Differences Between Dinarics and Norics
"From France to Macedonia, and from Istanbul to Samarkand, are found populations in which the majority of persons present a characteristic morphology of the head and face; with a brachycephalic skull, often flattish in the occipital region, the foramen magnum and auricular passages set disproportionately far to the rear, the forehead often sloping, the face frequently elongated, and the nose salient and frequently convex."
From: The Principle of Dinaricization
http://www.fikas.no/~sprocket/snpa/troeplate35.htm
So, a Dinaric does not always have a convex nose or a flattened occipital region, it is seen often and frequently.
European Dinarics, (Photographic Supplement, Plate 36)
Notice that most of them have straight but prominent noses and a rounded occiput.
With all that in mind: Just as a person can have non-Hallstatt traits and be classified as Hallstatt (i.e, Ben Affleck), a person can have non-Dinaric traits and still be classified as Dinaric (i.e, you). Every single type has some variation naturally. You belong to the Noric branch of the Dinaric race because you have more typical Nordic traits, (pale skin, light eyes, blond hair as a child) and also some UP traits.
If you look at portraits of Adolf Hitler, he is sometimes depicted as having a flattened occiput (although he didn't actually have this trait). Same thing with most of the NS propaganda art, specifically the SA. If this was an "inferior" or "Semitic" trait as you seem to fear, why would it be so frequently be depicted as a feature of the ideal German? If having a convex nose is such a terrible trait, why is the Waffen SS recruitment poster showing a Nordic man with a convex nose?
Convex nose and/or flattened occiput:
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/g...ers/front1.jpg
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/g...ers/garant.jpg
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/posters/wehr.jpg
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/posters/sa.jpg
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/g...ters/wille.jpg
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/g...rs/liste2a.jpg
You're fully European. I've known plenty of Middle Easterners and none of them look anything like you. If volksdeutsche says you look like a specific Turkish individual, that doesn't mean you look typically Turkish. You're not a Turanid or Near Eastern. Dinarics are Near Eastern in the same way Alpines are mongoloid- it's a very, very distant relationship. I don't think "Turkish" or "Turkic" means nonwhite automatically, it's not that simple.
I think you're Central European, not Northern European but would look at home just about anywhere in Europe, except for maybe Finland or Estonia since you have no East Baltic traits (and no, it's not because you're not blond enough, those people aren't all blond either). You look like a lot of Hungarians I know and have seen. That probably has all sorts of negative connotations in your mind as being "Eastern" and "foreign invaders." They've been European for 1107 years and there has always been a Dinaric element. If you look at portraits of important Hungarians you'll clearly see Dinaric was and is an important type there.
Norics are the best. I'm going to post a few images of handsome Norics and Dinarics. I remember NP88 said she thinks blond Noric men are handsome. I very much agree!
I spent a lot of time writing all this specifically for you, Von Braun, I hope it makes you happy.
Ferenc Liszt- Hungarian composer, Noric:
Reply With Quote
birds
I will think about all of it.
Bookmarks