View Poll Results: Who wins?

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • The god emperor Donald Trump

    16 61.54%
  • Sleepy Joe Biden

    6 23.08%
  • There won't be an election...

    4 15.38%
Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 17222324252627
Results 261 to 267 of 267

Thread: 2020 POTUS Election: Trump v Biden ("The Steal")

  1. #261
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    18 Hours Ago @ 05:41 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    882
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    352
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    567
    Thanked in
    342 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Verđandi View Post


    Joshua Klein, Breitbart, February 9, 2021

    In a recent Salon interview, former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi calls for a large-scale “de-radicalization approach” to “Trump’s political cult members” who have been radicalized “for the last four years,” while stating the need to “deprogram” those who believe that Joe Biden did not win the recent presidential election.

    The interview, published on Monday, begins with Salon politics staff writer Chauncey DeVega declaring that “today’s Republican Party is a political crime syndicate, and Trump is its leader” before asking how to “de-radicalize” Trump supporters.

    In response, Figliuzzi, a former FBI special agent who rose to the rank of assistant director when he led the bureau’s counterintelligence division, compares the radicalization of American citizens to international terrorism.

    Figliuzzi then proposes that not enough is done to combat homegrown radicalization because of the appearance of those radicalized.

    “We have been watching a radicalization process for the last four years under the Trump administration,” he states. “But we are not doing enough about it because, in part, there is a lack of will or an incapacity to see people that ‘look like us’ as an equal or greater threat than people who do not look like us.

    Figliuzzi then addresses how law enforcement approaches the issue of foreign enemies as compared to domestic terrorism.

    Comparing recruitment to foreign terror groups with domestic radicalization, Figliuzzi claims the two are “very similar.”

    “It is very similar on the domestic side here in the United States with social media,” he says. “Online activity has played an enormous role and has almost everybody behind the curve.”

    Figliuzzi then states that “using social media to call for breaching the Capitol and overwhelming the police is not free speech,” but “violence.”

    He then claims that the country must clear the “hurdle” of passing a domestic terror law, as it did with international terrorism.

    “We also need a more holistic, societal response that involves all hands on deck in terms of companies, government and law enforcement, everybody pulling together for a de-radicalization approach,” he says. “That must happen.”

    “You’ve got to deprogram some people who believe Joe Biden didn’t win the election,” he adds.

    The notion of “deradicalizing” and “deprogramming” Trump supporters has been fiercely promoted by those on the left in recent days following the November presidential elections and the storming of the U.S. Capitol last month.

    Breitbart
    If someone from your bureaucracy deems it necessary to reprogram voters or future voters you should be concerned, really concerned. If they even can speak openly about it, without an expectation to get reprimanded or sacked. That is even more concerning.

    an incapacity to see people that ‘look like us’ as an equal or greater threat than people who do not look like us.
    Well, perhaps that's the reason some societies are more peaceful and prosperous than others.

  2. #262
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 02:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    6,257
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    518
    Thanked in
    338 Posts

    My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell says election fraud claims cost him $65M in revenue



    My Pillow founder Mike Lindell says he has lost $65 million in revenue this year because of mass boycotts over his ongoing claims that the presidential election was stolen.

    The 59-year-old CEO revealed the devastating cost to his business — even as he scoffed at claims made in a $1.3 billion lawsuit that his alleged “big lie” over election fraud was “because the lie sells pillows.”

    “I lost 20 retailers, and it’s cost me $65 million this year that I won’t get back, OK?” Lindell told Insider. “There’s your story. Print it right. Don’t try and twist this,” he told the outlet.

    Lindell is the latest to be sued by Dominion Voting Systems for accusing the company of “stealing millions of votes” and rigging the 2020 presidential election.

    The lawsuit, filed Monday and seeking $1.3 billion for defamation, claims that he “exploited another chance to boost sales” after hitting the jackpot with Donald Trump’s endorsement for My Pillow.

    It also insisted that his “big lie” has “increased My Pillow sales by 30-40% and continues duping people into redirecting their election-lie outrage into pillow purchases.”



    Lindell insisted to The Associated Press that while his company got a brief surge in sales, it was devastated after more than 20 retailers dropped his products, including Bed Bath & Beyond and Kohl’s, as well as his ban from Twitter.

    He called the lawsuit “a very good day” as the discovery process will prove him right.

    “I’ve been looking forward to them finally suing,” said Lindell, who is known as the “My Pillow Guy” from his TV commercials.

    “I’d love to go to court tomorrow with Dominion,” Lindell said.

    He took umbrage at being repeatedly accused in the lawsuit of telling the “Big Lie” — noting that the expression was coined by Adolf Hitler. “The Big Lie here is the big lie,” Lindell said. “They’re the big lie.”

    This is the third defamation lawsuit that Dominion has filed against its accusers. At a news conference, Dominion CEO John Poulos said “it is by no means the last.”

    Nypost

  3. #263
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 02:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    6,257
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    518
    Thanked in
    338 Posts

    Police bolster security at US Capitol as QAnon theory claims Trump will become president March 4



    Capitol Police are beefing up security this week at the Capitol as a precaution against potential extremist activity amid a far-right conspiracy theory that President Donald Trump will rise to power on March 4, the original inauguration day for presidents before 1933.

    The acting sergeant-at-arms for the House of Representatives, Timothy Blodgett, informed members of Congress on Tuesday of the increased security measures. Wednesday morning, Capitol Police released a statement that the department had "obtained intelligence that shows a possible plot to breach the Capitol by an identified militia group on Thursday, March 4."

    Wednesday afternoon, the House of Representatives canceled its Thursday session as a precaution.

    The extra security was promised two months after the insurrection Jan. 6 at the Capitol, where rioters attacked police and threatened to kill members of Congress and former Vice President Mike Pence. More than a dozen followers of the conspiracy theory movement QAnon have been arrested in connection to the riot, which was organized and carried out by conservatives looking to restore Trump to power after his election loss in November by 7 million votes.

    It's unclear how many QAnon supporters support the March 4 inauguration theory and whether there will be any violence that day in Washington or elsewhere in opposition to President Joe Biden's election victory.

    Blodgett noted “the significance of this date has reportedly declined amongst various groups in recent days,” and there was no indication that groups would travel to the capital. Experts on QAnon said leaders and influencers in the movement have dismissed, or at least downplayed, the importance of March 4 and warned their followers not to attend any protests on that date.

    “The most prominent and most vocal QAnon promoters are not on board with the March 4 date,” said Travis View, a QAnon researcher and host of the QAnon Anonymous podcast. “Setting up big for big events and flagging that something big is going to happen, and then nothing happens, is a years-long QAnon tradition.”

    At least 13 of the 266 arrested in connection with the Capitol attack have subscribed to QAnon theories, according to a USA TODAY analysis of court documents.

    A new conspiracy theory gains traction

    The March 4 theory gained traction after Biden's inauguration Jan. 20, QAnon experts said. When Trump left office on that day, and when the military tribunals and mass arrests of Democrats predicted by QAnon followers didn’t happen, some adherents gave up on their unfounded theories. Others began pushing a new narrative: that Trump would rise again on the nation's original inauguration date, which was changed by the 20th Amendment.

    The theory posits that no American president has been officially inaugurated since Ulysses S. Grant in 1869. The conspiracy theorists claim a law was passed in 1871 that secretly turned the United States into a corporation, making all presidents after Grant illegitimate.

    The notion has its roots in the "sovereign citizen" movement, a separate but overlapping class of conspiracy theorists that claims, among other things, that the federal government is illegitimate, that sovereign citizens shouldn’t have to pay taxes and that sheriffs represent the highest legal power in every county.

    It's not unusual that some in the QAnon community have grasped onto this idea, View said; what is strange is that so many of the group's leaders have rejected the significance of March 4.

    “QAnon is generally a pretty big tent conspiracy theory, where they’re not eager to shoot down the theories of their fellow believers,” View said. "But occasionally, there are things that cross the line.”

    March 4 is one such dividing line, View said. QAnon promoters don’t want the embarrassment of another failed prediction, he said. They also don’t want to be associated with any criminal activity that might happen in Washington or elsewhere on that date.

    QAnon community not giving up hope

    The QAnon movement began in 2017 with the discredited conspiracy theory that a cabal of powerful, Satan-worshipping Democrats, celebrities and bankers run a pedophile ring and kill and eat children to obtain a life-giving chemical called adrenochrome. The original theory claimed that Trump was chosen by military generals to run for president to confront this cabal and throw its members in prison in a cleanup known as “The Storm.”

    The genesis of the theory, which borrows heavily from white supremacist and anti-Semitic propaganda, was a series of posts written by a user or users on anonymous internet message boards. The author, or authors, of the posts, which were usually written in semi-sensical riddles, signed off their screeds with a “Q,” a reference to a top-secret security clearance used by the federal government.

    There haven't been any internet postings credited to Q since December. Trump is no longer president. QAnon followers have been banned from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube, and there are signs that the movement is struggling, though it's impossible to say how many people still believe in the theory.

    Marilyn Mayo, a senior research fellow at the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism in New York, said it would be wrong to think that the QAnon community has given up.

    Mayo said she saw a flare-up of hope and attention on online message boards and social media accounts linked to the community after Trump’s speech Sunday at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Trump reignited the claim that the election was rigged and hinted that he will run for president in four years.

    “There’s renewed hope,” Mayo said. “A lot of people believe, without talking about a specific date, that Trump will be president, and that the military will somehow be involved.”

    USAtoday

  4. #264
    Senior Member
    Winterland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    4 Days Ago @ 05:44 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German; Scot-Irish; Scandinavian
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Coastal region
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Free Lance
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    344
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    300
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    214
    Thanked in
    154 Posts
    It's amazing how the Left and owners of companies sue or remove products from the markets to weaken challenging ideas or "free" speech. People have to prove their accusations in any rational argument to expose "lies." I just wish Trump and others sue their Left competitors over defamation and damages due to FALSE claims, if they speak truths. Like the voting "fraud," somewhere you think Trump can find tampering evidence through his own team of lawyers to expose these cheaters. Lots of normal Americans can't really accept that Biden won since he tired to become President since 1988 and lost many elections, along with his "confusing moments." At the same time, I don't trust American voters who want to vote into the treasury equally well and get a "piece" before the entire system collapses. With our near 29 trillion debt, we will have a reckoning day for the mayhem, but "we're all in it together!" Isn't that nice!!!!!!!

  5. #265

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  7. #266

    HR 1: Why Dems' 'Voting Rights Bill' is Just Part of the Establishment's Power Grabbing Grand Design




    While the For the People Act of 2021 contains a wide variety of issues starting with voting rights and ending with an "ethics code of conduct" on the US Supreme Court, it appears to be just part of a broader set of measures aimed at solidifying the Democratic Party's power.



    Since its passage in the House of Representatives on 3 March, the H.R. 1 For the People Act of 2021 has been lauded as a major election reform and voting rights bill by Democrats. However, in the eyes of the GOP it's "an unconstitutional, reckless, and anti-democratic bill that could permanently damage our republic", as former Vice President Mike Pence described it in a tweet last week.


    Why H.R. 1 is Not Actually About 'Voting Rights'


    "Nancy Pelosi's top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats", wrote Betsy McCaughey, a Republican politician and former Lieutenant Governor of New York in her 7 March
    op-ed for the Boston Herald. "Her bill H.R. 1 trashes the US Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It's a power grab".



    While conservative pundits and think tanks have detailed the possible ramifications of loosened election rules, expanded mail-in voting, ballot harvesting, as well as placing three extra Democratic lawmakers in the US Congress via the Washington, DC statehood provision, the libertarian Cato Institute remarks that election integrity is not the only thing at stake here.



    In fact, the bill would assert federal control over a broad array of areas of American life far beyond the scope of elections and campaigns, writes the Cato Institute's Walter Olson:


    · first, it "would require disclosure of the names of many persons who donate to organisations that engage in policy‐oriented speech", thus chilling free speech;


    · second, it would require all US politics-related social media posts written by "agents of a foreign principal" – i.e. "any person outside of the United States" – to be accompanied by a disclaimer saying as much;


    · third, "notwithstanding the status of the Article III judiciary as a separate and independent branch of government, the bill presumes to order the drawing up of a Supreme Court ethics code".


    The latter issue deserves special attention given that in 2016 Chief Justice John Roberts pointed out that the Supreme Court is based "on independence from political influence" which means that Congress does not have the constitutional authority to impose an ethical "code of conduct" on the judicial branch.



    However, Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Centre (CAC) think tank, hailed Biden's pledge to create a "bipartisan commission of… constitutional scholars" that would produce "recommendations as to how to reform the court system" in her 10 February op-ed for The Hill. Wydra noted that Biden's commission is expected to consider the issues of the Supreme Court's "legitimacy and expansion", which evokes strong memories of last year's "court-packing" rhetoric. While the bill's provisions appear to be nothing short of a "grab‐every‐power‐in‐sight" effort, the measure's proponents argue that the Supreme Court remains "the least accountable institution within our three branches of government".



    "The first thing to understand is that it is not the Democrats grabbing power", notes a former US official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "It is the establishment, or the ruling oligarchy, the elites, the deep state or whatever we want to call it that is grabbing power through the Democrats. It is easier and cheaper for the establishment to control one party than two".





    Supporters of President Donald Trump carry flags and signs as they parade past the Capitol in Washington after news that President-elect Joe Biden had defeated the incumbent in the race for the White House, in Washington, Saturday, Nov. 7, 2020



    Why the Establishment Does Not Need the First Amendment


    The much discussed H.R.1 is only part of a broader set of measures aimed at accumulating power in "one [set of] hands"and silencing dissent, according to Sputnik's interlocutor.



    "From the ruling establishment's standpoint, the problem with the First Amendment is that free speech and free association can be used to challenge the establishment's explanations and agendas", he/she says.


    At the same time, one must bear in mind that the attack on free speech and the First Amendment is limited to Trump supporters and people who dissent from establishment explanations; those who support the establishment enjoy free speech rights to the fullest extent, according to the former official.



    Hence, selective shadow-banning, censoring, and removal of social media accounts by Big Tech as well as the mainstream media blackout of newscasting a shadow on the establishment's political candidates and operatives.



    The Democratic Party-proposed Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act (DTPA) also appears to be aimed at silencing and intimidating political opposition.



    "The domestic terrorism bill can be used to criminalise dissent, thus preventing alternative explanations", the ex-official notes. "Without free speech there can be no democracy and no way for the people to hold the government accountable to law. It is a reversion to pre-modern times prior to the English Glorious Revolution of 1688".



    Massive Immigration as a Tool to Solidify Dems' Lead



    Joe Biden's effort to reverse many of Donald Trump's migrant laws and the new administration's plan to provide a path to citizenship for 11 million illegal residents may play an important role in the purported "grand design" as well.


    "The Democrats are consolidating their hold by amnesty to millions of illegal aliens and opening the borders to immigrant-invaders", says Sputnik's interlocutor.


    In 2013, when Democrats were pushing immigration reform, political leaders and analysts suggested that if the nation's estimated 11.1 million predominantly Hispanic illegal migrants were granted the right to vote, it would be "an electoral bonanza for Democrats". Indeed, a year earlier Pew Research found that 31% of Latino immigrants identified themselves as Democrats and only 4% as Republicans. At the same time, 33% described themselves as political independents, 16% mentioned some other political party, and 15% either said they "don't know" or refused to answer. When the fact tank surveyed Latino immigrants who are eligible to vote "many more identify as Democrats than as Republicans—54% versus 11%".



    Predictably, the influx of immigrants is changing the fabric of society and partisan affiliation of cities and states. While explaining Biden's 2020 win in Georgia, Politico drew attention to the immigrant population in the state having leaped by 84% between 2010 and 2018, putting the Empire State of the South "on the fast track to becoming majority-minority by 2030".



    "Black, Latino, and Asian voters in the once-Republican Atlanta suburbs helped deliver the state for Joe Biden in November. In the Peach State — and soon, strategists argue, the rest of the South — demography is becoming destiny", Politico predicted on 5 December 2020. Given the assumption that newcomers tend to vote for Democrats, not much room is left for largely silenced and marginalised "Trump supporters" and other conservative groups.


    "[Meanwhile], the media which is controlled by the establishment, is supporting the creation of a one-party state by associating Republicans with demonised Trump and 'white supremacist militias' who are 'MAGA terrorists' and 'enemies of Democracy'", Sputnik's interlocutor concludes.




    HR 1: Why Dems' 'Voting Rights Bill' is Just Part of the ...

    https://sputniknews.com/us/202103091082291216-hr-1-why-dems-voting...
    10 III 2021.


  8. #267

    Bandaging the corpse



    Bandaging the corpse



    Costumed Calaca Sugar Skull attendees dressed as Lady Liberty with a stabbed heart and Uncle Sam with a Twitter Bird on his shoulder at Hollywood Forever on October 28, 2017 in Hollywood, California



    Biden's bailout will not alter the structural inequities and other fundamental underpinnings of America's death spiral.



    The established ruling elites know there is a crisis. They agreed, at least temporarily, to throw money at it with the $1.9 trillion Covid-19 bill known as the American Rescue Plan (ARP). But the ARP will not alter the structural inequities, either by raising the minimum wage to $15.00 an hour or imposing taxes and regulations on corporations or the billionaire class that has seen its wealth increase by a staggering $1.1 trillion since the start of the pandemic. The health system will remain privatized, meaning the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations will reap a windfall of tens of billions of dollars with the ARP – and this when they are already making record profits. The endless wars in the Middle East, and the bloated military budget that funds them, will remain sacrosanct. Wall Street and the predatory global speculators that profit from the massive levels of debt peonage imposed on an underpaid working class and loot the US Treasury in our casino capitalism will continue to funnel money upwards into the hands of a tiny, oligarchic cabal. There will be no campaign finance reform to end our system of legalized bribery. The giant tech monopolies will remain intact. The fossil fuel companies will continue to ravage the ecosystem. The militarized police, censorship imposed by digital media platforms, vast prison system, harsher and harsher laws aimed at curbing domestic terrorism and dissent, and wholesale government surveillance will be, as they were before, the primary instruments of state control.



    This act will, at best, provide a momentary respite from the country’s death spiral, sending out one-time checks of $1,400 to 280 million Americans, extending $300 weekly unemployment benefits until the end of August, and distributing $3,600 through a tax credit for children under the age of six and $3,000 per child aged six to 17 starting on July 1. Much of this money will be instantly gobbled up by landlords, lenders, medical providers, and credit card companies. The act does, to its credit, bail out some one million unionized workers poised to lose their pensions, and hands $31.2 billion in aid to Native communities, some of the poorest in the nation.


    But what happens to the majority of Americans, who get government support for only a few months? What are they supposed to do when the checks stop arriving at the end of the year? Will the federal government orchestrate another massive relief package? I doubt it. We will be back where we started.


    By refusing to address the root causes of America’s rot, by failing to pump life back into the democratic institutions that once gave the citizen a voice, however limited, and make incremental and piecemeal reform possible, by not addressing the severe economic and social inequality and dislocation that afflicts at least half the country, the anomie and ruptured social bonds that gave rise to Donald Trump will expand. The American empire will not staunch its disintegration. The political deformities will metastasize.


    When the next demagogue appears, and the Republican Party has banked its future on Trump or his doppelganger, he or she will probably be competent. The Republican Party in 43 states has proposed 250 laws to limit mail, early in-person and Election Day voting and mandate stricter ID requirements, as well as reduce the hours at voting sites and the numbers of voting locations potentially disenfranchising tens of millions of voters. The party has no intention of playing by the rules. Once back in power, cloaked in the ideological garb of Christian fascism, the new or the old Trump will abolish what little is left of democratic space.


    The established elites pretend that Trump was a freakish anomaly. They naively believe they can make Trump and his most vociferous supporters disappear by banishing them from social media. The ancien regime, will, they assert, return with the decorum of its imperial presidency, respect for procedural norms, elaborately choreographed elections and fealty to neoliberal and imperial policies.



    But what the established ruling elites have yet to grasp, despite the narrow electoral victory Joe Biden had over Trump and the storming of the capital on January 6 by an enraged mob, is that the credibility of the old order is dead. The Trump era, if not Trump himself, is the future. The ruling elites, embodied by Biden and the Democratic Party and the polite wing of the Republican Party represented by Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney, are headed for the dustbin of history.


    The elites collectively sold out the American public to corporate power. They did this by lying to the public about the consequences of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), trade deals, dismantling welfare, revoking Glass-Steagall, imposing austerity measures, deregulating Wall Street, passing draconian crime bills, launching endless wars in the Middle East, and bailing out the big banks and financial firms rather than the victims of their fraud. These lies were far, far more damaging to the public than anything said by Trump. These elites have been found out. They are hated. They deserve to be hated.


    The Biden administration – and Biden was one of the principal architects of the policies that fleeced the working class and made war on the poor – is nothing more than a brief coda in the decline and fall, set against which is China’s rising global economic and military clout.


    The loss of credibility has left the media, which serves as courtiers to the elites, largely powerless to manipulate public perceptions and public opinion. Rather, the media has divided the public into competing demographics. Media platforms target one demographic, feeding its opinions and proclivities back to it, while shrilly demonizing the demographic on the other side of the political divide. This has proved commercially successful. But it has also split the country into irreconcilable warring factions that can no longer communicate. Truth and verifiable fact have been sacrificed. Russiagate is as absurd as the belief that the presidential election was stolen from Trump. Pick your fantasy.


    The loss of credibility among the ruling elites has transferred political influence to those outside established centers of power such as Alex Jones, celebrities, and those – such as Joe Rogan, Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi – who were never groomed by the media conglomerates. The Democratic Party, in an effort to curb the influence of the new centers of power, has allied itself with social media industry giants such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Patreon, Substack, and Spotify to curtail or censor its critics. The goal is to herd the public back to Democratic Party allied news organizations such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and CNN. But these media outlets, which in the service to corporate advertisers have rendered the lives of the working class and the poor invisible, are as reviled as the ruling elites themselves.


    The loss of credibility has also given rise to new, often spontaneous groups, as well as the lunatic fringe that embraces conspiracy theories such as QAnon. None of these groups or individuals, whether they are on the left or the right, however, have the organizational structure, coherence and ideological cohesiveness of radical movements of the past, including the old Communist Party or militant labor unions. They traffic in emotional outrage, often replacing one outrage with another. They provide new forms of identity to replace the identities lost by tens of millions of Americans who have been cast aside. This energy can be harnessed for laudable causes, such as ending police abuse, but it is too often ephemeral. It has a tendency to transform political debate into grievance protests, at best, and more often televised spectacle. These flash mobs pose no threat to the elites unless they build disciplined organization structures, which takes years, and articulate a vision of what can come next. (This is why I support Extinction Rebellion, which has a large grassroots network, especially in Europe, carries out effective sustained acts of civil disobedience, and has a clearly stated goal of overthrowing the ruling elites and building a new governing system through people’s committees and
    sortition).



    This amorphous, emotionally driven anti-politics is fertile ground for demagogues, who have no political consistency but cater exclusively to the zeitgeist of the moment. Many of those who support demagogues know, on some level, they are con artists and liars. But demagogues are revered because, like all cult leaders, they flout conventions, are outrageous and crude, claim omnipotence, and disdain traditional decorum. Demagogues are weaponized against bankrupt well-heeled elites who have stripped the public of opportunities and identities, extinguishing hopes for the future. A cornered population has little left but hate and the emotional catharsis that expressing it brings.


    The engine of our emerging dystopia is income inequality, which is growing. This bill does nothing to address this cancer. The bottom 50% of households in 2019 accounted for only 1% of the nation’s total wealth. The top 10% accounted for 76%. And this was before the pandemic accelerated income disparity. More than 18 million Americans depend on unemployment benefits, as businesses contract and close. Nearly 81 million Americans struggle to meet basic household expenses, 22 million lack enough food, and 11 million say they can’t make their next house payment. Only deep structural reforms accompanied by New Deal-type legislation can save us, but such changes are an anathema to the corporate state and the Biden administration. History has amply demonstrated what happens when income disparities of this magnitude afflict a country. We will be no exception. Lacking a strong left, the United States will in desperation embrace authoritarianism, if not proto-fascism. This will, I fear, be Biden and the Democratic Party’s real legacy.




    As much as I admire Chris Hedges' intellect and insights he derailed twice in this monologue: ".

    1) .. as absurd as the belief that the presidential election was stolen from Trump" Overwhelming evidence of cheating and fraud in the election. leaves zero doubt. "

    2) ... the storming of the capital on January 6 by an enraged mob" No enraged mob, only a select group of actors (and I do mean "actors") hired for yet another false flag.




    Nearly a quarter century ago, I wrote in my Washington Times columns about the dangers of the growing PLUTOCRACY in America, and about the DICTATORSHIP OF MINORITIES. Here's an excerpt: "America is rapidly becoming a nation of mutts. Our country's traditional character is being systematically destroyed by nihilistic "liberals," the New World Order's centurions whose only God is the Almighty Dollar. The same kinds of people invented the "dictatorship of the proletariat," and applied it to the unsuspecting Russians. Now, they are trying to ram a "dictatorship of the minorities" down the naive Americans' throats. In its present form, America's social demise is a more benign mutation of the "Bolshevik" revolution, perhaps the kind of a gradual change which the "Menshevik" communists would have preferred. Either way, the desecration of America the Beautiful is not a spontaneous event. Nor is a deliberate dumbing down of our nation. It is a multi-pronged process carried out by the Wall Street elite and their vassals in government, education, media and the entertainment industry. Why would the bankers and industrialists want America to be a nation of "ignorant blunderers or dunderheads," according to Oxford Dictionary's definition of "mutts?" Or a country of "mongrels, fools or muttonheads," according to Webster's? Because such a stupefied population is easier to subjugate by the elite's financial shackles than would be the free-spirited, free-thinking, patriotic Americans."



    Now you see what created all these fake groups from BLM, LGBTQrstuv, Me TOO and everything from PC Culture to WOKE and every possible denomination of people has a group including gender issues like TOXIC MASCULINITY
    and how many public bathroom options are needed to cover all these new genders... This is not a movement but an organised division of the 99% to keep the 1% safe from the pitchforks. The 1% has funded every aspect of these groups knowing full well if we cannot peacefully agree on "our equal right to individualism and opinion" then there is absolutely no way we can unite against their theft of the world, not just the US but the globe! To think all these groups naturally occured on there own is delusional!




    This article was originally published by ScheerPost.


    R T:

    Chris Hedges: Bandaging the corpse OP-ED

    Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for 15 years for the New York Times, where he served as the Middle East Bureau Chief and Balkan Bureau Chief for the paper.





    Hedges C V tells us enough about him. Bet he never said the conquest and division of Yugoslavia was an ‘elite’ assets grab.

Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 17222324252627

Similar Threads

  1. POTUS Election 2012
    By Ćmeric in forum The United States
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Tuesday, August 21st, 2012, 05:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •