Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Define the Racial "In" Group

  1. #1
    Account Inactive
    Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Define the Racial "In" Group

    In terms of racial characteristics, what is the "in" group that is to be the nucleus for carrying Western civilization forward, if and when all obstacles (particularly the zionists) are overcome? It is clear that being accepted as white is not good enough for the vast majority of people in our "movement," judging by the amount of time many devote to portraying other non-Nordic white groups as inferior.

    Is it a Nordic-centric issue, in which all individuals allowed into the new racially conscious country are a certain number or less on the McCulloch scale? Or is it less about group membership and more feature-based: would an Alpine-Nordic mix with blonde hair be let in to the country and a pure Halstatt Nordic with brown hair be rejected?

    It seems that the "movement" is about ""whites" fighting for a new "aryan" homeland." Granted, many people do think that "white" and "aryan" are identical, but others have a more exclusive defintion of "aryan." In this light, ""whites fighting for an "aryan" homeland" could be taken to mean "white people who are not 100% Nordic sacrifice time, energy, and money and fight for a homeland that only people who are pure Nordics AND who have blonde hair and blue eyes are allowed into (darker pure Nordics of course do not count as aryan, same for blonde people who are not 100% Nordic)." This sounds unfair. I want people to share their true thoughts and feelings with me on this issue.

  2. #2
    Purifier

    Azdaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, April 25th, 2012 @ 01:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic/Germanic
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    573
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Post

    << It is clear that being accepted as white is not good enough for the vast majority of people in our "movement," judging by the amount of time many devote to portraying other non-Nordic white groups as inferior. >>

    I think right away 2 things need to be kept in mind:
    1) The most knowledgeable and racially pure Nordicists that I've come across - such as Northstar, Volksdeutsche, and Fion mac Cumhaill - do NOT look down upon or deride non-Nordic Europid sub-races. It is always the borderline/questionable "Nordics" that engage in the hostile behavior. The "Nordicism" of such borderline cases is an outgrowth of egotism and a sign of mental problems. Such people - I doubt - would ever rise to any position of importance in any "white homeland". Their opinions, though humorous, are of no real worth.
    2) The fascination with Nordics in our movement is largely the result of Nordicists going out into the world and promoting that fascination. If people of other sub-races went out and created "SNPA" type sites which focused on their own sub-race, then maybe so many people would not feel the need to identify themselves as 'nordish' or 'partially nordish'. Racialism - at least in part - should be about being proud of who you are. Nordicism is an outgrowth of that principal..for Nordics. I would also like to see "Alpinism" and "Mediterraneanism" and "Dinaricism".

    << Is it a Nordic-centric issue, in which all individuals allowed into the new racially conscious country are a certain number or less on the McCulloch scale? Or is it less about group membership and more feature-based >>

    Well if we are talking about a "Nordish" homeland, as opposed to a more generalize Europid homeland (and I don't see why we cannot have the former, once we've got the latter), I would say that the first option you give makes far more sense. I say this because by "features", you seem to mean only hair and eye colour. The McCulloch scale is "feature" based, after all.

    << "whites fighting for an "aryan" homeland" could be taken to mean "white people who are not 100% Nordic sacrifice time, energy, and money and fight for a homeland that only people who are pure Nordics AND who have blonde hair and blue eyes are allowed into >>

    Well judging from the true Nordicists I've met, I doubt that non-Nordics would be 'screwed' out of a homeland once such a homeland was secured. Chances are the Nordicists would simply take a peace of the greater Europid homeland and use it for their own purposes, which would certainly be fine by me. Other sub-types could do the same.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    ...................
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Allenson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 19th, 2017 @ 10:51 AM
    Ethnicity
    New English
    State
    Vermont Vermont
    Location
    Bliss Farm
    Gender
    Occupation
    Smuggler
    Politics
    Ruralist
    Religion
    Old Mother West Wind
    Posts
    3,905
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    70
    Thanked in
    69 Posts

    Post

    From a sub-racial preservationists perspective, I suppose that depends on what group is doing the defining. Personally, I'm an advocate of preserving all types....so all types are the 'in-group' for their particular group

    From a 'pan-Aryan' perspective, I'd guess that the term "Europid" would be a good call for what the 'in-group' should be.

    Check out Legion Europa's 'proximals' and 'distals' for a pan-Aryan view on the matter.

  5. #5
    Account Inactive
    Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post

    Originally posted by Zoe
    Von Braun wrote:



    That would be ME.

    -Zoë
    You showed me your pictures a while back. You have red hair. Since that is a dominant trait, will the "Aryanists" accept red hair?

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Account Inactive
    Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post @ Zoe

    The paradigm seems to be "emphasize as many recessive and/or rare traits (which are not always the same) that you can find in yourself." That is why my custom title is "Proud to be A Negative." Rh negative blood seems to be highly correlated with (if not exclusively) Europids.

    There are two general paths that I can choose: work with other white racialists toward a racial state in the future, or just have my own family and friends, amongst whom we are all "white enough" for each other. The latter scenario looks more and more attractive, as people continually try to lump me in with non-europid elements with their use of sloppy nomenclature.

    You see, what really pisses me off is the redundant use of terminology. White Mediterraneans like Goebbels and Mengele are not like the brown-skinned mongrels that some people call "meds." I am part Dinaric via Germany, which is paritally white Mediterranean, and I am also part
    Atlanto-Mediterranean via the Biritish Isles and France. If I am referred to as partially "Mediterranean," some people who have not seen me might get the wrong idea and think I am a brown-skinned Pakistani. Experts have admitted that I am fully Europid, just as true Mediterraneans like Goebbels and Mengele were fully Europid. Can you see the problem with calling wholly white people like me part Mediterranean, and then referring to brown-skinned people as far east as India as "meds"?
    Last edited by Von Braun; Monday, April 21st, 2003 at 06:02 PM.

  8. #8

  9. #9
    Account Inactive
    Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post

    Originally posted by Zoe
    You still don't get it.

    It doesn't matter what some posters on a webboard think of you.
    It does matter if I spend time, energy, and money fighting for our goals and then end up being excluded from the future racialist homeland because I look "central European," or because I am a "peripheral Nordish type of rating 4" or because I have "brown hair and green eyes" or because whatever Nordic traits I have (light eyes) are too few in comparison to my non-Nordish, Dinaric traits.

    Zoe, please understand that this is not about vanity, it is about the very practical concern pertaining to whether or not I will be backstabbed.
    Last edited by Von Braun; Monday, April 21st, 2003 at 06:34 PM.

  10. #10

    Post

    So, essentially, you are saying that you're are fighting to be part of the winning group, but you don't want to fight if you're going to be excluded from that group? That's your concern? Aren't you jumping the gun a little? And honestly, that is not a trusthworthy or reliable stance, imo.

    The vast, vast majority of WNs & Racialists do not subscribe to the Nordisher-Than-Thou school of thought. Perhaps your view is skewed from spending too much time on the internet. Your work with the NA should have taught you that.

    Anyway, I don't think you see the bigger picture. I will gladly and ferociously defend anyone I deem white and worthy of defence, but I wouldn't marry or breed with just any old white guy. We're racists, even within our own little group. I'll work side-by-side with Alpines, Neo-Danubians, Borrebies and even those vicious Slavs (kidding!), but I'll marry and procreate within my own racial and intellectual sub-group because of my own self-centered personal agenda & preferences. I'm a racist, sue me.

    Scoring a 1 or a 5 on the scale is important in some aspects, irrelevant in others. You focus too much on what will happen "after we win" and not nearly enough on what needs to be done this very day for us to "win", as you put it.

    -Zoë

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. How Do You Define the Word "Racist"?
    By Northern Paladin in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Monday, June 13th, 2011, 06:01 PM
  2. "Racial Origin and earliest Racial History of the Hebrews", by Eugen Fischer
    By Frans_Jozef in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Friday, October 22nd, 2004, 06:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •