Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Big Tech giants versus the people

  1. #1
    Spirit of the Reich „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Ahnenerbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Volksdeutscher
    Subrace
    Atlantid
    Y-DNA
    I-M170
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Gau Westmark
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Gemini
    Family
    Polyamory
    Occupation
    Herbalist
    Politics
    Ecological Geniocracy
    Religion
    Vedic
    Posts
    1,216
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    25
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    244
    Thanked in
    142 Posts

    Big Tech giants versus the people

    The Shuttening: Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube and Microsoft Sign EU Censorship Blood Pact


    Since Facebook, Google, Twitter and Microsoft want to further trample our rights to free speech, fight fire with fire.

    According to the latest reports, they plan to “expeditiously review” reports of “hate speech” within 24 hours.

    Let’s flood them with reports on bullshit mainstream media propaganda and SJW whining. Anything with a liberal, socialist, communist, or SJW bent to it should be reported. If we overwhelm their censors it will cost them money as well as hamper their ability to censor us.

    I propose that we promote this idea under the hashtag #FlagForFreeSpeech.

    If you see a post anywhere on social media that looks like it’s being promoted by the thought police, flag it!. Flood them with reports until they cannot effectively review anything!

    The phony concept of “hate speech” cannot coexist with the right to free speech!

    Source: SDT

    Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Microsoft back EU hate speech rules

    I urge you all to create alternative accounts on Vk.com and Minds.com and connect with your contacts there, before it's too late!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Ahnenerbe For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 18th, 2021 @ 12:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,434
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,266
    Thanked in
    750 Posts

    Exclamation The Shuttening: Facebook and Google Quietly Moving Toward Secret Auto-Blocking of Videos

    2016 is the year of the shitlord but also the year of the shutdown.

    The Shuttening continues, as both Facebook and Google have quietly begun programs to auto-censor wrongthink.

    Neither company has made a public announcement on this issue.

    Reuters:

    Some of the web’s biggest destinations for watching videos have quietly started using automation to remove extremist content from their sites, according to two people familiar with the process.

    The move is a major step forward for internet companies that are eager to eradicate violent propaganda from their sites and are under pressure to do so from governments around the world as attacks by extremists proliferate, from Syria to Belgium and the United States.

    YouTube and Facebook are among the sites deploying systems to block or rapidly take down Islamic State videos and other similar material, the sources said.

    Yes, this is always their explanation – it’s to stop Moslem terrorists.

    However, these Moslem terrorists always seem to continue using these services, while we in the Alt-Right are shut down.

    The technology was originally developed to identify and remove copyright-protected content on video sites. It looks for “hashes,” a type of unique digital fingerprint that internet companies automatically assign to specific videos, allowing all content with matching fingerprints to be removed rapidly.

    Such a system would catch attempts to repost content already identified as unacceptable, but would not automatically block videos that have not been seen before.

    So, when Evalion got shut down, I told people to reupload her videos. What this technology will do, when fully implemented, is make that impossible.

    They are preparing to literally exterminate our presence on these video sharing sites.

    The companies would not confirm that they are using the method or talk about how it might be employed, but numerous people familiar with the technology said that posted videos could be checked against a database of banned content to identify new postings of, say, a beheading or a lecture inciting violence.

    The two sources would not discuss how much human work goes into reviewing videos identified as matches or near-matches by the technology. They also would not say how videos in the databases were initially identified as extremist.

    The videos are flagged by users then reviewed by people in India.
    http://www.dailystormer.com/the-shut...ocking-videos/

  4. #3
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 18th, 2021 @ 12:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,434
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,266
    Thanked in
    750 Posts

    Exclamation Google and Facebook Vow to Stop Spread of "Fake News" on the Internet

    It looks as if the Jew-run companies of Google and Facebook have come to their senses. They are finally going to do their best to stop the spread of fake news on the Internet.

    Reuters:

    Alphabet Inc’s Google and Facebook Inc on Monday announced measures aimed at halting the spread of “fake news” on the internet by targeting how some purveyors of phony content make money: advertising.

    Google said it is working on a policy change to prevent websites that misrepresent content from using its AdSense advertising network, while Facebook updated its advertising policies to spell out that its ban on deceptive and misleading content applies to fake news.

    The shifts comes as Google, Facebook and Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) face a backlash over the role they played in the U.S. presidential election by allowing the spread of false and often malicious information that might have swayed voters toward Republican candidate Donald Trump.

    The issue has provoked a fierce debate within Facebook especially, with Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg insisting twice in recent days that the site had no role in influencing the election.

    Regrettably, the type of fake news they are talking about cracking down on is only low-grade clickbait fake news, such as the now-classic Amish-for-Trump article that went viral last month. They won’t be cutting down on the bigger fake news threat, which is the mainstream Jewish media itself.

    Websites like CNN, New York Times, Washington Post and other dishonest media outlets created fake news throughout the election cycle as part of a failed attempt to swing the election in favor of Hillary Clinton. In fact, CNN is still manufacturing fake news after the election. They recently hoaxed one of their own cameramen being an anti-Trump protester.
    http://www.dailystormer.com/google-a...-the-internet/

  5. #4
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 8th, 2018 @ 12:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Scandinavia/Germany/British Isles
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Washington Washington
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Volkisch Tribalist
    Religion
    Heathen-Armanist
    Posts
    36
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    If you haven't boycotted these two companies already, I highly recommend you do.

    A good alternative to Gmail (which Google attempted to censor) is protonmail.com (complete with encryption!)

  6. #5
    Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves.
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Wulfaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Online
    Friday, January 24th, 2020 @ 12:05 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Germans, Hungarians, Slavs
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Politics
    Democratic National-Conservativ
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    1,561
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    62
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    88
    Thanked in
    62 Posts

    The First Step of the Western Censorship.





    In these times the Google and the Facebook are rather a source for the 10s, 20s, 30s years old people than the television. The Liberal-Globalist have experienced what is a danger it for our media monopolium. Hence now they start to censure the Facebook and the Googles. They cut off the anti-pollcorrect articles from the FB flow and the Google supress the non-PC sites, like as the Skadi.

    By the way the Google some years ago has started that it drops links about the themes what you searched earlier. The causes is that if you like a fashion, the Google will drop rather fashion-like themes and the Google advertising in the hompages show advertisment about your earlier search. F.e. I like the ZARA, the H&M, the Marks&Spencer and since as I searched for this sites via Google, because it is simpli to use the URL-bar in the Firefox/Explorer/etc., the Google often bombardments me the advertisment of these companies where pages are Google advertisement. The original cause was that they want make the Google more user-friend, however thus they get back a lot of search link and advertisement what would be interest me.

    About this mechanism it is easily to imagine how much power have these companies to influence the political posts, messages, searches and advertisment.




    "Remember that, even when those who move you be kings or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone. When you stand before God, you cannot say, "But I was told by others to do thus,"or that virtue "was not convenient at the time." This will not suffice."
    /King Baldwin IV in the Kingdom of Heaven/

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Tripredacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 10:50 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Germany, Poland, Italy
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Software Engineer
    Politics
    Fascism
    Religion
    I Am
    Posts
    337
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    28
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    75
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    It isn't really serious. Their headline is they are shutting out dissenting voices. For if they were serious about stopping fake news on their services, they would have to shut them down.

    And besides, I believe that the issue isn't so much about fake news, it seems to be directly aimed at news aggregates if you read (at least google's) announcements. The crackdown on aggregates would make more sense as they are websites who take stories from other websites and publish them on their own news sites. As an example, newspapers and television news websites are also part aggregates for AP and Reuters news stories, but they have some deal worked out with those agencies to get and then run the stories as credited.

    While a lot of websites do credit news stories that are lifted from other websites, a lot of them do not. AND most of them do not have any sort of deal worked out with the sites or agencies in which they get their story.

    It cannot be that this is about actual false or modified news stories themselves. That cannot be helped by hiding them. When you see someone on a Google + (no one uses it so bad example :p) or Facebook share a story or picture, and you find it is not correct and point it out, the person claims you to be a liar or will defend the false information. This is another thing entirely and seems to be what the political spin stories are referring to. The ones saying fake or misleading info about US Election candidates caused the results to go the other way than expect... or as hoped/reported. And of course many fear that this will be some death knell to alternate new sources. I don't think it will be that at all, those sources of information will still exist and do not require Google or Facebook to do so.

  8. #7
    "Du bist das Bild, das ich in mir barg..."
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Siegmund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, April 11th, 2017 @ 11:14 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Gender
    Politics
    Folkish
    Posts
    1,023
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    20
    Thanked in
    19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Wulfaz View Post
    By the way the Google some years ago has started that it drops links about the themes what you searched earlier. The causes is that if you like a fashion, the Google will drop rather fashion-like themes and the Google advertising in the hompages show advertisment about your earlier search. F.e. I like the ZARA, the H&M, the Marks&Spencer and since as I searched for this sites via Google, because it is simpli to use the URL-bar in the Firefox/Explorer/etc., the Google often bombardments me the advertisment of these companies where pages are Google advertisement. The original cause was that they want make the Google more user-friend, however thus they get back a lot of search link and advertisement what would be interest me.
    It's hard for me to imagine that there are still people who don't use ad blocking software to silence all the noise to which you are referring. Also, it takes just a little time and effort to opt out of personalized ads, whether it's Google, Bing, Safari, Microsoft or whatever that wants to bombard you with them. I always opt out of any and all "anonymous" data collection as well, whenever it's possible to do so.

    But no one who surfs the internet should be under any illusion that it is easy to completely anonymize oneself. It takes a lot of effort and sophistication, and even then there are no guarantees. Ever.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tripredacus View Post
    It isn't really serious. Their headline is they are shutting out dissenting voices. For if they were serious about stopping fake news on their services, they would have to shut them down.
    Absolutely true. In my opinion, their real objective is censorship of their ideological adversaries. And as the author of the article stated, the greatest source of fake news is the so-called mainstream media.

  9. #8
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 18th, 2021 @ 12:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,434
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,266
    Thanked in
    750 Posts

    Merkel With Obama: Internet 'Disruptive' Force That Has to Be 'Contained, Managed, and Steered' by Government

    Speaking at a joint press conference with outgoing American President Barack Obama on his farewell tour, German Chancellor Angela Merkel made chilling remarks about her views on the need for government to control the internet, and slammed anti-Islamisation protesters who she accused of hijacking the German spirit for liberty ... Calling the surge of interest in right-wing politics a “wave” that “engulfs us,” Ms. Merkel noted the sentiment “seems to come from the United States,” but in an oblique reference to President-Elect Donald Trump said it was an issue she was dealing with in Europe, too ... Apparently blaming this rising populism — politics that are popular with voters — on the internet, the German chancellor implied the internet would have to be subject to restrictive censorship laws ..
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016...ruptive-force/

  10. #9
    The Germanic Orthodoxy
    Juthunge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 11:46 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German
    Subrace
    Keltic Nordid-CM
    Gender
    Religion
    Religion of the Blood
    Posts
    1,682
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    824
    Thanked in
    385 Posts

    Big Tech giants versus the people

    Facebook, Twitter Could Pay $53 Mn for Hate Speech, Fake News in Germany

    Published time: 14 Mar, 2017 20:32

    German authorities have circulated further steps aimed at fighting hate speech and so-called fake news posts on social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter proposing fines of up to 50 million euros ($53 million).

    German Justice Minister Heiko Maas announced plans to introduce a new law that would oblige social networks to publish quarterly accountability reports, which would include information on how effectively cases of hate speech and fake news reported by users on social networks are being considered, the German Justice Ministry reported on Tuesday.

    Apart from that, social media companies would have to take down offensive posts within 24 hours after a complaint is submitted. As of today, it takes at least a week to delete these kind of posts.

    A breach of these organizational obligations is, according to our proposal, an administrative offense and an individual employee responsible for the complaint procedure can be punished with a fine of up to five million euros. The whole company may be face fines of up to 50 million euros,” Maas said in a statement, released by the ministry.

    “Freedom of expression ends where criminal law begins. There should be no place for criminal incitement and libel on social networks like there is no such place for these things on the street,” he added.

    [...]

    According to the statistics, Twitter takes down only one percent of inciting content while Facebook’s figure is 39 percent.

    Google’s YouTube performance is significantly higher with some 90 percent of deleted hate-speech messages.
    The new bill is yet to be approved by Angela Merkel’s cabinet and then the German parliament (Bundestag).

    [...]

    The initiative is the result of two-year's work undertaken by a task force created by Maas’ department to clamp down on “illegal hate speech on the internet.”
    Source (RT)


    Welcome to Germany, the stronghold of democracy and free speech, brought to you by the Ministry of Truth.
    And the day they sold us out, Our hearts grew cold
    'Cause we were never asked, No brother, we were told!
    What do they know of Europe, Who only Europe know?



    Ancient DNA: List of All Studies analyzing DNA of Ancient Tribes and Ethnicities(post-2010)


  11. #10
    Germania incognita
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Hersir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Norway
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Y-DNA
    I2b1
    mtDNA
    J2a1a1b
    Country
    Norway Norway
    State
    South Trondelag South Trondelag
    Location
    Norway
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Posts
    6,156
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,268
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    974
    Thanked in
    463 Posts

    No more dissident voices: Succumb to Facebook & Twitter’s demands or get banned (or both)

    A recent purge by Facebook and Twitter of a host of independent media sites has pushed thousands of people out of work and has killed one of the most effective forms of expressing political dissent.
    On Thursday last week, Facebook purged more than 800 pages and accounts, accusing them of engaging in “inauthentic behaviour” and violating Facebook’s anti-spam policies.
    According to a statement released by Facebook on its website, many of these pages were:
    using fake accounts or multiple accounts with the same names and posted massive amounts of content across a network of Groups and Pages to drive traffic to their websites. Many used the same techniques to make their content appear more popular on Facebook than it really was. Others were ad farms using Facebook to mislead people into thinking that they were forums for legitimate political debate.”


    One of these pages was The Anti-Media, which I have worked for since mid-2016. Until the purge, we had some 2.17 million followers on Facebook. Supposedly, Facebook wants you to believe that 2.17 million people voluntarily signed up to our page just to receive all the spam content that we put out there (sounds realistic).
    Shortly after Facebook unpublished our page, Twitter suspended our account as well.
    Twitter did one better than Facebook, though, as it went one step further and suspended the accounts of our editors and many influential people who work on our team. Carey Wedler, Anti-Media’s editor-in-chief’s Twitter account was suspended and yet Twitter could not even provide her with a valid reason for doing so.
    I am not joking. In her notice of suspension, Twitter informed Wedler that her account, “CareyWedler has been suspended for violating the Twitter Rules. Specifically, for:” and the “specifically, for” part of Twitter’s notice was left blank.
    They literally could not even think of a reason; and yet they are for some reason not required to provide one.
    Twitter also removed our talentedly efficient social media manager, PM Beers, who had amassed a following of over 30,000 followers on one of her accounts. She previously had access to over 30 accounts, yet Twitter was somehow able to coordinate the suspension of all of them at the same time except for one. Our Chief Creative Officer was also banned, even from accounts that he had not even used yet.

    Twitter then felt the need to remove the @AntiMediaRadio account, and when an appeal was made, Twitter responded by saying that the account was suspended due to “multiple or repeat violations of the Twitter rules.” The account had zero posts on it.
    If you believe that any of this has been done with genuine intentions to protect American democracy, then you probably deserve what’s coming next. This is not just some social media strategy to remove spam and attack so-called Russian bots from interfering with “American democracy.” This was a coordinated effort to remove all of our accounts, launched in tandem between two social media giants, because we say things the government doesn’t want you to hear.


    The first thing you need to know about this purge is that we can be relatively sure who is behind it. Facebook openlyannounced it was working with the NATO-funded Atlantic Council to prevent Facebook’s service “from being abused during elections” (what’s that I hear about the midterms coming up?) The Atlantic Council directors list is no less than a who’s who of well-established war criminals, including Henry Kissinger.
    But it gets even better than that. Most of the 800 pages removed by Facebook last Thursday were honourable mentions in a blacklist published by the Washington Post in November 2016, including and especially The Anti-Media. The Post relied upon the findings of a shadowy and questionable outfit known as PropOrNot, which compiled a list of media organizations it claimed were part of a “sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign.”
    Continues

    "Make strong old dreams lest our world lose heart." -Ezra Pound



    Support Skadi forum



  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hersir For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •