View Poll Results: The primitive races are not Homo Sapiens at all (or at least mostly not)

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • I agree

    17 51.52%
  • I disagree

    9 27.27%
  • I am undecided

    7 21.21%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Homo Erectus: Extinct or still with us?

  1. #1
    Account Inactive Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Homo Erectus: Extinct or still with us?

    I have read about evidence for modern syb-Saharran Africans being mostly if not entirely Homo Erectus. Modern establishment scientists will tell you that all people are modern Homo Sapiens. This is clearly a lie. Sub-Saharran Africans are either archaic Homo Sapiens or Homo Erectus, or a mix of the two, in my opinion.

    Whenever ones species evolves into existence, it comes from a branch off the parent specis. Those of the parent species not of this off-shot go on living until extinction or until they evolve into something else. This means that the picture presented to layman of species A evolving into species B evolving into species C and so on is incorrect. To be more precise, when a new species arises, it overlaps in time with the parent species.

    In Africa, Homo Sapiens evolved out of part of Homo Erectus. In my opinion, the former species left Africa for the most part. The degree of gene flow of the new species back into the more primitive one (or vice versa) is hard to speculate on. We do know that one Homo Sapiens left Africa, and we also know that a branch of Homo Erectus left Africa in an earleir wave (Java Man in the Indian Ocean area). I think that that branch, instead of dying out as is claimed, went on to become the Australian indiginous population (as well as other peoples in the surrounding islands). Meanwhile, Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa, then left Africa in a later wave, and populated Eurasia, while the branch of Homo Erectus that stayed behind in Africa advanced litte (and are the people whom we call "black" today).

    Liberal multicult scientists will throw the definition of "species" at me and point to the fact that members of various races can produce fertile offspring. To counter this, I cite Darwin's "Descent of Man" which cited information on mixed race people being less fertile than people who are racially pure. In any case, the notion that hybrids are ALWAYS sterile is not true. I have heard that some mules (donkey-horse mixes) can reproduce (as can ligers and other interspecies hybrids). Unfortunately, when mating occurs as often as it does with the mixed-race mud people in this country, they will still have several offspring regardless.
    Last edited by Von Braun; Thursday, February 20th, 2003 at 05:39 AM.

  2. #2
    Purifier
    Azdaja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, April 25th, 2012 @ 01:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Slavic/Germanic
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    -
    Posts
    572
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    << we also know that a branch of Homo Erectus left Africa in an earleir wave (Java Man in the Indian Ocean area). I think that that branch, instead of dying out as is claimed, went on to become the Australian indiginous population (as well as other peoples in the surrounding islands). >>

    Ok, I've actually been thinking for awhile now that this may be true. I even posted about it in another thread. Going strictly by physical appearence, it seems obvious.
    However going solely on physical appearence can lead one astray. I wonder if there have been any genetic tests done that would lend some more weight to this theory?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 30th, 2017 @ 05:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German and English
    Subrace
    Nordid
    mtDNA
    H
    Country
    Prussia Prussia
    State
    Teutonic Order Teutonic Order
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aquarius
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Ethnocentrism
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,827
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post

    That just might be. What evidence have you read Von Braun? They seem rather primative to me, and skeletal structure fits also.

    Here's a sketch of Homo Erectus






    They look like Homo Erectus, albeit slightly evolved. Slightly less prognathic. Does that make them Homo Sapiens? I don't think it does.

  4. #4
    Account Inactive Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    Originally posted by NordicPower88
    That just might be. What evidence have you read Von Braun? They seem rather primative to me, and skeletal structure fits also.

    Here's a sketch of Homo Erectus






    They look like Homo Erectus, albeit slightly evolved. Slightly less prognathic. Does that make them Homo Sapiens? I don't think it does.
    I read this on SF several months ago. It was a thread with a catchy title: something like "All humans are equal." It turned out his point was that many other races are not human like us. People were commenting that they thought he was an anti-racist from the title of the thread. Anyway, I think he had some good sources.

  5. #5
    Account Disabled on Request
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Friday, January 8th, 2010 @ 08:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Subrace
    Alpinid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Lappland Lappland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Posts
    3,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts

    Thumbs Down I agree with Von Braun.

    This site claims Aborigines are clearly homo sapiens. It's a statement made to dodge any claims of Australoids being subhuman. The modern Aborigine skull shown on that site bears more than a passing resemblance to homo erectus.

    Aborigine?

    Though it somewhat reminds me of the negroid Whoopi Goldberg, too. x_hehe

  6. #6
    Account Inactive Von Braun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 16th, 2005 @ 08:00 AM
    Subrace
    Dinarid-UP-Kelt Nordid-Alpinid
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Occupation
    Public sector
    Politics
    Misanthrope
    Religion
    None
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    I agree with Von Braun.

  7. #7
    ...................
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Allenson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 19th, 2017 @ 10:51 AM
    Ethnicity
    New English
    State
    Vermont Vermont
    Location
    Bliss Farm
    Gender
    Occupation
    Smuggler
    Politics
    Ruralist
    Religion
    Old Mother West Wind
    Posts
    3,908
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Post

    Not that Coon is the 'be all end all' in physical anthropolgy but he states that there is nothing MORE sapiens than the Negroid. That's right, the Negroid. According to his hypothesis, the modern European population is a combination or blend of sapiens and the Neaderthal, whereas the Negroid is purely sapiens....albeit an archaic variety.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 30th, 2017 @ 05:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German and English
    Subrace
    Nordid
    mtDNA
    H
    Country
    Prussia Prussia
    State
    Teutonic Order Teutonic Order
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aquarius
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Ethnocentrism
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,827
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post

    The theory that whites are mixed with Neanderthals has long been disproved. Why people keep propagating it I have no idea.

    Coon copied most of his ideas from anti-racists.

  9. #9
    ...................
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Allenson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 19th, 2017 @ 10:51 AM
    Ethnicity
    New English
    State
    Vermont Vermont
    Location
    Bliss Farm
    Gender
    Occupation
    Smuggler
    Politics
    Ruralist
    Religion
    Old Mother West Wind
    Posts
    3,908
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Post

    Originally posted by NordicPower88
    The theory that whites are mixed with Neanderthals has long been disproved. Why people keep propagating it I have no idea.

    Coon copied most of his ideas from anti-racists.

    Oh I'm not saying that there is Neaderthal in us or not....just presenting theories that have have been devised before. Personally, I find the notion to be quite possible. What about all the intermediate skulls that have been found....especially the ones from what is now Israel/Palestine? Coon's theory is that the rugged Upper Paleolithic types (Brunns & Borrebys) are the direct result of this blend.

    I thought you were a 'Coonist'. You quote and site his work often here but now you say he 'copied his ideas from anti-racists'.

    I'm not being argumentative here but I'm curious what you know about the disproval of this theory. Have genetic studies been conducted? Thanks.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Angelcynn Beorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 1st, 2012 @ 07:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Subrace
    Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    State
    Essex Essex
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Politics
    National Capitalist
    Religion
    Protestant
    Posts
    867
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    Have to agree with Dalon. I used to be very interested in the multi-regional theory a while back, and read up on it some. I tend to believe its actually the out-of-Africa thory, so beloved of commies, which is the anti-racist idea.
    I am Ripper... Tearer... Slasher... Gouger.
    I am the Teeth in the Darkness, the Talons in the Night.
    Mine is Strength... and Lust... and Power!
    I AM BEOWULF!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Homo Erectus Travelled the High Seas
    By Todesritter in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Tuesday, September 13th, 2011, 08:18 AM
  2. Were Australoids first considered Homo Erectus?
    By Digitalseal in forum Australoid
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Tuesday, February 13th, 2007, 07:07 AM
  3. Homo erectus / Javaman
    By cosmocreator in forum Paleoanthropology
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Tuesday, April 6th, 2004, 08:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •