reversed admixture, Borreby and Plau
    predate the Danubians and must from the end of the mesolithic till
    far into the Bronze Age had a maximum territorial extension from the
    Atlantic over the North European Plain into both Scandinavia and the
    Danubian-Balkanic tract and underway altered incoming gracilized
    races and participating in their further development, another
    possibility takes them as an endemic element to these entities. Since
    mesocephaly is integral to the Borreby race, it wouldn't have
    worked
    yet as brachycephalization agent, then again the skull shapes are
    strikingly different, ovoid for the Borreby, ellipsoid for the
    Danubians with flattened parientals.
    Danubians, being meso- to platyrhinic, the nose takes a small,
    concave and blunted form, a snubbed nose type not unlike EB and
    Alpines.
    In Central and Eastern Europe, where the Danubians and columns of
    native European first farmers originated, snub-nosed are
    indiscriminantly associated with both brachycephalic and
    mesocephalic, high-vaulted and either blond or more brunet races: so
    whatever happened to the descendants of the Danubian main type?
    Schaginhaufen's revelation on the blond brachycephals in
    Switzerland,
    only 6% of the population, and often mesorhine and mesoprosopic, but
    predominantly leptorhine aand leptoprosopic, of medium body height,
    with rounded occiput, slightly receding forehead that appears high
    and full, could be the leading representation of the danubian in its
    present-day form in the Celtic-Germanic countries, with due reserve,
    while the Danubian head breadth could under impetus of the
    brachycephalization broaden up to 3-4 units and shorten similarly in
    lenght, and still attain a cephalic index in the mesocephalic range.
    The situation of the Auvergne, Central France, supports the
    implication of increased local "alpinoid" brachycephalisation
    out
    of , in Coon's sense, Mediterranid stocks, with deceiving
    properties
    like a mesene upper face, relatively broad nose, small stature,
    brunet complexion and paedomorphism.
    The Auvergne includes the departments of Allier, Cantal, Haute-Loire
    and Puy-de-Dôme, one-time teritory of the Celtic tribe of the
    Avernii.
    Vallois devices it with Brittany to create a large area going from
    the Atlantic seaboard into the Massif Central, anthropologically
    gathering a population marked by medium tall brachycephals with
    chestnut hair and light eyes.
    France was for instance in the Iron Age predominantly dolichomorphic,
    the Beaumes Chaude type nearly disappears and is replaced by the
    Genay type, which Vallois holds for Proto-mediterrenean and
    corresponds with the Danubian. The Auvergne is no exception to this
    rule and burial mounds only contained dolichoid finds. Only in the
    Parisian Basin, Brittany and the Languedoc are brachycephals present
    and their proportion in the population is constantly feeble.
    Even in the Middle Ages, the Auvergne couldn't have been a
    concentration of Alpines and it hadn't been strongly touched by
    the
    trend of brachycephalisation, which in France seemingly occured with
    a gradual leptoprosopy and reduction of the maxillae.
    Bouchereau's material reveal short(179.5mm) and narrow(141.8mm)
    skulls, resulting in a Cr.I of 79, highly mesocranial and orthocranial
    (LHI 72.9), the face is narrow, 126mm, broad-nosed, N.I.48.1 and
    mesene, 52.4.
    The study further indicate that in recent times the average head
    became rounder and broader(l= 176.3mm,b= 145.5) and attains a
    subbrachycephalic mean of 82.5, while still orthocranial, the basion-
    bregmatic height reduced from 131 to 128.4.
    The body lenght increased as well from general medium height in 1880
    (164-165.9cm) to fairly tall heights above 170cm today. The eyes are
    rather mixed than light, which is more frequent in Brittany, and in
    equivalence with dark eyes. Leptoprosopy and leptorhinity are common.
    It illustrates that the problem of brachycephaly and the Alpine race
    are two distinct study objects and not to be intertwined.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Asiatic Alpines
    By Boche in forum Alpinid
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Monday, April 19th, 2010, 01:35 PM
  2. Replies: 40
    Last Post: Thursday, January 28th, 2010, 03:41 PM
  3. Alpines+Meds - Amorsite gallery
    By Amorsite in forum Dinarid
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Thursday, March 15th, 2007, 12:45 AM
  4. Hans F.K. Günther on Alpines?
    By Relevant Range in forum Alpinid
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Sunday, September 17th, 2006, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •