Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Paul Craig Roberts' Articles on Anti-White Propaganda

  1. #1
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    664
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    785
    Thanked in
    378 Posts

    Paul Craig Roberts' Articles on Anti-White Propaganda

    The New York Times’ Assault on White Americans


    Paul Craig Roberts, February 11, 2020

    Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the presstitute New York Times, announced on August 12, 2019, the “1619 Project” which reinvents American history and reduces it to racism and slavery. As I wrote in my remarks on the project on August 22, 2019, the New York Times has an agenda which is to dehumanize and demoralize white Americans of the original colonial era ethnic stock so that left indefensible and overwhelmed with guilt they will accept their fate as their country is overrun by non-white immigrants touted by the New York Times as the real founders of the country.


    The 1619 Project portrays white people as the source of all evil in America. The project is distinctly anti-white. Nothing comparable could be said about blacks, Jews, or any other race or ethnicity as the 1619 Project says about white people. Only white people can be demonized like this. It is the intention of the New York Times that the 1619 project becomes the basis for the American history curriculum in all schools. The Buffalo, New York, public school system has already announced that the 1619 project is required for all students. The teaching of hatred of white people is on its way to being the primary goal of US education.

    Liberal historians have complained about the untruthfullness that characterizes the project, but American liberalism has already been swept away by Identity Politics, the ideology of the Democrat Party, which teaches that white people are the oppressor class and everyone else is the victim class. Hillary Clinton herself labeled the American working class the “Trump Deplorables.”

    When the New York Times announed the 1619 project, I noted the lies on which the project rested ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201...-1619-project/ ). The New York Times wrote: “In order to understand the brutality of American capitalism you have to start on the plantation.”

    There were no plantations in the British Virginia colony in 1619.

    The 1619 Project claims that the British colonies that evolved into the United States 157 years later were racists from the beginning because 20 black slaves were brought to Jamestown in 1619. Not that facts matter to the 1619 Project or to the New York Times, according to John Rolfe who recorded the event at the time, the 20 Africans were a Dutch man-of-war ship captain’s offered payment to the colony for food for which the Dutch ship was short. Historians have corrected this original report by John Rolfe and say the ship was an English warship, White Lion, which had seized the slaves from the Portuguese slave ship, San Juan Bautista, in an act of piracy. To cover up the piracy, Rolfe said the ship was Dutch.

    In 1619 slavery as an institution did not exist in the Virginia colony. Slavery evolved gradually and legally from indentured servitude and was not recognized in law in the colony until 1662. Until that year, blacks were considered indentured servants and some were able to gain their freedom ( https://www.nps.gov/jame/learn/histo...-jamestown.htm ).

    The importance of 1619 is not that a warship unloaded blacks, captured from the Portuguese, in the Virginia colony. The importance of 1619 is that it was the year that the Jamestown British colony in Virginia formed the first representative assembly. But this is not what the NY Times emphasizes.

    The 1619 Project also ignores that there were hundreds of thousands of white slaves in addition to white indendured servents in the colonies. See, for example, They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America, 4th Edition( https://www.amazon.com/They-Were-Whi...ustomerReviews ).

    The 1619 Project further demonstrates its totally propagandistic nature by ignoring that slavery in 1619, and for a long time before and after, was universal. Millions of white people were held as slaves by people of color ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/201...the-new-world/ ).

    The propagandistic 1619 Project also carefully avoids asking where black slaves came from. Did the white British colonists sail over to Africa, kidnap some black people and and sail back to the colony with them? No. The black king of Dahomey originated the black slave trade in his slave wars against other black tribes. When Dahomey had more slaves than they could afford to keep, they began selling them to Arabs and later to Europeans who needed a work force in their new colonies. The socialist Karl Polanyi provides a history of the black slave trade in Dahomey and the Slave Trade (1966), a truthful account for which the propaganda known as Black Studies has no interest. And neither does the 1619 Project, the purpose of which is to destroy white confidence and to teach hatred of whites who are already on the path to second class citizenship like female Scandinavians ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...swedish-women/ ).

    Some critics of the anti-white 1619 Project interpret it as an effort of a Jewish newspaper to shift black Americans’ focus on Jewish slave traders to whites instead. The Black Muslims’ book series, The secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, reveals that Jews were major beneficiaries of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Various Jewish authors are the sources for this conclusion. One wrote that “Jews were about twice as likely to be slave owners as the average white Southerner,” and another wrote that “in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated” the slave trade ( https://www.unz.com/article/jews-sel...ions-movement/ ).

    In a book titled Jews Selling Blacks: Slave-Sale Advertising By American Jews, the Black Muslims published a large collection of the actual historical ads that Jewish slave traders placed in newspapers advertising black slaves for sale. Needless to say, the books published by the Black Muslims are banned by amazon.com on orders from the Jewish Anti-Defamation League.

    The New York Times “1619 Project” is just another falsification of history like World War I, World War II, the so-called Civil War, the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X, the USS Liberty, 9/11 and on and on. The difference is that the 1619 Project fosters in the minds of racial minorities, which demographics show to be temporary minorities, the belief that people of color are morally superior to white people, with the consequence that in the future white people will face second class citizenship if not genocide.

    There can be no doubt whatsoever that the New York Times, whether intentionally or stupidly, is destroying racial, social and political stability in the United States. The social violence that will result from teaching hatred of white people will be horrendous.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...ite-americans/
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    664
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    785
    Thanked in
    378 Posts
    PBS Assaults White Americans


    Paul Craig Roberts, February 12, 2020

    The New York Times’ assault on white Americans, about which I wrote yesterday ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...ite-americans/ ), is not unique to the New York Times. White people are the targets of Identity Politics—the political ideology of the Democrat Party. The demonization of white people is the main focus of “Black Studies” in universities and schools. Corporate adds now engage in attacks on white ethnicities, such as this Scandinavian Airlines ad: https://youtu.be/ljtFEMAfQ_E . Not to be left out of the fun of beating up on white people, PBS announced that the propaganda film, The Long Shadow ( http://thelongshadowfilm.com ), will be aired 697 times on 176 PBS stations and channels across 70% of the US.


    The Long Shadow is an ignorant or intentionally propagandistic film. The premise is that white-imposed institutional anti-black racism, “guided by the South’s powerful political influence, steadily, deliberately and at times secretly, established white privilege in our institutions, laws, culture and economy.” This is an amazing lie. Slavery was universal. Muslims held millions of white slaves obtained from raids on European coastal towns. Was this “Muslim anti-white racism, guided by Islam’s powerful influence,” or was it the appropriation of labor, as were feudal dues or the modern income tax on labor? How come slavery is only something whites did to blacks, and not something that Muslims did to whites or blacks to blacks? As the historic record makes certain, the black slave trade originated in Africa in the black king of Dahomey’s slave wars against other black tribes.

    When whites held whites as slaves, was this white-imposed anti-white racism?
    https://www.amazon.com/They-Were-White-Slaves-Enslavement/dp/0929903056/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=White+Slaves&qid=158 1376154&s=books&sr=1-1#customerReviews
    https://www.hannenabintuherland.com/usa/larry-elder-more-whites-brought-as-slaves-to-north-africa-than-blacks-to-us-herland-report/
    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/03/12/whites-were-slaves-in-north-africa-before-blacks-were-slaves-in-the-new-world/

    These questions are carefully avoided by The Long Shadow film, by the New York Times’ 1619 Project, by Black Studies, and by Identity Politics as is the question: Where did the black slaves come from?

    The answer is that they came from the black kingdom of Dahomey.

    Does this mean that blacks, “guided by the black king’s powerful influence imposed anti-black racism and institutionalized this racism in Dahomey’s laws and homegrown African institution of the black slave trade?”

    What about the Jewish slave traders? Are they also responsible for institutionalizing racism?

    Why did slavery only cast evil over America and not over Greece, Rome, Europe, the Muslim world, and black Africa? What kind of bullshit game are PBS, the New York Times, Identity Politics, Black Studies, school districts, and corporations playing?

    How is it that slavery is white racism when every race has owned slaves?

    According to The Long Shadow propaganda, the filmmakers are two “privileged daughters of the South, who were haunted by their families slave owning past” and made the film as an act of exorcism. Slavery in the US ended more than one and one-half centuries ago. Does anyone really believe that today, after 55 years of minority preferences in university admissions and employment, two people in the 21st century are remorseful over a feature of an ancestor’s society in the 19th century? What sense does this make?

    What is wrong with the New York Times, PBS, universities, and Democrats that they are unable to comprehend that for the United States slavery was an inherited institution, not one created by the Founding Fathers or by Southerners?

    The answer is that they are determined not to understand anything. The intent is to demonize white people.

    If Jews are demonized, it is hate speech and anti-semitism.

    If blacks are demonized, it is hate speech and racism.

    But when whites are demonized it is OK, but it is not OK for whites to protest their demonization. So, how is there white privilege when whites are the only race whose demonization is encouraged, and, if whites protest, it is regarded as proof that they are unrepentant white supremacists?

    The demonization of white people is so out of hand that today white Americans and Europeans are demonized worse that Jews were demonized in National Socialist Germany. No good can come from this. Swedish women are already paying a huge price (https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...swedish-women/ ).

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...ite-americans/
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    664
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    785
    Thanked in
    378 Posts
    White People Are Being Erased


    Paul Craig Roberts, February 13, 2020

    White people aren’t supposed to know that they are being demonized by the New York Times, PBS, universities, the Democrat Party’s Identity Politics, and corporations, and if they find out they are not allowed to protest. If they do protest, they are in even more trouble.

    Those Americans empowered by “white privilege” who are still a demographic majority are too scared and too intimidated to open their mouths or use their pocketbooks to protest their demonization and marginalization. Facebook and Twitter will drop them, denying them their virtual existence. Indoctrinated and mindless white friends will shun them as racist, anti-semitic white supremacists. Twenty-eight US states will fire them if state employed and deny them contracts if their protests have anything to do with Israel. Deserted and isolated on social media, their life will be over. This is what “white privilege” means.

    Throughout the Western world truth is out of favor. Indeed, truth is objectionable. It offends Identity Politics, feminism, the Israel Lobby, the military/security complex, Monsanto/Bayer, the extractive industries, the pharmaceutical industry, the “woke people,” the transgendered and every other interest that desires to be unaccountable and free of criticism.

    Today it is much more important to be sensitive to “woke people” and the Israel Lobby than it is to tell the truth. Truth has ceased to be a criteria in news reporting and analysis. Indeed, it is increasingly dangerous to challenge official explanations. It gets you fired and left unemployable in the media, the educational system, and Google.

    In Canada and Europe a researcher who challenges the official Holocaust story can be imprisoned regardless of the objectivity of his research. The question should be: is he right or wrong, not has he violated a taboo lobbied into law. Even research that reports massacres of Jews can put a researcher in prison if he doesn’t support the official number of exterminated Jews and official means of extermination. If a researcher finds that two million Jews were machinegunned into open trenches but there were no gas chambers, he is toast if he publishes his findings.

    Alternative media websites that favored normalizing relations with Russia found themselves on a PropOrNot list designating them to be “Russian dupes or agents.” Both myself and Stephen Cohen, the last honest Russian expert in American universities, are on the list of “Russian agents and dupes.”

    In other words, if a person supports normal diplomatic relations with a nuclear power capable of terminating life in the United States for eternity, this person is a Russian Agent. This means that Presidents John. F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan were Russian Agents.

    What has gone wrong in American understanding of the world that four Presidents of the United States are considered to be Russian Agents?

    Another example of the inability of Americans to think straight is that Internet sites that warn of dangers of vaccination suffer harassment and denunciation instead of open discussion whether they are correct. There is evidence that vaccinations cause more deaths than they prevent. This evidence should be carefully investigated, and the results honestly reported. Is this still possible in the United States?

    To tell truth about anything in America or anywhere in the Western World is becoming increasingly difficult and is very costly to truth-tellers. Just consider the threatment of Manning and Julian Assange. Both are in prison, despite the fact that neither of them should be in prison according to law. But truth-tellers are no longer protected by law or by the truth. Assange is in prison because Washington demands revenge for Wikileaks bringing to light Washington’s war crimes. Manning is in prison because Manning will not give false testimony against Assange. A democracy governed by a rule of law cannot produce these results. Therefore, we know certainly that the United States is definitely not a democracy ruled by a rule of law.

    So what is the United States? A tyranny that is acceptable because its propaganda produces a chauvinistic population that supports at any cost the tyrannical government as long as it advertises “foreign threats”?

    As America and the Western World have many lies among their foundations and historical development, indoctrinated people are hostile to truth that disproves the lies that are the foundation of their belief system. Peoples, such as Americans, Canadians, and Europeans, who are accustomed to a diet of lies, are naturally hostile to the truth.

    My article, “PBS Assaults White People” ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...ite-americans/ ) is a statement of fact, not an opinion piece, but some of the websites that traditionally have been eager to repost my articles are now shying away from statements of truth, because the cost of stating truth has risen so high.

    What I think has happened is that many Americans no longer know the difference between fact and opinion. They think everyhthing is opinion and the best opinion is the politically correct opinion. A factual statement that is not politically correct is not treated as a factual statement but as a politically incorrect opinion that brings denunciation of the writer. Whenever I peruse comment sections I encounter this common confusion of truthful fact with disapproved opinion. This is now happening in universities with renowned professors silenced on their subject matter, because the facts are politically incorrect and are objectionable to feminists and people of color, few, if any, of whom have any comprehension of the subject matter.

    According to news reports, white professors and administrators at Cambridge University have been individually assigned a person of color to monitor their speech, reading lists, lectures, and university policies for anything that would be offensive to persons of color. Yet we hear that white people muzzled in this way have “white privilege,” while black professors denounce white people as “racists.” Isn’t this “black privilege” instead of “white privilege?”

    The non-white professors at Cambridge don’t have a white monitor to prevent their accusation of racism against whites, or to make certain that hatred of white people—colonialists and the sort—is not featured in their reading list or in their lectures, whereas no white professor can have on his reading list Karl Polanyi’s book, Dahomey and the Slave Trade orJean Raspail’s Camp of the Saints. As Karl Marx has been labeled an anti-semite although he was Jewish, Das Kapital will soon disappear from amazon.com and from university reading lists.

    When my website originated those years ago, the site designer included a comment section. What happened was that anti-semites, or people pretending to be anti-semites, wrote anti-semitic comments. Other commentators accused them of trying to get the site labeled an anti-semite website with their comments and advised me to shut the comment section. As I was very critical of George W. Bush’s wars and police state attacks on the Constitution, I think it was the neocons or some elements of the military/security complex trying to limit the influence of my website by using the comment section to cast it as an anti-semitic website.

    My latest experience with the unreliability of commentators was my review of one of David Irving’s histories, the highly praised Hitler’s War. I quoted Irving’s statement that many Jews were massacred, but that he has never been able to find in the documentary records evidence that supports the Zionist version of the holocaust. His position was, when he wrote the book, that there was a holocaust of a sorts but not the one in the official story.

    For quoting this—which was nothing but a reporting job—my Wikipedia biography was rewritten by someone or some persons who attributed Irving’s words to me and labeled me a “Holocaust Denier.” Corrections to this smear were made many times, but those determined to smear me always “corrected” the corrections. Pointing out to Wikipedia that I am quoting Irving, not expressing my uninformed views on the Holocaust, a subject I have never studied or written about, had no effect except that the last I looked the bio said that as I allegedly quoted Irving “appreciatively” I must agree. “Appreciatively” is a subjective opinion, and on the basis of this subjective opinion of an unknown person(s), I am labeled a “holocaust denier.” This is designed to scare off readers from my website.

    I suppose we gentile whites, if we had any pride, should regard these labels as badges of honor. We should respond to these labels applied by the Israel Lobby with the statement that yes, “we are all anti-semites” as long as you oppress the Palestinians, cause wars, interfere in our elections, purchase special interest laws that protect you from criticism and boycotts, and slander those of us who tell the truth.

    Slander and libel are the ways inconvenient truth-tellers are got rid of. Most Americans have no idea what a “holocaust denier” and an “anti-semite” are, but they know it is dangerous to be identified as one, especially in Canada and Europe where the charge brings a prison sentence, or to be associated with a person so labeled. A tiny handful of people have intimidated hundreds of millons. So, how strong really are “privileged” white gentiles that they can be so easily swept away?

    Are the white ethnicities failing in terms of Darwinian natural selection?

    As integrity is no longer a valued virtue in the Western media, it is not safe for a person to quote someone else as he or she will be held accountable for the quoted person’s words or to post a guest column without being held responsible for the guest’s words.

    it is certainly not safe for anyone to state a fact that “woke people” can misrepresent as a politically incorrect opinion and brand as “racism,” “anti-semitism,” “white supremacist,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” etc.

    Based on my experience, comment sections are good for little except to discredit a website’s writers. This is why comment sections exist on few websites that are not those used to attack Western civilization and to redefine Western civilization as diverse multiculturalism opposed by “white supremacists.” If you see failure in a Tower of Babel, you are politically incorrect and worse and should be denied the vote.

    If you stand for the solidity of a homogenous ethnicity, you are a white supremacist unless you are Asian, Black, or Israeli with Israel’s apartheid state, an existence that has been denied to white ethnicities. Throughout Europe and the UK, the ethnicities that historically define the countries are placed on the defensive by their own white governments who are forcing them to become “diverse” and “multicultural.” The result is that in Scandinavia one-third of females are afraid to leave their home.

    Entire white national ethnicities are in the process of being erased, and protest against being erased is labeled “racism,” “Nazism,” “white supremacy,” “chauvinistic nationalism.” In Germany and in Sweden and elsewhere in Europe the white populations continue to elect and reelect the governments that have inundated them with immigrant-invaders that have multiplied the crime rate and pushed up the rape rate over 1,000%.

    Even Scandinavians accept these humiliations and punishments, Indeed, Scandinavian governments seek them, because they are so weak-minded that they feel guilt even though it has been a millennium since there were Viking colonies in Russia and the north of England.

    If the demonization of Jews led to the Holocaust, what will the demonization of White People lead to? Unlike feisty Jews, mentally and emotionally weak white gentiles, overwhelmed with a false sense of guilt, seem willing to accept their extermination.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/02/13/white-people-are-being-erased/
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Paul Craig Roberts
    By jagdmesser in forum The United States
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, May 6th, 2019, 03:41 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Friday, November 11th, 2016, 06:14 PM
  3. How the Feds Imprison the Innocent by Paul Craig Roberts
    By Verðandi in forum The United States
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Friday, October 23rd, 2009, 06:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •