Prime Minister Boris Johnson does not have the “political guts” to take a firm line on the illegal boat migrant crisis in the English Channel and send the aliens back to France, Reform UK leader Richard Tice told Breitbart London.
Over
23,500 boat migrants have crossed the English Channel this year, nearly
three times as many as made the dangerous journey last year. Despite the record-breaking numbers of illegal landings, Prime Minster Boris Johnson’s Tory government has been unable or unwilling to take a firm line with France — where the vast majority of the boat migrants came to Britain from — or indeed the EU as a whole, having only successfully
deported five illegals back to the bloc during the whole of this year.
In an
exclusive interview with
Breitbart London, Reform UK leader Richard Tice — who is running for Parliament in the upcoming special by-election for the Sidcup seat — said that the government has been “
incompetent” and cowardly in the face of the growing crisis.Mr Tice said that the government is “
woefully” failing in its duty to secure the nation’s borders, arguing that migrants should be turned directly back to France, a safe and prosperous nation from which refugees have no justification to flee from. He argued that the waves of migrant boats would cease within “
two or three days” if the government began merely sending them back to France, which he said can be justified under existing international law, a claim which the French have
denied.
“
There will be some difficult discussions with the EU and with France, but this will stop and it will stop fast,” Mr Tice said. As to why he felt Mr Johnson or Home Secretary Priti Patel have yet to adopt such an approach, the Reform UK leader said: “
We just haven’t got the political guts, the political will to do it.”
Despite the UK agreeing to send the French an additional
£54 million to step up enforcement against the people smuggling trade and patrols of beaches in Calais, the crisis has only intensified. Last week, a new daily record of
1,185 migrants were brought ashore in Britain in a 24-hour period. This week, an estimated
1,135 migrants landed on Tuesday, representing the second-highest figure recorded. Following a meeting between Home Secretary Priti Patel and her French counterpart Gérald Darmanin on Monday, the UK government claimed that France had agreed to work with the British to stop “
100 per cent” of illegal crossings of the Channel. This was disputed by the French Embassy, which
wrote on social media: “For the record, the 100% figure was not agreed between the Home Secretary and French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin and should not be presented as an agreed commitment: it is not. And it is not part of the joint statement.”
Prior to the meeting on Monday, Darmanin
said per
The Telegraph that Britain was not in a position to “give lessons” to France on illegal immigration, adding that the UK “should stop using us as a punch ball in their domestic politics”. Aside from being stymied by the French, the government has also been unable to corral its own Border Force to stop acting as a “
taxi service” for illegal migrants and turn back the boats. Last week, the union representing Border Force officers, PCS,
said that it would begin launching legal action to prevent the government from forcing the agency from actually protecting the UK’s sea border, citing concerns over safety. The outgoing head of the Border Force was even quoted as having complained that “bloody borders” are a “
pain in the bloody ass” and that “
we are all human beings”.
Reform UK leader Richard Tice said that civil servants are “
deliberately” trying to undermine the intentions of the government. He argued that the government is in need of “competent ministers” brought in from the private sector who have the courage to stand up to the deep state bureaucracy. Tice said that civil servants need to be told to “
either deliver on this agenda or frankly get out of the way.”
Johnson is a good globalist minion.
Are we all suffering from collective dementia?
Theresa May signed us up to the global migration pact which will see the Middle East and Africa move to Europe. (It’s basically communism final solution to the democracies and naturally Islam is all for the helping hand to their global ambitions)
Why are we surprised when people migrate by any means but then don’t get removed?
The revolution will weed out those that have done us wrong.
There was an online petition to get UN Migration Pact discussed in parliament first. It had reached over 100,000 signatures and was rising when those of us who signed it received an email telling us that "a decision has already been taken." This issue has such far reaching very serious consequences for our national security and social cohesion that it should have been put to the people in a referendum. We simply cannot trust these issues to be left to a transient government of the day who often have interests inconsistent with their first duty of protecting our country and people.
Consider this. In March 2018 the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia pledged 65 billion pounds to Theresa May for a joint economic and investment partnership and said they wanted 40+ more Typhoon Fighter Jets worth billion of pounds more. Later in that same year Theresa May went off and signed the UK up to the UN Migration Pact dismissing the people's petition to have it first discussed in parliament. She new very well that Muslims from North Africa and the Middle East would be the chief beneficiaries of her signing. As far back as the 1980's when I worked in Saudi Arabia I had the locals telling me that they were buying the UK for Islam and Muslims because our government was tolerant and greedy for their oil and money. This is what is happening.
We have become too supine for a revolution and I doubt that most would support a military take-over for awhile to turns things round. In the future most of our indigenous will settle for the country being divided into Muslim and non-Muslim zones and live within their ever declining in numbers zones for safety. Then just a remnant will remain of our people and culture.
If people are only talking about stopping/halting/slowing immigration then they are not even addressing the problem. Reversing immigration and making sure we get rid of a number of unwanted people is the only way of beginning to get to grips with the problem we already have. Letting it fester and spread across the country is not dealing with it; active measures to go through those that have mistakenly been allowed in is what is needed and then root and branch change of personnel responsible for those mistakes needs to happen.
Article 3 and nuances of the ECHR is used more than any other tool to get the deportation order of a foreign criminal quashed. It is a treasure trove of loopholes for human rights lawyers.Blair got us into this.
The boat invaders are part of the replacement population in the British Government’s population replacement programme, which is why the Government are totally committed to maximising the number of invaders reaching Britain. I agree with all of that, alas methinks it is a tad too late, indeed the authorities begin to be run by 'the others', this cannot end well.
When you don't have a country to be British in ! The British are far too polite to do what they need to do, telling them all to 'go forth and multiply,' back to the cesspits they crawled out of, and the British will soon be unique in the ascent of man, to be the only people in history to ever be destroyed by their misplaced good manners.
As one Muslim businessman told me here in Malaysia about two years ago "your government and people are too tolerant for your own good. Your tolerance and liberalism are the two strands of the rope that is going to hang you". How true that sounds today.
“ Ejecting people who we have allowed to settle here is unBritish”
Who’s “we”?
The Globalist politicians?
We indigenous people certainly haven’t allowed them to settle here. We have never been consulted.
If we ever manage to get rid of the Globalist politicians, then their ‘guests’ can go as well. We indigenous people certainly don’t want them.
It's called "Soros's population replacement plot" among the EU's inner circles, read 2030: Your Children's Future in Islamic Britain.
Richard Tice: Boris Johnson Doesn’t Have the ‘Political Guts’ to Stop Illegal Immigration
19 XI 2021.
Bookmarks