NW Europeans vs NE Europeans

[Stríbog]

To see just how much bias various members exhibit, I want to determine who thinks Mediterranean or partially Mediterranean Northwestern Europeans are more assimilible than Neo-Danubians and East Baltics, and vice versa.

[Tore]

Personally, I place precedence upon pigmentation as such recessive genes as blond hair and blue eyes could very well become non-existent.

Therefore, I vote for NE Europeans.

[Hamlet VI]

'General Nordic population' (I think you mean 'Nordish'...Slavs and Russians are not Nordic)? Last time I checked people viewed themselves by nationality, not sub-race. There is no general Nordic population, only individual Nordics of varying nationalities (who unlike some weirdos here place more importance on their ethnicity than superficial appearance). Same applies to Alpines and Mediteraneans.

[Evolved]

Just because I think East Baltics and Danubians are better looking than Atlantic/Paleo Mediterraneans, I would like to see East Baltics and Danubians propagated in large numbers.

Danubians are the best. x_love

[Von Braun]

Originally posted by NordischesBlutundEhre
To see just how much bias various members exhibit, I want to determine who thinks Mediterranean or partially Mediterranean Northwestern Europeans are more assimilible than Neo-Danubians and East Baltics, and vice versa.

I am really sick of this attitude of yours that someone who is 1/8 n.e. asian or congoid or something nonwhite, but who has light hair and light eyes, is somehow better than an unmixed person with darker hair and darker eyes.

[Evolved]

Since when are dark hair (black) and dark eyes (black) NOT evidence of mixture?

[Von Braun]

Originally posted by ladygoeth33
Since when are dark hair (black) and dark eyes (black) NOT evidence of mixture?

One of the original groups of Europe had black hair.

Black eyes are most likely a sign of mixture.

[Ederico]

Originally posted by Von Braun
I am really sick of this attitude of yours that someone who is 1/8 n.e. asian or congoid or something nonwhite, but who has light hair and light eyes, is somehow better than an unmixed person with darker hair and darker eyes.

I do not see where he is implying this. Are you imagining things now?

[goidelicwarrior]

Originally posted by Von Braun
I am really sick of this attitude of yours that someone who is 1/8 n.e. asian or congoid or something nonwhite, but who has light hair and light eyes, is somehow better than an unmixed person with darker hair and darker eyes.

Dont worry .. its easy, the Caucaisan race generally has the following characteristics

High nosebridge
marked chin
high forehead
round eyesockets
thin lipps
white skin, varies a bit in complexion
black to blond hair
Brown to ice blue eyes

sign of mixture are

thicker lipps
slooping forehead
black eyes, Arabidor mongolid?
broad facial structures, Asiatic?
slanted eyes, asiatic?

besides blood types are a good indicator.. I think most western Europeans have 0+ - or A and Basques RH negative along with paleo Atlantids along west Europe shorelines, i would argue they are the purest Europeans there is, decendants of the megalith buliders of stone henge and Carnac!!

[radha]

actually i have missed the source that says
that east baltic race is a _result_ of
interaction between nordic and mongoloid race.
i agree that due to the geographical closeness
there naturally is more eastern influence in the
east.

i think it is absurd if you draw this conclusion
from slightly broader face. east baltic persons
dont look like halstatt nordics, but there are
broad faced people elsewhere in the world too.
actually there are very few halstatt nordic
persons at all.

i'd like to point out that any 'eastern/mongoloid'
influence that east baltic or ladogan subraces
have is something that happened thousands of years
ago (if at all). if there is someone in russia
having a mongoloid greatgrandparent, he cannot be
judged to be a good representative of the east
baltic race.

things to consider:
russia:
-viking novgorod
-eastern/hun invasions in southern russia
(ca. 1000ad ?)
-communist 'sovjet race'-policy: resettling people

central europe:
-roman (incl. slaves) influence in france/britain

interaction between pre-slavic white population or
slavic population and the neighbouring mongoloids
has been minimal. i can only think of huns as an
example. east-west trade was a more southern
phenomenon, and mongoloids were not kept as
slaves. mongoloid tribes were mostly nomadic, and
slavic people were not, so i doubt they had the
rich cultural bounds of southern european people.

so someone should not be judged 'mongrel' by him
being east baltic or russian.

(i know this has been fully discussed already,
but i just had to say this )