Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Michigan professor sparks outrage after saying university’s policies are anti-white

  1. #1
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 02:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    6,298
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    519
    Thanked in
    339 Posts

    Michigan professor sparks outrage after saying university’s policies are anti-white



    A Michigan professor has sparked a firestorm after demanding an apology for his university’s new anti-racism policies — insisting that he has been “systematically discriminated against for 40 years” as a white man.

    Jeffrey Burl used Michigan Technological University headed notepaper for his two-page diatribe in January against a series of strict resolutions that damned college- and society-wide “anti-Blackness and systemic racism.”

    He requested “an apology for the racist sentiments expressed” in the resolutions which “contribute to a hostile work environment,” saying they implied that “white people and local people are racist.”

    “I find this resolution particularly offensive because I, as a white male, have been systematically discriminated against for 40 years,” Burl wrote in the letter widely shared among students and sparking a petition demanding he be fired for his “ignorance and hate.”

    The Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering insisted that during his 28 years at the university in Houghton he saw no “discrimination against women and people of color” while the college “actively discriminated against white males.”

    “Discrimination in hiring, discrimination in grant allocation, discrimination in advancement, etc.,” he wrote.

    “Simple statistical analysis will demonstrate that Michigan Tech’s hiring practices are biased against white males,” he said, claiming to have been “denied an opportunity to compete for my dream job because of gender discrimination.”

    The resolution he protested had resolved that the university “explicitly and loudly denounces white supremacy, anti-blackness, systemic racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, fatphobia, and other oppressive and intolerant behaviors, actions, and speech.”

    It also asserted that “no student should be able to earn an undergraduate degree … without having had a sound, education concerning the historical and current manifestations and operations of anti-Blackness and systemic racism in American culture.”

    A second Michigan Tech professor, Jaroslaw Drelich, also complained, submitting a letter accusing the resolution of pushing a leftist narrative, Michigan Live said.

    Burl admitted he “hesitated to write this letter for fear of retaliation” at first — and the feared backlash he predicted soon followed.

    As well as complaints online by students, a Change.org petition called for him to be terminated — although as of Tuesday morning it is still almost 1,000 short of its goal of 2,500 signatures.

    It was started by Timothy Ward, a former Michigan Tech student who later also taught there, who said he was “offended” by the “racist views and ignorant statements” in the letter.

    “I felt gross just trying to read it. I can only imagine how his students will feel going forward having to sit in lectures for hours with him,” the petition stated.

    “This kind of ignorance and hate does not belong at Michigan Tech nor any institution of higher learning. This petition is calling for his immediate termination,” it stated.

    University President Richard Koubek told students that the university condemns racism in a statement that did not mention Burl by name, Michigan Live said.

    The university told the outlet that Burl’s letter was an exercise of his right to free speech, as were those who disagreed with the resolution as well as the complaints about it.

    Burl insisted he is neither racist nor a white supremacist.

    “I would argue that I have a squeaky-clean reputation in that I don’t think that anybody who knows me will think that I’m a racist,” he told the outlet.

    NYpost

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Verđandi For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. White Race Superman
    By ogenoct in forum Literature & Book Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Saturday, November 14th, 2009, 06:20 PM
  2. Superman II baddies
    By Skerritt in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006, 08:26 AM
  3. Classify the next Superman
    By Dombvi in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: Thursday, March 30th, 2006, 07:01 AM
  4. New Superman movie goes multikult
    By AngryPotato in forum Film, TV, & Performing Arts
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Sunday, April 25th, 2004, 01:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •