Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: The "Great Reset," The Fake Pandemic, And The 2020 US Election

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 09:04 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    1,043
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    401
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    667
    Thanked in
    414 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Winterland View Post
    I had a few friends who caught Covid-19 this year. They were also very skeptical if it was 'fake" or exaggerated of overlapping symptoms from multiple diseases. They believe in Covid now.
    Again, that presupposes that there is "really a new contagious disease". There is up to now, no evidence of this, but thousands of attempts were made to create such evidence.

    The problem is that anybody that got sick and experienced it as "something new" now believes that is a) was Covid and hence b) that COVID exists.
    Well, such experiences are shaped by exposure to information, especially if that kind of information was omnipresent and repeated over and over again.



    Quote Originally Posted by Winterland View Post
    Covid reminds me of a common cold and flu-like respiratory disease. In my opinion, people who isolated more often seemed more susceptible to worse symptoms of Covid or "contracted it." We were out in public often and avoided masks until the law came into affect. Plus, we stayed active and continue to visit others casually. Laws were not strict like CA and some European countries. I stayed outdoors and avoided super crowded areas and washed hands as usual. It seems more like the flu as people describe it.
    There is no clear definition of what constitutes "COVID". And we are not talking about minor deviations or variations here. The "scientific community" has defined anything from 'being asymptomatic' (meaning essentially healthy) to atypical pneumonia (and various other severe conditions) to be "Covid" now. This is actually preposterous on its face, but nevertheless millions do believe it now.

    Now, those conditions weren't exactly unknown previously. Although some of the included were rather rare, hence less mentioned and therefore have the subjective appearance of being something new to many. The variability has the advantage in propaganda that more people can somehow more people will be able to relate to it, since they or someone they know even via others may have experience them. But it is also a give-away that the "COVID"-theory / set o hypothesis is complete nonsense.

    The key issue that their postulated "Virus Isolation" experiences do have methodological (and logica) issues that prevent them from being scientific proof for anything. You can do control experiments (which they didn't, and hence is a red flag) with samples from healthy people and get the same type of results they got with the samples with proposedly "infected people" (e.g. pneumonia patients). That shows that their "virus isolation" (which is a misnomer as well) got no probative value. No research with probative value means that for the empirically/scientifically minded person there is no reason to believe in a new physical contagion.

    As for spikes in "infection", they are created with more and/or more lax configurated tests. Spikes in sickness and/or mortality stem from the results of lockdowns and coronaphobia (hypes were created via media). So this doesn't support the notion of a pandemic neither.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  3. #22
    Senior Member
    Tripredacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, November 30th, 2021 @ 10:25 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Germany, Poland, Italy
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Software Engineer
    Politics
    Fascism
    Religion
    I Am
    Posts
    337
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    28
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    75
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Theunissen View Post
    There is no clear definition of what constitutes "COVID".
    There is a clear definition, that is, what the virus has been observed to do. Which is that it blocks oxygen absorption in cells. Depending on where the infection occurs the symptoms can be varied.

    A surefire way to detect for the presence of covid-19 would be to test for the spike protein, but this isn't done. Instead the public gets a test for a nucleic acid in the virus body, which is not unique to Sars-Cov-2, nevermind the issue with the cycles used during amplification.

    As for the infection spikes, this is something that we will never know. It can only ever be a theory that the reason why Covid had an abnormal infection timeline was because of the lockdowns. It does make sense, but also you must understand that there is never only 1 thing that causes another thing. Environments are varied and complicate things to an astounding degree that mostly cannot be measured.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tripredacus For This Useful Post:


  5. #23
    Senior Member
    Winterland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 02:28 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German; Scot-Irish; Scandinavian
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Coastal region
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Free Lance
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    264
    Thanked in
    194 Posts
    There is no clear definition of what constitutes "COVID". And we are not talking about minor deviations or variations here. The "scientific community" has defined anything from 'being asymptomatic' (meaning essentially healthy) to atypical pneumonia (and various other severe conditions) to be "Covid" now. This is actually preposterous on its face, but nevertheless millions do believe it now.


    I agree that Covid 19 seems to have too many symptoms overlapping the "Crud," flu or even common sinus and chest-cold infections. All these diseases above can cause symptoms that produce annoyances: lack of appetite, failing senses such as taste or smell, stomach upset, or general body aches and discomforts. In severe cases, they can turn into pneumonia if an infection is untreated. About 40% of colds are in the covid family. I agree with your comment of faulty studies, not testing healthy people as baseline, who already seemed immune to "covid." Maybe, we have more exposure to colds and other cruds, which produce a natural barrier or start with, in better health. Most people who died were over 75, heavy smokers, obese, or with other medical conditions. To shut down economies was absurd. People who were frail or with medical conditions should stay out of public if they were at risk.

  6. #24
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 09:04 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    1,043
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    401
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    667
    Thanked in
    414 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripredacus View Post
    There is a clear definition, that is, what the virus has been observed to do. Which is that it blocks oxygen absorption in cells. Depending on where the infection occurs the symptoms can be varied.
    ....
    "The Virus" hasn't been observed to do anything.

    What they did is take a sample from a pneumonia patient and put it on cell culture, while creating conditions that would ultimately kill the cells. When that happened they claimed to "have isolated the Virus". They have not. They created a mixture with samples and dead cells. That's it. That's their base for all the rest of "research work".

    They injected from the mixtures into the lungs of lab animals. Well, they get sick, when one inserts goop there. That's their proof of this being the cause of the atypical pneumonia they redubbed "COVID19".

    They analysed the goop as well for RNA and other materials. The snippets they found were puzzled together to be a "virus genome". That's where the markers for the tests come from. And now is anyone with a positive test a "COVID-CASE". If there is any illness, this becomes then "due to the virus", hence "COVID". That's why I say it's essentially undefined, rebranded old symptoms now called covid.... Anything from asymptomatic to atypical pneumonia is "COVID" now. Especially when some markers test positive. Problem: Those markers might be from any other human RNA as well, meaning that the tests are useless for serious diagnostic purpose. They are a waste of money, essentially a fraud.

    If it wasn't for the permanent repetitive news and people running around with those silly masks (Pandemic Propaganda Equipment), virtually nobody would believe the narrative. "COVID" would be another Swine Flu at best.

  7. #25
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    11,029
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    698
    Thanked in
    462 Posts

    Police State: Dystopian Short Film



    What once seemed like the paranoid ramblings of crazy "conspiracy theorists" is now the stated goal of the World Economic Forum and our world rulers.

    Renegade

  8. #26

  9. #27
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    11,029
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    698
    Thanked in
    462 Posts

    Health Crises, Authoritarian Regimes and Hyperinflation – The Great Reset Is Coming

    Give up your freedom, give up your rights, give up your wealth and submit to the new oligarchs who already rule the world today, and have the future planned out for you.

    American President Franklin Roosevelt once said that nothing in politics happens by chance. When something happens, you can bet that it was planned to happen.

    When you look at what has happened in the past 18 months, this sentence becomes particularly frightening. Can it be that everything we have experienced was planned?

    The situation in which we currently find ourselves is unique in the history of mankind. Never before has the entire world been subjected to such a global regime of coercion as in our time.

    And never before have so many measures been taken, which at first glance seem so incomprehensible, sometimes so nonsensical, and often so contradictory. Officially, we are facing the most severe health crisis in living memory. But the measures taken against it have not improved the situation but continuously worsened it.

    Any doctor can confirm that the majority of people’s health is worse today than it was before the crisis. And even from the point of view of those who ordered the measures, we face shambles. The alleged threat of a fourth wave and the announcement of the need for third, fourth, and fifth vaccinations show that the measures taken so far have completely failed to contain the disease.

    But that is not all. As a result of the lockdowns, we are currently facing a severe global economic crisis. Production is down around the world; logistics are down, supply chains are broken, we have crop failures, food shortages, and shortages of semiconductors that are vital to large parts of the economy.

    But even in this area, rather than being addressed and solved, we see the problems multiplied and magnified by the imposition of further measures and the constant threat of new restrictions.

    The latest example: in China, a port terminal in the third-largest cargo port in the world has been closed because of a positive test among dock workers.

    Or New Zealand: not long ago, 5 million people were seriously put on lockdown for three days because a single 58-year-old tested positive.

    Another crisis affects the middle class, which creates the most jobs worldwide and bears the highest tax burden. The middle class is being squeezed harder every week by incessantly stoked uncertainty and constantly new regulations and has never been in as deep a crisis as it is at present.

    But even that is not all. We are witnessing a massive increase in inflation worldwide, especially in commodities, producer prices, and food. But here, too, no countermeasures are being taken; on the contrary, monetary tightening is continuing and intensified.

    Since the beginning of the crisis, states and central banks have injected almost US$20 trillion into the global monetary cycle with no end in sight. And the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the world’s most powerful financial organization, recently issued SDRs worth US$650 billion, the most significant amount ever of its currency, the Special Drawing Rights.

    The social situation is no better. Just one example: in the USA, the economically most robust country in the world, almost 4 million people are threatened with eviction because they cannot pay their rents or service their home loans. And more than ten times as many are unable to support themselves on their income – remember, the U.S. is the wealthiest country in the world.



    Additionally, the deliberate breaking of the economy and the fueling of inflation have now achieved something absolutely unprecedented: an international division of the population never before experienced.

    To a certain extent, one aspect of all this is the change of power in Afghanistan, which was deliberately brought about by the USA. The Taliban have been gifted with military material worth US$20 billion, a complete air force and 11 air bases, which will certainly trigger the next huge wave of refugees.

    WHY?

    Why are measures being taken around the world that are creating one disaster after another and dragging the majority of people deeper and deeper into the abyss, instead of getting them out of their misery? To answer this question, one must ask two more questions: namely, who has a stake in this global agenda? And who benefits from it?

    The answer to both questions is clear. The biggest profiteer of the current crisis and the main mastermind behind the scenes is the digital-financial complex. In other words, a kind of community of interests headed by the largest I.T. companies and the largest asset managers of our time.

    The largest I.T. companies include Apple, Google’s parent Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook. The stock market value of these five companies alone is currently an incredible US$9.2 trillion. Just for comparison, the combined gross domestic product of Germany, France and Italy is US$8.6 trillion.

    In addition to these digital companies, there are also the large asset managers. Namely Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street, and Fidelity. They all have significant stakes in all I.T. companies and much more. These four alone currently manage a total of US$18 trillion.

    Again for comparison: the gross domestic product (GDP) of all 28 states of the European Union was US$15.7 trillion last year. But it’s not just the immense financial power of these companies that makes the digital-financial complex so powerful.

    Let’s take the I.T. corporations first. Not only do they have enormous market power themselves, they also control hundreds of thousands of other companies because they organize their digitization and thus have constant insight into their data flow.

    The I.T. industry has metastasized into all sectors of the economy over the course of the past few years, making them dependent on it and now completely dominating them.

    The situation is no different for asset management companies. They are involved in all the big companies of the world and are able to move any market of the world in any direction. The largest of them, Blackrock, has the largest repository of financial information the world has ever seen, with its more than 40-year-old Aladdin data analysis system.

    Blackrock uses this knowledge in the background to advise the world’s largest central banks, i.e. the Federal Reserve in the USA and the European Central Bank (ECB). With the huge information advantage that Blackrock has in this way, it should be clear who is dependent on whom here.

    We are therefore dealing with a historically unique mixture of concentrated financial power and the power of disposal over an unimaginably huge pool of data. Since the beginning of the crisis, this combination has given companies a boost like never before.

    And not only that. This upswing is accelerating continuously. In the last quarter alone, i.e. in April, May and June of this year, these corporations posted the highest profits in their entire history. Given these facts, it doesn’t take much imagination to conclude that the digital-financial complex is the global powerhouse around which everything revolves.

    The digital-financial complex stands far above all governments and is capable of bringing any cabinet in the world to its knees and making it compliant at any time. However, one has to wonder all the more about the methods with which the digital-financial complex has been working since the beginning of the current crisis.

    It almost looks as if the complex is undermining the very system from which it profits. Here are just a few examples.

    THE DIGITAL-FINANCIAL COMPLEX

    If the digital-financial complex destroys the middle class, then it is actually destroying its own livelihood. Because as just pointed out, the middle class pays the most taxes and creates the most jobs. And if it then fuels inflation, that also harms the complex. And if it destroys social peace through the explosion of social inequality, then it also destroys the ground on which it does business.

    All these are justified objections, but they miss the reality.

    The reality is this. The digital-financial complex has no choice but to do what it is currently doing. What we are currently witnessing is not a desk-bound agenda to acquire even more money and power and then enjoy the fruits of its efforts in peace.

    What we are currently witnessing is a gigantic act of desperation. Probably the biggest ever in the entire history of mankind. This act of desperation has its cause in the fact that the system to which the digital-financial complex owes its existence can no longer be kept alive through the previous means.

    It was already on the verge of its end in the world financial crisis of 2007/2008. If governments had not mobilized huge amounts of taxpayers’ money at that time and instructed central banks to create vast amounts of money out of thin air, the system would have collapsed then.

    However, the rescue was only temporary. The money supply had to be continuously increased over a period of 12 years and interest rates had to be lowered time and again. In other words, the system had to be made more and more unstable. That could not go well in the long run. And then, last year, the time had come. In March 2020, the next collapse loomed.

    This collapse was postponed, for the very last time, by a final show of strength, namely by lowering interest rates to zero and injecting trillions instead of billions. But this has created a qualitatively new situation.

    Another postponement would require interest rates to be cut into negative territory, thus destroying the very foundation of the existing banking system. Banks cannot live with negative interest rates in the long run. This means that there will be no further deferral with the means applied so far.

    In the current situation, the highest amount that can be injected into the system is trillions and trillions, but with the consequence that inflation, which is already rising sharply, will be further fueled and turned into hyperinflation.



    The situation in which the digital-financial complex finds itself is therefore the alternative between the final collapse on the one hand and hyperinflation on the other. That is, the complete devaluation of money.

    This means that we have historically arrived at a point where the digital-financial complex, within the framework of the existing system, only has the choice between two different forms of collapse. So what to do?

    Quite obviously, in this situation, one has opted for a new system and for a dual strategy to install it.

    FROM TOTAL CHAOS TO TOTAL CONTROL

    On the one hand, a new system is being prepared in the background, away from the eyes of the public. And on the other hand, at the same time, they are using the final phase of the current moribund system to plunder it by every trick in the book.

    This is exactly what we have been experiencing since last March 2020: the deliberate and conscious destruction of the world economy for the sole purpose of self-enrichment by the digital-financial complex with simultaneous preparation of a new system by the central banks in cooperation with the I.T. corporations.

    How this new system looks like, is something we already know. It is the complete abolition of cash and the banks in their previous form and the introduction of digital central bank money. The ultimate goal is that each of us will have only one account, through which all transactions will take place, and this account will no longer be with a commercial bank but with the central bank.

    The background to this plan is logical. Digital central bank money is programmable. And since central banks can create unlimited amounts of money out of thin air, it would indeed be possible to introduce negative interest rates in this way without destroying the system. But that is far from the only property that digital central bank money possesses.

    It would allow the state to monitor all transactions, assign us different tax rates, and impose individual penalties on us. The state could partially tie the money to an expiration date and could force us to spend certain specific sums within certain time periods. It could also earmark the money and force us to spend certain amounts only on certain goods or in certain regions.

    Above all, however, the state would be able to cut off each and every one of us from all payment flows with a simple click of the mouse, thus eliminating us financially. Digital central bank money would be the most effective social control mechanism that has existed in human history. It would thus be nothing more and nothing less than the completion of an all-encompassing dictatorship brought about via money.

    However, the whole thing has a huge catch: namely, the expected resistance of the population. It is safe to assume that a large part of the people will not accept this form of disenfranchisement, which means that the introduction of digital central bank money would lead to great social unrest.



    It is precisely this problem that has obviously given the digital-financial complex the idea of reversing the process of introducing this money. That is, not to introduce digital central bank money gradually and risk great resistance, but the other way around – in other words, to plunge society into chaos in order to present digital central bank money as the solution to all problems, in the form of “universal basic income”.

    For those who think that this is a conspiracy theory plucked out of thin air, I recommend that you take a close look at what we have experienced in the past 18 months.

    Under the pretext of fighting a disease, devastating and irreparable health, economic and financial damage has been done. We have only begun to feel the full impact of this up to now.

    At the same time, however, work is being done day after day to increase this damage. At the same time, the social divide is systematically deepened by driving new wedges between people. All this leads us in only one direction. Social unrest up to civil war. And that worldwide.

    It is precisely this goal that is being sought, according to all information available to me. We experience at present that under employment of all conceivable means the largest possible social chaos is tried to cause and then on the high point of this chaos with a panacea with the name ‘universal basic income’ to arise and in this way convert maximum chaos into maximum control.

    By the way, there is also a second reason why the universal basic income has to come from the point of view of the powerful. We are in the midst of the fourth industrial revolution and in the period ahead we will see the loss of millions upon millions of jobs through the use of artificial intelligence.

    That means millions of consumers will be eliminated. Demand for consumer goods will collapse at an ever-increasing rate. And since the current economic system is consumption-driven, you have to break this downward spiral to keep it alive. This can only be done by giving money to the unemployed consumers who are without a job.

    Everything we have experienced in the past 18 months and everything we are currently experiencing is obviously following a plan. This plan is to dismantle the current system in favor of the elite, to create maximum economic and social chaos, and to establish a new system under the pretext of providing humanitarian aid.

    WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM

    Some indications of this plan can be seen in the two books – ‘The 4th industrial revolution’ and ‘The great reset’ – written by the German Klaus Schwab, whose World Economic Forum (WEF) plays a key role in the whole agenda.



    The WEF has managed in the past 50 years to become one of the most important control centers of the digital-financial complex. It first networked business leaders, later on, politicians, and even later media professionals, the high nobility, and celebrities; in the 90s it additionally subjected them to targeted training.

    We know today that since 1992 the ‘Global Leaders of Tomorrow’ and since 2005 the ‘Young Global Leaders’ have been subjected to systematic and increasingly in-depth training by the WEF, and that they are exactly the people who are currently holding the levers of power.

    Consider Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, or Jack Ma from the I.T. sector. Consider Blackrock boss Larry Fink or IMF boss Kristalina Georgieva from the financial sector. Consider Emmanuel Macron, Sebastian Kurz, or Angela Merkel from the political sector. They have all either been trained by WEF or sit on its governing bodies.

    However, it’s not just the 1,300 members of this tightly networked leadership elite who pull the wires worldwide. Since 2012, they have also been joined by 10,000 under-30-year-old so-called ‘global shapers’. They were also brought together by the WEF and exerted influence on the course of the world.

    Whoever wants to know what this course could look like should take a look at the works of WEF founder Klaus Schwab. Moreover, even if, at this point, you still don’t believe that everything we are experiencing and have experienced follows a plan, you should take a look at the publication date of Schwab’s ‘Great Reset’.

    The book was published on July 9, 2020, less than four months after the global lockdown. It gives precise instructions on how to use Covid-19 to creatively destroy the world, in Schwab’s words, and build a new world.

    Eurocanadian

  10. #28

  11. #29

    The Great Reset is Here: Follow the Money



    The Great Reset is Here: Follow the Money




    The top-down reorganization of the world economy by a cabal of technocratic corporativists, led by the group around the Davos World Economic Forum– the so-called Great Reset or UN Agenda 2030– is no future proposal. It is well into actualization as the world remains in insane lockdown for a virus. The hottest investment area since onset of the coronavirus global lockdowns is something called ESG investing. This highly subjective and very controlled game is dramatically shifting global capital flows into a select group of “approved” corporate stocks and bonds. Notably it advances the dystopian UN Agenda 2030 or the WEF Great Reset agenda. The development is one of the most dangerous and least understood shifts in at least the past century.


    The UN “sustainable economy” agenda is being realized quietly by the very same global banks which have created the financial crises in 2008. This time they are preparing the Klaus Schwab WEF Great Reset by steering hundreds of billions and soon trillions in investment to their hand-picked “woke” companies, and away from the “not woke” such as oil and gas companies or coal.


    What the bankers and giant investment funds like BlackRock have done is to create a new investment infrastructure that picks “winners” or “losers” for investment according to how serious that company is about ESG—Environment, Social values and Governance. For example a company gets positive ratings for the seriousness of its hiring gender diverse management and employees, or takes measures to eliminate their carbon “footprint” by making their energy sources green or sustainable to use the UN term. How corporations contribute to a global sustainable governance is the most vague of the ESG, and could include anything from corporate donations to Black Lives Matter to supporting UN agencies such as WHO.


    The crucial central goal of ESG strategists is to create a shift to inefficient and costly alternative energy, the Zero Carbon promised utopia. It is being driven by the world’s major financial institutions and central banks. They have created a dazzling array of organizations to drive their green investing agenda.


    In 2013, well before the coronavirus, the major Wall Street bank, Morgan Stanley, created its own Institute for Sustainable Investing. This was soon expanded in 2015 when Morgan Stanley joined the Steering Committee of the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF). On its website the they state,


    “PCAF is based upon the Paris Climate Agreement’s position that the global community should strive to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and that society should decarbonize and reach net zero emissions by 2050.”


    By 2020 the PCAF had more than 100 banks and financial institutions including ABN Amro, Nat West, Lloyds Bank, Barcylays, Bank of America, Citi Group, CIBC, Danske Bank
    and others. Several of the PCAF member banks have been indicted in money laundering cases. Now they sense a new role as virtue-models to change the world economy, if we are to believe the rhetoric. Notably, former Bank of England Governor, Mark Carney is an “Observer” or consultant to the PCAF.


    In August 2020 the PCAF published a draft standard outlining a proposed approach for global carbon accounting. This means the bankers are creating their own accounting rules for how to rate or value a company’s carbon footprint or green profile.


    The Central Role of Mark Carney


    Mark Carney is at the center of reorganizing world finance to back the UN 2030 green agenda behind the WEF Davos Great Reset, where he is a member of the Board of Trustees. He also is Adviser to the UN Secretary General as United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Action. He has described the PCAF plan as follows:

    “To achieve net zero we need a whole economy transition – every company, every bank, every insurer and investor will have to adjust their business models, develop credible plans for the transition and implement them. For financial firms, that means reviewing more than the emissions generated by their own business activity. They must measure and report the emissions generated by the companies they invest in and lend to. PCAF’s work to standardise the approach to measuring financed emissions is an important step to ensuring that every financial decision takes climate change into account.”


    As Governor of the Bank of England Carney played a key role getting world central banks behind the Green Agenda of the UN 2030 scheme. The major central banks of the world, through their umbrella Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basle, created a key part of the growing global infrastructure that is steering investment flows to “sustainable” companies and away from those like oil and gas companies it deems “unsustainable.” When then-Bank of England Governor Mark Carney was head of the BIS’ Financial Stability Board (FSB) he established something called Task-force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) in 2015.


    The central bankers of the FSB nominated 31 people to form the TCFD. Chaired by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, it included in addition to BlackRock, JP MorganChase; Barclays Bank; HSBC; Swiss Re, the world’s second largest reinsurance; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, mining giant BHP and David Blood of Al Gore’s Generation Investment LLC.


    Anne Finucane, the Vice Chair of the Bank of America, a member of both the PCAF and the TCFD, noted, “we are committed to ensuring that climate-related risks and opportunities are properly managed within our business and that we are working with governments and markets to accelerate the changes required… climate change presents risks to the business community, and it is important for companies to articulate how these risks are being managed.”


    The Bank of America vice chair describes how they assess risks in its real estate loan portfolio by assessing, “acute physical risk analysis on a sample portfolio of Bank of America residential mortgages across the US Each property was given a score based on the level of risk associated with 12 potential hazards: tornado, earthquake, tropical cyclone, hailstorm, wildfire, river flood, flash flood, coastal flood, lightning, tsunami, volcano, and winter storm.” As well, the banks’ investment “risk” in oil and gas as well as other industrial sectors is reviewed using the criteria of Carney’s TCFD. All risks are defined as related to CO2, despite the fact there is no conclusive scientific proof that manmade CO2 emission is about to destroy our planet by global warming. Rather evidence of solar activity suggests we are entering an unstable cooling period, Grand Solar Minimum. That’s of no concern to the financial interests who stand to reap trillions in the coming decade.


    Another key part of the financial preparation for the Great Reset, the fundamental transformation from a high-energy intensity economy to a low and economically inefficient one, is the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). SASB says it “provides a clear set of standards for reporting sustainability information across a wide range of issues… “ This sounds reassuring until we look at who makes up the members of the SASB that will give the Climate-friendly Imprimatur. Members include, in addition to the world’s largest fund manager, BlackRock (more than $7 trillion under management), also Vanguard Funds, Fidelity Investments, Goldman Sachs, State Street Global, Carlyle Group, Rockefeller Capital Management, and numerous major banks such as Bank of America and UBS. Many of these are responsible for the 2008 global financial collapse. What is this framework group doing? According to their website, “Since 2011, we have has been working towards an ambitious goal of developing and maintaining sustainability accounting standards for 77 industries.”


    Where this is all going is to create a web of globally-based financial entities who control combined wealth including insurance and pension funds into what they claim to be worth $100 trillion. They are setting the rules and will define a company or even a country by the degree of carbon emission they create. If you are clean and green, you potentially get investment. If you are deemed a carbon polluter as the oil, gas and coal industries are deemed today, the global capital flows will disinvest or avoid funding you. The immediate target of this financial cabal is the backbone of the world economy, the oil and gas industry along with coal.


    Hydrocarbons Under Attack


    The immediate target of this financial cartel is the backbone of the world economy, the oil, coal and natural gas sector. Oil industry analysts predict that over the next five years or less investment flows into the world’s largest energy sector will fall dramatically. “Given how central the energy transition will be to every company’s growth prospects, we are asking companies to disclose a plan for how their business model will be compatible with a net zero economy,” BlackRock’s chairman and CEO Larry Fink wrote in his 2021 letter to CEOs. Blackrock is the world’s largest investment group with over $7 trillion to invest. Another BlackRock officer told a recent energy conference, “where BlackRock goes, others will follow.”


    “To continue to attract capital, portfolios have to be built around core advantaged assets – low-cost, long-life, low carbon-intensive barrels,” said Andrew Latham, Vice President, Global Exploration at WoodMac, an energy consultancy.


    The Biden Administration is already making good on his pledge to phase out oil and gas by banning new leases in Federal lands and offshore and the Keystone XL oil pipeline. The oil and gas sector and its derivatives such as petrochemicals are at the heart of the world economy. The 50 largest oil and gas companies in the world, including both state-owned and publicly traded companies, recorded revenues of about $5.4 trillion in 2015.


    As a new Biden Administration pushes their ideological opposition to so-called fossil fuels, the world will see a precipitous decline in oil and gas investment. The role of the Davos globalists and the ESG financial players are out to guarantee that. And the losers will be us. Energy prices will skyrocket as they did during the recent Texas blizzards. The cost of electricity in industrial countries will become prohibitive for manufacturing industry. But rest well. This is all part of the ongoing Great Reset and its new doctrine of ESG investing.In 2010 the head of Working Group 3 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Dr Otmar Edenhofer, told an interviewer, “…one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore…” The WEF Great Reset is not simply a big idea of Klaus Schwab reflecting on the economic devastation of the coronavirus. It has been long planned by the money masters.





    The Great Reset is Here: Follow the ... - New Eastern …

    https://journal-neo.org/2021/03/19/the-great-reset-is-here-follow-the-money
    18/03/2021 · The Great Reset is Here: Follow the Money. The top-down reorganization of the world economy by a cabal of technocratic corporativists, led by the group around the Davos World Economic Forum– the so-called Great Reset or UN Agenda 2030– is no future proposal. It is well into actualization as the world remains in insane lockdown for a virus.



    “New Eastern Outlook”




    Climate change is nothing new. The Global elite using it to tighten their overall planetry control is, while their MSM go along with it.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •