Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: US Air Force Pursuing Antimatter Weapons

  1. #1
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Posts
    830
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post US Air Force Pursuing Antimatter Weapons

    Imagine using antimatter to boost fusion weapon yields!

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGM393GPK1.DTL

    The U.S. Air Force is quietly spending millions of dollars investigating ways to use a radical power source -- antimatter, the eerie "mirror" of ordinary matter -- in future weapons.

    The most powerful potential energy source presently thought to be available to humanity, antimatter is a term normally heard in science-fiction films and TV shows, whose heroes fly "antimatter-powered spaceships" and do battle with "antimatter guns."

    But antimatter itself isn't fiction; it actually exists and has been intensively studied by physicists since the 1930s. In a sense, matter and antimatter are the yin and yang of reality: Every type of subatomic particle has its antimatter counterpart. But when matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate each other in an immense burst of energy.

    During the Cold War, the Air Force funded numerous scientific studies of the basic physics of antimatter. With the knowledge gained, some Air Force insiders are beginning to think seriously about potential military uses -- for example, antimatter bombs small enough to hold in one's hand, and antimatter engines for 24/7 surveillance aircraft.

    More cataclysmic possible uses include a new generation of super weapons -- either pure antimatter bombs or antimatter-triggered nuclear weapons; the former wouldn't emit radioactive fallout. Another possibility is antimatter- powered "electromagnetic pulse" weapons that could fry an enemy's electric power grid and communications networks, leaving him literally in the dark and unable to operate his society and armed forces.

    Following an initial inquiry from The Chronicle this summer, the Air Force forbade its employees from publicly discussing the antimatter research program. Still, details on the program appear in numerous Air Force documents distributed over the Internet prior to the ban.

    These include an outline of a March 2004 speech by an Air Force official who, in effect, spilled the beans about the Air Force's high hopes for antimatter weapons. On March 24, Kenneth Edwards, director of the "revolutionary munitions" team at the Munitions Directorate at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida was keynote speaker at the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) conference in Arlington, Va.

    In that talk, Edwards discussed the potential uses of a type of antimatter called positrons.

    Physicists have known about positrons or "antielectrons" since the early 1930s, when Caltech scientist Carl Anderson discovered a positron flying through a detector in his laboratory. That discovery, and the later discovery of "antiprotons" by Berkeley scientists in the 1950s, upheld a 1920s theory of antimatter proposed by physicist Paul Dirac.

    In 1929, Dirac suggested that the building blocks of atoms -- electrons (negatively charged particles) and protons (positively charged particles) -- have antimatter counterparts: antielectrons and antiprotons. One fundamental difference between matter and antimatter is that their subatomic building blocks carry opposite electric charges. Thus, while an ordinary electron is negatively charged, an antielectron is positively charged (hence the term positrons, which means "positive electrons"); and while an ordinary proton is positively charged, an antiproton is negative.

    The real excitement, though, is this: If electrons or protons collide with their antimatter counterparts, they annihilate each other. In so doing, they unleash more energy than any other known energy source, even thermonuclear bombs.

    The energy from colliding positrons and antielectrons "is 10 billion times ... that of high explosive," Edwards explained in his March speech. Moreover, 1 gram of antimatter, about 1/25th of an ounce, would equal "23 space shuttle fuel tanks of energy." Thus "positron energy conversion," as he called it, would be a "revolutionary energy source" of interest to those who wage war.

    It almost defies belief, the amount of explosive force available in a speck of antimatter -- even a speck that is too small to see. For example: One millionth of a gram of positrons contain as much energy as 37.8 kilograms (83 pounds) of TNT, according to Edwards' March speech. A simple calculation, then, shows that about 50-millionths of a gram could generate a blast equal to the explosion (roughly 4,000 pounds of TNT, according to the FBI) at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.

    Unlike regular nuclear bombs, positron bombs wouldn't eject plumes of radioactive debris. When large numbers of positrons and antielectrons collide, the primary product is an invisible but extremely dangerous burst of gamma radiation. Thus, in principle, a positron bomb could be a step toward one of the military's dreams from the early Cold War: a so-called "clean" superbomb that could kill large numbers of soldiers without ejecting radioactive contaminants over the countryside.

    A copy of Edwards' speech onNIAC's Web site emphasizes this advantage of positron weapons in bright red letters: "No Nuclear Residue."

    But talk of "clean" superbombs worries critics. " 'Clean' nuclear weapons are more dangerous than dirty ones because they are more likely to be used," said an e-mail from science historian George Dyson of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., author of "Project Orion," a 2002 study on a Cold War-era attempt to design a nuclear spaceship. Still, Dyson adds, antimatter weapons are "a long, long way off."

    Why so far off? One reason is that at present, there's no fast way to mass produce large amounts of antimatter from particle accelerators. With present techniques, the price tag for 100-billionths of a gram of antimatter would be $6 billion, according to an estimate by scientists at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and elsewhere, who hope to launch antimatter-fueled spaceships.

    Another problem is the terribly unruly behavior of positrons whenever physicists try to corral them into a special container. Inside these containers, known as Penning traps, magnetic fields prevent the antiparticles from contacting the material wall of the container -- lest they annihilate on contact. Unfortunately, because like-charged particles repel each other, the positrons push each other apart and quickly squirt out of the trap.

    If positrons can't be stored for long periods, they're as useless to the military as an armored personnel carrier without a gas tank. So Edwards is funding investigations of ways to make positrons last longer in storage.

    Edwards' point man in that effort is Gerald Smith, former chairman of physics and Antimatter Project leader at Pennsylvania State University. Smith now operates a small firm, Positronics Research LLC, in Santa Fe, N.M. So far, the Air Force has given Smith and his colleagues $3.7 million for positron research, Smith told The Chronicle in August.

    Smith is looking to store positrons in a quasi-stable form called positronium. A positronium "atom" (as physicists dub it) consists of an electron and antielectron, orbiting each other. Normally these two particles would quickly collide and self-annihilate within a fraction of a second -- but by manipulating electrical and magnetic fields in their vicinity, Smith hopes to make positronium atoms last much longer.

    Smith's storage effort is the "world's first attempt to store large quantities of positronium atoms in a laboratory experiment," Edwards noted in his March speech. "If successful, this approach will open the door to storing militarily significant quantities of positronium atoms."

    Officials at Eglin Air Force Base initially agreed enthusiastically to try to arrange an interview with Edwards. "We're all very excited about this technology," spokesman Rex Swenson at Eglin's Munitions Directorate told The Chronicle in late July. But Swenson backed out in August after he was overruled by higher officials in the Air Force and Pentagon.

    Reached by phone in late September, Edwards repeatedly declined to be interviewed. His superiors gave him "strict instructions not to give any interviews personally. I'm sorry about that -- this (antimatter) project is sort of my grandchild. ...

    "(But) I agree with them (that) we're just not at the point where we need to be doing any public interviews."

    Air Force spokesman Douglas Karas at the Pentagon also declined to comment last week.

    In the meantime, the Air Force has been investigating the possibility of making use of a powerful positron-generating accelerator under development at Washington State University in Pullman, Wash. One goal: to see if positrons generated by the accelerator can be stored for long periods inside a new type of "antimatter trap" proposed by scientists, including Washington State physicist Kelvin Lynn, head of the school's Center for Materials Research.

    A new generation of military explosives is worth developing, and antimatter might fill the bill, Lynn told The Chronicle: "If we spend another $10 billion (using ordinary chemical techniques), we're going to get better high explosives, but the gains are incremental because we're getting near the theoretical limits of chemical energy."

    Besides, Lynn is enthusiastic about antimatter because he believes it could propel futuristic space rockets.

    "I think," he said, "we need to get off this planet, because I'm afraid we're going to destroy it."

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Stríbog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 13th, 2005 @ 12:45 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid-Baltid (Aistin)
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    Where Rust Belt meets Farm Belt
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Occupation
    college student
    Politics
    Environmentalism and eugenics
    Religion
    occultism & Nature worship
    Posts
    2,172
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    17 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    Aren't there books sold by JRonline or Noontide Press that insist the US government has a mind-control ray stationed in Alaska? Great way to gain credibility for European preservation...

  4. #4
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Posts
    830
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    Quote Originally Posted by Stríbog
    Aren't there books sold by JRonline or Noontide Press that insist the US government has a mind-control ray stationed in Alaska?
    HAARP?

  5. #5
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 9th, 2006 @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Posts
    830
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    You guys seem incredulous...

    This is all the more remarkable considering Dr. Solar Wolff lends credence to risible "Area 51 science" and Stríbog entertains primitive conspiracy theories.

    But the militarization of established, tested physics is just "too out there"?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Stríbog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 13th, 2005 @ 12:45 AM
    Subrace
    Nordid-Baltid (Aistin)
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    Where Rust Belt meets Farm Belt
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Occupation
    college student
    Politics
    Environmentalism and eugenics
    Religion
    occultism & Nature worship
    Posts
    2,172
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    17 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    I didn't say I didn't believe the report on antimatter weaponry (I don't know enough to comment either way); I was responding to Dr. Solar Wolff's comments about fringe theorists. I don't believe in a Masonic conspiracy, btw, which is why I was asking.

  7. #7
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 10:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    90
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,698
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    25
    Thanked in
    25 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    This reminds me of a very old joke. A young graduate student in chemistry comes home on vacation and tells his father that he is doing research intended to produce the universal solvent. "What's that ?", his father asks. "A solvent that will dissolve anything and everything" replies the young man. His father thinks about this for a moment and then asks, "Well, what are you going to keep it in ?" For about 56 years now, efforts have been made to develop "magnetic bottles" to contain a hydrogen isotope plasma for a thermonuclear fusion reactor. Instabilities have always developed and they have always leaked. Storage of antimatter is somewhat less difficult but more hazardous. Antimatter could be stored and much lower temperatures than thermonuclear plasmas, but leakage is far more dangerous than that of a thermonuclear plasma which will cool very rapidly once it escapes. Antimatter, however, at any temperature, will destroy whatever it touches if it escapes. An antimatter weapon is likely to be more dangerous to its users than to its intended victims.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Tripredacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    2 Days Ago @ 07:25 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Germany, Poland, Italy
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Software Engineer
    Politics
    Fascism
    Religion
    I Am
    Posts
    327
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    25
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    63
    Thanked in
    43 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    Quote Originally Posted by The Blond Beast
    HAARP?
    LOL no...

    HAARP is, of course, billed as a weather detecting device, although it does have the ability of warming up air in a location if it is intended.

  9. #9
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, November 24th, 2004 @ 08:47 AM
    Subrace
    Alpinid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Somewhere In U.S. Hypocrisy
    Gender
    Politics
    White Pride & World Peace
    Religion
    Greek Polytheist Ancient Beliefs
    Posts
    43
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: US Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

    Let's just say if it is real that is all we need is a weapon that makes nuclear warfare look like a walk in Disney Land compared to this.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Sunday, February 22nd, 2009, 02:45 PM
  2. US Air Force to use Synthetic Fischer-Tropsch Fuel?
    By Theudanaz in forum Self-Defense & the Art of War
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Saturday, February 17th, 2007, 05:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •